
Digested week: Caroline Kennedy swoops on RFK Jr with talons out
'Trying not to upset the French' could be a chapter in a Debrett's guide to etiquette and manners, one that may have been taken to heart by the government this week with its decision to change the name of a new submarine. The Astute-class attack vessel is still being built, but on Sunday night, the Royal Navy announced that what was to become HMS Agincourt would, instead, be given the more Franco-friendly name of HMS Achilles. Up pops Grant Shapps, the former Conservative defence secretary, to dust off his opportunism and accuse the navy of bending to Labourite 'woke nonsense'. It's just like riding a bike!
The naming of ships in this country is famously fraught after the saga of Boaty McBoatface, one of those jokes that was supposed to advertise the country's jaunty irreverence and ended up being flogged into tiresome half wittedness. But back to the submarine formerly known as Agincourt. The government insists the vessel hasn't been renamed because it might make the French feel bad, but rather to pay tribute to a previous ship of the same name that received 'battle honours' during the second world war.
This would be more credible if Achilles had been the first idea out of the gate and not the substitution for a name that honoured the defeat of the French by Henry V at Agincourt in 1415. Times Radio, meanwhile, managed to whistle up an angry former Royal Navy commander, Chris Parry, who had the courtesy to deliver exactly what they were looking for and call the renaming a 'craven and contemptible surrender to ideology being pushed by the government'. We must be grateful no one put in a call to the British Legion. (The Daily Express probably did. I can't bring myself to look.)
It was Kennedy v Kennedy in the US Senate this week at the confirmation hearing for the presumptive health secretary and anti-vaxxer, Robert F Kennedy Jr. The son of RFK came up against perhaps the only person in the US with greater surname capital than his own – Caroline Kennedy, the daughter of JFK, which makes her assuredly an outranking FK – who released a video in which she read out a statement enumerating all the ways in which her first cousin was a terrible person who was unfit for office.
Caroline Kennedy wasn't messing around. Like a playful assassin, she opened gently, referring to RFK Jnr as 'Bobby' and contextualising him fondly as one of 'a close generation of 28 cousins who have been through a lot together'. That tone soon evaporated. Bobby, said Caroline, was 'dangerous and wilfully misinformed' on vaccines, lacking in any relevant medical or government experience, and wholly unsuited to the job of health secretary. And this was just the warm up.
Reminding us that the Kennedys didn't accumulate their wealth and influence via charm alone, Caroline then flatly informed the Senate panel and the American public that her cousin was a 'predator' who, 'no surprise', keeps birds of prey and – who saw this detail coming? – once 'put baby chickens and mice in a blender to feed his hawks'. We look forward to the Republican-run Senate confirming RFK Jr to take his rightful place alongside Kristi Noem, the freshly confirmed homeland security secretary, who admitted in her recent memoir to having shot her dog.
To the theatre, to see the acclaimed adaptation of Annie Ernaux's book of auto-fiction, The Years. The five women in the cast are fantastic, the staging is perfect, and – bonus drama – the 'graphic scenes' of abortion that have been knocking out audience members intermittently since the play opened, caused someone in the audience to faint. The show stopped for 10 minutes.
As the action resumed, I found myself wondering if it was a man or a woman who'd keeled over. The scene was graphic to the extent that fake blood poured down the character's legs and the dialogue painted an even grimmer and more upsetting picture. Still – and sorry to be gross – the experience of having your bathroom turning into a scene from Straw Dogs is pretty familiar to most women I know, especially if they're approaching menopause. I assume it was a man who passed out.
Anyway on with the play, in which there were cigarettes and existentialism and of course, blood, very much in line with the French idea of womanhood as hard work and less aligned perhaps with the British fondness for defensive flippancy. As we left the theatre, an older British lady in front of us laughed and remarked to her companion: 'I think we'll need some ice-cream after that.' Well said, madam.
Menopausal ladies are big business at the moment. After Davina McCall's and Jen Gunter's bestselling menopause books, comes Dare I Say It, a menopause memoir by movie star Naomi Watts, and a new 'viral' menopause workout by Jennifer Aniston.
Aniston's partnership with a fitness brand called Pvolve – no, I don't get it, either – offers a rigorous programme of low-impact exercise designed for middle-aged women. Fine, lovely, it's nice to see a historically ignored demographic get our moment of rigorous commercial exploitation. The upside to the Pvolve programme is that you don't have to leave your house to do it. The downside is that it involves buying a load of Pvolve-branded gear – an exercise ball, a 'heavy ankle board', 'glider discs' – to gather dust in your house when, two weeks into the programme, you understand you are not turning into Jennifer Aniston and give up.
An impact of the pandemic on very young children is that, according to a survey of 1,000 teachers released this week, many of those who started reception last year spoke with vaguely American accents from too much screen time and were 'unable to climb a staircase'. Intellectually, I understand the concerns this might raise, but from experience it all looks normal to me. When my own tiny three-year-olds started the equivalent of reception, they spoke with American accents, struggled with stairs because we didn't have any, and one of them was still in pull-ups. Somewhere in the intervening seven years we figured it out.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Colorado attack rocks community after fatal Israel Embassy shooting
Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser said in a statement that the attack appeared to be a "hate crime given the group that was targeted." Weiser said the group meets weekly at the Pearl Street Mall in downtown Boulder to urge the release of the Gaza hostages. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a prominent Jewish Democrat, condemned the attack in a post on X. "This is horrifying, and this cannot continue. We must stand up to antisemitism." Colorado Gov. Jared Polis also blasted the incident as a "heinous act of terror. Hate-filled acts of any kind are unacceptable." In a statement on social media, the Boulder Jewish Community Center said it was in touch with law enforcement about the Jewish community in the city, noting that safety is the "highest priority." "We are saddened and heartbroken to learn that an incendiary device was thrown at walkers at the Run for Their Lives walk on Pearl Street as they were raising awareness for the hostages still held in Gaza," the Boulder Jewish Community Center said. Israeli Embassy staffers slain as they exited Jewish Museum On May 21, Yaron Lischinsky, 30, and his girlfriend Sarah Lynn Milgrim, 26, were gunned down in Washington, D.C., as they exited the Capital Jewish Museum about a mile from the White House. Elias Rodriguez, 31, was charged with two counts of first-degree murder and was also facing several firearms charges and counts of killing foreign officials. Authorities said that the attack is being investigated as a hate and terrorism crime. Yechiel Leiter, Israeli ambassador to the United States, said the two victims killed were a "young couple about to be engaged." And just days after that shooting, a dual U.S. and German citizen was arrested in New York for allegedly attempting to firebomb a branch office of the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv, Israel, authorities said. ADL: Antisemitism reports spiking Reports of incidents of antisemitism have continued to rise for a second year in a row, accoding to an annual report released by the Anti-Defamation League in April. ADL researchers counted 9,354 incidents of antisemitic assault, harassment, and vandalism across the country in 2024 - a 5% increase from 2023, which was also a record-breaking year. The number of incidents was the highest since the ADL started tracking antisemitism data in 1979. Tensions heightened over the Gaza war Israel's war on Gaza, in response to the Oct. 7 Hamas attack - which killed 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and saw 251 taken as hostages into Gaza - has led to a climate of heightened tensions throughout the United States. It also comes at a time when the Trump administration has detained pro-Palestinian protesters without charges and halted funding to certain U.S. universities that have been the site of Gaza protests. Israel's campaign has devastated much of Gaza, killing over 54,000 Palestinians and destroying most buildings. Contributing: Will Carless, Thao Nguyen, John Bacon


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Dem Chris Muphy hits Republican Joni Ernst town hall Medicaid comment
The comment come after Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, addressed federal cuts to Medicaid - which Republicans have proposed as part of President Donald Trump's sweeping tax bill - during a town hall in Parkersburg, Iowa, on May 30. As she was speaking, someone shouted from the audience, "people will die!" Ernst then told the auditorium, "People are not - well, we all are going to die. For heaven's sakes, folks." Medicaid, the program that provides health insurance to more than 71 million low-income Americans, would undergo big changes under the bill that passed in the House last month. That includes new work requirements for some adults beginning in December 2026, more frequent eligibility checks and disincentives for states to cover unauthorized migrant children, among other provisions. Collectively, the Medicaid proposal would save at least $625 billion and cause 7.6 million Americans to lose their health insurance over the next 10 years, according to initial estimates by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Still, Ernst shared a sarcastic apology video after facing criticism from Democrats over her response to the town hall attendees' concerns. "Hello everyone," she said in a video posted to social media. "I would like to take this opportunity to sincerely apologize for a statement that I made yesterday at my town hall." "I made an incorrect assumption that everyone in the auditorium understood that yes, we are all going to perish from this Earth," she added. "So, I apologize. And I'm really, really glad that I did not have to bring up the subject of the tooth fairy as well." Republicans have said the proposed changes to Medicaid protect the program for those who need it, and their legislation is curbing waste and fraud. Democrats, like Murphy, argue the fallout will be felt by Americans across the country. "When rural hospitals close because of this bill, when drug treatment clinics close in Iowa and rural America because of this bill, more people will die at a younger age," Murphy alleged in the interview on June 1. Though Republicans control the Senate, the legislation isn't expected to sail through the upper chamber. Several Senate Republicans, including Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Rand Paul of Kentucky, argue the bill comes with too high a price tag. "This is our moment," Johnson told CNN's Jake Tapper in May. "We have witnessed an unprecedented level of increased spending ... This is our only chance to reset that to a reasonable pre-pandemic level." House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, and other champions of the legislation argue the legislation is an investment in America's economy. But it's expected to add around $3.3 trillion to the nation's deficit over the next 10 years and swell the federal government's debt. Contributing: Stephen Gruber-Miller, Des Moines Register; Riley Beggin


BBC News
7 hours ago
- BBC News
Military veteran has 'burning fire' to correct pension 'robbery'
Time has not dimmed Ernest Williams' sense of being 90 years of age, the former Royal Navy veteran says he still has a "burning fire" inside believes he was "robbed" of the military pension he deserved and has been fighting to have it corrected since the 1980s."I'm coming up to 91 and I haven't got long to go," Mr Williams said. "I'm doing it for my wife." It wasn't until Mr Williams had a chance conversation with his brother-in-law Ronald Oswell, that he says he realised what had two men had almost identical service records and both applied for redundancy when the UK armed forces looked to reduce numbers in while Mr Williams, who lives in King's Stanley, Gloucestershire, was given a discharge date in 1970, his brother-in-law was allocated one in 1972."He said 'What do you think of the pension, Ernie?'," Mr Williams told BBC West Investigations."I said, 'Well £440 a year is not very good, is it?'"And he said 'No it's £880 a year'." It transpired that during the intervening two years, military pension rules had changed and had Mr Williams been given the later discharge date he would have got a much better Ministry of Defence said it cannot comment on individual cases, but during his time campaigning Mr Williams has been told that his pension reflected his "full and correct entitlement".Mr Williams enlisted in the navy aged 18 in 1952, eventually becoming a Chief Petty Officer. He served many years overseas, including on aircraft carriers in the far as the UK armed forces looked to reduce numbers, he was offered redundancy under a navy programme known as DCI 1187/ navy agreed to add time to his service record so that he received a military pension in addition to the state crucially, Mr Williams says he was not given a say in when he left the armed forces, and rather was told he would leave the navy on 28 November who applied at the same time were given a discharge date in 1972."You're told when you're going. [Your discharge date] was not disclosed until some time later. There was nothing I could do about it," Mr Williams said. Mr Williams and his wife Wendy believe about 400 men were discharged in the same 'first wave' as him, with about 2,600 going in the 'second wave' in 1972, receiving a substantially improved Williams said: "What did this 400 do that was so wrong they had to be discriminated against financially?"She added that the extra money would have made a "vast difference" to their couple launched a series of appeals to various official bodies once they realised what had May 1984, Mr Williams was told by the MOD that both his and his brother-in-law's pension "are correct" and the disparity was due to "a pay rise for CPO's [Chief Petty Officers] in the intervening two years which is reflected in the basic pension awarded".He continued to fight his case throughout the 1980s, 1990s and 1998, the Armed Forces Personnel Administration Agency told Mr Williams that in the period between the two phases, "changes were made [to the military pension] but these changes were not retrospective" and that his pension reflected his "full and correct entitlement". Over the years Mr Williams has been supported by some of Stroud's 2019, Labour MP David Drew wrote to Penny Mordaunt, the Defence Secretary at the time, to highlight Mr Williams' case, believing he was the victim of "an injustice" and had been "unfairly treated".Mr Drew argued that comments made by senior politicians in the late 1960s about intended improvements to military pay meant that possible differences in pensions should have been describes Mr Williams' case as "shocking" and that "both the process and the documentation surrounding the volunteer redundancies were ethically flawed".But ultimately, Mr Williams received the same answer from everybody he asked to look at his case – that his pension was correct based on the rules at the Williams still maintains that before he left, he never had the effect of different discharge dates explained to him – and that he would never have accepted redundancy on the earlier date had he known an extra two years would have effectively doubled his pension. Mr Williams' case has similarities to a fight waged by other military veterans over their Monaghan was involved with the Equality for Veterans Association (EfVA) which also campaigned against pension decisions in the rules before April 1975 meant that in most circumstances, servicemen had to serve 22 years to be eligible for an armed forces pension in addition to the state Monaghan left the RAF at the end of 1974, having accrued 14 years' service, including in Singapore and the middle he left a few months later, he would have received a military pension. The rule change in 1975, like rules on pensions generally, were not retrospective. The issue was debated in parliament in 2015, with then-Defence Minister Anna Soubry saying making changes to pension policy retrospective would break an "essential principle" and "would lead to widespread, long-term and unmanageable consequences for both this government and future governments".Mr Monaghan believes communication from the MOD was not good enough."Everyone was kept in the dark," he said."They knew nothing about [pensions] when they were young."We never had a brief on pensions. We were never given any insight and probably we didn't have any interest because I was a young man."The Equalities for Veterans Association was disbanded a few years ago – because of a lack of success and the dwindling number of surviving veterans from that period. Mr Williams says he feels "very bitter" about his experience but hopes that by speaking out publicly for the first time, he can bring more attention to his also hopes any other servicemen still alive and affected by the same issue will come added he intends to continue his campaign by contacting the current Stroud MP, Labour's Simon Opher, in the hope he will take up the Williams said: "I'm just a stubborn old sod and I'm not going to give in. I would appreciate it if anybody said to me 'you were right and we were wrong'."