Exactly how much you'll pay to use phone abroad this summer from O2 to Vodafone
Most of the major mobile networks have reintroduced roaming fees following Brexit - and we've rounded up all the fees from O2, Vodafone, Voxi, EE, Sky and more
If you're planning your summer holiday, you may want to take note of how much you could potentially be charged to use your phone abroad.
Most of the major mobile networks have reintroduced roaming fees following Brexit. Before this, you could use your existing call, text and data allowances in Europe at no extra cost.
New rules that were introduced last October mean that mobile providers must now notify customers when they start roaming while abroad. They will also have to notify customers of any "fair use" limits that apply to their phone package.
"Fair use" caps the amount of your UK data allowance you can use while roaming in Europe. We've rounded up how much it will cost you to roam in Europe this summer...
EU roaming costs by mobile provider
EE: £2.59 a day for contract customers. £2.50 a day, or £10 for seven days, if you are pay-as-you-go. EE has a 50GB "fair use" limit.
Three: £2 a day for contract customers. You can buy a three-day pass for £5, a seven-day pass for £12, or a 14-day pass for £24. You can also buy a Data Passport for £5 for unlimited data in 89 countries. No charge for pay-as-you-go. Three has a 12GB "fair use" limit.
Vodafone: £2.42 a day if you're on contract. You can buy a European Roaming pass for £12 for 8 days or £17 for 15 days. £9 for 3GB for eight days if you're pay-as-you-go. Vodafone has a 25GB "fair use" limit.
Sky: £2 a day. No "fair use" limit.
Voxi: £2.45 a day for one day. You can buy a pass for £4.50 for two days, £12 for eight days, or £17 for 15 days. Voxi has a 20GB "fair use" limit.
O2: No roaming fees. O2 has a 25GB "fair use" limit.
GiffGaff: No roaming fees. GiffGaff has a 5GB "fair use" limit.
Tesco Mobile: No roaming fees until 2026.
How to cut your mobile bill
The first thing you should do, is use a comparison website to see what other deals are available elsewhere. Take a look at how many minutes, texts and how much data you currently use, so you can find similar plans that suit your needs.
You may find you're actually paying too much right now for allowances you're not using. If you've found a cheaper deal, you can switch to this if you're out of contract. Alternatively, you may want to haggle down your current provider.
When haggling, explain the better deals you've seen elsewhere then ask if the company can match or beat that price. The best time to do this is normally when you're near the end of your existing contract, or when a price rise has been announced.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
19 hours ago
- Telegraph
British holidaymakers to miss out on compensation after EU rule change
Britons will miss out on compensation for delayed flights after Brussels adopted a rule change following complaints from airlines. Payouts that were previously triggered by delays exceeding three hours will now only be made after four hours of holdups, European transport ministers agreed. The new regulation, hammered out following a decade of discussions and bargaining over passenger compensation, will apply to all services from EU countries to the UK. For the time being, travellers headed from Britain to the Continent will still qualify for a refund when flight delays hit the three-hour mark, unless they are flying with an EU-registered airline. While raising the compensation threshold, ministers also agreed to increase the minimum level of payment from €250 (£210) to €300 for shorter journeys and to €500 for those above 3,500km (2,175 miles). The original regulation, known as EU261, was passed in 2004 with the aim of ensuring that passengers received money and assistance in the event of flights being cancelled at short notice. Following Brexit, the UK adopted it into law so that the rights of travellers remained unchanged. However, the Government will now have to decide whether to adopt the amendments for outbound flights or stick with the original version. Taking no action might be welcomed by consumer groups but would have consequences for UK airlines, which would be at a disadvantage to their European rivals. It could also affect fares, with Ryanair having claimed that EU261 costs passengers £7 per ticket. Airlines for Europe, an industry group, had pressed for a higher compensation threshold, arguing that extending it to five hours – as originally proposed by the European Commission – would allow 70pc of flights that are cancelled to be rescued. It argued said that airlines inevitably scrapped flights once compensation was triggered, especially since the payouts involved were often higher than the ticket prices charged. It said a five-hour threshold would have made it more practical for carriers to fly in replacement aircraft so that more flights would get away, potentially benefiting 10m passengers a year. A spokesman said: 'Getting to their destination is the primary concern of passengers, even if it means getting to bed or arriving at their holiday resort late. But with a low cancellation threshold it makes more sense to call off the flight and take that hit.' Airlines have also railed against the fact that the compensation applies whether delays are caused by a crew shortage or technical issue that might be laid at their door, or by severe weather or air traffic control issues beyond their control. A number of extraordinary circumstances are expected to be added as part of revisions to 31 different air passenger rights. The revisions must still clear the European Parliament but are expected to become law in the bloc by the end of the year. The Department for Transport said the UK did not have to amend its legislation in line with any changes from the EU, and that any potential future reforms would require careful consideration on their merits, and be subject to public consultation.
The Independent
2 days ago
- The Independent
Quicker queues at EU passport checks? Simon Calder's assessment of claims that millions of Brits will win access to e-gates
British travellers to Europe have never had it so good: that is the narrative from the government ever since the UK-EU 'reset'. Ministers from Sir Kier Starmer downwards have been happy for holidaymakers to infer that they will have a better experience at European Union borders this summer – and that the UK government deserves credit for improving our travelling lives. Much of that optimism is based on British citizens being able use passport e-gates. But what is the reality? Some background: after the 2016 decision to leave the European Union, Boris Johnson's government negotiated for the 'Venezuela outcome' as far as British travellers are concerned. We chose to became 'third-country nationals' – a designation proudly shared with many others, including Venezuelans. The practical consequences for British holidaymakers crossing borders were clear, because the UK helped create the European rules. Previously only one check was necessary when travelling between the UK and the Schengen area (the rest of the EU minus Ireland, plus Iceland, Norway and Switzerland): that the passport was valid and that it belonged to the holder. E-gates are brilliant at this. They compare the information encoded in a passport with the traveller's face to verify that the document belongs to that individual. They are also linked to a central database to confirm the document's validity. The post-Brexit changes that the UK requested, and to which Brussels agreed, include: Having our passports stamped on the way in and out of Europe Giving up access to the fast track for citizens of the EU and wider Schengen area Having border guards check we have not outstayed our 90-day welcome Each individual border transaction therefore takes much more time, leading to extremely long queues if border resources are thin. The most recent half-term was miserable for thousands of families, whether flying in to the Spanish island of Tenerife or flying out of Faro in Portugal. New arrivals and homeward-bound passengers experienced two-hour waits at times. This was gruelling for new arrivals – and expensive for some departing travellers, who missed their flights despite having arrived in good time at the airport. Faro airport, at least, will improve – with British travellers now able to use e-gates. But that is only part of the story. These are the key UK government claims, and my assessment of each. 'Millions more Brits arriving in the Algarve are set to benefit from e-gates ahead of the summer holidays' Source: Cabinet Office press release. Assessment: Configuring e-gates at the Portuguese airport to connect to UK government systems will speed things up a bit for many British passengers. Border staff will no longer need to verify the traveller's identity. All good, then? Not quite. Families with young children will still need to queue to see an official. And after passing through the e-gate, every British passport must be stamped by a human border guard. In theory he or she should also check that the traveller has not been in the Schengen area for more than 90 days out of the past 180 days. The claims for Faro airport get increasingly ambitious: '[E-gate access] will speed up journeys for the approximately 10 million British travellers who use the airport each year' Source: Prime minister 's official spokesperson. Assessment: Complete tosh. Around 2.5 million UK citizens visit Portugal in a typical year. Counting flying in and out, that is 5 million border crossings – covering Lisbon, Porto and Madeira airports as well as Faro, plus those who arrive by land and sea. But let us generously assume that half of those British visitors are using Faro airport. That is still one-quarter of the figure given by No 10. I have told the Cabinet Office this, and asked to see its working. Now let us look at some wider assertions … 'British holidaymakers will be able to use more e-gates in Europe, ending the dreaded queues at border control' Source: Government announcement. Assessment: The first part of this claim is demonstrably true. Besides Faro allowing UK visitors to go through e-gates, many other European authorities are moving in that direction because, as mentioned, it is an extremely efficient way of handling part of the border bureaucracy. Each EU nation makes its own decisions on how to operate its borders. Some are choosing to introduce e-gates for third-country nationals in order to accelerate the arrival and departure process. The second part of the assertion is fanciful. While 'dreaded' is not quantified, it is reasonable to say anything longer than a half-an-hour is unwelcome. There will doubtless be squeezes in arrivals halls over the summer that result in hour-long queues. At Tenerife South airport, at times in summer nine inbound flights from the UK are scheduled within a single half-hour. If they keep to schedule, there will be a sudden influx of over 1,600 people – the vast majority of whom have British, rather than EU, passports. Resourcing to allow swift processing for peaks such as that would be unreasonably expensive for border authorities. 'The Prime Minister has been clear that there should be no reason why European countries cannot go further and faster on this now' Source: Foreign Office minister Baroness Chapman of Darlington, speaking in the House of Lords. That's a big claim. European countries may well have good reasons for not going 'further and faster' on rolling out e-gates for British holidaymakers. They may wish to commit money and effort to things that will benefit their citizens, rather than helping the UK clear up one of the many messes brought about by the British decision to leave the EU.
Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Ofcom says these mobile networks offer the best service – we compared the prices
Ofcom's annual report into customer service reveals the networks that offer the most satisfaction – and it's not who you think The mobile phone has become part of daily life, but sitting with your existing supplier and putting up with the pain doesn't have to be part of the deal. Ofcom has just released the results of its satisfaction survey, revealing the best mobile networks for shoppers who want a smooth experience. Published annually, the report examines overall service, perception of signal strength, how satisfied customers are with value for money, as well as how often complaints pop up and how will they are handled. None of the major networks top the charts, suggesting they all have work to do to satisfy customers. According to Ofcom, GiffGaff and Tesco Mobile offer the highest level of satisfaction of all the suppliers tested. These two beat Vodafone, EE, O2 and Three, despite both running on the O2 network. A big part of the equation is the perception of value for money. Here, Tesco Mobile tops the charts thanks to its competitive prices, while GiffGaff comes just behind. Tesco Mobile offers a 30GB SIM-only tariff for £12.99 a month (or £10.50 with a Clubcard); GiffGaff will give you 50GB of data for £12 a month SIM only. Perception of value is where Vodafone and O2 struggle, regardless of whether they are actually good value for money or not. Vodafone's 30GB Red plan is £19 a month (and that's currently discounted), while O2 is offering 50GB data for £15 a month, so it's easy to see why GiffGaff and Tesco Mobile networks feel cheaper – because they are. However, customers on O2 expressed that they weren't happy with the signal strength, while both GiffGaff and Tesco Mobile customers were satisfied, despite all these suppliers running on the same 5G network. That might suggest that savvy shoppers choosing GiffGaff or Tesco Mobile have lower demands, or that O2 customers expect more, because it's a larger network. If you are interested in an O2 plan, then you can shop the network's deals here. Of the big networks, the Ofcom report highlights that Three customers aren't happy with how complaints are handled, highlighting that Three might want to look at its customer service provision, while O2 is highlighted as having the longest waiting time to have a call answered by the supplier. The results are clear, while most customers are satisfied with their mobile phone network overall, those with Tesco Mobile and GiffGaff have more to be happy about, being the most satisfied shoppers overall. Is it time you switched? If you've been on your current tariff for a long time, then you could save money and get a better experience if you switch networks. While some of the larger networks offer more bundles and incentives, like a discounted Disney+ subscription for example, cash remains king and taking the data you need at the price that's right is still the smart thing to do. Switching networks is incredibly easy, especially if you're keeping your handset and just getting a new SIM. As long as you're out of your current contract, you can move supplier quickly and easily. All you have to do is text PAC to 65075, and you'll receive a switching code. You then give the PAC code to your new supplier and the switch should be completed within one day. It's that simple – so if you're still spending money on a bad experience then shop around and switch.
