logo
40% of Irish adults know a survivor of child sexual abuse – One in Four survey

40% of Irish adults know a survivor of child sexual abuse – One in Four survey

Irish Examiner01-05-2025

As many as 40% of people know someone who was sexually abused as a child, according to a poll.
And 70% of people surveyed said they believe parents are 'uncomfortable' discussing safety and sex with their children.
The findings are contained in a new report by One in Four, a charity working with survivors of childhood abuse and perpetrators of sexual violence.
One in Four is urging the Government to show leadership and set up a new 'preventative public health framework' — across health, education, justice, and technology — to tackle the crisis.
The report, Irish Attitudes to Tackling Child Sexual Abuse, jointly commissioned with Community Foundation Ireland, is due to be launched today by children's minister Norma Foley.
A nationally representative survey of over 1,000 people found that more than 90% of respondents believed society had failed to address child sexual abuse.
In addition, researcher Karen Hand also spoke to a range of experts, including therapists, and survivors of child abuse.
The survey found:
88% of respondents said a 'whole of society' approach is needed to prevent and tackle child sexual abuse;
78% said pornography encourages more violent sexual desires;
69% said parents are uncomfortable discussing safety and sexuality with children;
81% support more penalties against tech companies that allow children access pornography online;
76% said a 'national conversation' on the issue is needed;
73% back smartphone restrictions for under-16s.
The survey said 39% of people know someone who experienced sexual violence in childhood and a further 17% said they 'might or might not know' someone who had.
One in Four chief executive Deirdre Kenny said the report identifies what has been holding the country back and why Ireland has 'struggled' to protect its children.
Three 'barriers' to better child protection
• She said 'invisibility' is a barrier, in that the abuse happens out of sight and is rarely talked about, leaving survivors feeling alone.
• A second barrier the report identified was 'collapsing boundaries', in that the usual protections at home, at school, and online were breaking down with social media and technology making it 'easier for abuse to happen anywhere'.
• A third barrier is 'explosiveness', describing how the topic is 'so emotional and overwhelming' for people to face and deal with.
Social psychologist and report researcher Karen Hand with One in Four chief executive Deirdre Kenny ahead of today's launch of 'Irish Attitudes to Tackling Child Sexual Abuse'. Picture: One In Four
Ms Kenny said child sexual abuse is often 'shrouded in silence and shame'.
She said: 'This silence isolates survivors, perpetuates harm within families and communities, and creates significant barriers to meaningful change.
'It is clear we cannot continue to view child sexual abuse as something confined to the past or to certain institutions. It is happening today, in homes, schools, sports clubs, peer to peer and increasingly, through online spaces. Our collective inability to confront this uncomfortable reality has allowed it to persist, causing immeasurable harm.'
The report said the proposed preventative public health framework involves primary prevention and secondary prevention, including intervention when there are early warning signs, and speedy professional support for survivors.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk wanted to ‘move fast and break things' in Washington. The main thing he broke was his reputation
Elon Musk wanted to ‘move fast and break things' in Washington. The main thing he broke was his reputation

Irish Times

timea day ago

  • Irish Times

Elon Musk wanted to ‘move fast and break things' in Washington. The main thing he broke was his reputation

Elon Musk came to Washington with a chainsaw and left with a black eye . Shrinking government is hard, particularly when you do it callously and carelessly – and apparently on hallucinogens. As with US president Donald Trump's tariffs , the department of government efficiency (Doge) has created more volatility than value. A guy who went bankrupt six times doesn't really care about spending. And Trump certainly didn't want to see the headline 'Trump cuts social security'. READ MORE He just wanted to get revenge on 'the bureaucracy' by deputising Musk to force out a lot of federal employees and give the impression that they were cutting all the waste. As always with Trump, the former reality star, the impression matters more than the reality, especially the reality of his own sins. This past week, Trump tried to recast the very nature of crime. As the New York Times' Glenn Thrush wrote: 'President [Donald] Trump is employing the vast power of his office to redefine criminality to suit his needs – using pardons to inoculate criminals he happens to like, downplaying corruption and fraud as crimes, and seeking to stigmatise political opponents by labelling them criminals.' It is sickening that the US department of justice is considering settling a wrongful-death lawsuit by giving $5 million (€4.4 million) to the family of Ashli Babbitt – who was shot on January 6th, 2021 , by a Capitol police officer when she ignored his warnings and tried to climb through a smashed window into the Speaker's Lobby in the Capitol. If Babbitt was trying to help Trump claw back a 'stolen' election by breaking into the Capitol, then breaking into the Capitol must be a good thing to do, and any police officer who tried to stop her and protect lawmakers cowering under desks must be in the wrong. [ Elon Musk leaves Trump's club, yet he was never quite part of it Opens in new window ] To abet Trump's fake reality, the craven House Republicans refused to put up a plaque honouring the police officers and others who defended the Capitol that awful day. I take it personally because my dad spent 20 years as a police inspector in Washington in charge of Senate security. He would run to the House whenever there was trouble. So if on January 6th Mike Dowd had been preventing insurrectionists from assaulting lawmakers, he would now be, in Trump's eyes, not a hero deserving of a plaque, but a blackguard who was thwarting 'patriots', as Trump calls the rioters he pardoned. It is a disturbing bizarro world. Trump was rewriting reality again Friday afternoon as one of the most flamboyant, destructive bromances in government history petered out in the Oval Office. It had peaked last winter when Musk posted on social platform X, 'I love @realDonaldTrump as much as a straight man can love another man', and again when Trump tried to reciprocate by hawking Teslas in the White House driveway. But Friday, even these grandmaster salesmen couldn't sell the spin that Musk had 'delivered a colossal change'. Elon Musk with US president Donald Trump during a joint news conference after Musk announced his departure from his role as a special government employee. Photograph: Haiyun Jiang/New York Times Musk has acknowledged recently that his dream of cutting $1 trillion had been a fantasy. He said changing Washington was 'an uphill battle' and complained that Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget bill, which could add more than $3 trillion in debt, undercut his Doge attempts to save money. As Trump said, Musk got a lot of 'the slings and the arrows'. His approval rating cratered and violence has been directed toward Tesla, a brand once loved by liberals and in China, which is now tarnished. Musk cut off a reporter who tried to ask about a Times article asserting that he was a habitual user of ketamine and a dabbler in ecstasy and psychedelic mushrooms even after Trump had given him enormous control over the government. That could explain the chainsaw-wielding, the jumping up and down onstage, the manic baby-making and crusading for more spreading of sperm by smart people, and the ominous Nazi-style salutes. When a reporter asked Musk why he had a black eye, he joked about the viral video of Brigitte Macron shoving her husband's face . Then he explained that while 'horsing around' with his five-year-old, X, he suggested the child punch him in the face, 'and he did'. The Trump and the Tony Stark prototype tried to convey the idea that they would remain tight, even though Musk would no longer be getting into angry altercations with Scott Bessent outside the Oval, sleeping on the floor of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building and hanging around Mar-a-Lago. (Trump wants the $100 million Musk has pledged for his political operation.) Musk, wearing a black Doge cap and black 'Dogefather' T-shirt, looked around the Oval, which Trump has tarted up to look like a Vegas gift shop, and gushed that it 'finally has the majesty that it deserves, thanks to the president'. Trump gave Musk a golden ceremonial White House key, the kind of thing small-town mayors give out, and proclaimed: 'Elon's really not leaving. He's going to be back and forth, I think.' Trump said that the father of (at least) 14 would never desert Doge completely because 'It's his baby'. Musk brought the Silicon Valley mantra 'Move fast and break things' to Washington. But the main thing he broke was his own reputation. – This article originally appeared in the New York Times .

Government to introduce permanent non-jury court
Government to introduce permanent non-jury court

Irish Examiner

time5 days ago

  • Irish Examiner

Government to introduce permanent non-jury court

The Government is to repeal the Offences Against the State Act and introduce a permanent non-jury court, justice minister Jim O'Callaghan has confirmed. A previous review of the Special Criminal Court, and its surrounding legislation, delivered a majority and minority report with recommendations for changes to the non-jury court. The majority report called for the replacement of the existing Special Criminal Court with a more permanent non-jury court, with tighter controls for its use. The court itself has been in operation on an emergency footing for more than 50 years, traditionally to deal with terrorist offences. However, in more recent years, the focus has shifted to dealing with organised crime. Under the existing laws, the court must be renewed on an annual basis through a vote in the Dáil. Mr O'Callaghan confirmed the Government accepted in principle the recommendations of the majority report. The Government will, however, renew the existing legislation while proposals to replace the Special Criminal Court are compiled. 'The Offences Against the State Act has served the State well and fulfils a vital role in our criminal justice system,' Mr O'Callaghan said. 'However, an updated approach is now required to fit the modern security landscape. Accepting the recommendations of the majority report sets a clear direction for reform. Given the importance of the act over many decades, proposals for reform must be thoroughly considered and approached with the utmost care. This is to ensure we do not do anything to undermine the efforts of the authorities with responsibility for countering terrorism and organised crime. However, Mr O'Callaghan said there is a continued need for a non-jury court, saying it remains 'necessary to try serious criminal offences in certain exceptional cases where the ordinary courts are inadequate'. The minority report expressed concern about the normalisation of a non-jury court, saying they should 'be used only in circumstances where there is a real and present danger of jury intimidation or tampering'. It highlighted that the majority report outlined the non-jury court could be used for 'any serious offence', where ordinary courts were deemed inadequate was 'too great a change'. It also warned this could go 'well beyond' issues of terrorism and organised crime. Mr O'Callaghan said: 'It is the Government's duty to ensure that those tasked with protecting us from this threat have at their disposal the appropriate measures to meet it. The provisions I am seeking to renew are necessary and required to support An Garda Síochána in investigating, disrupting, and dismantling the activities of terrorists and criminal gangs.' Read More Browne brings emergency legislation to prevent lapsing planning permissions

Police Ombudsman in contact with Shane O'Farrell's family
Police Ombudsman in contact with Shane O'Farrell's family

RTÉ News​

time5 days ago

  • RTÉ News​

Police Ombudsman in contact with Shane O'Farrell's family

The Police Ombudsman has said that it has been in direct contact with the family of Shane O'Farrell today. The family yesterday received a public apology from the Government, who admitted there had been "failures" on the part of the State in relation to Mr O'Farrell's death. The 23-year-old law graduate was knocked off his bicycle and killed in a hit-and-run incident near his home in Carrickmacross, Co Monaghan in August 2011. The car that hit Mr O'Farrell was driven by Zigimantas Gridziuska. The Lithuanian national was a repeat offender on bail. A court ruling meant that he should have been in jail at the time of the collision due to his re-offending. Despite receiving the public apology from the Government yesterday, Shane's mother, Lucia said there are still questions to be answered in terms of how such circumstances could transpire that Gridziuska was on the road that day almost 14 years ago. Speaking outside the Dáil yesterday, Ms O'Farrell said: "Did you hear the litany of times he [Gridziuska] should have been brought back and wasn't, and why did that happen? Nobody is asking why. "I think those answers need to be given to us. "It doesn't have to be in the public inquiry, it can be in the GSOC [now Fiosrú - The Office of the Police Ombudsman] reports that have been refused to us. "There is a file on him [Gridziuska] in the Garda National Crime and Security Intelligence Service, what is in that file? "Our child lies in a grave. We should be given the answers and, apologies, yes, if it goes so far but we do need answers to our questions," Ms O'Farrell said. In a brief statement this evening, a spokesperson for Fiosrú said: "The Police Ombudsman has been in direct contact with O'Farrell family this afternoon and for now is not making any statement on the matter." The Office of the Police Ombudsman, Fiosrú, took over the responsibilities of the Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission (GSOC) from the beginning of last month. It is now the independent body that deals with complaints by the members of the public concerning members of An Garda Síochána.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store