Kim Jong-un's Absence from the Victory Day Parade: A sign of Disregard and Distrust toward Putin
Kim, Min Gyu(Former Senior official of DPRK Foreign Ministry)
On May 9, the Victory Day parade, Russia's symbolic national celebration, took place in Moscow's Red Square. On this day, Russia reflects on its historical achievements while showcasing its enduring military strength.
The day held particular significance for Putin this year. Amid growing international isolation following the war in Ukraine, he sought to demonstrate Russia's 'anti-Western coalition' by inviting the leaders of allied and friendly nations.
Notably, Putin cordially invited Kim Jong-un to highlight the strong ties between the two countries, as their expanding military and economic cooperation has revitalized their relationship.
North Korea's supply of shells and missiles to Russia, coupled with Russia's provision of satellite technologies, crude oil, food supply, and its support on the international stage, has drawn significant global attention.
However, it was none other than the supreme leader of North Korea, Kim Jong-un, who struck down Putin's hope, rejecting the invitation.
Instead, Kim visited the Russian embassy in Pyongyang to mark the anniversary. On the surface, it appeared to be a display of 'amicable bilateral ties', but it wasn't so beneath that facade.
In his congratulatory speech, Kim Jong-un seemed to praise Russia's victory, but the remarks were largely centered around his own achievements. Even the North Korean media focused more on their leader than on Putin, saying 'Russia and North Korea are enjoying a new golden age of their friendship ushered in by Kim's remarkable leadership.' In the end, Kim managed to make the event more about himself than Russia.
This is typical of North Korean diplomacy. They speak of 'blood alliance', 'friendship' and 'brother nations', but all they think about is preserving the regime and reinforcing the cult of its leader. The decision not to attend the event fits squarely within this pattern.
North Korea claimed Kim's absence was due to 'security concerns', but it reflects its lack of trust in the diplomatic protocol and security arrangements of its ally.
Russia has a proven track record of successfully ensuring the safety of world leaders at numerous international events. Delegations from 27 countries attended this year's Victory Day parade, with 15 of them holding bilateral talks with Putin through the 10th.
Even amid the Chechenya war and the annexation of the Crimean Peninsula, protocols and security measures to protect high-profile figures were meticulously planned under Putin's leadership. Yet, Kim's refusal to visit Moscow―citing 'security concerns'―reveals the underlying truth of their relationship: while exchanges based on mutual interests persist, mutual trust is absent.
In fact, such an audacious diplomatic behavior is nothing new for Kim Jong-un. A notable example is China's 70th Victory Day parade in 2015. At the time, China invited the leaders of its key allies and friendly nations, including Russia, Central Asia and Southeast Asia, to the Tiananmen Square in Beijing.
Kim was also on the guest list, but he made a specific request: 'to be positioned next to Xi Jinping during the ceremony'. In essence, he demanded a treatment for a supreme leader. Xi, however, rejected the request, instead placing the UN Secretary General and the leaders of countries considered to share a 'blood alliance' with China in the positions closest to him. Displeased by this decision, Kim informed China that he would not attend the event.
North Korea claimed his absence was due to a domestic schedule. In reality, it was because he did not want to risk losing face. This incident―seen as one of the key moments that contributed to the rift between Pyongyang and Beijing―perfectly illustrates how capricious and self-centered the Kim Jong-un regime's diplomacy is. Unless he is the most respected figure at the table, Kim refuses to engage in any diplomatic event. This is precisely why he also declined Putin's invitation to the Victory Day parade.
This highlights the fundamental flaw in Pyongyang's diplomatic strategy. Traditional diplomacy between nations is built on mutual trust, consultation, national interests, and balance. In contrast, Kim's diplomacy is entirely driven by personal reputation and regime survival. His pride and regime stability take precedence over bilateral relations. Despite frequently using phrases like 'blood alliance', 'anti-Western front', and 'autonomous bloc', the reality behind such rhetoric is volatile.
Kim Jong-un's absence from the Victory Day event starkly exposes how self-serving and unreliable his diplomatic conduct is. It also underscores the emptiness of his talk of 'alliances' or 'friendly cooperation'. Even if Russia extends military and economic support, Kim will readily disregard such gestures if they do not directly serve his personal image or regime security.
Moscow should take this incident as an opportunity to reassess its relationship with Pyongyang. In the short term, transactional exchanges―such as military goods, oil and technological support―may continue. However, the foundation for long-term trust appears out of reach. Kim Jong-un's erratic and self-serving diplomatic behavior is likely to pose a serious risk to the future of their bilateral relations.
At the same time, the international community must take a clear-eyed view of the structural flaws in North Korea's diplomacy. Any negotiations or cooperation with North Korea are ultimately contingent on Kim's personal pride. Even nuclear negotiations, economic aid or humanitarian support can be abruptly reversed, depending on his mood or internal political calculus. Kim's absence from the recent event has just exposed the deep nature of how North Korea conducts foreign relations.
In other words, it was not merely a matter of skipping a single event. It was a public snub of Putin's hospitality, a display of duplicity in Kim's dealings with Russia, and a stark reminder of the systemic issues embedded in North Korea's diplomatic approach. It is now imperative for every country and the broader international community to take a hard look at the inherent risk and volatility that North Korea represents, and to begin formulating an effective strategy to manage this challenge.
read more
Analysis- Turkey Has 0 Regional Allies... Why?
Analysis: Russia, Turkey... Libya in Return For Syria?
Analysis: Who Will Gain Trump's Peace Plan Fruits?
Analysis: Will Turkey's Erdogan Resort to Snap Election?
Analysis: What Are Turkey's Aspirations in Iraq?
Opinion & Analysis
Analysis: Mercenaries In Libya... Who Should Be Blamed?
Opinion & Analysis
Analysis- How 'Libya Nightmare' Takes Erdogan to Algiers
Opinion & Analysis
Analysis: What Happens After Brexit?
Opinion & Analysis
Analysis: Strategic Significance of Libya's Sirte, Jufra!
News
Egypt confirms denial of airspace access to US B-52 bombers
News
Ayat Khaddoura's Final Video Captures Bombardment of Beit Lahia
News
Australia Fines Telegram $600,000 Over Terrorism, Child Abuse Content
Arts & Culture
Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban's $4.7M LA Home Burglarized
Sports
Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer
Sports
Neymar Announced for Brazil's Preliminary List for 2026 FIFA World Cup Qualifiers
News
Prime Minister Moustafa Madbouly Inaugurates Two Indian Companies
Arts & Culture
New Archaeological Discovery from 26th Dynasty Uncovered in Karnak Temple
Business
Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War
Arts & Culture
Zahi Hawass: Claims of Columns Beneath the Pyramid of Khafre Are Lies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Egypt Independent
2 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Russia and Ukraine may meet again for peace talks. But neither side gives reason for optimism
CNN — Since last sitting down with Ukraine to talk peace, Russia has launched four of its five largest drone attacks against the country, killed more than 340 of its civilians and continued to peddle its false narrative about the unprovoked war it has been waging for more than a decade. Now, Moscow wants to talk. Again. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said the next round of talks between Russia and Ukraine would take place in Turkey on Monday. On Sunday, Kyiv confirmed that it would be sending a delegation to the meeting, as Russian state media reported that a Russian delegation was flying to Istanbul for the talks. Ukraine also announced on the same day the most ambitious simultaneous strikes on Russian air bases carried out by its forces since the war began, adding an extra layer of uncertainty to the already fragile talks in Turkey. Kyiv says that Russia and Ukraine agreed to exchange their requirements for a ceasefire during their previous meeting in Istanbul last month. But while Kyiv said it presented its plan last week, Russia has not. The Kremlin has so far ignored the call by Ukraine to present the plan. In a post on Telegram on Wednesday, Lavrov said the Russian delegation would present its memorandum to Ukraine at the meeting on June 2. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky said that the Kremlin's failure to hand over its plan was 'another Russian deception' and accused Moscow of not wanting to end the war. 'For a meeting to be meaningful, its agenda must be clear, and the negotiations must be properly prepared,' Zelensky wrote on X on Friday, after hosting Turkey's foreign minister for talks in Kyiv. Zelensky said he'd also discussed the potential second round of peace talks with Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Friday, writing on Telegram: 'We discussed a possible next meeting in Istanbul and under what conditions Ukraine is ready to take part in it. We share the view that this meeting cannot and should not be empty.' In a post on X on Sunday, the Ukrainian leader said that he had requested 'preparation of the (Istanbul) meeting at the highest level' in order to 'establish a reliable and lasting peace and ensure security.' Zelensky added that Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov would lead the delegation again. Emergency workers extinguish flames in the debris of a private house that was destroyed in a Russian rocket strike in Markhalivka, Kyiv region, Ukraine, on May 25. Thomas Peter/Reuters But even though Russian and Ukrainian officials have agreed to meet on Monday, their summit is unlikely to yield any immediate results. Statements made by Russian officials in recent days make it clear that Moscow is sticking to its maximalist demands. Speaking after a phone call with US President Donald Trump on May 19, Russian President Vladimir Putin reiterated his demand that the 'root causes' of the conflict must be eliminated. The 'root causes' include long-held Russian grievances that include the existence of Ukraine as a sovereign state, and NATO's eastward expansion since the end of the Cold War. Kyiv has dismissed these demands, as accepting them would effectively amount to capitulation. A resident stands near buildings damaged by Russian military strikes in the front line town of Myrnohrad, Donetsk region, Ukraine, on Thursday. Anatolii Stepanov/Reuters Show for Trump The talks on Monday may be designed mostly to appease Trump, who has repeatedly told both Ukraine and Russia that there will be consequences if they don't engage in his peace process. Trump has been pressuring Kyiv to talk to Moscow, threatening to walk away from the talks and cut US aid if he concludes that Ukraine isn't cooperating. And while he has threatened 'massive sanctions' against Russia if it doesn't agree with his 30-day ceasefire proposal, he has also voiced concern that potential new sanctions on Russia could jeopardize a deal. On Friday, a bipartisan pair of US senators met with Zelensky in Kyiv. Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut are co-sponsoring a bill to impose more sanctions on Russia – including a 500% tariff on goods imported from countries that buy Russian oil, gas, uranium and other products. It must pass both chambers of Congress and be approved by Trump to become law. Asked by reporters on Friday if he would support the bill, Trump responded: 'I don't know, I'll have to see it. I'll take a look at it.' Putin has not explicitly rejected the ceasefire proposals, choosing instead to delay and distract. Russia's insistence on having the talks and presenting its ceasefire proposal only once the two sides meet is just the latest example of this tactic. Putin initially proposed the first round of the talks in response to the ceasefire-or-sanctions ultimatum given to Moscow by Ukraine's European allies. The Russian president ignored the ultimatum, proposing instead 'direct talks' between Moscow and Kyiv. This prompted Trump, who initially backed the ultimatum, to change his tune and call on Zelensky to 'take the meeting.' Moscow's conduct since the talks last month suggests no desire to end the war with a ceasefire. Rescuers work at a site of a trolleybus depot, hit by a Russian drone strike in Kharkiv, Ukraine, on Friday. Sofiia Gatilova/Reuters Russian forces have intensified airborne attacks against Ukraine in recent weeks, are stepping up ground attacks in many areas along the front line, and Moscow is building up its forces elsewhere. At the same time, Putin ordered one of the largest expansions of the Russian military in recent years. Meanwhile, over the weekend, Ukraine carried out its most ambitious simultaneous strikes on Russian airbases since the war began, using drones to destroy multiple Russian combat planes on Sunday, according to a source in the Ukrainian Security Service (SBU). The Russian Ministry of Defense confirmed Ukraine had targeted Russian airfields across five regions, calling the drone strikes 'terrorist attacks.' The day before, two bridges in western regions of Russia collapsed, killing at least seven people and injuring dozens. It was not clear on Sunday morning whether the two incidents — which both involved trains — in neighboring Bryansk and Kursk were related, or what exactly caused the separate collapses. Investigators from Russia's Investigative Committee were working at the scenes to establish the circumstances of what happened. Expectations were running high ahead of the talks last month, the first direct meeting between Ukraine and Russia since the early days of the full-scale war. This was mostly because of speculation that Putin himself might show up, after being challenged to travel to Turkey by Zelensky. When the Russian leader sent a low-level delegation in his place, it became clear no breakthrough was in sight. Although the two sides agreed to hold the largest ever prisoner exchange during the meeting, there was no sign of a ceasefire agreement being any closer. As for the latest meeting, while it's obvious that neither Moscow nor Kyiv are particularly keen on talking to each other, and have little expectation of actual progress, they are likely to play along just to keep Trump interested.
Egypt Independent
2 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Dutch government collapses as Wilders' far-right party leaves coalition
CNN — The far-right Party for Freedom (PVV) is leaving the Netherlands' government over its policy for asylum-seekers, its leader Geert Wilders said on Tuesday, toppling the governing coalition. 'I signed up for the strictest asylum policy, not for the downfall of the Netherlands,' Wilders told reporters Tuesday morning. 'And our responsibility for this cabinet therefore ends here.' Wilders' decision to withdraw support for the most right-leaning government in Dutch history has plunged the country's politics into chaos. It leaves the government, led by Prime Minister Dick Schoof, with just 51 out of 150 seats in parliament. Prime Minister Dick Schoof called the decision 'unnecessary and irresponsible.' But speaking with reporters after a Tuesday afternoon cabinet meeting, he offered few details on his conversations with Wilders. He said that without the PVV's support, it was impossible for the government to carry on, and that he would remain in office leading a caretaker government until a new coalition takes over. Opposition leaders have called for immediate elections. Polls suggest that, were elections to be held today, the PVV would lose seats but remain the largest party, just ahead of the center-right People's Party for Freedom and Democracy. But that's no guarantee that it would be able to enter a new government. Dutch politics features a constellation of parties, none of which has ever been able to command a majority of Dutch votes. Polls suggest that both center-right and center-left parties would gain from new elections. Wilders' PVV was the clear winner of a November 2023 election. But a coalition accord struck after months of haggling dictated that, while his party would join the government, he would remain on the sidelines, in parliament. Wilders has a long history of anti-Islam and anti-immigrant rhetoric, He was convicted of discrimination after insulting Moroccan immigrants at a 2014 campaign rally, and his party calls for 'no Islamic schools, Qurans, and mosques.' Wilders last week held a rare, formal press conference to present the government with an ultimatum for hardening the country's asylum policy – despite the fact that the minister for asylum and migration is a member of his own party. 'The PVV promised voters the strictest asylum policy ever, aiming to make it the strictest in all of Europe,' Wilders said Tuesday. 'We proposed a plan to close the borders to asylum seekers, to stop them, to send them away. To stop building asylum-seeker centers, to close them.' But the coalition, he said, refused his proposals. 'I could do nothing other than say that we are now withdrawing our support for this cabinet.'
Middle East
3 hours ago
- Middle East
OPEN// FM looks forward to strengthening ties with India
CAIRO, June 3 (MENA) - Minister of Foreign Affairs, Emigration and Expatriates Badr Abdelatty voiced hope to capitalize on the momentum witnessed in relations between Egypt and India in recent years to take tangible steps to enhance cooperation in various fields. This came during a meeting on Tuesday with a high-level parliamentary delegation from India, on the sidelines of the delegation's visit to Cairo. During the meeting, Abdelatty highlighted the importance of activating the strategic partnership agreement between the two countries for the best interests of both sides, said Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Tamim Khalaf. The minister highlighted the importance of utilizing the delegation's visit to Cairo to launch institutionalized cooperation at the parliamentary level between Egypt and India, and to explore new horizons for bilateral collaboration. Meanwhile, the minister expressed Egypt's solidarity with India on the back of the terrorist attack that took place in Pahalgam in Kashmir on April 22, 2025, referring to the phone call that President Abdel Fattah El Sisi made with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi following the incident, as well as the calls that Abdelatty made to his Indian counterpart. This reflects the depth of relations between the two countries as well as Egypt's firm commitment to its humanitarian principles that call for addressing all forms of terrorism. Abdelatty expressed Egypt's concern over the spread of terrorism, which has become one of the most serious security threats facing humanity, highlighting Egypt's adoption of an integrated approach to confronting this phenomenon. He underscored Egypt's accumulated experience in confronting fierce waves of terrorism over the past decades. Abdelatty accentuated Egypt's supportive stand for easing tension between India and Pakistan in order to contribute to security and stability in the South Asian region, noting that Cairo has been following with great concern the developments in the region. He noted that Egypt welcomes the India-Pakistan ceasefire agreement and underlined the importance of settling all protracted issues between the two sides through dialogue and diplomatic channels. (MENA) M N E/R E E
