logo
Scissor killer seeks ban on biological males in women's jails

Scissor killer seeks ban on biological males in women's jails

Daily Record22-05-2025

Jayney Sutherley was acquitted of transphobic abuse of trans murderer Alex Baker - who is still being held in women's jail despite being biologically male
A female prisoner accused of anti-trans hate against a biological male killer in a women's jail has spoken out about her 'hell' after being cleared.
Jayney Sutherley has blasted the Scottish Government and prison bosses for continuing to house biological males in female prisons.

The hairdresser, who killed a man with her scissors, was cleared on Monday of waging a four year hate campaign against trans murderer Alex Stewart and partner Nyomi Fee, a notorious child killer.

Now Sutherley says prison chiefs must drop their policy of allowing inmates to choose their gender - which has remained despite a Supreme Court decision that states the legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex.
Sutherley claims she was the one who was persecuted, not Stewart and Fee.
And she claims the regime inside HMP Greenock, which continues to house Stewart, 37, alongside her lover Fee, 36, is biased against women.
Sutherley said: 'A woman in prison has no chance. They are told to shut up and accept trans women or they are branded haters.
'But I want everyone to know that there are women in here who have suffered at the hands of men and they have concerns that there are still trans men, with a penis, in the shower next door to them.

'We don't stand as chance, as we get labelled if we say what we feel. But trans women change the rules to suit.'
At Greenock Sheriff Court, Sutherley faced a charge of abusing Stewart and Fee continuously for four years.
Her lawyer claimed the charges only arose after the case of Isla Bryson blew up in the world media in January, 2023.

Bryson only declared themselves a woman after being charged with rape and was set to be housed at a women's prison HMP until a public outcry forced a U-turn.

Sutherley said she was denied parole hearings due to the case hanging over her for two years.
Writing from Saughton Prison, where she is now serving her sentence, she wrote: 'It is bullying by the Scottish Prison Service. I never got a chance or was asked about the events I was charged with and it affected me getting out.

'Please stop other girls going through this as it's not fair.
'We don't get a say on how we feel when trans women get privileged lock-ins with their girlfriends and we get shipped or punished if we are vocal.
'I don't hate anyone but the SPS and Scottish Government have a lot to answer for because trans women with a penis shouldn't be in women's jails, just to make their jail time easy or give them loopholes to progress further while having sexual relationships.'

Sutherley claimed the Scottish justice system was turned against her after she dared to complain about showering in cubicles next door to trans-identified males with fully intact genitals.
She said: 'From the minute I got into prison it worried me.
'No-one told me transwomen would be in the prisons.

'At one point I was expected to shower with two transwomen taking up two of the four showers. I only had allocated time so went without that because Alex often stood at the mirror for ages when he got out his shower and I felt he could see me.
'The prison managers didn't ask the prisoners how we felt about living with transwomen.'
Sutherley, 51, said she was one of two nominated inmates who took concerns to prison managers.

She said: 'Myself and a friend, who is a gay woman, went in with complaints.
'After that my life was hell, with accusations of being homophobic and transphobic hurling in from Alex and Nyomi, some of them sicker than others.'

The court hearing heard claims that Stewart and Fee had provoked complaints from inmates after appearing to have sex in the prison showers and in a public area.
'Match made in hell' between child killer and murdered who changed gender
When Nyomi Fee's engagement to Alex Stewart was revealed in 2021, it was greeted as a 'match made in hell'.
Both had been jailed for life for dreadful murders.
Fee was caged for 24 years after she and ex-civil partner Rachel Trelfa, 34, were convicted in 2016 of Liam's murder, at the High Court in Livingston.
The evil pair had subjected the tot to a horrific campaign of abuse and neglect, including chaining him to a cage in a room full of snakes and rats.
The fiends also inflicted suffering on two other boys in Thornton, Fife.
Trelfa, who was Liam's birth mother, was locked up for 23 and a half years for her part in his murder.
Fee started a relationship with Alex Stewart in 2019 and fellow prisoners were soon left furious after claims that Fee brazenly 'groped' her transgender girlfriend in the nick.
Stewart was known as Alan Baker when he knifed John Weir, 36, to death at his flat in Bonhill, Dunbartonshire, in 2012 - hours after they met on a dating site.
Earlier in the Sutherley trial it was revealed that the only gender related surgery undergone by Stewart was to reduce the
Jayney Sutherley, was jailed for six years in 2020 for the culpable homicide of Alistair MacFadyen in a flat in Paisley.
She stabbed her victim with scissors after claiming he attacked her.
Sutherley was originally accused of murder but pled guilty to culpable homicide at the High Court in Glasgow.
Sutherley said: 'If women in same sex relationships get put on a report for the slightest show of affection, why has the relationship between Alex and Nyomi been encouraged and facilitated by staff?

'And if you complain about the situation you get labelled and shipped out?'
Sutherley said Stewart was not afraid of her and had asked her for a haircut for a special graduation ceremony inside prison.

She said: 'She wasn't scared when I was doing her hair for her graduation day. She asked for me to get the hairdressers open especially for her as it had been closed for weeks.
'The governor, who was a hairdresser, offered to do it and she said no - she wanted me. Where in that is fear?'
Sutherley had also been accused of taunting Stewart by suggesting a Shania Twain hit for Stewart at the jail karaoke night.

She wrote: 'I refused to go to karaoke because I wasn't being subjected to the torture of people singing and, to be honest, I stayed away from them at all costs.
Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!
Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today.
You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland.
No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team.
All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in!
If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like.
To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
'The comment about the song 'Man, I Feel Like A Woman' wasn't even said to or about Alex. It was another trans woman who said she was going to sing it.'

Sutherley said she was allowed in Saughton to be separated from any transwomen.
She added: 'Greenock is a hotel for monsters and a place of fear for women. The staff don't care about our past history or why we behave in a certain manner.

'I was a prisoner in my own cell but after being shipped to Saughton the staff are confused as I'm not the person who they have read reports on. And I'm not trying hard, I'm just being me.'
Last month, after a challenge by the For Women Scotland group, the UK's highest legal authority the Supreme Court ruled that in the Equality Act 2010 'sex' means biological sex.
Since the ruling many institutions have reverted to excluding biological males from women's spaces.

This includes the SFA which has banned trans-identified males from competing in women's football.
When asked by the Daily Record about Sutherley's claims, a Scottish Prison Service spokesperson said: 'Our staff work hard to support the health, safety, and wellbeing of all people living and working in Scotland's prisons.
'We have received the Supreme Court's judgement and are considering any potential impact it may have.'
A Scottish Government spokesperson said the housing of prisoners was a matter for the SPS.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wisconsin group sues Elon Musk, alleging million-dollar check giveaways were voter bribes
Wisconsin group sues Elon Musk, alleging million-dollar check giveaways were voter bribes

NBC News

timean hour ago

  • NBC News

Wisconsin group sues Elon Musk, alleging million-dollar check giveaways were voter bribes

A Wisconsin watchdog group has filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk claiming that he unlawfully bribed voters with million dollar checks and $100 giveaways in the state's latest Supreme Court election. Wisconsin Democracy Campaign — a non-partisan, nonprofit organization that investigates election transparency — along with two Wisconsin voters, filed the suit against Musk, his super PAC America PAC, and another Musk-owned entity called the United States of America Inc.. In the suit, the plaintiffs claimed that Musk and his entities violated state laws that prohibit vote bribery and unauthorized lotteries. It also accuses Musk of conducting civil conspiracy and acting as a public nuisance. Musk and America PAC did not respond to a request for comment. 'In the context of an election for Wisconsin's highest court, election bribery—providing more than $1 to induce electors (that is, voters) to vote— undermines voters' faith in the validity of the electoral system and the independence of the judiciary,' the suit reads. The complaint alleges that Musk violated state laws giving away $100 to voters who signed a petition 'in opposition to activist judges' and handing out million dollar checks to those who signed the petition. and The suit says that those who had won the checks had voted for candidate Brad Schimel. At a town hall in Green Bay, Musk gave away million dollar checks to two different people, both of which the suit claims voted for Schimel. In a video America PAC posted on X, one of the winners said he had voted for Schimel and encouraged others to do the same. 'Everyone needs to do what I just did, sign the petition, refer your friends, and go out to vote for Brad Schimel,' the winner, Nicholas Jacobs, said in the video. The suit mentions that Musk had said that the $1 million awards would be given 'in appreciation' for those 'taking the time to vote.' Despite Musk's America PAC spending over $12 million dollars on Schimel's campaign, candidate Susan Crawford still won the race. Before the race had been called, Wisconsin attorney general Josh Kaul filed a similar lawsuit against Musk for his involvement in the state Supreme Court election, but a county judge declined to immediately hold a hearing. A Pennsylvania judge similarly declined a request to block Musk's million-dollar giveaways in the state. During the presidential election, Musk's America PAC had also given out million dollar checks to people registered to vote in swing states, which the Justice Department had warned could be illegal. Musk defended his giveaways during the presidential election despite the allegations of unlawfulness by saying that those who signed the petition weren't given the money as a prize and that chance 'was not involved here.' Those who signed the petition were instead America PAC spokespeople with the 'opportunity to earn' $1 million. 'Make no mistake: an eligible voter's opportunity to earn is not the same thing as a chance to win,' Musk said, according to Reuters. Jeff Mendel, the co-founder of Law Forward — the law firm that filed the suit on behalf of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign — said in an interview with NBC News that this lawsuit has the advantage of additional time. 'The election is over. Some passions have cooled, and we are bringing this in a normal posture, asking the court to go through its normal procedure,' Mendel said. 'We are confident that we'll get a complete and fair adjudication.' The Wisconsin Democracy Campaign's lawsuit also seeks to bar Musk from 'replicating any such unlawful conduct in relation to future Wisconsin elections.' 'Almost everyone who was watching closely or saw what was happening here in Wisconsin in that very tight period was pretty horrified, and would say things like, 'Well, this can't possibly be legal,' or 'he can't possibly get away with this,'' Mendel said. 'That's really the purpose of this lawsuit, is to make sure that a court does say — in accord with both the law and, I think people across the political spectrums intuition — that this is not legal conduct, this is not consistent with how our democracy works, and to make sure it doesn't happen again.'

Trump attorneys argue for hush-money appeal to move to federal court
Trump attorneys argue for hush-money appeal to move to federal court

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Trump attorneys argue for hush-money appeal to move to federal court

Attorneys for Donald Trump on Wednesday argued that the appeal of his felony conviction in New York should be moved to federal court because the case related to official acts as president, while the state said it was too late to make the was convicted last May of lying in relation to a hush-money payment to adult-film star Stormy Daniels, which he appealed. Then, in July, the US Supreme Court granted the president immunity for official acts. For Trump's legal team, the goal of moving to federal court is for the conviction to be overturned on immunity sides made their case during a one-hour hearing before a three-judge panel of the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals. Trump's attorney, Jeffrey Wall, argued that the president's appeal belonged in federal court because the Manhattan District Attorney's Office chose to include evidence that they say relates to Trump's official acts as president, including testimony from former White House Communications Director Hope Hicks."Everything about this cries out for federal court," Mr Wall told the three-judge panel. The Manhattan District Attorney's Office, meanwhile, argued Trump's legal team took too long to ask for the case to be moved, after his sentencing. "After sentencing, removal is no longer available," said Steven Wu of the Manhattan District Attorney's Office. "Even if it were technically available, there are compelling reasons not to permit it."Mr Wu also disagreed with Trump's attorneys that some of the evidence presented in the hush-money trial related to his official acts. He gave an example of a postal worker who robbed someone while not at work, but then chose to confess his crimes in the postal office. The confession in the office, he argued, would not be related to the postal worker's official duties. Trump's crime, Mr Wu argued, "was completed before the White House evidence". During the hearing, the three judges pressed both sides, noting the case was "extraordinary" and "highly unusual". One judge told Mr Wall it would be "quite anomalous" for an appeal to be moved to federal another noted that the Supreme Court in their immunity ruling used "broad" language to describe which evidence is related to "official acts" as president. The panel is expected to issue a written opinion at a later date. Trump's attorneys argued last September to move his New York case to the federal courts, but that request was denied by US District Judge Alvin Hellerstein. The 2nd US Circuit court is now hearing the appeal of that decision. Trump was sentenced in the hush-money case ten days before taking office in January. He was given an unconditional discharge, meaning he received no fines, probation or jail time, but the conviction will stay on his record. Trump was indicted in several criminal state and federal cases before his latest run for office, but the New York case was the only one to go to trial before he won the presidency. Trump's defence lawyers in the New York case, including Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, have since been promoted to positions in the justice department.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store