New York City mayoral candidate Brad Lander arrested by Ice agents
Brad Lander, New York City's comptroller and a mayoral candidate, was arrested on Tuesday by masked federal agents while visiting an immigration court and accompanying a person out of a courtroom.
In a statement to the Guardian, assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin from the Department of Homeland Security said Lander 'was arrested for assaulting law enforcement and impeding a federal officer'.
Upon his release, Lander said he 'certainly did not' assault an officer.
Lander appeared at 26 Federal Plaza to observe immigration hearings involving individuals marked for potential deportation.
He told an Associated Press reporter that he was there to 'accompany' some immigrants out of the building. Tuesday's trip to an immigration court was Lander's third over the last month.
He was arrested, according to video footage of the incident, as he and his staff walked with an immigrant – who Lander later identified as 'Edgardo' – who had their case dismissed pending appeal earlier in the day, per AMNY.
Lander can be seen and heard in videos of the incident asking the immigration officials if they have a judicial warrant. Additional footage of the arrest shows Lander telling the officials: 'I'm not obstructing. I'm standing right here in the hallway. I asked to see the judicial warrant.
Lander appears to be holding on to Edgardo's shoulder as the officials move him towards an elevator.
'I will let go when you show me the judicial warrant,' says Lander. The officials, two of whom were wearing masks, then pinned Lander to a wall and put him in handcuffs.
'You don't have the authority to arrest US citizens asking for a judicial warrant,' Lander can be heard saying.
Immigration lawyers told the New York Times that officials do not need judicial warrants to make arrests in immigration courts because they are public spaces.
Lander's wife posted an update on her husband's Twitter/X account less than an hour after the incident.
'Hi, this is Meg Barnette, Brad's wife,' she wrote, adding: 'While escorting a defendant out of immigration court at 26 Federal Plaza, Brad was taken by masked agents and detained by ICE. This is still developing, and our team is monitoring the situation closely.'
In a news conference after the arrest, Barnette said she was 'extraordinarily proud' of her husband and called the ordeal 'shocking and unacceptable'.
Masked agents from several federal agencies were seen lining the halls of 26 Federal Plaza on Tuesday morning, including Ice, Enforcement and Removal Operations, the FBI and the treasury department, according to reporters on the scene from the City.
Video and news of the arrest made the rounds on social media.
Zohran Mamdani, a mayoral candidate who also cross-endorsed Lander, called out the arrest on X: 'This is fascism and all New Yorkers must speak in one voice. Release him now.'
Julia Salazar, a New York state senator, called the arrest 'more evidence that Ice agents are flagrantly breaking the law'.
'[Lander] knows his rights, and he was speaking up for the rights of others. Ice agents responded by unlawfully arresting him and refusing to answer basic questions,' she said.
Andrew Cuomo, former New York governor and Lander's mayoral opponent, wrote on X that the arrest is 'the latest example of the extreme thuggery of Trump's ICE out of control – one can only imagine the fear families across our country feel when confronted with ICE. Fear of separation, fear of being taken from their schools, fear of being detained without just cause. This is not who we are. This must stop, and it must stop now.'
Mamdani also appeared at the aforementioned pop-up press conference that Barnette spoke at, telling the crowd: 'We have to be clear that, in [Lander's] ask and in their response, we saw that Ice has no interest in the law, it has no interest in order.
'[Ice] only has an interest in terrorizing people across this country. In this exact moment, New Yorkers and Americans are looking to leaders to meet this moment, to showcase the courage that is necessary,' he said, before adding:
'This is not about an election. This is about ensuring that we protect the city and the country that we love. This is about ensuring that immigrant New Yorkers who come here for regular check-ins do not need to fear being separated from their families in the most brutal and cruel ways imaginable. We know that today's arrest is but one example of what Ice is doing every single day across this country.'
A demonstration broke out outside 26 Federal Plaza on Tuesday afternoon, with a crowd of supporters shouting 'free Brad Lander'.
Protesters held up placards saying 'fascist minion' and 'immigrants are New York' while surrounded by a tight cordon of police and metal barricades. Public entry to the building was closed despite it being a public building.
New York's governor, Kathy Hochul, called the arrest 'bullshit' on social media and to reporters. She later said in a news conference that the charges against Lander had been dropped late on Tuesday afternoon.
'To my knowledge, there are no charges. The charges have been dropped. He walked out of there a free man,' she said.
Upon his release, Lander said at the same news conference that he was 'just fine' and only 'lost a button'. He went on to add that this was not the case for Edgardo, the man who'se arrest he was challenging.
'Edgardo is in Ice detention and he's not going to sleep in his bed tonight. So far as I know, he has no lawyer. He has been stripped of his due process rights,' Lander said, later adding: 'We are normalizing family separation. We are normalizing due process rights violations. We are normalizing the destruction of constitutional democracy, and we're not going to stand by and let it happen.'
Lander's arrest comes as federal immigration officials continue to make arrests outside immigration courtrooms across the US. As the Guardian reported on Sunday, between early January, right before the inauguration, and June, there has been an 807% increase in the arrest of immigrants with no criminal record.
The arrest also bore similarities to that of Alex Padilla, a Democratic California senator and vocal critic of the Trump administration's immigration polices, who was forcibly removed and handcuffed as he attempted to ask a question at a press conference held by Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, in Los Angeles last week.
Much like the criticism of Lander's arrest, Padilla's arrest was widely lambasted, with Kamala Harris, the former vice-president, calling the incident 'a shameful and stunning abuse of power'.
Lander's arrest was also just one week before the Democratic primary for mayor. His opponents include Cuomo, Mamdani, Adrienne Adams, Scott Stringer, Michael Blake and others. Along with Mamdani, Hochul, Stringer, Blake and Adams showed up to support Lander at the site where he was arrested.
Hochul was later seen inside 26 Federal Plaza seeking answers from Ice about the arrest.
'How long is this going to take, I don't think he has a long rap sheet,' she reportedly said to agents.
Ed Pilkington contributed reporting
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
32 minutes ago
- Axios
Handcuffed Democrats become symbol of Trump's crackdown on dissent
A string of Democratic officials' arrests and clashes involving federal agents has sent a message about the way the administration responds to dissent: with force, or the threat of it. The big picture: Critics say the Tuesday arrest of New York City comptroller Brad Lander was the latest example of the administration backing force in the face of immigration-related dissent. The Department of Homeland Security said Lander was arrested for assaulting law enforcement and impeding a federal officer, though Gov. Kathy Hochul said it was her understanding any charges against him had been dropped. But Raha Wala, the Vice President of Strategy and Partnerships at the National Immigration Law Center, said it was one moment "in a series of absurd overreactions to the very simple notion that people should have their day in court." Driving the news: Images of Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) and Lander being handcuffed and Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) facing a federal indictment crystalized burgeoning fears among Democrats about Trump's willingness to sidestep norms to crush dissent. Padilla's forceful removal from Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's press conference earlier this month was kerosene on escalating tensions over Trump's federalization of the National Guard in response to the Los Angeles protests without the state's consent. American Oversight Executive Director Chioma Chukwu said the administration's movement of troops "absolutely is an abuse of power." Friction point: The jarring images of Democrats' detainments and removals correspond to what Wala said is "an even more jarring reality." He argues the administration is pursuing an "unprecedented authoritarian playbook ... on the backs of immigrant communities." Wala sees a "completely unprecedented and un-American assault on basic due process rights" that has started "in the immigration context but ... won't end there." The other side: White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson questioned in a statement to Axios why "so many Democrat officials feel emboldened to brazenly break the law and ... complain when they are held accountable." She said Democrats who have been removed or arrested are "disingenuously characterizing their behavior with the help of the Fake News media." What they're saying: "The disturbing incident in Los Angeles reflects this administration's alarming tendency to use federal officers to squelch dissenting voices," writes Kareem Crayton, vice president of the Brennan Center for Justice's Washington, D.C. office. "An unabashed government stamping out dissent through force ignores the commitment to unfettered political discourse that defines American law and traditions," he wrote. Zoom out: A common issue area threads the arrests, removals and protests: the administration's aggressive deportation tactics. In Lander's case, he was arrested while attempting escort a defendant out of immigration court, as Immigration and Customs Enforcement has surged courthouse arrests. Similarly, Baraka's arrest came during a conflict at an ICE detention center in May that also involved three House Democrats. While the trespassing charge Baraka faced was dropped, Rep. LaMonica McIver was later charged with assaulting, impeding and interfering with law enforcement. She plans to plead not guilty. And Trump earlier this month suggested Gov. Gavin Newsom should be next. Newsom, in response, characterized Trump's comment as "an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism."
New York Post
39 minutes ago
- New York Post
Subway crime starts at the turnstile — and every Democrat fails the test
Pro-crime Democrats are propelling New York toward anarchy and financial ruin by refusing to grapple with the city's most prevalent crime. All the candidates vying for the Democratic nomination for Gotham's mayor — including front-runners Andrew Cuomo and Zohrab Mamdani — unanimously oppose increasing penalties for farebeaters. Their soft-on-crime positions make them unfit for the city's top job. These pols do not regard law-abiding New Yorkers as their constituents. Instead they're siding with criminals and left-wing ideologues who excuse crime as a side effect of society's imperfections. Stopping farebeating keeps dangerous criminals out of the subway system, explains former NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly. 'In previous administrations, proactive fare evasion enforcement has been a powerful tool in reducing overall subway crime,' Kelly told me. Thieves and assailants don't swipe a card to get onto the train before they prey on innocent riders. Their first lawless act is jumping the turnstile. And many have rap sheets. Arrests are infrequent, but 45% of those arrested for farebeating in 2023 were already wanted for other crimes — and about 10% of them were carrying weapons. Clearly, consistent farebeating enforcement would keep thugs out of the subways. A crackdown would also fill the MTA's empty coffers, eliminating the financial rationale for congestion pricing. Some 14% of subway riders and nearly half of bus riders don't pay the fare, adding up to an annual $800 million shortfall in MTA revenue. Gov. Kathy Hochul's congestion-tax scheme is one way to offset those yearly losses — but it's a gut punch to law-abiding people driving into Manhattan who work for a living. 'If you let the police do their job' against turnstile jumpers, President Donald Trump reminded Hochul when they met at the White House in February, congestion-pricing revenue isn't needed. 'The way it is now,' the president told her, 'you feel like a sucker if you pay the fare.' New York state law makes farebeating a Class A misdemeanor, allowing police officers to issue criminal summonses or to arrest offenders. But arrests are rare, and the city's district attorneys almost never prosecute. In January, MTA head Janno Lieber called on Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, Brooklyn DA Eric Gonzalez and Bronx DA Darcelle Clark to change course and prosecute persistent fare dodgers. Lieber calls fare evasion 'the No.1 existential threat' to safety and order underground. The Citizens Budget Commission, an esteemed government watchdog group, also called for more prosecutions this spring. Good luck with that. Democrats have been moving in the opposite direction for years. In 2017 Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance announced he would stop prosecuting fare evasion. Other boroughs' DAs followed. From 2019 to 2024, fare evasion roughly doubled, according to MTA data. And no surprise, violent subway felonies rose 14% during the same time period. A year ago, Hochul eliminated the $100 civil fine for first-time fare-dodgers as part of the state budget she proposed and signed. What's her logic — that it's OK to steal the first time? Worse, a bill proposed in the Legislature by state Sen. Cordell Cleare of Harlem would wipe criminal penalties for farebeating off the books entirely. Decriminalization is crazy. 'Civil summonses have proven not to be a deterrent,' Kelly says. And DAs' long-running refusal to go after farebeaters distorts the law, Kelly adds. 'District attorney discretion was never meant to allow refusal to prosecute an entire category of crime such as fare evasion,' he notes. Across the five boroughs, New Yorkers live in many different circumstances, but the subway is everybody's neighborhood. Prosecuting farebeaters should be a litmus test for every candidate — and Democrats are failing the test. Voters need to consider other candidates. Mayor Eric Adams, running as an independent, says he wants tougher enforcement. 'If we start saying it's all right for you to jump the turnstile, we are creating an environment where any and everything goes,' he warned in 2022. But since then, he's lacked the political capital to get much done. Curtis Sliwa, the Republican mayoral candidate, also calls for 'aggressive enforcement' in his platform. And we should look beyond the mayor's race to seek out common-sense candidates throughout city government Richie Barsamian, a former cop running for a Brooklyn City Council seat as a Republican and Conservative, cautions that tolerating fare evasion 'opens the window to normalizing crime.' He's right — normalizing crime is at the core of the Democrats' agenda. They tolerate lawlessness and philosophize about crime's 'root causes.' New Yorkers can't wait for society to fix root causes. They need safety now. When it comes to subway crime, that means electing leaders who will crack down on farebeaters. Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York and co-founder of the Committee to Save Our City.
Fox News
40 minutes ago
- Fox News
Supreme Court ruling on trans treatments for minors decried by media as 'huge setback for transgender rights'
The legacy media was united in its disapproval of the Supreme Court's landmark ruling upholding Tennessee's ban on transgender medical treatment for minors. In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court struck down a challenge to a Tennessee law restricting access to puberty blockers and hormone treatment to children who identify as the opposite sex. Several news organizations framed the ruling negatively and implied it was a "setback for transgender rights" for all ages, despite the decision affecting only minors. The result was also described as a "major blow," a "devastating loss," and a "stunning setback." "BREAKING: The Supreme Court upholds a Tennessee ban on gender-affirming care for transgender minors in a huge setback for transgender rights," the Associated Press reported on X Wednesday. "BREAKING: Supreme Court upholds a Tennessee law restricting gender transition care for minors, delivering a major blow to transgender rights," NBC News similarly posted. "The US Supreme Court backed a Republican-backed ban in Tennessee on gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors, in a setback for transgender rights that could bolster efforts by states to defend other measures targeting transgender people," Reuters wrote. "The Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for transgender minors, a stunning setback to transgender rights," The Boston Globe also posted. While the Tennessee law was passed in 2023 and Supreme Court oral arguments were heard in December, some news outlets tied the ruling negatively to President Donald Trump's policies. Newsweek warned in its headline that the ruling was a "major setback for transgender rights," telling readers the decision "effectively protects from legal challenges many efforts by President Donald Trump's Republican administration and state governments to roll back protections for transgender people." The Washington Post described the 6-3 ruling as a "divided Supreme Court" and called the broader trans debate "a polarizing national issue the Trump administration has seized on in initiatives targeting transgender rights." NPR said the decision "plunged the Supreme Court into yet another culture war feud." The New York Times attempted to equate the ruling on trans-identifying minors to the Supreme Court's 2020 decision giving gay and transgender adults civil rights protections from employers under Title VII. "The decision, which came amid the Trump administration's fierce assaults on transgender rights, was a bitter setback for their proponents, who only five years ago celebrated a decision by the court to protect transgender people from workplace discrimination," the Times wrote. CNN went even further, decrying the ruling coming at a "critical time" for the transgender community. "The 6-3 decision by a conservative majority is a major blow to the transgender community and its advocates at a critical time," CNN wrote. "Since 2020, Republican-led states around the country have passed a wave of laws regulating the lives of trans Americans, with a particular focus on minors." "And President Donald Trump, who ran for reelection in part on ending the 'transgender lunacy,' has taken several steps intended to roll back gains made by that community," CNN continued. The Guardian called the ruling "a devastating loss for trans rights supporters in a case that could set a precedent for dozens of other lawsuits involving the rights of transgender children." CNN political director David Chalian said Republicans will use the ongoing transgender debate ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, but stressed there will be a "real human impact" on American families. "We're going to learn what the human impact is of this court decision among families across the country, but in the politics of it, I think the two things to watch are how Republicans will sort of hit the gas on this issue, what they believe is a winning culture war issue for them, and watch how Democrats, especially those considering a 2028 presidential campaign, respond to this court ruling. Have they learned to message around this issue in a way that's more politically palatable than what Kamala Harris was able to do back in 24," Chalian said on the channel. An MSNBC panel sounded the alarm about the "slippery slope" that could put transgender kids at risk as a result of the ruling. "Any transgender minor is now at risk because states are copycats. They see now that Tennessee has been successful, and so they're going to implement laws that copy the language here," MSNBC legal analyst Barbara McQuade said. "So I think if you are a family today with a transgender child, your child is likely at risk if you live in a state that is hostile to transgender Americans."
