Philippine lawmaker criticizes US for new travel warning: 'Unfair treatment from our number 1 ally'
A Philippine lawmaker on Sunday railed against the U.S. government for its updated travel advisory for the Asian country, with the politician arguing that the warning to American travelers is "unfair" coming from "our number one ally."
"This is an unfair shotgun warning," Philippines House of Representatives member Rufus Rodriguez said. "There are certainly many places in our country that are safe to tourists such as Cagayan de Oro City."
"The United States should review this advisory. We do not deserve this unfair treatment from our number one ally," he continued.
On May 8, the U.S. State Department issued a "Level 2: Exercise Increased Caution" travel advisory for the Philippines.
"Terrorists and armed groups have carried out kidnappings, bombings, and other attacks targeting public areas like tourist sites, markets, and local government facilities in the Philippines," the advisory reads. "Violent crimes are also common in the Philippines such as robbery, kidnappings, and physical assaults. Protests happen in the Philippines and could turn violent and/or result in traffic jams and road closures with limited capacity of the local government to respond."
"Due to the risks, U.S. government employees working in the Philippines must obtain special authorization to travel to certain areas of the country," it added.
The advisory cautioned against all travel to the Sulu Archipelago and Marawi City, issuing a "Level 4: Do Not Travel" warning over kidnappings and other attacks targeting foreign nationals, including Americans, in the Sulu Archipelago and the Sulu Sea and the risk of death or injury due to "ongoing clashes between terrorist group remnants and Philippine security forces in Marawi."
It said the U.S. government had limited resources to provide emergency services to its citizens in these areas.
A "Level 3: Reconsider Travel" advisory was issued for Mindanao island — with exceptions for Davao City, Davao del Norte Province, Siargao Island and the Dinagat Islands — due to terrorist and armed groups in Mindanao that have "historically engaged in kidnappings for ransom, in addition to bombings and other attacks." The warning said these incidents often target foreign nationals, including Americans.
Rodriguez, who represents the second district of Cagayan de Oro, a city in northern Mindanao, called on his government's Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) to summon U.S. Ambassador to the Philippines MaryKay Carlson to demand answers over the advisory.
The lawmaker also called on President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. to ask the DFA, Philippine Ambassador to the U.S. Jose Manuel Romualdez and the Philippine Department of Tourism to explain what they have done since the U.S. State Department's warning on May 8.
Rodriguez argued that the warning places the country in a bad light for the international community.
"It discourages not only Americans but other foreign tourists as well from visiting the Philippines. It will surely hurt our tourism sector," he said. "It is likewise particularly biased against our beloved island, Mindanao."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans Prepare Bill Declaring 'Free Palestine' Is Antisemitic
The House of Representatives is trying to pass a resolution making the term 'Free Palestine' an official antisemitic slogan. Republican Representative Gabe Evans from Colorado introduced the resolution in the wake of the attack on a gathering for Israeli hostages in Boulder this week. Mohammed Sabry Soliman, an Egyptian national, has been charged for the attack, during which he yelled 'Free Palestine,' according to the FBI. 'Whereas, while shouting 'Free Palestine,' an antisemitic slogan that calls for the destruction of the state of Israel and Jewish people, Mohammed Sabry Soliman attacked the peaceful demonstrators with homemade Molotov cocktails,' the resolution reads. House Republicans are expected to vote on the nonbinding resolution next week. The term 'free Palestine' has been a touchy subject among liberal and conservative Zionists alike, as they have long deemed even saying it to be antisemitic hate speech against Jews rather than an acknowledgment of the decades of displacement, destruction, death, and apartheid that Palestinians have suffered at the hands of the Israeli government. This right-wing attack on free speech clearly demonstrates the hypocrisy of these 'anti-woke' Republicans who love to wax poetic about the land of the free while kidnapping students off the streets for writing op-eds. Now this resolution seeks to further entrench the flawed logic that the Jewish religion and culture and the Israeli government that has been starving and bombing Palestinians are one and the same. Anyone who votes against this bill in an attempt to protect free speech will be labeled a terrorist sympathizer.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump to sell Tesla amid bitter row with Musk
Donald Trump is planning to sell the White House Tesla amid a bitter row with Elon Musk. Mr Trump purchased a red Model S Tesla in March when Mr Musk brought a range of his fleet to the White House for the president to peruse. The purchase was a show of support for Mr Musk's business at a time when his shares were tumbling, with Mr Trump declaring the car a 'great product' and 'as good as it gets'. However, a senior administration official told NewsNation that Mr Trump now plans to sell or give away the car, which is currently parked at the White House and used by staff. Mr Musk spent hundreds of millions of dollars on the president's re-election campaign before assuming a senior role in his government but the two men have bitterly fallen-out, primarily because of disagreements over Mr Trump's tax-and-spend bill. On Thursday, Mr Trump suggested the Tesla billionaire had developed 'Trump derangement syndrome' while Mr Musk suggested he should be impeached and will cause the US to go into recession. The president continued the war of words on Friday when he claimed Mr Musk had 'lost his mind', despite officials claiming he was 'over' their public spat. Thanks for following our live coverage. This blog is now closed. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the firebrand Republican congresswoman, has hit out at Elon Musk for 'lashing out on the internet'. The intervention is significant from the Georgia representative, who as chair of the House of Representatives' Doge subcommittee would in theory be one of Mr Musk's closest allies in Congress. Referring to Mr Musk spending close to $300 million on Mr Trump's re-election campaign, she said: 'Every single one of those votes, no matter how much money they have, matter... whether it was $1 or 100 donated, or hundreds of millions of dollars donated, I think they're all the same. 'And I think each voice really matters. 'And I don't think lashing out on the internet is the way to handle any kind of disagreement, especially when you have each other's cell phones.' Donald Trump has said Elon Musk has 'lost his mind' in an escalation of his public war of words with the tech billionaire. Asked about reports of a scheduled call with Mr Musk later today, Mr Trump told ABC News: 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' The US president added that he was 'not particularly' interested in speaking with Mr Musk, with whom he has clashed over his tax and spend bill. The comments came after White House sources told The Telegraph that Mr Trump was 'over it' and wanted to move on from the public spat, which ended with Mr Musk calling for the president's impeachment. A Trump official said: 'I don't think the president is interested in speaking to Elon right now. But he's also over it and wants to stay focused on passing the bill. 'That was his mindset when he left last night, and that's his mindset moving forward.' Other than Mr Trump's comments earlier today - calling Mr Musk 'crazy' - there is no sign of the feud continuing on social least for now. The US president's last post on his Truth Social was about the economy. 'GREAT JOB NUMBERS, STOCK MARKET UP BIG! AT THE SAME TIME, BILLIONS POURING IN FROM TARIFFS!!!' he posted. Mr Musk, meanwhile, congratulated Tesla's Berlin team after it produced its eight millionth vehicle in the German capital. If you're just catching up on the latest between Donald Trump and Elon Musk, here's where things stand... Mr Trump and Mr Musk's relationship descended into chaos last night days after the Tesla billionaire launched his scathing criticism of the US president's tax and spending bill Mr Trump said he was 'very disappointed' by Mr Musk's criticism and said he did not know if their relationship would survive Mr Musk quickly hit back on Twitter, suggesting a new political party should be formed and accused Mr Trump of being on the Epstein list There was talk of a phone call between the two in order to settle their differences... But Mr Trump said he had 'no interest' in speaking to Mr Musk, who he said had gone 'crazy' Mr Musk is yet to tweet about the president today Americans should continue to put their trust in Donald Trump, who 'continues to beat expectations', the White House has said. Karoline Leavitt, Mr Trump's press secretary, posted figures on X showing that the US economy added 139,000 jobs in May, which was more than expected. 'President Trump's American First Economic Agenda has created a BOOMING economy - jobs are up, unemployment is down, wages are increasing, and inflation is dead. 'More than 139,000 good jobs were added to the private sector in May, all accounted for by American-born workers. Americans should continue to Trust in President Trump, who continues to beat expectations.' The row between the President and Elon Musk could also hit the tech billionaire's Starlink internet service. An offshoot of Mr Musk's SpaceX company, Starlink, uses satellites to deliver broadband services to areas which would otherwise be off-grid. The contracts with the Federal government are worth millions of dollars to Mr Musk. They include a $70 million deal to provide satellite communications to 54 stations used by the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard. Starlink is also used by the Federal Communications Commission to provide rural broadband to 642,000 company is currently negotiating new contracts with the US Geological Survey, the Army, and the Navy. Not long ago, Elon Musk was a darling of American progressives. A visionary bringing electric cars to the people, and voting Democrat for more than two decades. He then became their self-appointed nemesis, clearing the US government of a 'viper's nest of radical-Left Marxists who hate America'. So, how did Musk make the political voyage from Left to Right in record time? Mike Johnson, speaker of the US House of Representatives, expressed confusion over Elon Musk's criticism of the GOP tax and spending bill and Donald Trump. Mr Johnson has reportedly been contacting Mr Musk through calls and messages to persuade him to reconsider his stance. Speaking to reporters, Mr Johnson said he wasn't sure 'what has motivated this disturbance to begin, but obviously it's not helpful'. He added that he would prefer 'that policy disputes are not personal'. 'I've tried very hard to speak with Elon over and over, you know, and talk with him about what I believe are misconceptions he has about this bill and what it is,' Mr Johnson said. An online poll has shown that Americans are largely siding with President Trump over Elon Musk, although the vast majority preferred to stay out of the dispute. When asked by YouGov who they supported - Mr Trump, Mr Musk, or neither - 28 per cent chose Mr Trump, 8 per cent backed Mr Musk, and 52 per cent sided with neither. Amongst Republicans, support for Mr Trump was overwhelming at 71 per cent, compared to just 6 per cent for Mr Musk, with 12 per cent choosing neither. Democrats mostly favoured neither, but amongst those who picked a side, 11 per cent supported Mr Musk versus 4 per cent for Mr Trump. Senior Russian officials have made digs at both Donald Trump and Elon Musk, joking about hosting peace talks, while another said Mr Musk should bring his businesses to Russia. 'Elon, don't be upset!' nationalist senator Dmitry Rogozin, who once ran Russia's space programme, wrote on Mr Musk's X social media site. 'If you encounter insurmountable problems in the US, come to us. Here you will find reliable comrades and complete freedom of technical creativity.' Dmitry Medvedev, a senior security official and former Russian president, posted: 'We are ready to facilitate the conclusion of a peace deal between D and E for a reasonable fee and to accept Starlink shares as payment. Don't fight, guys!' Margarita Simonyan, one of Russia's most powerful state media executives, mocked it as an example of 'modern US political culture'. 'Sort of like the English Industrial Revolution. Only in reverse,' she added. Donald Trump has said that Elon Musk has 'a problem' in his latest comments on the feud between them. 'I'm not even thinking about Elon... He's got a problem,' he reportedly told ABC News. 'The poor guy's got a problem.' Mr Trump added: 'I won't be speaking to him for a while, I guess, but I wish him well.' Vice President JD Vance said Donald Trump's dismissal of his former ally Elon Musk from the MAGA circle was neither rash nor ill-planned. 'There are many lies the corporate media tells about President Trump. One of the most glaring is that he's impulsive or short-tempered,' Mr Vance wrote on X 'Anyone who has seen him operate under pressure knows that's ridiculous,' he said. 'It's (maybe) the single biggest disconnect between fake media perception and reality.' Late on Thursday, Mr Vance made his loyalty to Mr Trump clear, saying he was 'proud to stand beside him'. Donald Trump is reportedly considering selling or giving away the red Tesla car he purchased earlier this year, according to a senior White House official. Mr Trump bought the car during a White House photo-op intended to promote Elon Musk's business. As of Thursday evening, the vehicle remained parked outside the West Wing. A planned meeting between US and Chinese officials on trade is expected to take place within seven days, White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said on Friday, a day after President Donald Trump and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping spoke. Readers of The Telegraph have had their say on the public spat between Elon Musk and Donald Trump. You can add your own thoughts at the bottom of this page. Yesterday evening, there were signs that Elon Musk and Donald Trump could reconcile after their argument played out across social media. Mr Trump projected an air of nonchalance as he spoke about the spat in a phone call last night. 'Oh it's okay,' Mr Trump told Politico when asked about the argument. 'It's going very well, never done better.' Mr Musk also appeared agreeable to a truce last night when hedge fund manager Bill Ackman moved to ease tension.'I support @realDonaldTrump and @elonmusk and they should make peace for the benefit of our great country,' Mr Ackman wrote on X.'You're not wrong,' Mr Musk responded. Those hopes were dashed when White House sources denied any possibility of a phone call between the pair today. The Trump-Musk alliance was always on shaky ground - and now, with a spectacular bang, it has crashed. But from Mr Trump's relentless need to dominate the spotlight to his history of turning on allies, many say this explosive split was almost inevitable. Here, The Telegraph's Michael Lind breaks down why their public fallout came as no surprise. A bust in honour of Elon Musk was vandalised in Brownsville, Texas, as the feud escalates. Quotes from sources close to the White House reveal a tense and uneasy view of the fallout between Donald Trump and Elon Musk. One insider described Mr Trump as concerned about Mr Musk's mental state, telling POLITICO: 'The president is worried Elon is not well… and is just kind of freaking out.' But even taking this into consideration, the source said Mr Trump's combative nature remains: 'He'll punch at whoever punches him if he thinks he needs it.' Another senior official hinted that the administration is unsurprised that their relationship has suddenly soured. 'Everyone knew this was gonna end badly. We're dealing with someone who is unstable… we saw it coming,' they said. While the comments offer insight into the workings of their relationship, perhaps more importantly, they could present Mr Musk with an opportunity to back-pedal by attributing his actions to going through a 'difficult time'. The breakdown of Donald Trump's relationship with Elon Musk yesterday resulted in a combined loss of about $21 billion for both men. Both Mr Trump and Mr Musk oversee vast business empires, and each had a key public company affected by the fallout. As their social media feud escalated into personal attacks, investors reacted sharply. Tesla shares plunged 14.3 per cent, wiping nearly $20 billion off Mr Musk's net worth. Meanwhile, Trump Media & Technology Group's stock fell 8 per cent, costing Mr Trump around $202 million. The most significant blow to Mr Trump came from the roughly 10 per cent drop in his Official Trump meme coin, which could have cost him nearly $900 million. Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, has called Elon Musk's behaviour 'an unfortunate episode', adding the Tesla boss is 'unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted'. In a post on X, Ms Leavitt wrote that Donald Trump's 'number one focus' is ensuring that the legislation passes smoothly. 'This is a transformative piece of legislation that delivers on the Make America Great Agenda by delivering the largest tax cuts and border security investments in HISTORY,' she added. Sweeping cuts introduced by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) will have a lasting impact on foreign aid, global health, and development programmes. The end of dozens of USAID projects has limited the resources it will spend on disaster relief, food security, and refugee support, worsening crises in vulnerable regions. Cuts to funding for initiatives like the Global Fund or pandemic preparedness set back efforts to combat infectious diseases, including malaria, tuberculosis, and Covid-19. The US is also said to be proposing cuts to its flagship anti-HIV programme by almost 40 per cent next year. The long-running programme is estimated to have saved more than 20 million lives in the past two decades, and is often cited as one of the world's most successful public health schemes. Experts worry reduced US aid could open the door for rival powers - including China and Russia - to increase their influence through their own investments and aid, reshaping global alliances. Elon Musk's legal 130-day term as a 'special government employee' is set to expire today after a controversial stint that will have a lasting impact both in the US and across the world. Mr Musk's stated goal as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) was to slash spending across the board, saving American taxpayers money by ending 'waste, fraud, and abuse'. He claimed he could cut $1 trillion from the federal budget before September 30, but the reported toll is far off that figure. As of May 26, DOGE's online 'wall of receipts' claims estimated savings of $175 billion since the start of Mr Trump's term, averaging $1,086.96 saved per taxpayer. But analysis by the New York Times has spotted gaping holes in those claims. This includes counting government contracts not yet awarded, contracts that ended years ago, triple-counting the same savings, and confusing 'million' with 'billion'. DOGE has since corrected some of those errors, but many remain, leaving Mr Musk's governmental legacy in murky waters. Republicans with close ties to Donald Trump might not be as willing to forget Elon Musk's series of sensationalist social media posts against the US president. Leading figures have pitched in their thoughts in the hours since the spat began. 'The president treated him almost like a son,' Steve Bannon, a long-time antagonist of Mr Musk, told Playbook yesterday. 'He invited his family to Christmas dinner. He let him sleep over. He let him walk in and out of meetings. The president went to the max informality to welcome this guy.' Bannon added: 'You're going to tell me we should allow some fucking punk to sit there and say he should be impeached and JD (Vance) should step in? F--- you, dude. We're going to go to f------ war, and I'm going to rip your f------ face off.' In one of his controversial posts on X, Elon Musk hit out at Donald Trump's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Ever since Epstein's crimes first came to light, the internet has been filled with conspiracy theories about Mr Trump's relationship with the convicted paedophile. Mr Trump and Epstein's friendship stretched back decades: In 1997, the US smiled as he posed for a photograph with his old friend in Palm Beach. At the time, the pair, who moved in the same wealthy social circles and bonded over their love of beautiful women, had been friends for years. But when did their friendship begin and what are the finer details? Read the full story here. The Kremlin has said it would not get involved in Donald Trump's row with Elon Musk, but was confident that Mr Trump would deal with the situation. The quarrel between the two was an internal US matter, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said this morning. Elon Musk's high-profile support of Donald Trump during his election campaign undoubtedly gave him a boost. Early on, Mr Musk offered his support for Mr Trump's policies on business deregulation, space exploration, and economic growth. He generated high-profile endorsements, leveraging his influence in tech and media circles. Public comments and interviews saw Mr Musk praise aspects of Mr Trump's agenda, lending credibility to the campaign among voters interested in innovation, space, and technology. The once-strong alliance between President Trump and Mr Musk is unravelling, with insiders suggesting a breakup is imminent. Mr Musk's explosive rift with the White House stems from longstanding tensions about his libertarian policies and his unpredictable behaviour, according to sources close to the president. Interviews with a string of insiders reveal months of concern at Mr Musk's grandstanding behaviour and philosophical differences with people at the heart of the Trump administration. Our Chief US Correspondent, Rob Crilley, has the full story here. Mr Trump's new bill marks a major legislative move by the US president. Named the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act', it encompasses significant tax reforms, spending cuts, and defence allocations. The bill is the root of the tensions between Mr Musk and Mr Trump, with the Tesla boss claiming it will undo all of the cost-cutting he has initiated during his tenure at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Key provisions include: Tax reforms: The bill proposes extending the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act provisions, which benefit upper-income earners. It would also increase the state and local tax deduction cap from $10,000 to $40,000. Spending cuts: It aims to reduce non-military government spending, cutting funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Medicaid through stricter eligibility requirements. Defence spending: The legislation allocates an extra $150 billion for defence expenditures. Energy policy: It would scale back many clean-energy tax credits from the Inflation Reduction Act, including the $7,500 federal tax credit for electric vehicles. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said today that he had 'absolutely no doubt' that Mr Trump would keep the United States within the Nato military alliance. 'I have absolutely no doubt that the American government is sticking with Nato,' Mr Merz said in a speech at an entrepreneurs' event just hours after returning from his inaugural trip to Washington. Tesla shares have risen after news that White House aides had scheduled a call with CEO Elon Musk in an effort to ease tensions. The stock climbed about 5 per cent in Frankfurt, rebounding after a sharp 14.3 per cent drop in New York on Thursday that wiped out roughly $150 billion in market value. 'It's unlikely that Trump will end subsidies and contracts with Tesla. Those are obviously threats that are unlikely to come into fruition,' Fiona Cincotta, senior market analyst at City Index, told Reuters. 'I don't expect this to blow out into anything more serious than a war of words for a couple of days.' Welcome to today's live coverage of the spat between Elon Musk and Donald Trump. For those of you who are just joining us, the argument began yesterday when Mr Musk publicly criticised the US president's new spending bill. The Tesla boss labelled the legislation a 'disgusting abomination' before accusing Mr Trump of being named in documents relating to the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Mr Musk added that Mr Trump would have lost the election without him and called for him to be impeached. Mr Trump responded that his former ally was lashing out at his legislation because he did not 'get his own way'. Read the full story here. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - The One Big Beautiful Bill Act delivers for America. Now the Senate Must Deliver Too.
The House of Representatives has delivered on the American people's mandate by passing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the most comprehensive and consequential set of conservative reforms in our nation's history. This transformative package includes record levels of tax cuts, spending reduction, and border and national security investment. The ball is now in the Senate's court and their mission is simple: move the One Big Beautiful Bill to the president's desk as soon as possible. This legislation delivers a historic tax cut and $5,000 raise for the average American family to provide immediate relief to working households struggling after four years of economic mismanagement under the Biden administration. It permanently expands the 2017 Trump tax break for small businesses, the backbone of our economy, and enhances incentives for American companies to invest, grow and raise worker wages for decades to come. The bill's impact extends beyond the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act by providing additional relief to lower- and middle-income Americans by eliminating taxes on tips, exempting overtime pay and doubling the tax credit for seniors on a fixed income. Additionally, we support working families by increasing the child tax credit to $2,500 per family, making interest on car loans tax deductible and expanding health savings accounts. We're strengthening America's security by investing $46 billion to complete President Trump's border wall and hiring 18,000 new immigration enforcement personnel to detain and deport at least 1 million illegal immigrants annually. We're committing almost $150 billion to rebuild America's military, including $34 billion to revitalize our naval fleet and $25 billion for missile defense. Furthermore, we're unleashing American energy dominance by opening federal lands for drilling, reducing the regulatory stranglehold on conventional fuels, and eliminating hundreds of billions in green new deal subsidies that have made U.S. energy more expensive and less reliable. And we're accomplishing all of this while reducing spending by $1.6 trillion, the largest spending reform package in American history by two-fold. This isn't just fiscal responsibility; it's the beginning of a generational reset that will restore America's financial health. At every stage of this process, Democrats have resorted to fear-mongering and false claims to undermine this critical legislation. So desperate to derail the bill, they manipulated Congressional Budget Office analyses to mislead the American people about the outcomes of the One Big Beautiful Bill. They use the fact that we prohibit illegal immigrants and able-bodied adults who refuse to work from receiving taxpayer-funded welfare services to fallaciously suggest that vulnerable people are being 'ripped away' from the social safety net. Furthermore, they deliberately cherry-pick CBO data to spread the false narrative that our tax cuts only benefit the wealthy. Never mind the fact that CBO's own data confirm that American households in every tax bracket would see increased after-tax income under our legislation. The left knows they can't convince the American people on the substance of this bill, so they have resorted to fabrications. The Senate now holds America's economic future in its hands. The House spent months developing a balanced budget reconciliation bill that advances every pillar of the America First vision, including restoring our nation's fiscal health by reining in the runaway spending and reducing our debt-to-GDP ratio. While the Senate may be able to make modest improvements, they must resist the temptation to significantly alter this carefully crafted legislation. Any major changes risk upsetting the delicate balance struck in the House and derailing President Trump's America First agenda. In fact, every day the Senate delays this process is another day closer to tax hikes for working families, uncertainty for small businesses, and a military and border patrol lacking the resources they need to be successful. The American people gave President Trump and unified Republican leadership a clear mandate to reverse course on the failures of the last four years — they expect action, not endless deliberation. The House has delivered. Now it's time for the Senate to meet this moment with the urgency it demands. America's next Golden Age is within reach — but Republicans must come together in order for us to seize it. House Budget Chairman Jodey Arrington represents Texas's 19th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives. He sits on the House Ways and Means Committee and the Joint Economic Committee. August Pfluger represents Texas's 11th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives. He is the chairman of the Republican Study Committee and sits on the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
