Pentagon silent, aviation experts baffled by Trump's fighter comments
President Donald Trump's comments Thursday in Qatar about future fighter jets planned for the U.S. military have baffled observers and been met with silence from the Pentagon.
During a roundtable discussion in Doha, Qatar, flanked by the heads of Boeing and GE Aerospace, Trump surprised many in the military aviation world by asserting a twin-engined F-35 successor, which he dubbed the F-55, was in the works.
'The F-35, we're doing an upgrade, a simple upgrade,' Trump said. 'But we're also doing an F-55, I'm going to call it an F-55. And that's going to be a substantial upgrade. But it's going to be also with two engines.'
Trump added that a modernized version of the F-22, which he referred to as 'F-22 Super,' was in the works.
Frank Kendall, the secretary of the Air Force during former President Joe Biden's administration, said in an interview with Defense News that it is unclear what Trump was referring to when he discussed an 'F-22 Super,' but it may have been a reference to the F-47 sixth-generation fighter jet.
The F-47, which was previously referred to as Next Generation Air Dominance, is intended to replace the service's fleet of about 185 F-22 Raptors. The Air Force has worked for years on NGAD, and in March awarded Boeing the contract to build them.
But Trump's F-55 comments came with no additional details, and the government has not provided any further clarity on what he meant.
The Air Force and Navy referred questions about Trump's comments to the White House. A White House spokesperson contacted by Defense News referred questions to another spokesperson, who did not immediately respond.
Lockheed Martin, which makes both the F-35 and F-22, did not address specific questions about Trump's comments but issued a statement that read, 'We thank President Trump for his support of the F-35 and F-22 and will continue to work closely with the administration to realize its vision for air dominance.'
Kendall said it is also unclear what Trump was referring to when he discussed the alleged F-55.
'President Trump appears to have been speculating out loud about future airplanes that, as far as I know, don't exist,' Kendall said.
Aviation expert Richard Aboulafia suggested Trump may be 'trolling' the public with his suggestion of an F-55 fighter jet. When asked whether he could think of anything that might fit Trump's reference to an F-55, Aboulafia said, 'Other than from Revell model kits from a couple decades ago? No.'
The Navy is working on its own sixth-generation fighter, which it refers to as F/A-XX. It is unclear whether Trump's F-55 comments may have been in reference to that.
Trump also disparaged the F-35's single-engine design and suggested that could put the jet at risk if an engine failed.
'An F-35 has a single engine; I don't like single engines,' Trump said, before gesturing to GE Aerospace chief executive Larry Culp. 'Even this man, he's the best in the world at engines. But on occasion, I know you won't admit this, if an engine goes out, it's nice to have two, three or four. That's why I like the 747, it's got four.'
Kendall pointed out that the Air Force now flies about 830 F-16s and 471 F-35As, which have single engines, versus the 185 F-22s and more than 250 F-15s that account for its twin-engined jets.
'The bulk of our fighter fleet is single-engine aircraft, and has been for forever,' Kendall said. 'Those engines are highly reliable.'
The F-35 program, Lockheed Martin and engine maker Pratt & Whitney are working on a variety of improvements to the Joint Strike Fighter, which Trump may have been referring to when he discussed the jets' 'simple upgrade.'
A series of upgrades called Block 4 are intended to improve the F-35's sensors, target recognition and electronic warfare capabilities, and allow it to carry more weapons. Lockheed Martin told reporters earlier this year that it planned to start rolling out some early Block 4 capabilities to the F-35 this summer.
Pratt & Whitney is also working on modernizing the F-35's existing engines with a core upgrade, which is intended to deliver more power, thrust and cooling capability.
Lockheed Martin executives said in an April earnings call they hoped to adapt some sixth-generation technologies, developed as part of their NGAD bid, into the F-35 and F-22. This would create a 'supercharged,' 'fifth generation-plus' jet, Lockheed chief executive Jim Taiclet said, akin to making an F-35 into a 'Ferrari.' Taiclet said this may allow the F-35 to deliver most of the capabilities of an NGAD jet at half the cost.
The intentions behind Trump's comments about upgrading the F-35 and the F-55, and his preference for a dual-engine jet, were unclear. But Aboulafia said that if Trump was advocating for modifying the F-35 with a pair of engines, that would be virtually impossible short of a massive restructuring of the entire jet.
To do that, he said, Lockheed Martin would have to 'rip apart the entire middle of an F-35, [and] replace it with a completely different middle. You should probably get new wings with it … just for stability. … That might be the worst idea ever, but theoretically, sure [it could be done]. It would just be a new aircraft.'
Trump also suggested military aircraft's stealth capabilities are quickly cracked by potential adversaries and rendered obsolete, and he disparaged the aesthetics that result from a low-observability design.
'Sometimes, you know, stealth, they do stealth,' Trump said. 'I'm not a huge believer in stealth, because stealth is basically, a lot of it's the design and the shape. … You're going to design an ugly plane for stealth reasons. And then six months later, they're going to figure out this, and then you're stuck with a plane.'
Trump's new stance on stealth differed from remarks he made during his first administration, when he repeatedly extolled the F-35's stealth capabilities.
'You can't see it,' Trump said in 2017. 'You literally can't see it. It's hard to fight a plane you can't see.'
Top Air Force leaders have not indicated any desire to step away from stealth capabilities. To the contrary, the service has emphasized the need for future combat aircraft to be as undetectable as possible to survive in a potential conflict with China, whose military is nearest in capabilities to the United States.
The upcoming B-21 Raider stealth bomber and F-47 have been designed with advanced stealth capabilities, and the drone wingmen known as collaborative combat aircraft will also use stealth. The Air Force has even considered adding stealth capabilities to a next-generation refueling tanker, to allow it to refuel jets closer to a combat zone, though budget concerns have put those plans in doubt.
The fifth-generation F-22 is also a stealth fighter, which seemed not to have lessened Trump's enthusiasm for its profile.
'I think the most beautiful fighter jet in the world is the F-22,' Trump said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stephen Miller Melts Down as Musk Exits With His Wife and an Attack on Trump
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller spammed social media Tuesday night in a raging display of his unwavering support for President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' as it faced increasing backlash from MAGA figures, including Elon Musk. The Trump loyalist went in hard to sell the 1,038-page document that passed the House by a single vote on May 22. Miller's comments came hours after former DOGE chief Musk attacked the mega-spending bill as the legislation moves to the Senate, labeling it a 'disgusting abomination.' The world's richest man also threatened to 'fire all politicians who betrayed the American people' at next year's midterm elections. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on X. Miller responded by calling Trump's bill 'the most essential piece of legislation... in generations' and 'the most MAGA bill ever passed by the House.' Miller pointedly described those on Trump's side of the argument as the president's 'closest allies.' It is unclear how much personal animus there is between Miller and Musk after the tech billionaire walked out on the administration, taking Miller's wife Katie with him. Katie Miller was hired by DOGE under the same 'special government employee' status as Musk, meaning that she was also time-limited to 130 days in office, but that has done little to quell unsubstantiated internet speculation about Musk and the Millers. She will now reportedly work for Musk full-time. Miller began his own barrage of posts on X, first by claiming Trump's bill would fund increased deportation. '[The bill] will increase by orders of magnitude the scope, scale, and speed of removing illegal and criminal aliens from the United States,' Miller wrote. 'For that reason alone, it's the most essential piece of legislation currently under consideration in the entire Western World, in generations.' 'Now or never,' the 39-year-old wrote in another post. Trump's bill is estimated to increase the budget deficit by approximately $600 billion in the next fiscal year. Miller tried to explain his take on the bill by breaking it down into three sections: 'The most significant border security and deportation effort' in history, a full 'extension and expansion' of Trump's tax cuts and finally cutting almost $2 trillion through 'the largest welcome reform in history.' 'Item 1 alone (border security + deportation),' Miller wrote, 'makes this the most important legislation for the conservative project in the history of the nation.' Critics of Trump's bill fear it would lead to millions of Americans losing health coverage by slashing Medicaid and introducing budget cuts to food assistance programs, with spending on border security and military programs increased. Some Republicans have also expressed fears about the rising cost of the bill, despite a deadline of July 4 to get the measure passed and signed into law. Miller's flurry of posts included him bragging that the bill 'was designed by President Trump and his allies in Congress to deliver on his core campaign pledges to voters and that is exactly what it does. This is the most MAGA bill ever passed by the House, and it's not even close.' 'The bill was designed by President Trump, his loyal aides, and his closest allies in Congress to deliver fully and enthusiastically on the explicit promises he made the American People,' he wrote in another post. Miller also called out GOP Kentucky senator Rand Paul, who told Fox Business his biggest objection to Trump's bill was the addition of '$5 trillion to the debt ceiling' over the next decade. 'Why doesn't Rand ever fight this hard to deport illegals?' Miller asked in a post. Miller clarified Trump's bill would not fund the Department of Education, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, or the Environmental Protection Agency. Experts have, however, warned the bill could ruin student loan borrowers and universities and will have an environmental impact through increased mining and logging of public lands to raise revenue. 'We could have never dreamed of a bill like this in 2017,' Miller posted on X. Miller's loyalty comes as other Republican senators have joined Musk in questioning the contents of Trump's bill. At least four are demanding changes, according to Reuters. They include Sen. Mike Lee and Sen. Ron Johnson. While Republicans have a 53-47 seat majority in the Senate, they cannot afford to lose support. Georgia Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene revealed she had not read a part of the bulky bill that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence systems for a decade. 'Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of (the bill) that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years,' Greene posted on X. 'I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there.' California Republican Jack Kimble was also critical of the bill on Tuesday. He posted on X: 'Full transparency, I did not know that the big beautiful bill was a real budget and would be used to determine spending levels. It seems to me that this is something that should have been made known to those in the House of Representative[s].' When a follower told him 'you're supposed to read the bills before you vote on them' Kimble replied 'Yeah, my bad.' Ron Johnson also agreed with Musk's 'disgusting abomination' comments on the bill. Speaking to NewsNation's The Hill on Tuesday, Johnson said, 'He's telling the truth... that's all I'm doing, too.' 'The trajectory of deficits is up, and no matter what the 'big, beautiful bill' does, it does not address that long-term prospect, it does not bend the deficit curve down. It supports it going up.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said President Trump was already aware of 'where Elon Musk stood on this bill' and that he would not be changing it. 'This is one, big, beautiful bill,' Leavitt said on Tuesday. 'And he's sticking to it.'
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
5 killed, 73 injured in Russian attacks on Ukraine over past day
At least five civilians were killed and 73 others injured in Russian attacks across Ukraine over the past 24 hours, regional authorities reported on June 6. Russia launched 452 drones overnight, including Iranian-designed Shahed-type suicide drones, along with 45 missiles of various types, Ukraine's Air Force reported. Air defenses intercepted 199 drones, while another 169 dropped off radars — likely used as decoys to overwhelm Ukrainian systems. Ukrainian forces also intercepted 36 missiles, including the Iskander-M ballistic missile. The attack was repelled using aviation, electronic warfare units, mobile fire groups, and anti-aircraft missile systems. Kyiv suffered the highest number of fatalities, where at least four civilians were killed and 20 others injured, including 16 hospitalized, according to Mayor Vitali Klitschko. In Volyn Oblast, 15 people were injured. Drones damaged an apartment building, blowing out windows and tearing through its roof, the local State Emergency Service said. Ternopil Oblast saw 10 people injured in strikes on civilian areas, including five members of the State Emergency Service, Governor Vyacheslav Negoda reported. Four people were also wounded in Chernihiv Oblast and multiple homes were damaged by Russian strikes, Governor Viacheslav Chaus reported. In Donetsk Oblast, six residents were injured — two each in Krynytsi, Pokrovsk, and Kostyantynivka — amid continued Russian shelling, Governor Vadym Filashkin said. Kharkiv Oblast reported three injuries following attacks on six settlements across the region, Governor Oleh Syniehubov said. In Kherson Oblast, 10 people were injured after Russian forces shelled residential areas and public infrastructure, according to Governor Oleksandr Prokudin. Poltava Oblast recorded three injuries after missiles hit administrative buildings, commercial warehouses, and a local coffee shop, Governor Volodymyr Kohut said. In Sumy Oblast, two civilians born in 1966 and 1967 were wounded. Russian troops carried out nearly 110 attacks on 47 settlements in the region, local authorities said. Zaporizhzhia Oblast reported one fatality amid ongoing Russian attacks on front-line settlements, Governor Ivan Fedorov said. Read also: UPDATE: Russia hits Ukraine with large-scale attack days after Operation Spiderweb We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stephen Miller Breaks Silence With ‘Pork' Prod at Elon Musk
Stephen Miller has broken his silence after Elon Musk turned on his billionaire bestie, Donald Trump. The deputy chief of staff, usually a prolific social media poster, had been silent for hours online after the volcanic fall out between the two men, despite social media erupting with Musk's bombshell allegations including a claim that the president was named in the Jeffrey Epstein files. It comes as Miller's wife, Katie, followed Elon Musk out of the White House and DOGE duties last month, reportedly for a new job working with the tech billionaire. While Miller did not tag Musk or mention any of the billionaire's personal claims about Trump in a belated Thursday night post, he instead took a jab by referencing a comment made by the 53-year-old earlier this week. 'The only 'new' spending in the bill is to defend the homeland and deport the illegals—paid for by raising visa fees. All the other provisions? Massive spending cuts. There is no 'pork' in the bill. Just campaign promises," Miller wrote. Miller was quoting a pointed comment made by Musk which claimed Trump's bill is a 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill,' adding it 'is a disgusting abomination.' The Trump confidante followed the veiled comment with another late-night post that read, 'Still trying to figure out what the objection is to a bill that combines record tax cuts with record spending cuts with record deportations.' Miller's relative silence on the issue was in stark contract with his flurry of posts throughout the week as the Musk and Trump drama boiled over, and the Trump adviser went on a posting spree in an attempt to save the bill's reputation. Miller also pulled out on a scheduled appearance on Larry Kudlow's Fox News show on Thursday afternoon, with the host apologizing for him. 'We lost Mr Miller to a meeting in the Oval Office,' Kudlow said. 'Perfectly understandable, when I was in government it would happen all the time, you'd have to kill a TV show, you're at the president's beck and call.' Miller then appeared in a White House discussion alongside Senior White House officials Taylor Budowich, Russ Vought and James Braid discuss Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' The half-hour YouTube video was posted Thursday night, with Miller the first to speak. 'The most important thing in politics in American is honoring the promises you make to the American people, the sacred trust between the voter and the man they elect, in this case the president of the United States,' Miller said, noting the president made numerous promises on the campaign trail that 'are codified in this legislation.' Miller reposted numerous videos uploaded from the discussion to X by the White House's Rapid Response team. Musk earlier unfollowed Miller's account on X on Thursday, in an unfollowing spree that also included right-wing media personality Charlie Kirk. Appearing on Kirk's podcast on Thursday, Kirk said to Miller, 'I want you to say again that this would be one of the greatest legislative accomplishments in Republican party history.' Miller began the interview by telling Kirk, 'You've been such a critical element of the success of the MAGA movement. I hope your audience appreciates how much we appreciate you.' The interview descended into both men talking up the 'big beautiful bill.' 'If Ronald Reagan had just done no tax on tips, they'd still be giving speeches today about it at the Reagan Library,' Miller claimed. 'There'd be whole statues, there'd be museum displays, they'd have entire industries built off just telling the story of when Reagan did no tax on tips. Isn't that right Charlie?" The 30-minute discussion did not mention Elon Musk calling the bill a 'disgusting abomination' or his wife Katie's employment status. Miller did say he was 'optimistic' the bill would be passed 'because I have faith in the power of the Trump voter.'