logo
He Fought Claims of Harm From Infant Formula. Now He Regulates It.

He Fought Claims of Harm From Infant Formula. Now He Regulates It.

New York Times04-03-2025

The new head of the Food and Drug Administration division that regulates infant formula was in recent months a corporate lawyer defending a top formula maker from claims that its product gave rise to debilitating harm to premature babies.
Kyle A. Diamantas joined the F.D.A. last month to lead the food division, leaving the law firm Jones Day, which has served as a pipeline of talent to both Trump administrations.
As a partner in Jones Day's Miami office, Mr. Diamantas's recent work included defending Abbott Laboratories in lawsuits accusing the company of failing to adequately warn parents that its specialized formula for premature infants was associated with an elevated risk of a deadly bowel condition.
Abbott lost the case and was ordered to pay $495 million. Abbott is appealing the verdict. Mr. Diamantas's role in the Abbott cases has not been previously reported.
The leader of the F.D.A.'s food division has a wide-ranging role in ensuring the safety of about 80 percent of the food supply in the United States. In that job, Mr. Diamantas is also expected to take a lead role in enacting Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s agenda, which calls for reducing additives in food and eliminating what Mr. Kennedy has described as corruption in public health agencies.
'We will shut the revolving door to re-establish public trust,' Mr. Kennedy told the Health and Human Services Department's staff during his first week in office.
The selection of Mr. Diamantas to run the food division struck Representative Rosa DeLauro, who has worked on infant formula issues, as a 'betrayal.' She has focused on infant formula since 2022, when a major formula shortage began after Abbott temporarily shut down its Michigan formula plant amid findings of unsanitary conditions.
'The F.D.A.'s job is to protect our babies, not the corporations that poisoned them,' Ms. DeLauro, a Connecticut Democrat, said in a statement emailed to The New York Times. 'Appointing an Abbott lawyer to oversee food safety, which includes infant formula, is letting the fox guard the henhouse.'
Mr. Diamantas did not respond to a request for comment. The F.D.A. said he will comply with his routine ethics agreement with the agency, which includes pledges to recuse himself from specific matters related to Abbott and also British American Tobacco, another prominent Jones Day client. Health and Human Services officials declined to make Mr. Diamantas's ethics agreement available to the Times.
'Mr. Diamantas shares Secretary Kennedy's vision of improving nutritional outcomes, ensuring the food supply is safe and healthy, and continuing to carry out the F.D.A.'s overall mission of protecting and promoting public health,' a spokesman for the department of Health and Human Services, Andrew Nixon, said.
The F.D.A. did not issue a formal announcement about Mr. Diamantas' role, but on Feb. 24, the agency put up a web page listing him as the acting deputy commissioner of human foods and calling him its 'top food executive.' He will also will represent the agency in dealings with foreign governments and the White House.
Before he joined Jones Day in 2021, Mr. Diamantas (who has also been shown hunting with Donald Trump Jr., the president's son, in a photo on social media) worked at another law firm. There, he defended a cannabis company called Hemp Bombs against claims about its CBD products, which are derived from the cannabis plant. He also defended Whole Foods Markets in a lawsuit claiming that it sold a CBD product that misled users to believe it would reduce pain.
The F.D.A. has taken the position that CBD is unsafe to add to the food supply and has gone after companies in situations it deemed high risk. The agency began an effort to determine how it would regulate CBD but in early 2023 concluded that Congress needed to step in.
The deadly bowel condition associated with infant formula for preterm infants has also been debated at the F.D.A. Hundreds of lawsuits are pending, many claiming that Abbott failed to warn parents of the outsized risk of infection that arises when very low-weight babies — around 3 ½ pounds or less — are fed formula instead of breast milk.
In three infant formula cases filed in a Missouri court, Mr. Diamantas was admitted to represent Abbott in March 2024, court records show. In two of the cases, his role was described in court records as representing two Abbott sales representatives.
He did not address the jury during the high-profile trial of Margo Gill v. Abbott, which ended with the jury levying $95 million in compensatory and $400 million in punitive damages against the company.
The case centered around whether Abbott had adequately warned Ms. Gill that very low-weight babies who are fed infant formula face an elevated risk of a bowel condition called necrotizing enterocolitis, or NEC, which can quickly lead to destruction of the intestines and death.
At six weeks old, Ms. Gill's daughter developed NEC about 24 hours after she was fed formula. She left the neonatal intensive care unit, or NICU, with extensive bowel and brain damage, according to court testimony viewed on Courtroom View Network. Ms. Gill testified during the trial that at 3, her daughter was unable to talk, walk or eat without a feeding tube.
Abbott did not argue that Ms. Gill had been warned, rather saying it was the doctor's role to counsel families. During the trial in July, a lawyer for Ms. Gill, Jake Plattenberger, showed jurors internal Abbott documents saying that infant formula 'is thought to be a contributing factor to the development of NEC.'
He also told the jury that about 90 percent of the preterm infants who got the condition had been fed formula. He showed a study of 1,800 preterm infants that concluded that formula feeding raises the risk of developing NEC by 180 percent.
James F. Hurst, the lead trial lawyer for Abbott, argued that formula does not cause the condition. The product is typically used in hospitals and is labeled 'for institutional use only' and 'use as directed by a doctor.' On a slide presented to the jury, Mr. Hurst wrote: 'Different Words On Abbott's Label (Or Anywhere Else) Wouldn't Have Changed Anything' for the infant.
He also argued that the cascade of injuries Ms. Gill's daughter sustained, including brain damage, were related to other factors, including her birth complications and very low oxygen level.
'These premature infant formulas and human milk fortifiers are part of the standard of care for premature infants and have been used safely for 45 years, nourishing generations of NICU babies,' Abbott said in a statement on Monday.
On July 26, jurors sided with Ms. Gill and awarded nearly half a billion to her family. Soon after, Abbott's chief executive, Robert B. Ford, publicly warned that the company might need to stop selling some formula for preterm infants.
Mr. Ford turned to the F.D.A. three days after the verdict, records show, and met with Dr. Robert Califf, the F.D.A. commissioner, and others in the food division.
Soon, officials with the F.D.A. and two other health agencies began to work quickly on a consensus statement about NEC. A person familiar with the process, who requested anonymity to discuss the dialogue, said formula companies had asked government officials to craft a consensus statement, but did not dictate what it said. Some working group members had relationships with Abbott, such as through accepting speaker fees, that were not specifically outlined in the final report, records show.
On Oct. 3, the health department released its conclusion: '1) There is no conclusive evidence that preterm infant formula causes NEC; and 2) there is strong evidence that human milk is protective against NEC.'
The statement echoes Abbott's position in court and is expected to help formula makers in upcoming cases. Since the Gill verdict, another similar case ended in a $60 million verdict in favor of a family and another case resulted in a victory for formula makers.
The F.D.A.'s food division handles myriad other matters in its role regulating the majority of the food supply. On infant formula, the division is trying to hold Abbott and other companies to a high standard after inspectors at Abbott's Michigan plant discovered a leaking roof, pooled water and evidence of a deadly bacteria. The plant was shut down for an overhaul, setting off a monthslong infant formula shortage in 2022 that left parents scrambling.
The food division also leads investigations into food-borne illnesses, working with states and other federal officials to use high-tech tools to connect sick patients to contamination at food plants or vegetable farms. The division has also been rolling out rules making it easier to trace food through the supply chain and helping farmers ensure irrigation water does not spread bacteria on crops.
Mr. Kennedy has outlined other priorities for the agency, including to scrutinize chemical additives in food. At least one influential supporter of Mr. Kennedy sees Mr. Diamantas's experience as an asset.
During the weekend of the inauguration, Vani Hari, a clean-food activist known online as the Food Babe, said she met and chatted with Mr. Diamantas at three different events. The first time, his wife leaned in and told Ms. Hari she had been a follower of her blog for years.
'He is all on board to change the way the regulatory system works,' Ms. Hari said. Rather than see his work with Abbott and other corporations as a potential conflict of interest, Ms. Hari said it gave him insight into how to work with them.
'It's just the way the world works. The companies will have to be involved in these discussions,' Ms. Hari said. 'He's very passionate about the Make America Healthy Again movement but he's also very levelheaded. He'll figure out a solution that is feasible to everyone to change our food system.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's aggressive moves on immigration protests put Democrats in a political bind
Trump's aggressive moves on immigration protests put Democrats in a political bind

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's aggressive moves on immigration protests put Democrats in a political bind

President Donald Trump's deployment of military troops to California is forcing Democrats back onto politically perilous turf, as they look for ways to condemn his actions without being drawn into a broad debate over immigration or tying themselves to the chaotic scenes emerging from Los Angeles. Republicans are relishing a fight that directs attention away from their monthslong, intraparty debate over tax and spending legislation, and the messy political breakup of Trump and Elon Musk, and toward what they view as Democrats' biggest vulnerabilities: immigration, law enforcement and public disorder. Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman warned his fellow Democrats about the images emerging from California, where protests erupted Friday after Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids and escalated into outbreaks of violence. Some protesters have thrown objects at law enforcement, looted businesses, blocked a major freeway and set self-driving cars ablaze — while police in riot gear fired rubber bullets to disperse crowds. While much of the protest activity has been peaceful, images of burning cars and chaos have been widespread across social media and traditional news coverage. 'You can't defend when people start setting things on fire or they start damaging buildings or going after members of law enforcement. That's not free speech. That is not peaceful protest,' Fetterman said Tuesday. Fetterman, who was lieutenant governor of Pennsylvania during racial justice protests around the country in 2020, said Democrats 'should have learned the lesson back in 2020. Absolutely, there was righteous outrage over what happened to George Floyd, but that never means that you can support or be quiet if there's destruction or rioting and destroying and looting and those kinds of things.' He said he was 'not judging any of my other colleagues in my party,' but warned: 'You can't be quiet on those things. You have to just call it really what it is.' Some Democrats privately agree with Fetterman, saying their party's leaders must be more forceful in condemning the rioters' behavior. Lawmakers in competitive swing districts also worry about the political ramifications down the road, particularly if party activists resurrect a years-old battle cry for abolishing ICE. And in the meantime, they believe Democrats will be forced to grapple with an existential question: Do they support federal law enforcement officials actually enforcing federal immigration law? In a clear sign of the fraught political moment, lawmakers from across the Democratic Party's ideological spectrum issued warnings Tuesday against violence. Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, a progressive independent who caucuses with Democrats, urged protesters to exhibit the same 'disciplined non-violent resistance' to Trump that civil rights leaders used to end segregation. 'Violent protests are counterproductive and play right into Trump's playbook,' he said on X. Texas Rep. Henry Cuellar, a conservative Democrat who has long represented a Rio Grande Valley district, said in a statement that 'when people start throwing bricks and hammers at law enforcement, that's no longer protest — that's criminal.' 'We can debate policy without attacking the people who wear the badge and work to keep us safe,' Cuellar said. Trump, for his part, has blamed Democrats broadly and California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Karen Bass specifically for mishandling the situation, saying on Truth Social the city 'would be burning to the ground right now' had he not deployed troops there. And Republicans have delighted in pitting Trump against Newsom. House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters Tuesday that Newsom — who has aggressively criticized the Trump administration's moves — 'ought to be tarred and feathered.' 'He's standing in the way of the administration carrying out the federal law. He is applauding the bad guys and standing in the way of good guys,' Johnson said. Trump's actions have put Democrats in a complicated political spot. The party has struggled to navigate the issue of immigration since the president's victory in November — split between the moral outrage of the Democratic base over Trump's unprecedented deportation efforts, and polls that have largely reflected public support for the president on the issue overall. In particular, surveys have shown that most voters want tougher border security than the Biden administration put in place for much of the previous four years. But the politics get murkier when Americans are asked about the details of how Trump is carrying out his campaign promise to conduct the largest deportation effort in the nation's history. In the past — particularly when federal law enforcement cleared Lafayette Square, near the White House, amid 2020 protests — polls found that Americans opposed the use of rubber bullets and tear gas, and opposed deploying the US military in response to protests within the country. A CBS News/YouGov survey conducted before the protests in Los Angeles broke out found somewhat contradictory results: Fifty-four percent of Americans support Trump's deportation program, and 55% like its 'goals.' However, 56% said they dislike 'the way you think [Trump] is going about' the deportations. unknown content item - Democrats this week argued that Trump's actions have only worsened tensions in California. Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly said the president's deployment of the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles is 'like throwing the match onto the kindling.' 'He took some actions that escalated an issue — a problem, but it was under control. And now the problem is bigger because of the actions he took,' Kelly told CNN. Democrats also accused Trump of hypocrisy, pointing out that he was slow to deploy the National Guard on January 6, 2021, when his supporters were rioting and attacking police officers at the US Capitol. 'We begged the president of the United States to send in the National Guard. He would not do it,' California Rep. Nancy Pelosi, who was the House speaker at the time, said Tuesday. California Rep. Ro Khanna told CNN outside the Capitol on Monday that Democrats 'need to continue to unequivocally condemn the violence, the threats or attacks on law enforcement agents — I mean, that has no place.' But, the progressive congressman added, Trump's actions are unconstitutional. 'One can hold two thoughts — that political violence should be absolutely condemned, vandalism needs to be condemned, but that the appropriate remedy are state and local police — that you can't deploy the military against our own people, unless there's a real crisis,' Khanna said. Massachusetts Rep. Seth Moulton similarly said that 'there's no excuse for violence.' 'If you're protesting the fact that ICE officers are sometimes too violent, doing that with violence doesn't make the point,' he said. However, Moulton also said Trump is using the US military to achieve political aims at home. 'This is not an opportunity to turn active-duty Marines against the American people. And that's what Trump is doing,' Moulton said. Trump has used Newsom as a foil as he deploys troops to the Los Angeles area — even suggesting Monday that border czar Tom Homan should arrest the governor. Newsom, a potential 2028 presidential contender, has embraced the clash and publicly dared Homan to arrest him. Newsom himself has been in regular touch with lawmakers on the Hill, and held a briefing with his state's delegation and the leader of the California National Guard on Monday to update them on Trump's actions, according to two people familiar with the call. Newsom's office has also been distributing copies of some of attacks on him, including Trump's calls to arrest him, to House Democrats' offices, those people said. The scenes unfolding in California are also leading Democrats elsewhere to grapple with what they would do if Trump took similar actions in their states. And they fear they'd be powerless to stop it. Rep. Mikie Sherrill, one of the Democratic candidates in Tuesday's New Jersey gubernatorial primary, said Trump's move 'shows the further incompetence coming from Washington and the constant level of chaos that is almost intentionally generated there.' Sherrill also warned that military missions are much different from those of law enforcement in the United States. Another New Jersey gubernatorial candidate, Rep. Josh Gottheimer, highlighted Trump's actions in a speech. He said the scenes in California make clear 'just what's on the line in this election and why it's so important that we have a governor who's willing to stand up and fight.' The Democratic Governors Association, in a statement signed by 22 governors, called Trump's deployment of troops to California 'an alarming abuse of power.' But the statement did not address the president's handling of his deportation program. 'It's important we respect the executive authority of our country's governors to manage their National Guards — and we stand with Governor Newsom who has made it clear that violence is unacceptable and that local authorities should be able to do their jobs without the chaos of this federal interference and intimidation,' the Democratic governors' statement said. CNN's Arlette Saenz, Ted Barrett, David Wright and Manu Raju contributed to this report.

Former State Sen. Cindy Coyne will run for RI lieutenant governor in 2026
Former State Sen. Cindy Coyne will run for RI lieutenant governor in 2026

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Former State Sen. Cindy Coyne will run for RI lieutenant governor in 2026

PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WPRI) — Former State Sen. Cindy Coyne announced Tuesday she will seek the Democratic nomination for Rhode Island lieutenant governor in 2026. Coyne becomes the first official challenger looking to unseat incumbent Lt. Gov. Sabina Matos, a Democrat whose political standing was badly damaged by a scandal over nomination papers that helped torpedo her 2023 run for Congress. Matos was appointed to the job in 2021 and elected to a full term the following year. Coyne, a 63-year-old Pawtucket native, represented Barrington as well as parts of Bristol and East Providence in the R.I. Senate from 2015 to 2022. She flipped a seat that Republicans had held for more than 100 years, and went on to serve as chair of the Judiciary Committee. Prior to her time as a senator, she was on the Barrington Town Council. Coyne filed candidacy paperwork with the R.I. Board of Elections on Tuesday morning, and then released a campaign launch video on YouTube to announce her candidacy. 'I'm running to be your next lieutenant governor — to put my experience to work for you.' Coyne said in a statement. 'My work has been about bringing people together. Listening to people. Seeking the truth and solving problems. That's what government should be about and that's what I'll do as your next lieutenant governor.' Before entering politics, Coyne served on the Rhode Island State Police, where she was one of the first women to join the ranks. She is also the wife of former longtime Deputy Attorney General Jerry Coyne. They have four children. 'As a mother of four, I know that there are great challenges facing our state,' Coyne said. 'We need to tackle the high cost of housing, protect our aging adults, keep our communities safe, and make life more affordable for families.' Democrats have won every election for Rhode Island lieutenant governor since 1968, though Republican Bernard Jackvony held the job for a short time in the 1990s when he was appointed to fill a vacancy. (Jackvony lost his bid for a full term.) Other Democrats are also considering a run for lieutenant governor, including Central Falls Mayor Maria Rivera, state Sen. Lou DiPalma and podcast host Bill Bartholomew. Aaron Guckian, who was the Republican nominee against Matos in 2022, could also run again. Rhode Island's statewide primary election is scheduled to take place on Sept. 8, 2026. RELATED: Woman at center of Matos signature scandal avoids prison time Ted Nesi (tnesi@ is a Target 12 investigative reporter and 12 News politics/business editor. He co-hosts Newsmakers and writes Nesi's Notes on Saturdays. Connect with him on Twitter, Bluesky and Facebook. Download the and apps to get breaking news and weather alerts. Watch or with the new . Follow us on social media: Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Texas Lottery Commission Told To Hold $83.5M Jackpot Won By Woman In February
Texas Lottery Commission Told To Hold $83.5M Jackpot Won By Woman In February

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Texas Lottery Commission Told To Hold $83.5M Jackpot Won By Woman In February

(Texas Scorecard) – A state judge in Travis County has ordered that Texas Lottery commissioners must hold on to an $83.5 million jackpot won by a woman in February that has not yet been paid out. Earlier this week, District Judge Aurora Martinez Jones ruled that the jackpot could not be 'diminished, wasted, or paid to another' by Sergio Rey, in his official capacity as acting executive director for the TLC. Jones' temporary restraining order only lasted for three days, but a June 5 hearing resulted in Judge Jan Soifer ordering an extension of the enjoinments until June 10. On June 10, the court will reconvene to discuss a longer temporary injunction to protect the jackpot throughout the litigation period. The jackpot, won by a woman who purchased a $20 ticket through the ticket reseller service Jackpocket, has not been dispersed due to an investigation into the controversial win ordered by Gov. Greg Abbott. Jones found that the jackpot could be at risk of being lost when Senate Bill 3070 becomes law, posing 'irreparable' and 'imminent' harm to the winner. The measure, expected to be signed by Gov. Greg Abbott, would abolish the TLC and transfer oversight of the Texas Lottery to the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation. It would also ban ticket resellers like Jackpocket. Resellers, also known as couriers, allow customers to play the lottery online through an intermediary who buys the ticket at a brick-and-mortar store on their behalf. The practice has been at the center of the controversy surrounding the $83.5 million winning ticket in February, which was purchased at a retailer owned by Jackpocket. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick published a video at the retailer following news of the win, noting that it could be an example of 'bulk purchasing'—or buying up a significant portion of combinations to have a higher chance of winning the lottery. Shortly after Patrick's exposé and the federal indictment of a Russian businessman with ties to the lottery, Abbott called for a limited investigation by the Texas Rangers. That investigation, later expanded to include all lottery operations, halted the winnings from being dispersed. In late May, an anonymous woman claiming to be the rightful winner of the February jackpot filed a petition seeking to retrieve the money. She claimed that even with concerns over how the ticket was procured, commissioners had 'determined that Plaintiff was the lawful bearer of the winning ticket.' Her attorney, Randy Howry, told KXAN-TV he believes the TRO protecting the winnings until June 10 would also apply to the new agency overseeing the lottery if Abbott signs SB 3070 into law. Notably, according to KXAN-TV, the Texas Rangers have not contacted either the anonymous winner of the $83.5 million jackpot or her attorney. On June 17 at 9:00 a.m., the court will meet at the request of Rey's legal team to discuss whether the court has the authority to hear the case in the first place. The February jackpot is just one of two controversial, high-profile wins connected to ticket resellers that have spawned statewide investigations and legal battles. Plaintiffs in another lawsuit allege that four lottery retailers, including a ticket reseller, conspired to work with a sports gambling company to bulk purchase a $95 million jackpot in April 2023. Abbott's investigation also covers that win.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store