logo
Does Uber Eats owe you money? Proposed class action alleges customers faced hidden service fees

Does Uber Eats owe you money? Proposed class action alleges customers faced hidden service fees

Toronto Star20 hours ago

Uber Eats has been charging customers hidden service fees, a proposed class action lawsuit alleges.
The statement of claim was filed in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice last month with Toronto-based law firm Koskie Minsky LLP as class counsel.
The lawsuit, directed against Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber Canada Inc., Uber Portier Canada Inc. and Uber Castor Canada Inc., accuses the food delivery company of drip pricing and 'misrepresenting the true cost of its delivery services' by charging users a service fee — separate from applicable delivery fees — when they opt for delivery. Users are not charged the service fee for pickup orders, the lawsuit alleges.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
Further, the service fee is only revealed at the final stage of checkout under a 'taxes and other fees' line item.
Uber says it is reviewing the proposed suit and will be 'defending the lawsuit.'
What is drip pricing?
Drip pricing, according to Competition Bureau Canada, is when the price you see is not the price you pay, the total cost of a good or service is not displayed upfront and unexpected additional charges are present.
'When companies offer low prices to attract consumers, but then add mandatory fees so that the advertised prices are not attainable, it affects their abilities to make informed decisions,' the competition bureau website says.
The lawsuit says this alleged practice misleads Canadian Uber Eats customers about the final cost of their delivery purchase, violating the Competition Act and the Ontario Consumer Protection Act.
During the 'browsing stage,' the claim says customers are only informed of a delivery fee.
'By displaying a delivery fee that fails to include the service fee, the defendants made a false and misleading representation about the cost of delivery and the total price to be charged for a delivery order,' the document reads.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
What about Uber One members?
The claim says service fees still apply to delivery orders for Uber One members, Uber's paid subscription service, despite the subscription being advertised to save customers money, offering a $0 delivery fee.
Business
Competition Bureau sues DoorDash, accuses firm of misleading customers with fees
TORONTO - Canada's competition watchdog is suing DoorDash Inc. and its Canadian subsidiary, accusing them of marketing their online delivery s…
Business
Competition Bureau sues DoorDash, accuses firm of misleading customers with fees
TORONTO - Canada's competition watchdog is suing DoorDash Inc. and its Canadian subsidiary, accusing them of marketing their online delivery s…
This service fee, the court document states, is mandatory for all Uber Eats delivery orders and generally calculated as 10 per cent of the order's subtotal, ranging between $2 to $4 depending on factors such as how large the order is.
When reviewing an order at checkout on the Uber Eats app, if a customer clicks on the 'i' symbol next to 'taxes and other fees,' it says the service fee 'helps cover costs related to your order.'
According to the Uber Canada website, Uber One customers must make a purchase totalling $15 or more from eligible restaurants in order to receive free delivery and a five per cent discount, shown as a 'membership benefit.'
The lawsuit accuses Uber Eats of breach of contract for those who paid for Uber One as the mandatory service fee, which it calls a delivery fee as it only applies to delivery orders, nullifies the advertised purpose of the subscription.
'Uber One Class Members do not, in fact, benefit from no delivery fees as they are still required to pay the Service Fee, which is an additional delivery fee,' the statement of claim reads.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
What is Uber Eats' response?
In a written statement to the Star, Uber Eats Canada declined to comment on details about the 'ongoing legal proceedings' but added that the company is taking the allegations 'seriously.'
'We are committed to transparency and fairness in our pricing practices,' the statement reads. 'We are reviewing the claims thoroughly and will be defending the lawsuit.'
Business
I went undercover as an Uber Eats courier and made just $1.74 per hour online. Here's what I learned about the troubling cost of convenience
For six weeks, I hustled for orders and made a shockingly low wage. Uber says my experience was 'atypical' — but workers I spoke to say differently.
Business
I went undercover as an Uber Eats courier and made just $1.74 per hour online. Here's what I learned about the troubling cost of convenience
For six weeks, I hustled for orders and made a shockingly low wage. Uber says my experience was 'atypical' — but workers I spoke to say differently.
This comes as other food delivery services are facing accusations of deceiving customers with fees. Earlier this week, Canada's competition watchdog sued DoorDash Inc. after alleging that an investigation found the service's users could not purchase food and other items at the prices advertised on DoorDash's websites and mobile apps because of mandatory fees added at checkout, hiking the total cost of their purchase.
DoorDash 'does not hide fees from consumers or mislead them in any way,' the company said in response.
'This application is a misguided and excessive attempt to target one of Canada's leading local commerce platforms,' DoorDash spokesperson Trent Hodson told The Canadian Press.
'It unfairly singles out DoorDash, and we intend to vigorously defend ourselves against these claims.'
In 2021, another class action lawsuit was filed against Uber Eats in Quebec, stating that consumers paid excess service fees on their orders. It also claimed that when a consumer uses a promo code or offer, including the 'two for one' deals, service fees were allegedly calculated according to the gross price of the cart, before the discount.
'The consumer is therefore paying a service fee on a supposedly free item, and therefore, a service fee higher than the anticipated rate of 10% of the advertised subtotal,' Lambert Avocats, class counsel in the case, said on its website. The action was settled in December 2024.
Who is included in the Uber Eats class action lawsuit?
The class action lawsuit is on behalf of all Canadian residents who on or after May 16, 2023, purchased a delivery order on Uber Eats and was charged a service fee. This also applies to Uber One members who subscribed to the service on or after May 16, 2023.
With files from The Canadian Press

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thousands of B.C. reservations at risk due to short-term rental regulations: Airbnb
Thousands of B.C. reservations at risk due to short-term rental regulations: Airbnb

The Province

timean hour ago

  • The Province

Thousands of B.C. reservations at risk due to short-term rental regulations: Airbnb

Airbnb says the rules requiring short-term rental hosts to confirm that their listings are legal under the changes have already led to some bookings being cancelled. Published Jun 13, 2025 • 3 minute read The logo of the online lodging service Airbnb Photo by LIONEL BONAVENTURE / AFP via Getty Images Airbnb, the short-term vacation rental platform, says thousands of reservations in B.C. are at risk of being cancelled and accused the province of rushing out regulations as it cracked down on the industry. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by top sports columnists Patrick Johnston, Ben Kuzma, J.J. Abrams and others. Plus, Canucks Report, Sports and Headline News newsletters and events. Unlimited online access to The Province and 15 news sites with one account. The Province ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles and comics, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by top sports columnists Patrick Johnston, Ben Kuzma, J.J. Abrams and others. Plus, Canucks Report, Sports and Headline News newsletters and events. Unlimited online access to The Province and 15 news sites with one account. The Province ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles and comics, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Alex Howell, Airbnb's Canadian policy lead, said that the rules requiring short-term rental hosts to confirm that their listings are legal under the changes have already led to some bookings being cancelled. The government has said platforms such as Airbnb can't post B.C. listings without confirming their registration with the province, but Howell said many hosts whose properties qualify can't register due to glitches and other problems with the government's system. 'Typically, we would have worked with a government for six months to do live testing, to make sure that things are working the way they should,' Howell said. 'And unfortunately in this situation, B.C. really just rushed into launching the system that hadn't been fully tested, and that's what's brought us to this situation.' Essential reading for hockey fans who eat, sleep, Canucks, repeat. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. She said that property owners have reported that typos and formatting errors have prevented them from registering with the province, despite meeting all the legal criteria for hosting short-term rentals. The province had said that short-term rentals are being restricted to principal residences, a secondary suite or a structure such as a laneway house on the property, and the policy is meant to open up more units in B.C.'s rental housing market. Howell said the timing of B.C.'s latest rules on short-term rentals is especially harmful, just before the busy summer tourist season. 'Thousands of reservations across the province are now at risk,' she said. 'These are registered, compliant hosts that are failing validation protocols through no fault of their own. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'And this impacts … thousands of reservations across the province, at least 50 per cent of which are domestic travellers who are following their own government's advice to support local and travel within Canada this year.' Howell said instead of waiting until the June 23 deadline — when bookings on unregistered B.C. properties would be cancelled — Airbnb is already contacting affected hosts and guests to offer penalty-free cancellations. 'We think it's irresponsible to wait until the 23rd to alert travellers that there might be an issue,' she said. 'We're trying to get them that information ahead of time so that they can make some informed decisions.' Housing Minister Ravi Kahlon said the province is confident that 'Airbnb will find solutions to their challenges with getting listings verified ahead of the June 23 deadline.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'We hope that Airbnb will choose to support their hosts in verifying their listings, instead of cancelling their bookings,' Kahlon said in a statement. 'This is new ground for B.C., and we are working through ServiceBC, our short-term rental branch, and the platforms themselves to help hosts comply with the requirements.' The ministry also noted that there are 65 short-term rental platforms operating in B.C., and other platforms have been successful in supporting their hosts to get registered. The Opposition B.C. Conservatives criticized the short-term rental policies of the NDP government, with Prince George-Valemount legislator Rosalyn Bird saying the regulations running counter to the province's efforts to promote local travel. 'How do you promote staycations while sabotaging the short-term rental market that makes them possible in small towns?' Bird said in the statement. 'The premier (David Eby) says 'travel within B.C.', and then his government kneecaps our ability to welcome those travellers.' Read More Vancouver Canucks Sports Soccer Sports Local News

Airbnb says thousands of B.C. reservations at risk, blaming ‘rushed' rental rules
Airbnb says thousands of B.C. reservations at risk, blaming ‘rushed' rental rules

Toronto Star

timean hour ago

  • Toronto Star

Airbnb says thousands of B.C. reservations at risk, blaming ‘rushed' rental rules

VANCOUVER - Short-term vacation rental platform Airbnb said Friday that 'thousands' of reservations in British Columbia are at risk of cancellation, accusing the province of rushing out regulations as it cracked down on the industry. Alex Howell, Airbnb's Canadian policy lead, said in an interview that the rules requiring short-term rental hosts to confirm their listings are legal under the changes have already led to some bookings being cancelled.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store