
'Shocking' COP30 lodging costs heap pressure on Brazil
President President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has personally championed the symbolic choice of holding the major UN climate conference in the Amazon.
And with months to go before the November 10-21 meeting, work is in full swing, AFP journalists witnessed recently.
But members of national delegations, civil society, and the media have been faced with a major dilemma: how to find a room at a decent price?
"I've never seen anything quite like the situation unfolding in Belem. The soaring accommodation prices, which mean it will now cost thousands of dollars a night for even basic rooms," Mariana Paoli, with the NGO Christian Aid, told AFP.
The steep rates are "not just shocking, it is exclusionary," said Paoli, a Brazilian who has attended several UN climate summits before.
"Delegates from across the Global South, particularly grassroots activists, Indigenous leaders, and civil society groups, already face immense barriers to participation... Now, they're being priced out entirely."
In recent months, AFP has seen hotels offering rooms at $1,200 a night. On short-term rental platform Airbnb, some rates were even higher.
With a total of 50,000 people expected to attend, Claudio Angelo of the Brazilian Climate Observatory collective warned that delegations are mulling cutting back on the number of attendees.
"Everybody's concerned because at this point, five months to the date, everybody should have hotels and no one has," he told AFP in Bonn, Germany, where technical negotiations have been held over the past two weeks.
CEO rules out relocation
Brazil is no stranger to hosting major events, particularly in Rio de Janeiro.
After the 2016 Olympic Games and last year's G20 summit, Rio will host a summit of the BRICS group of emerging economies next month.
Some have speculated about a possible last-minute move to a large city, maybe Rio.
COP30 chief Ana Toni, while sharing concerns over the lodging, ruled out any last-minute relocation to a larger city.
"Let's be very very clear, it's all happening in Belem," she told AFP in Bonn.
Toni, who also serves as Brazil's national secretary for climate change, said that the government was aware and working on solutions.
In response to the emergency, Brazilian authorities are trying to put pressure on the hotel sector.
The National Consumer Rights Bureau (Senacon) has summoned the main hotels in Belem for an inquiry into "possible abusive pricing practices," leading to accusations from the sector of "threats."
A negotiator from the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) said she had received assurances from the COP30 presidency that they would receive assistance with their accommodation.
"But we have not received any communication or proposal on how this might work," she said with concern.
Several months behind schedule, an official platform offering a total of "29,000 rooms and 55,000 beds" is supposed to go online at the end of June.
Nearly half will be short-term rentals (25,000 beds), and participants will even be able to stay "on two cruise ships, with a total of 3,882 cabins and 6,000 beds."
'Under the stars'
Organizers have already sought to ease pressure on Belem by organizing this year's heads of state summit before the actual COP, on November 6 and 7.
But Lula, who is seeking to position himself as a climate champion, did not hesitate to respond sarcastically to critics.
"If there are no five-star hotels, sleep in a four-star hotel. If there are no four-star hotels, sleep in a three-star hotel. And if not, sleep under the stars," Lula said sarcastically in February during a visit to Belem.
As at last year's UN biodiversity summit in Cali, Colombia, delegates will at least be able to enjoy an unusual option: more than 1,600 beds are available in "motels," establishments usually reserved for romantic trysts and rooms rented by the hour.
"We are adapting our establishments to accommodate visitors for overnight stays," said Ricardo Teixeira of the Brazilian Association of Motels for the State of Para.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


AFP
38 minutes ago
- AFP
Canada will not enact new nationwide driving rules in July 2025
"Starting July 5,2025, big changes are coming to Canada's roads. The federal government will introduce the New Canada Driving Law 2025," claims a June 17, 2025 Facebook post. The text purports Canada is about to enforce a country-wide 30 kilometers (18.6 miles) per hour speed limit in all school zones, coming with a violation fine of Numerous other posts spread across Facebook claiming the country would be lowering the blood alcohol limit for impaired driving violations, requiring mandatory installation of advanced driver-assistance systems and forcing seniors to submit to driving evaluations. The text in many posts appeared to be copy-and-pasted, while some publications linked to articles repeating similar claims on websites with domains indicating activity Image Screenshot of a Facebook post taken June 27, 2025 Image Screenshot of a Facebook post taken June 27, 2025 posts gained traction as the Liberal government faces mounting pressure to adjust a ban on new gas-powered vehicle sales scheduled to go into effect in 2026. Other false claims about Prime Minister Mark Carney and new Canadian auto regulations were recently fact-checked by AFP. Transport Canada, the federal agency regulating transportation, also told AFP it did not have any new motor vehicle rule changes coming into effect in July 2025. "It's important to note that provinces and territories are responsible for areas such as driver licensing, vehicle registration, vehicle maintenance, insurance and enforcement of road rules," said Hicham Ayoun, a spokesman for Transport Canada in a June 19 email. The Ontario Ministry of Transportation told AFP it was not introducing any new rules such as the ones seen in the posts. "At this time there are no changes to Ontario's distracted driving law, school zones or automated vehicle oversight," said ministry spokeswoman Tanya Blazina in a June 26 email. AFP also confirmed with the province of British Columbia that the driving regulations seen in the misleading social media posts would not be coming to its jurisdiction. Searching the websites of regulations in certain provinces does not reveal any evidence of similar rules being introduced in those regions of the country (archived here, here and here) ffic Safety Act will go into effect on July 1 in Yukon territory to increase fines for some violations including failing to stop for school busses ( Read more of AFP's reporting on misinformation in Canada here.


France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
'Shooting the messengers': Trump tears into media over Iran report
Trump has staked significant political capital on the success of last weekend's strikes, which he ordered despite criticism within his own support base for breaking his campaign promises to avoid foreign military interventions. The president has blasted press coverage of a preliminary classified report from his own administration that suggested that Trump's claim that Iran's nuclear facilities were "obliterated" was overstated. The unusually scathing attack on reporters underscores what many observers view as Trump's effort to put the media -- already battling record low public trust -- on the defensive and stifle scrutiny of the bombing raid. "Having made the decision to join the fight against Iran, being able to claim that the intervention was brief and successful has obvious political upside for Trump in repairing rifts within his coalition," Joshua Tucker, co-director of the New York University Center for Social Media and Politics, told AFP. "The discussion by the media of the preliminary intelligence report therefore complicated the president's preferred narrative about the US attack." The preliminary intelligence assessment, first reported by CNN and The New York Times, then picked up by other mainstream media, suggested that the strikes may not have destroyed the core parts of the nuclear sites and had set back Iran's nuclear program by only a few months. Trump said CNN should throw the reporter on the story out "like a dog." He said CNN and New York Times reporters were "bad and sick people" attempting to demean American pilots involved in the strikes. At a televised news conference on Thursday, Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth reiterated the president's complaints and pushed back on the findings of the report -- issued by the US Defense Intelligence Agency –- but did not deny its existence. 'Increasingly ugly' Both news outlets have stood behind their journalists and defended their reporting. "President Trump and his administration are going after shooting the messengers in an increasingly ugly way," said CNN's top political anchor Jake Tapper. "They're calling journalists 'fake news' for true stories," he added. Trump has also threatened to sue The New York Times and CNN over their coverage of the intelligence report. In a letter, the president's personal lawyer said the New York Times had damaged Trump's reputation and demanded that it "retract and apologize" for its report, calling it "false," "defamatory" and "unpatriotic," according to the newspaper. The newspaper said it had rejected those demands. "Trump is killing the messenger," Todd Belt, director of the political management program at George Washington University, told AFP. "He's taking it out on the press because he knows that the press are unpopular," particularly among his core Make America Great Again (MAGA) base, he said. "Additionally, he and others in the administration are using the attack line of patriotism to bolster their side against the press." 'Peace through strength' The anti-media rhetoric escalates Trump's longstanding battle with the press. Since the beginning of his second term, his administration has sought to target the finances of media organizations -- already struggling in an increasingly tough commercial climate -- by cutting government agencies' news subscriptions. He has also targeted news outlets with multi-million dollar lawsuits. Trump's latest attacks come amid a public relations campaign to portray himself as a peacemaker in the Middle East, while retaining the support of his core MAGA base. On Friday, Trump doubled down on his stance, stating that Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei "got beat to hell" in the hostilities involving the United States and Israel, while exhorting Tehran to return to the negotiating table. "If his 'peace through strength' single attack didn't work and the conflict gets drawn out, this undermines his claim as a peacemaker," said Belt. "If the public believes the single strike didn't work, then he will either have to attack again or negotiate from a position that recognizes that Iran still maintains fissile material, which may not work."


France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Trump says would bomb Iran again if nuclear activities start
In an extraordinary outburst on his Truth Social platform, Trump blasted Tehran for claiming to have won its war with Israel and said he was halting work on possible sanctions relief. Trump said the United States would bomb Iran again "without question" if the country was still able to enrich uranium to the grade required for nuclear weapons following US strikes. The US president accused the Iranian leader of ingratitude after Khamenei said in a defiant message that reports of damage to nuclear sites from the US bombings were exaggerated, and said Iran had beaten Israel and dealt Washington a "slap." "I knew EXACTLY where he was sheltered, and would not let Israel, or the U.S. Armed Forces, by far the Greatest and Most Powerful in the World, terminate his life," Trump posted. "I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH, and he does not have to say, 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!'" Trump also said that he had been working in recent days on the possible removal of sanctions against Iran, one of Tehran's long-term demands. "But no, instead I get hit with a statement of anger, hatred, and disgust, and immediately dropped all work on sanction relief, and more," Trump added, exhorting Iran to return to the negotiating table. Iran has denied it is set to resume nuclear talks with the United States, after Trump said at a NATO summit in The Hague that negotiations were set to begin again next week. Its government on Friday rejected a request by Rafael Grossi, the director of the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency, to visit facilities bombed by Israel and the United States, saying it suggested "malign intent." Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi hit out at Grossi personally in a post on X for not speaking out against the air strikes, accusing him of an "astounding betrayal of his duties." 'Beat to hell' Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff had expressed hope "for a comprehensive peace agreement." Asked earlier in a White House press conference whether he would consider fresh air strikes if last week's sorties were not successful in ending Iran's nuclear ambitions, Trump said: "Sure. Without question. Absolutely." Trump added that Khamenei and Iran "got beat to hell" in the hostilities involving the United States and Israel and that "it was a great time to end it." In the Truth Social post, the US president accused Khamenei of "blatantly and foolishly" saying Iran won the 12-day war with Israel, adding: "As a man of great faith, he is not supposed to lie." The war of words comes as a fragile ceasefire holds in the conflict, which erupted on June 13 when Israel launched a bombing campaign that it said aimed to stop its adversary from developing a nuclear weapon. "Israel acted at the last possible moment against an imminent threat against it, the region and the international community," Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar wrote Friday on X. "The international community now has an obligation to prevent, through any effective means, the world's most extreme regime from obtaining the most dangerous weapon." Speculation had swirled about the fate of Khamenei before his first appearance since the ceasefire -- a televised speech on Thursday. Khamenei hailed what he described as Iran's "victory" over Israel, vowing never to yield to US pressure. "The American president exaggerated events in unusual ways, and it turned out that he needed this exaggeration," Khamenei said, rejecting Trump's claims Iran's nuclear program had been set back by decades.