Missouri Republicans throw transgender kids into line of fire on abortion debate
A Missouri family stands by their doormat at a home they are soon to leave — inspired to move bills that seek limiting medical care and other rights for their transgender son (Annelise Hanshaw/Missouri Independent).
Republicans in the Missouri legislature want everyone to know that they are very concerned about protecting children.
Not so much the 130 children and teenagers who die from gunfire in an average year. Those deaths, about two-thirds of which are homicides, are unfortunate collateral damage in the race to make firearms ever more accessible in Missouri.
And not the untold number of children who go hungry and without medical care because the state can't figure out how to fix its broken-down application processes for SNAP and Medicaid. Those kids are on their own.
The children of keen interest to Missouri Republicans are the very small number who may, as teenagers, seek medical treatment to deal with strong feelings that they are meant to be another gender than the one they were assigned at birth.
These are children who, with the consent of their parents, may try to slow down changes in their bodies with puberty-blocking medications, or use hormones consistent with the gender they identify with. A very small number may opt for gender-affirming surgery.
We're not talking about a lot of kids here. Less than 1% of the state's population is estimated to be transgender, and that percentage holds true for teenagers. Missouri Republicans, however, are fixated on them. They spend hours in committee meetings and floor debates professing concern for their health — while at the same time obsessing over what bathrooms they can use at school and the prospect that someone assigned male at birth might show up on a girls' softball roster.
Most recently, Republicans awarded transgender children a starring role in a piece of legislation that's destined to make Missouri meaner and angrier than we currently find it. That would be their attempt to overthrow the will of voters and reinstate an abortion ban.
HJR 73, the resolution that caused the 2025 legislative session to dissolve into chaos last month, asks voters to approve a constitutional amendment that would outlaw abortion except in a few circumstances. It would also, as its proposed ballot language states, 'protect children from gender transition' by banning the use of puberty blockers, hormones and surgeries.
Missouri already has a law that outlaws gender-affirming health care for minors through 2027, when the statute would have to be renewed. The unnecessary ballot provision is a cynical ploy to lure social-issues voters who might otherwise support abortion rights.
'The legislature chooses to use the word 'protect,' but that's not the word that the community of trans and queer folks and parents of trans kids would use,' said Katy Erker-Lynch, the executive director of PROMO, an advocacy group for LGBTQ citizens in Missouri.
Neither would many of us. Responsible adults don't drag vulnerable teenagers into an incendiary debate, expose them to intense public scrutiny and deprive them of health care that a consensus of medical groups agree can lower risks of suicide.
But, to state the obvious, this isn't about the kids. This is about power and deception.
A majority of Missouri voters support abortion rights. They made that clear in November when they approved Constitutional Amendment 3, which enshrined the right to abortion in the state.
Legislative Republicans can't let that stand, but they also know they're crosswise with the will of the people. And so they are throwing transgender children into the line of fire.
'It is cruel, but it is the only chance they have at overturning the right to abortion,' said state Sen. Patty Lewis, a Democratic from Kansas City.
Missouri politicians have long sought to use transgender people, and youth especially, to further their careers.
The state's senior U.S. senator, Josh Hawley, has launched numerous attacks on transgender health care. The current attorney general, Andrew Bailey, is in an ongoing fight to obtain sensitive health care records from clinics in the state that provide gender-affirming care to minors.
As this year's legislative session approached, PROMO tracked at least a dozen bills targeting transgender people, most centered on curbing their health care. Many were linked to attacks on abortion rights, using the contentious rationale that the U.S. Supreme Court Dobbs decision hands states the authority not only to regulate abortion but transgender health care as well.
'Threats to abortion care and trans health care are interconnected,' Erker-Lynch said. 'They're very strategic and intentional.'
In a survey last year of Missouri youth who identify as LGBTQ, conducted by The Trevor Project, a research and advocacy group, 92% said recent politics harmed their well being and 61% said they or their parents had thought about leaving the state for that reason. Among people who identified as transgender and nonbinary, 67% wanted to leave.
That's a lot of people who don't seem to feel protected. And the survey predated HJR 73.
'If our legislators really seek to protect children,' Erker-Lynch said, 'they can look at the way they're encouraging bullying, the way that they're encouraging discrimination, the way they're refusing access to care.'
They should, but they won't. Not with their desperate effort to ban abortion in the balance.
The transgender health care provision in Republicans' proposed constitutional amendment is being called 'ballot candy' — a sweetener for voters who are swayed by social issues.
Too much candy is bad for childrens' health. And so are the Missouri Republicans who callously placed transgender kids in the midst of their deceptive effort to ban abortion.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lisa Field wins special election for late Rep. Carol Doherty's Taunton seat
TAUNTON, Mass. (WPRI) — Democrat Lisa Field has won the special election to replace the late state Rep. Carol Doherty, according to unofficial results. Field narrowly defeated Republican Larry Quintal in the race for the 3rd Bristol District, which became vacant after Doherty died in February at the age of 82. The district contains parts of Taunton and Easton. BACKGROUND: 2 candidates seek late Rep. Carol Doherty's Taunton seat in June 10 election As of Wednesday morning, Field led in the unofficial tally by 21 votes. Field, who works for the Massachusetts Nursing Association, was up by a slim margin in Easton, while Quintal narrowly led in Taunton. Quintal, a Taunton city councilor, posted on social media Tuesday night he's requesting a recount. Heading into the race, Republicans hoped to capitalize on momentum from the 2024 election and flip the seat back to their column. President Donald Trump earned 47% of the vote in Taunton last November and Republicans flipped a state senate seat. Doherty's seat was also formerly held by Republican Shaunna O'Connell, who was elected mayor of Taunton in 2019. ALSO READ: Massachusetts orders Taunton to release some footage from mayor's 2024 arrest Meanwhile, the Massachusetts Democratic Party declared victory. 'Lisa's dedication to working families, strong public schools, and vibrant local communities inspired voters and energized our Democratic values,' the party said. 'We look forward to all she'll accomplish on Beacon Hill!' According to Debra O'Malley, a spokesperson for the secretary of the commonwealth's office, there are two types of recounts that could be requested: Districtwide and precinct level. Candidates are required to submit 38 signatures from registered voters in the district for a districtwide recount, or 10 for a precinct recount. Election officials have until 5 p.m. on June 25 to certify the results. If a recount happens afterward and changes the results, there would be a recertification, O'Malley said. NEXT: Taxes, fees going up in $14.3 billion RI budget as federal relief wanes Download the and apps to get breaking news and weather alerts. Watch or with the new . Follow us on social media: Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


The Hill
36 minutes ago
- The Hill
Stablecoin bill clears another hurdle in Senate, inching toward final vote
The Senate voted Wednesday to advance legislation setting up a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins, bringing the crypto bill one step closer to a final vote in the upper chamber. Seventeen Democrats voted with almost every Republican to end debate on an updated version of the GENIUS Act. The new bill text was reached as part of lengthy negotiations between Republicans and crypto-friendly Democrats last month, ahead of an earlier procedural vote on the Senate floor last month. The vote breakdown was largely similar to the May vote, although Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.) switched her vote to oppose the measure. She had supported the bill both in the Senate Banking Committee in March and on the Senate floor last month. Blunt Rochester voiced some hesitation Tuesday about Senate leadership's decision to forgo an open amendment process on the GENIUS Act, emphasizing that she hoped to see additional changes to the bill. 'I was really clear,' she told The Hill. 'I hoped that there would be an open amendment process, and that's what I heard Leader Thune say around last month, so I will take a look at this language, and we'll make a decision from there.' Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) ultimately scrapped the push for so-called 'regular order,' as controversial amendments — most notably, Sen. Roger Marshall's (R-Kan.) Credit Card Competition Act — threatened to upend support for the bill. The decision to move forward without an open amendments process frustrates a push by several Democrats to add in a provision that would prevent President Trump and other elected officials from profiting off stablecoins. 'The GENIUS act attempts to set up some guardrails for buying and selling a type of cryptocurrency, one type called a stablecoin,' Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) said on the Senate floor ahead of Wednesday's vote. 'Well, we need guardrails that ensure that government officials aren't openly asking people to buy their coins in order to increase their personal profit or their family's profit,' he continued. 'Where are those guardrails in this bill? They're completely, totally absent.' However, crypto-friendly Democrats who have been deeply involved in negotiations are urging their colleagues to support the bill despite some of its shortcomings. 'It's extremely unhelpful that we have a president who's involved in this industry, and I would love to ban this activity, but that does not diminish the excellent work of this legislation,' Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday. 'It does not diminish the hard work that bipartisan group of senators put into this to make a difference and to write a law that can protect consumers, that can protect our financial services industry, that can protect the strength of the dollar, and that can protect people who would like access to capital,' she added. The GENIUS Act likely faces a handful more votes before it can clear the Senate and head to the House. Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) told The Hill on Tuesday that she expects a final vote on the bill next week.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'Stand up for immigrants': Iowans gather in solidarity with LA protests, rally against ICE
More than 100 people gathered in downtown Des Moines to show support for immigrants' rights as protesters more than 1,600 miles away in Los Angeles continue to rally against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's efforts to deport people without legal status. As protests in California entered their fifth day on Tuesday, June 10, demonstrations have sprung up in major cities around the country in at least a dozen cities that included San Francisco, New York, Washington, Boston, Dallas, Chicago and Atlanta. The Iowa chapter of the Party for Socialism and Liberation held a small protest at Cowles Commons to show solidarity for immigrants and rally against President Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard and U.S. Marines to quell protesters. "We're here to stand up for members of our community. For immigrants. For migrants. For refugees. For people with disabilities. For people on Medicaid. For seniors. For all the working class, because we are all under attack right now," said Jake Grobe, a community organizer who led the protest. "And Trump is trying to scapegoat immigrants and make them the enemy, calling them criminals." Immigration raids in Los Angeles on the afternoon of June 6 sparked a small protest. The next day, larger protests began in the town of Paramount, south of Los Angeles, linked to rumors of a possible immigration raid. Toward the evening on June 7, Trump ordered 2,000 National Guard members to the area. That night, protesters threw rocks, bottles, and fireworks at officers. Local police declared a small part of downtown Los Angeles an unlawful assembly area, and large numbers of protesters were cleared from the site. More: Curfew enacted for parts of downtown LA; Newsom seeks to limit Marine deployment: Updates Mayor Karen Bass issued a curfew for parts of downtown Los Angeles on June 10 following intense days of protests. Demonstrators allege the Trump administration's immigration enforcement has violated civil and human rights. The sweeping immigration efforts, a hallmark of Trump's second term, has also caught up people legally residing in the country and led to legal challenges. Protesters nationwide are expected to hold 'No Kings' rallies June 14, which coincide with Trump's 79th birthday and come one week after the president mobilized the National Guard in Los Angeles. Rallies, including in Des Moines, Ames and Iowa City, will precede a large-scale military parade in Washington, D.C., celebrating the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. Back in Des Moines, Paulina Ocegueda drove with a friend from Ottumwa to the capital city to lend their support. For Ocegueda, the fight was personal. She said it took years for her parents, who originally came from Mexico, to become U.S. citizens. She said she is proud to be Mexican-American but that it is tough to "represent the American side right now." "I want to make sure that all of the immigrants, not just Mexicans but people from Colombia, people from Haiti, people from Burmese communities, be represented here today," she said. Des Moines resident Wendy Espinoza felt similarly. Espinoza, who attended the event with her two sisters, said they came to represent their parents, who came to the U.S. from Mexico for a better future. They wanted to "stick up for them" and for the many others "who don't have a voice," the 23-year-old said. The group chanted "Power to the people. No one is illegal," and "No justice, no peace. We want ICE off our streets." Des Moines police were present but the rally stayed peaceful. In the far back of the crowd, Julius De La Cruz, 24, stood next to his pregnant wife and listened to the speakers. De La Cruz of Des Moines said he is frustrated. "You got families that work their a-- off, and all they do is just work their a-- off for their family, for a better life, a future here, and then you get them taken away like that in the blink of an eye," he said, referring to masked ICE agents who have been seen on video arresting migrants outside of court hearings and at businesses. He hopes better for his child. "I don't want my kid to grow up and see all the hate," he said. "I grew up around people who just showed nothing but love and positivity, who never judge people, never judge a book by its cover. I don't want my kid to grow up around nothing but hate." USA Today and the Iowa City Press-Citizen contributed to this report. F. Amanda Tugade covers social justice issues for the Des Moines Register. Email her at ftugade@ or follow her on X @writefelissa. This article originally appeared on Des Moines Register: Anti-ICE rally comes to Des Moines in solidarity with LA protests