logo
Scientists worried about CSIRO-backed plan to release genetically modified mosquitos in Queensland

Scientists worried about CSIRO-backed plan to release genetically modified mosquitos in Queensland

The Guardian25-02-2025

A CSIRO-backed plan to release genetically modified mosquitoes in Queensland to combat dengue fever has sparked concern from scientists who suggest it could interfere with successful control programs and increase the risk of insecticide resistance.
Oxitec Australia, a collaboration between a British biotechnology firm and the CSIRO, has applied to sell a GM strain of Aedes aegypti mosquito, the main culprit for transmitting dengue and other viruses.
The strain, called OX5034 A. aegypti, prevents female mosquitoes from surviving into adulthood. Only female mosquitoes bite, spreading diseases to animals in the process.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Oxitec is proposing to sell the mosquitoes for Queensland residents to release. After release, they would breed with local A. aegypti mozzies, reducing populations.
An Oxitec Australia spokesperson said the sale of the strain would 'be available to protect Australian communities' and released only after it passed 'stringent government and regulatory approvals and undergoes extensive community engagement and consultation'.
But mosquito experts have criticised the proposal. 'We should be very concerned about this release going ahead as planned,' Dr Perran Ross, a scientist at the University of Melbourne who worked on mosquitoes for more than a decade, said.
'I'm not opposed to the [GM] technology in general but I am opposed to the approach they're using, taking a foreign mosquito strain and then releasing that straight into the wild.'
The OX5034 strain is engineered from mosquitoes originating from Mexico. Though Oxitec has conducted field trials in the United States, and Brazil, where the strain is commercially available, releases have not yet been tested in Australia.
Australian mosquitoes are uniquely susceptible to insecticides such as pyrethroids, Ross said. 'There's insecticide resistance almost everywhere else in the world. If you're releasing a mosquito strain from a different country … there's that risk that it might introduce genes that cause insecticide resistance.'
Climate adaptation was another concern, Ross said. 'If you take mosquitoes from Mexico and bring them to Australia, you might get some genes that make them more tolerant to dry climates or other conditions. We don't really know what the effect of that is going to be, but it is a potential risk.'
There are also concerns the Oxitec mosquitoes could interfere with success of Wolbachia programs, which have virtually eliminated dengue in far north Queensland.
Since 2011, mosquitoes infected with naturally occurring Wolbachia bacteria have been released in the state's north as part of a World Mosquito Program initiative. The Wolbachia prevents the mosquitoes from transmitting viruses.
'Wolbachia has eliminated dengue as a public health problem over the last decade there,' said Prof Cameron Simmons, executive director of global delivery at the World Mosquito Program. 'I can't see anyone spending public funds, or even really private funds, to suppress A. aegypti mosquitoes with Oxitec GMO mosquitoes in far north Queensland.'
Ross said: 'My major concern is the interference with the Wolbachia approach.
'They have very different objectives: the Wolbachia approach doesn't aim to wipe out populations, it's only replacing them with ones that don't spread dengue as well.
'The GM mosquitoes are going to actually compete and wipe those ones out.'
A spokesperson for Oxitec Australia said: 'There is no scientific evidence to suggest that there would be any negative interaction with mosquitoes that carry Wolbachia … We are committed to applying robust and transparent scientific processes to ensure that this technology is tested and is safe for deployment.'
Oxitec Australia has applied to the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator for a licence for commercial release. Public consultation on the proposal is expected to open in March; a public petition opposing the proposal was tabled in Queensland parliament last week.
Oxitec Australia says its mosquitoes could provide 'an extra level of protection against dengue' in areas where Wolbachia has not been introduced – such as the Torres Strait, where there was an outbreak late last year – and 'further reduc[e] the risk of dengue in areas where Wolbachia is present.'
Addressing insecticide concerns, Oxitec says its 'Aedes aegypti mosquitoes have been proven to dilute resistance to insecticides among wild mosquito populations'.
'Oxitec's technology is also sustainable, chemical-free, highly effective, and harmless to non-target species including mosquito predators,' a spokesperson said.
It will reduce dependence on pesticide-based controls, lowering environmental impacts and therefore help to protect native mosquitoes and other insect species like pollinators.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Miss Universe star shares heartache as 7 month old son has brain tumour
Miss Universe star shares heartache as 7 month old son has brain tumour

Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Miss Universe star shares heartache as 7 month old son has brain tumour

Ex Miss Universe star Erin McNaught and her partner Stace Cadet have shared the heartbreaking news their son Obi Brooks Kotaras, seven months, has been diagnosed with a brain tumour Australian model and former Miss Universe star Erin McNaught and her partner Stace Cadet have shared their heartache as their son has been diagnosed with a brain tumour. Erin, 43, who gave birth to their first child in October, and her record producer beau Stace released a statement this morning, sharing the devastating news about their son Obi Brooks Kotaras. ‌ The statement, shared on their Instagram pages, consisted of a snap of Obi laying on a hospital bed, a photo of his brain scan and a snap of the tot cuddling his dad. The statement in the caption read: "For the last few weeks we have noticed a rapid decline in Obi's behaviour and happiness. He was having problems eating, sleeping and most recently, keeping his head straight. ‌ "Late on Tuesday, as a precaution we took our little man in for an MRI under instruction from our Doctor. At about 6:00pm Tuesday night we met with a neurosurgeon who broke the heartbreaking news that Obi has a large brain tumour on the right side of his brain. "We are absolutely shattered and the last few days have been our hardest days. Our team at the Queensland Children's Hospital have been incredible and we remain hopeful that we can remove the mass and get Obi healthy and happy, pending the results. "We have a long and difficult road ahead us but are so lucky to have our family and friends' support at this time and we're keeping focussed on getting our little boy back." The couple were flooded with supportive messages in the comments. One follower wrote: "Big love team. Obi will be a fighter like his parents" followed by a red heart emoji. A second said: "Oh my heart just dropped. Sending love and strength" followed by a red heart emoji. ‌ "Oh no — this is heartbreaking Sending so much hope & strength xx" another said as a fourth penned: "Thoughts are with you and the family" followed by two red heart emojis. The heartache comes after the couple announced the birth of their son in October. Sharing a sweet photo of Stace having some skin to skin time with his newborn, the couple wrote in the caption: "Welcome home 'Mr. Obi Brooks Kotaras'. We can't believe how perfect you are and both feel so overwhelmed with pure joy." The tot is Erin's first child with Stace. She also has Evander, seven, and Ennio, five, with her ex-husband Example. Erin and Exmaple, real name Elliot Gleave, were married for 11 years before they split in 2022.

Australia is no model for assisted dying
Australia is no model for assisted dying

New Statesman​

time16 hours ago

  • New Statesman​

Australia is no model for assisted dying

Photo by Kelly Barnes / AAP Image via Alamy Australian laws on voluntary assisted dying (VAD) are deemed so similar to the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill that three quarters of overseas witnesses invited to give evidence to MPs were from Australia. 'This is not a revolutionary law reform,' Alex Greenwich, a politician from New South Wales, told the bill's scrutiny committee earlier this year. 'It has been tried and tested, we have appropriate safeguards in place throughout Australia, and they work.' Although Australian states extend the six-month life expectancy requirement to a year for those with neurodegenerative conditions, in terms of eligibility, process and safeguards, their laws are similar to the UK's bill. The two differ only in that self-administration of life-ending drugs would be permitted here, and a multidisciplinary panel would review cases. So when Kim Leadbeater, Labour MP and the bill's sponsor, responded with a heart emoji and '#ChoiceAtTheEndOfLife' to a Guardian article published on 7 June that showed the Australian system being abused, eyebrows were raised. An elderly couple had been granted VAD when neither were terminally ill; medics in New South Wales effectively greenlit their suicide pact. 'Looks like the safeguards didn't work,' Mark Taubert, an NHS consultant and the vice-president of the European Association for Palliative Care, responded on X. According to the palliative care doctor Rachel Clarke, the story 'could not highlight more starkly the dangers of the law we are currently debating'. MPs hearing evidence on the bill had little time with six Australian witnesses, all of whom were supportive of VAD. Their arguments didn't always stand up to scrutiny. 'The medications are completely effective. I have not experienced any failures,' said Chloe Furst, a palliative care doctor from South Australia and board member of Voluntary Assisted Dying Australia and New Zealand. But, MPs pointed out, there is no requirement that a doctor be present when someone self-administers, nor is there provision for reporting complications. In Western Australia, where this information is collected, complications were recorded in 4.3 per cent of deaths in 2023-24. Asked if it was a concern that a 'large proportion of people who opted for assisted dying cited being a burden as their reason', another witness, Meredith Blake from the University of Western Australia, replied this was 'not the evidence that we have got'. Except it is. Official state figures showed 35 per cent of those seeking VAD cited being a burden on family, friends or carers as their reason for doing so. Blake replied: 'If there are people who are saying they are a burden, that does not mean that their decision is not voluntary.' While MPs were told Australian palliative care doctors had 'embraced' VAD, I have spoken with medics in Australia who are troubled by how the legislation operates. Academics and politicians are, too. Robert Clark, a former attorney-general and MP in Victoria wrote to the committee twice with his observations: the second time after his fellow Australians had addressed MPs. Numerous aspects of their evidence were 'factually incorrect or incomplete', Clark claimed. There was not adequate palliative care available to all terminally ill patients in Australia. Evidence didn't show any reduction in non-medically assisted suicide. The right of doctors to object to VAD was not respected. Many doctors 'feel unable to raise concerns about VAD… lest they suffer adverse professional or career consequences, or else they are leaving the hospital system altogether', he said. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe British palliative care doctor Alex Hughes recently relayed his experience of assisted dying while working in Australia. Hughes, who is neutral on VAD in principle, described a borderline case in which it seemed the patient had chosen to die because of poor alternative care options. In another, he suspected the man may have been influenced by depression, but this had gone unexplored in assessment. Were assisted dying to come to the UK, doctors would be 'at a heightened risk of unconscious bias… [and] may lean towards giving patients the 'benefit of the doubt', granting assisted dying to individuals who, in reality, have more than six months to live.' The events described in the Guardian confirm that risk is not merely hypothetical. Ahead of its return to the Commons on 13 June, 1,000 doctors urged MPs to vote against the assisted dying bill. They argued it is 'deeply flawed' and unsafe. Similar statements have been made by the Royal College of Physicians and the Royal College of Psychiatrists, which say they cannot support the legislation as it stands. Such concerns are not 'noise', as Leadbeater has suggested. Many critics have no issue with the principle of safe VAD. But the passage of the bill has revealed law-making at its worst: rushed debate, the views of the vulnerable ignored or downplayed, and crucial information on how the bill would work absent. Supporters say there will be time to iron out details later. That is too risky. Under current plans, some vulnerable people will be helped – in Hughes's words – to have 'an inappropriate assisted death'. He now poses two critical questions for MPs: how many vulnerable people slipping through the net is acceptable? And can adequate safeguards be put in place 'without creating a system so cumbersome that it becomes unworkable'? It's time for MPs to be honest with themselves and the public: enabling some an autonomous death through assisted dying will inevitably put others at risk of harm. [See also: Has any Chancellor faced a challenge this daunting?] Related

Palestinians say 36 people killed trying to obtain desperately needed aid
Palestinians say 36 people killed trying to obtain desperately needed aid

Belfast Telegraph

time2 days ago

  • Belfast Telegraph

Palestinians say 36 people killed trying to obtain desperately needed aid

Experts and humanitarian aid workers say Israel's blockade and 20-month military campaign have pushed Gaza to the brink of famine. At least 163 people have been killed and 1,495 wounded in a number of shootings near aid sites run by the Israeli and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which are in military zones that are off-limits to independent media. We need your consent to load this Social Media content. We use a number of different Social Media outlets to manage extra content that can set cookies on your device and collect data about your activity. The Israeli military has acknowledged firing warning shots on previous occasions at people who it says approached its forces in a suspicious manner. The foundation says there has been no violence in or around the distribution points themselves. But it has warned people to stay on designated access routes and it paused delivery last week while it held talks with the military on improving safety. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Tuesday there is 'meaningful progress' on a possible ceasefire deal that would also return some of the 55 hostages still being held in Gaza, but said it was 'too early to hope'. Foreign minister Gideon Saar also mentioned on Tuesday that there was progress in ceasefire negotiations. Mr Netanyahu was meeting with the Israeli negotiating team and the defence minister on Tuesday evening to discuss next steps. In southern Gaza, at least eight people were killed while trying to obtain aid around Rafah, according to Nasser Hospital. In northern Gaza, two men and a child were killed and at least 130 were wounded on Tuesday, according to Nader Garghoun, a spokesperson for the al-Awda Hospital, which received the casualties. He said most were being treated for gunshot wounds. Witnesses told The Associated Press that Israeli forces opened fire at around 2am (midnight BST), several hundred yards from the aid site in central Gaza. Crowds of Palestinians seeking desperately needed food often head to the sites hours before dawn, hoping to beat the crowds. The Israeli military said it fired warning shots at people it referred to as suspects. It said they had advanced toward its troops hundreds of yards from the aid site prior to its opening hours. Additionally, three Palestinian medics were killed in an Israeli strike Tuesday in Gaza City, according to the health ministry. The medics from the health ministry's emergency service were responding to an Israeli attack on a house in Jaffa street in Gaza City when a second strike hit the building, the ministry said. The Israeli military did not comment on the strike, but said over the past day the air force has hit dozens of targets belonging to Hamas' military infrastructure, including rocket launchers. The US Treasury Department on Tuesday imposed sanctions on a major Palestinian legal group for prisoners and detainees along with five other charitable entities across the Middle East, Africa and Europe, accusing them of supporting militant groups, including Hamas's military wing, under the pretence of humanitarian aid in Gaza. Those sanctioned include Addameer, a nongovernmental organisation that was founded in 1991 and is based in the city of Ramallah in the Israeli-occupied West Bank. The Palestinian group provides free legal services to Palestinian political prisoners and detainees in Israeli custody and monitors the conditions of their confinement. The organisation also works with Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and is a member of the World Organization Against Torture. Other entities hit with sanctions Tuesday include the Gaza-based charity Al Weam Charitable Society and its leader; the Turkish charity Filistin Vakfi and its leader; El Baraka Association for Charitable and Humanitarian Work and its leader; The Netherlands-based Israa Charitable Foundation Netherlands and two employees; and The Italy-based Associazione Benefica La Cupola d'Oro.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store