She was set to retire in August, but Milei's government has dashed her hopes
Twice a week, Nilda Rivadeneira hops on her bicycle and pedals to work. She tells CNN she wishes it were a women's bike instead of a men's one, but she rides it now that her son, who no longer lives at home, stopped using it. In a way, it suits her, she says: being old and inconspicuous, she blends in, which helps her as she travels through unsafe areas.
Nilda works cleaning houses by the hour about two kilometers from her home in the northern part of Buenos Aires province, and by biking she saves on transportation costs. Between that job, another one that she goes to twice a week by bus, and sewing orders that she does on her own, she earns a monthly income of just under $300 (at Argentina's informal exchange rate).
In August, she will turn 60, the retirement age for women in Argentina, which would allow her to draw on another source of income. However, a measure implemented by President Javier Milei's government will prevent her from accessing her pension.
The Pension Debt Payment Plan – known as the pension moratorium – was a law passed during the administration of former President Alberto Fernández in 2023, which allowed those who did not have the required 30 years of contributions to instead pay into a plan of up to 120 installments through a direct deduction from their pension, allowing them to qualify for retirement.
The moratorium was for two years, until March 2025, and extendable for two more. But in October, Argentina's government announced that it would not be renewed.
When Nilda finished high school, she started a career in teaching, but quickly had to drop out. 'I got married very young and became a mother at 20. That's why I stopped studying, had three children not too far apart in age, and had to take care of the family,' she recalls.
Some time later, a fourth child arrived, but beyond the years she dedicated exclusively to raising children, Nilda calculates she's worked for 17 years in formal jobs and almost 20 years in odd jobs and gig work. But those don't count to the 30 years of eligible contributions required to retire by law.
According to the latest official data, 36.1% of Argentines have precarious jobs, meaning their employers don't make payments into the retirement system. And, according to a 2023 government report, the domestic employment sector — made up almost entirely of women — has much higher informality rates, close to 75%. Nilda is part of these statistics.
'They tell us: 'You can't retire because you don't have the years of contributions,' but we do have the years of work. What happens is that employers, if you go and present the situation to them, tell you: 'If you leave, I have 10 people in line after you.' So, that also demoralizes you,' she says.
According to her estimates, Nilda needs to contribute more than $5,000 to retire. Without the moratorium that allowed payment in installments, she would have to pay it all in full before August.
'It's impossible, impossible. Even if my children helped me, I can't afford it,' she laments.
For months now, senior citizens have gathered on Wednesday afternoons in front of Congress in Buenos Aires to protest government policies and particularly its pension reform.
Two weeks ago, a protest by retirees, joined by soccer fans and members of social and political organizations, ended in a violent clash between police and protesters. More than 100 people were arrested, and a photojournalist was seriously injured and remains hospitalized.
As part of the government's cuts, Milei vetoed a law in September that would have adjusted pension payments to mitigate pensioners' loss of purchasing power due to inflation, establishing a minimum pension and setting out an adjustment system based on price and wage developments.
Currently, the minimum pension, with an additional bonus, is less than $300, and pensions are updated monthly according to inflation.
According to the analysis organization Center for the Implementation of Public Policies for Equity and Growth (CIPPEC), the Argentine pension system stands out for its broad coverage, with 95% of those over 65 receiving some kind of pension. The downside: public spending on the pension system is equivalent to 10% of the country's GDP, based on data from last year.
The latest social security report, from last September, counts 7.8 million retirees and pensioners. Of these, 22% received non-contributory pensions, a benefit that does not require lifetime contributions.
Of the remaining 78%, or 6.1 million, who do receive a benefit based on contributions, only 2.2 million did not need to access a moratorium to retire.
If she were unable to retire, Nilda could still access a universal pension for older adults (PUAM), equivalent to 80% of a minimum pension, or about $220 per month, and health coverage.
However, that benefit is only available starting at age 65. Pension lawyer Christian González D'Alessandro tells CNN that, in this way, 'the age of eligibility for a benefit for women will inevitably be raised.'
Furthermore, Nilda would lose all the contributions she made during her formal working years as well as the ability to continue working and contributing, if her current employers were to regularize her situation. She would also be unable to collect other types of pensions, such as a widow's pension.
Nilda is still married and has become a grandmother of five. She feels fortunate. Aside from some muscle pain from cycling, she doesn't usually experience physical discomfort or have any chronic illnesses that require regular medication expenses.
With her and her husband's income, they manage to make ends meet, but even so, she would like to be able to treat her children to meals and cover expenses, or occasionally take her grandchildren to the movies.
'I hope that, beyond having a headache or feeling tired, I can still be healthy enough to keep working,' she says about her future.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Watch: CNN Stars Troll MAGA Panelist Amid Trump-Musk Feud
A CNN panel teased one of their contributors mercilessly on Saturday morning over Donald Trump and Elon Musk's meteorically messy divorce this week. 'Oh, this is just so horrible. And you know, when this news broke, all I could think of was my dear friend Scott Jennings,' the network's data guru Harry Enten said of his pro-Trump fellow panelist. 'Scott, how have you dealt with this, are you doing okay?' Enten went on, his voice laden with faux concern. 'My heart goes out to you.' A MAGA loyalist and frequent CNN contributor, Jennings has spoken often and enthusiastically in support of both Trump and Musk in the past. His appearance on Saturday, however, came amid the spectacular and rapidly widening rift between the president and his former-top-campaign-donor-turned-government-efficiency czar. Following his departure as head of Trump's cost-cutting DOGE initiative, Musk this week launched a series of vicious and highly personal attacks against the president, taking shots at the White House's budget proposals while accusing Trump of being less than candid about his relationship with late pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein. 'Yeah, mom and dad are not doing so well right now,' CNN host Abby Phillips put it on Saturday. 'On Friday, (Trump) spent a big chunk of the day, the morning it seemed, calling around to network reporters, including our very own Dana Bash here at CNN and spinning a narrative because, I guess, maybe he was unsatisfied with how this was playing out without him.' Jennings, for his part, seemed content to take his fellow panelists' mockery on the chin. 'I'm perfectly fine,' he responded to Enten, adding: 'I do appreciate you offering to let me stay at your place for a while.'


The Hill
7 hours ago
- The Hill
Sunday shows preview: Trump-Musk spat leaves admin reeling; ‘Big, beautiful bill' hits speed bump
President Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk's feud spilled out in public on Thursday, with the world's richest man and the world's most powerful leader trading barbs that engulfed news cycles in Washington and abroad. Musk, a Trump ally, was vocal about his disappointment with Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' currently sitting in the Senate. Musk, who spent millions during the 2024 presidential campaign to help elect Trump, called the massive piece of legislation a 'disgusting abomination.' Trump then weighed in on Thursday at the White House during German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's visit, saying, 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore.' The spat intensified, with Musk floating the prospects of creating a third party, claiming that without his political contributions, Trump would not be victorious against ex-Vice President Harris in November and accusing the president of having ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Trump threatened to cut off federal contracts awarded to Musk's companies. Later on Thursday, Musk signaled he might be open to brokering a truce with the commander-in-chief. After speaking with several news outlets Friday morning, Trump suggested he is ready to move on and indicated that he will not be speaking with Musk for a while. Trump told CNN Friday morning that he is 'not even thinking about Elon' and added that the SpaceX and Tesla CEO has 'got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem.' In the Senate, Trump's agenda bill, which passed the House chamber last month, has sparked concerns and criticism from GOP senators. The first group of GOP Sens., which consists of Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), are arguing they could vote against the bill if it slashes Medicaid benefits. Others, including Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) have previously said they would not back the legislation if it retains the current debt and spending levels. The GOP can have three defections total if all Democrats vote against the legislation. Sen. Johnson will be on CNN's 'State of the Union where he will likely discuss if any of his concerns regarding the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' have been addressed. As part of a push to root out waste, fraud and abuse within Medicare, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said this week that a bill sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), that would crack down on Medicare Advantage overpayments known as 'upcoding,' could be inserted into Trump's massive legislation. Cassidy will be on NewsNation's 'The Hill Sunday,' where he will likely discuss the latest on the reconciliation package along with his recent visit to the White House. NewsNation's 'The Hill Sunday': Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.); Rep. Sarah Elfreth (D-Ma); U.S. Chamber of Commerce chief policy officer Neil Bradley. ABC's 'This Week': Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy; House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.). NBC's 'Meet the Press': Sens. James Lankford (R-Okla.), and Cory Booker (D-N.J.). CNN's 'State of the Union': 'Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), and Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.); Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.). CBS' 'Face the Nation': National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett; Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.); Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Texas); Save the Children U.S. President and CEO Janti Soeripto. 'Fox News Sunday': Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought; Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.); Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas). Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures': Secretary Of Interior Doug Burgum, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.); House Ways And Means Committee Chairman Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.); Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.).
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Scott Jennings is correct about Wes Moore
Whatever CNN is paying Scott Jennings, it's not enough. His pragmatic, common-sense commentary offering realistic solutions to problems plaguing everyday Americans has become the glue holding the network's evening programming in place. Night after night, Jennings does rhetorical battle with far-left panelists who continually offer up the same two failing lines of attack: They hate Trump, and they believe everything should be viewed and addressed through the prism of identity politics. Surely, the executives at CNN understand that it was precisely those attack lines that enabled Trump to make substantial gains within the Hispanic community, the Black community, young men, independents and even a percentage of Democrats. All these voters switched to Trump because they knew that 'we hate Trump' and 'identity politics' were calculated rants and not a strategy to help keep them safe, lower the cost of essential items, protect their jobs, improve their health care or address the problem of failing public schools. Each evening on CNN, Jennings throws those bread-and-butter issues back at the liberal panelists — and they either sputter to come up with an answer or double down on the attack lines in allegiance to the vocal yet tiny minority making up the far-left wing of the Democratic Party. The next day, various conservative websites then sing the praises of Jennings for sticking it to the Democrats. Except … that is not what he does. Jennings is an honest broker who simply tries to call them as he sees them. His foundation is commonsense and logical, based on his real-world experiences. That acknowledged, Jennings offered up a valid opinion the other night that some Republicans and conservatives undoubtedly wish he had kept to himself — that Maryland Gov. Wes Moore (D) should be taken seriously as we approach 2028. This past Sunday on CNN's 'State of the Union,' Jennings made two statements that got immediate attention. The first: 'I'll defend the Democrats — they are for things. Illegal aliens, you're for boys in girls' sports. That's why you have such struggles right now in your party, because you're not for anything that's on the right side of any of the 80/20 issues that are driving this cultural divide in America.' Jennings's next opinion, about Maryland's Democratic governor, was also worth noting and filing away: 'I think Wes Moore is actually a pretty talented communicator. Moore is interesting, probably more interesting than some of the radicals you have out there, [Jasmine] Crockett, AOC. I mean those are the true leaders of your party right now, but you'd probably be better off replacing them with Moore.' Seconding the problems Democrats are having with voters because of their current 'leaders' and do-nothing policies is Harry Enten, CNN's chief data analyst. During an interview last week, Engen dropped two bombs. The first: 'Take a look at Reuters-IPSOS. What do we see here? Party with a better economic plan. Well in May of 2024, just before Donald Trump was reelected president, Republicans had a nine-point advantage. Look at where we are now in May of 2025. The advantage actually went up by three points. Now Republicans have a 12-point advantage when it comes to the party with a better economic plan.' Next came crushing bad news for Democrats with regard to middle- and working-class Americans. Reported Enten: 'Historically speaking, which is the party of the middle class has been a huge advantage for Democrats. I have polling from NBC going all the way back since 1989, when Democrats held a 23-point advantage. … And now in our latest CNN poll, among registered voters, which is the party of the middle class, it is tied. … Trump and the Republican Party have taken that mantle away. And now a key advantage for Democrats historically has gone. Adios amigos.' And then, on Sam Harris's 'Making Sense' podcast this week, Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.) — the first openly gay person elected from the Bronx, who has long been a voice for common sense, the working class and the disenfranchised — said this: 'There is a divide between what I would say are two teams in the Democratic Party. 'Team Restraint' and 'Team Resistance.' There are those in Team 'Resistance' who feel like we should react hysterically to everything Donald Trump says or does. And then those who feel like we should pick and choose our battles and be strategic. But I worry that the momentum is on the side of hysterical, hyperbolic resistance.' Obviously, as with the nightly warnings issued by Jennings, Torres is talking about Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) and others when he speaks of 'hysterical, hyperbolic resistance.' Questions for the Democrats: Is Torres correct? Has the momentum switched to the 'hysterical' and 'hyperbolic'? Is there no appetite in the Democratic Party for commonsense voices like Torres and Moore, who offer up strategies instead of insults? Or is the appetite there and growing, but the party is too afraid to confront its own bullies? No doubt CNN's Jennings will answer those questions and many more as we approach the midterms and the 2028 election. Ignore his opinions and truths at your own political peril. Douglas MacKinnon is a former White House and Pentagon official. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.