
Numbers show RI undocumented immigrants a small slice of those getting benefits. What we know.
Numbers show RI undocumented immigrants a small slice of those getting benefits. What we know.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
President Trump's radical immigration agenda takes shape
On Day 1 of his presidency, Trump sought to make good on his campaign promise to curb illegal immigration.
PROVIDENCE – President Donald Trump's threat to end birthright citizenship and conduct "mass deportations" has instilled fear and uncertainty into a population that is now driving Rhode Island roads legally, paying taxes and growing their families, some with state-paid – and legislature approved – health benefits.
How many of these undocumented immigrants are now living with the fear that all this will be snatched away?
Unclear.
At one point, a group calling itself the "Federation for American Immigration Reform" pegged the number at 35,000, based on an extrapolation of an estimated national number. The truth is: there is no reliable count.
But the numbers that are available indicate that undocumented immigrants – described in state law as those "unable to establish legal presence in the United States" – are just a tiny slice of those who are getting Rhode Island benefits.
What do we know about them?
Thousands of undocumented immigrants have intersected with state government in Rhode Island in recent years in their pursuit of "driver privilege cards," tax ID numbers that enable them to report their income and pay taxes and in some limited cases, state-subsidized benefits.
Here, at a glance, is the picture that can be drawn from the privileges and benefits Rhode Island lawmakers have approved:
MEDICAID
There were 5,090 undocumented women and children on the state-paid Medicaid rolls as of Dec. 5, when the Executive Office of Health & Human Services (EOHHS) ran the query for The Journal.
That number included 486 pregnant or postpartum women, 4,598 children and six infants.
Medicaid payments on behalf of those without Social Security numbers totalled $55.4 million last year, including the $16,106,050 paid for those officially determined to be undocumented immigrants.
Putting that $16.1 million in context, it's just a tiny piece of Rhode Island's Medicaid budget, which totaled $3.9 billion during the last fiscal year.
Kerri White, spokesperson for EOHHS, explained: "The only undocumented people in Rhode Island who qualify for coverage are either those who are currently pregnant or postpartum" or children covered by the Cover All Kids law adopted in 2022 to provide state-paid health insurance to all children in low-income families, regardless of their immigration status.
Removing any doubt, White said: The coverage for these undocumented women and children "is paid for by Rhode Island state general revenue only (not by federal funding)."
OTHER PUBLIC ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
As of Nov. 26, 2024, 1,625 people without verified Social Security numbers had received publicly-subsidized benefits from other Rhode Island assistance programs for low-income people, including: RI Works, Refugee Cash Assistance, SNAP and, in a handful of cases, for burials.
They fell into two categories: Those with what the state calls verified "alien status" (1,622) and those without (3).
Over the years, they have included: newborns, recent legal immigrants, asylum seekers, refugees, fostered or adopted children and whoever else might not have a SSN at the time of application.
As explained by Department of Human Services spokesperson James Beardsworth, the numbers include individuals with "qualified non-citizen status" which means the individual is in the country legally and is entitled to certain benefits even if there is no SSN."
The cost of providing benefits to those with a verified "non-citizen status" was $12,066,543 at that point in the year and only $1,058 for those with an "unverified status."
Of note: Beardsworth said state agencies are banned from denying some benefits because an individual does not have a Social Security number.
For example: The federal regulations governing the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) prohibit a state agency from delaying the approval and issuance of SNAP benefits to verify a Social Security number to a household that is otherwise eligible.
Similarly, state agencies cannot 'deny, delay, or discontinue assistance' for cash assiatnce from the state's RIWorks program 'pending the issuance or verification' of SSNs if the applicant or recipients have applied.
Federal regulations governing the Refugee Cash Assistance program prohibit state agencies from asking applicants for a SSN.
General Public Assistance (GPA) burial assistance does not require the submission nor verification of a SSN.
Putting these numbers in perspective, the current number of enrollees in Medicaid is 305,463 with full benefits and 12,000 receiving partial benefits; SNAP, approximately 40,000 people; assistance to needy families, 8,323; refugee cash assistance, 750 and General Public Assistance, 533.
TAX ID NUMBERS
Based on the Division of Taxation analysis, the number of state personal income tax filers using an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) is 9,174, according to spokesman Paul Grimaldi.
The "tax identification number" for most people in the United States is their Social Security number (SSN). But a "foreign person, who doesn't have and can't get a SSN, must use an individual taxpayer identification number (ITIN),'' according to the IRS.
While the 9,174 may, in fact, include undocumented immigrants, Grimaldi notes, they are not the only ones reflected in the count. They may be, for example, a foreign national not eligible to receive a SSN but has "reportable income" other than wages.
DRIVERS PRIVILEGE CARDS
State officials say they do not keep any count of the look-alike drivers' licenses created specifically for people who are "unable to establish legal presence in the United States."
Gov. Dan McKee cited a number – "3,000" – during an appearance on Gene Valicenti's WPRO radio talk show. But when pressed, the administrators of the Rhode Island DMV insisted they did not know.
Who is eligible for a "driver privilege permit"?
More: How many driver privilege cards have been given out by the DMV? Why officials can't say.
With the approval of state lawmakers, "driver privilege cards" have been available since July 2023 to individuals "unable to establish [their] legal presence in the United States," who can nevertheless produce proof of their residency and identity, as well as a personal income tax return for the previous year that documents they were here working and paying taxes – or are the dependent of someone who was.
State law does not bar the DMV from keeping a running count of the number handed out. But the McKee Administration has taken the position that it does.
"The legislative intent when the statute was passed was to ensure that [Drivers Privilege Cards] were indistinguishable from non-REAL ID credentials [so] that individuals holding [the cards] would not be targeted," Grimaldi said.
But the DMV was willing to disclose in November, after multiple requests from The Journal around what is public information, that in the 17 months the DPC program has been active, here have been:
12,418 reservations
2,036 no-shows for reservations
Roughly 10,382 separate privilege card reservations
But even that 10,382 number does not accurately represent the number issued, Grimaldi explained because "many people" fail to show up for their first reservations. Or they may book multiple reservations. Or they may not have the right paperwork, or may not pass the test to get the privilege card, requiring "additional reservations."
Current privilege cardholders are now starting to make reservations to renew their cards, which adds to the queue but does not, Grimaldi notes, "add to the total number of credentials in circulation."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
Israeli Ambassador: ‘Objective is not to contain the war' but ‘win the war' against Iran
Israeli ambassador to the United States, Yechiel Leiter, said the goal in the war against Iran is not to contain it but to win it, as the two countries continue to exchange strikes for a third day. During an appearance on ABC's 'This Week,' host Martha Raddatz asked Leiter how Israel would avoid escalating and attempt to contain the war. 'Martha, the objective is not to contain the war,' Leiter responded. 'The objective is to win the war.' 'Eighty years ago, we had a little man with a mustache running around Europe that nobody believed him when he said he was going to destroy the Jewish people,' he continued. 'We lost 6 million. Now we've got a crazed new Hitler running around the Middle East saying he's going to destroy us. 'We have to take him at face value… He's got a concrete plan to destroy us.' Her comments come after Israel and Iran continued to exchange airstrikes on Sunday. Another round of U.S.-Iranian nuclear talks was scheduled in Muscat, Oman, but was cancelled amid the fighting. When Raddatz mentioned that Trump did not want Israel to strike Iran because it would 'blow it,' Leiter said Trump was 'congratulatory about our strike,' noting that he had been given a 'heads-up' by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. When pushed further on whether Israel would accept a deal between Iran and Israel, Leiter said not unless Iran is willing to halt the nuclear program entirely. 'He wants the nuclear program in Iran to be halted in its entirety,' Leiter said. 'He said it very clearly: dismantle the centrifuges, dismantle the infrastructure, and stop in total the enrichment of uranium. So, if that can be achieved through negotiation, so be it. We'll be very happy. But it hasn't been.'

24 minutes ago
Trump says 'it's possible' US gets involved in Israel-Iran conflict
President Donald Trump said Sunday that the US is not involved in Israel 's military strikes but "it's possible we could get involved." In an interview with ABC News' Rachel Scott, Trump said he's open to Russian President Vladimir Putin serving as a mediator in the conflict -- something he said the Russian president pitched in their phone call on Saturday. Here are highlights from the interview: On Israel's latest attack on Iran:"I think they were very devastating. It was very devastating. They were hit also, but it was a very devastating into Iran, primarily" the president said. On a deadline for Iran to come to the negotiating table:"No, there's no deadline. But they are talking. They'd like to make a deal. They're talking. They continue to talk," he said. "Something like this had to happen because I think even from both sides, but something like this had to happen. They want to talk, and they will be talking." Asked again about the talks being called off, the president said he's confident it may help the deal -- "May have forced a deal to go quicker, actually." Will the U.S. get more involved in the conflict?:"We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved," the president said. Putin as a mediator in the conflict:"Yeah, I would be open to it. He is ready. He called me about it. We had a long talk about it. We talked about this more than his situation. This is something I believe is going to get resolved."


CNN
24 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump wary of increasing US involvement as Israel-Iran conflict escalates
Amid ongoing waves of tit-for-tat strikes between Israel and Iran, President Donald Trump is publicly and privately making clear his desire to keep the United States out of the fray for now, wary of becoming bogged in another Middle East war and highly attuned to the changing politics of his party. Sources familiar with the matter say Israel has spoken with the US about possibly increasing its level of involvement, though one Israeli official cautioned those conversation have not yet included 'practical' discussions of the finer details. And while Trump hopes to avoid a prolonged conflict that could further destabilize the Middle East, some in the administration recognize that American military assistance may help Israel conclude its objectives more quickly, the sources said. 'We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved,' Trump told ABC News on Sunday morning. The competing interests have created a complicated dynamic for a president eager to make good on his pledge to bring peace to the world's troubled regions. Since Israel launched its first attack early Friday morning, the US has offered defensive support to Israel intercepting an onslaught of Iranian reprisal strikes. But Trump has stopped well short of joining Israel's military in its attempts to dismantle Iran's nuclear facilities, resisting pressure from fellow Republicans to join the fight. He said in a social media post Saturday that he felt the conflict 'should end' as he continues to hold out hope for a negotiated agreement that would curb Tehran's nuclear ambitions, even after planned talks this weekend in Oman between the US and Iranian negotiating teams were called off. At stake is Trump's promise to act as a global peacemaker — or, as he told his inaugural crowd in January, to 'bring a new spirit of unity to a world that has been angry, violent and totally unpredictable.' That vow has already been tested by his inability to bring about an end to the Ukraine conflict and halting efforts to stop the fighting in Gaza. Now, as a new flashpoint is threatening to spiral out of control on Trump's watch, the commander-in-chief is attempting to limit US involvement. 'The U.S. had nothing to do with the attack on Iran, tonight,' Trump wrote on Truth Social late Saturday amid a fresh round of attacks in the region. 'If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before. However, we can easily get a deal done between Iran and Israel, and end this bloody conflict!!!' The post sent the message that Trump's line for getting more directly involved in Israel's assaults would be an attack on American facilities or personnel in the region. Short of that, the US role in the conflict so far has largely been defensive. The Israeli operation against Iran is expected to take 'weeks, not days' and is moving forward with implicit US approval, according to White House and Israeli officials. The Trump administration has not critiqued the weeks-long timeframe in private discussions, an Israeli official told CNN. A White House official said the administration was aware and implicitly supportive of Israel's plans. When asked about how long the conflict could continue, the official said it depended on Iran's response. 'The Trump administration firmly believes this can be solved by continuing negotiations with the US,' the official said, adding that the US was not going to direct Israel to do anything but defend itself. American military planners have long had prepared options for joint US-Israeli actions against Iranian facilities should a US president ultimately decide to try taking out Iran's nuclear facilities, some of which are buried deep underground. There is little to indicate Trump has come close to approving such options, however, and according to an Israeli official, the possibility of offensive US support for Israel's strikes inside Iran had not been discussed on a 'practical basis.' 'We are not there, on a practical basis,' the Israeli official said. 'If at some point, the United States decides to take an offensive role, I don't think we'll be in a position to try and talk them out of it – but that's not our ask,' the official said, adding that such a move would be a sovereign decision of the US. The official explained that the endgame is to make sure that Iran is 'no longer an existential threat' to Israel, with both its nuclear and ballistic missiles program. 'If it's done in conjunction with allies, fine, but if it's not done in conjunction with allies, we have to do it ourselves,' the official said. Inside the White House, there continues to be heavy skepticism about getting involved in the conflict further, according to multiple officials familiar with the matter. Trump remains concerned about getting dragged into a war he didn't start and wanted to avoid, and is acutely aware of the complicated politics at play, those officials said. Though he publicly warned Israel against launching an attack on Iran ahead of Friday's strikes, he said afterward he was supportive of the effort and well aware that it was being planned. Prev Next Trump has long promised not to engage in 'nation building' adventurism overseas, decrying his predecessors for sending American troops to die in wars that generated little benefit back home. 'For at least two decades, political leaders from both parties have dragged our military into missions it was never meant to be' a part of, said Trump told graduating cadets at West Point last month. 'They sent our warriors on nation-building crusades to nations that wanted nothing to do with us, led by leaders that didn't have a clue in distant lands,' he said, vowing to never repeat the mistake. Now, however, he is under pressure from some of his Republican allies to take a more interventionist role. 'If diplomacy fails, going all in for Israel shows that America is back as a reliable ally and a strong force against oppression. It would strengthen our hand in all corners of the world, as well as all other conflicts we face,' Sen. Lindsey Graham wrote on X last week.