Missouri Republicans throw transgender kids into line of fire on abortion debate
A Missouri family stands by their doormat at a home they are soon to leave — inspired to move bills that seek limiting medical care and other rights for their transgender son (Annelise Hanshaw/Missouri Independent).
Republicans in the Missouri legislature want everyone to know that they are very concerned about protecting children.
Not so much the 130 children and teenagers who die from gunfire in an average year. Those deaths, about two-thirds of which are homicides, are unfortunate collateral damage in the race to make firearms ever more accessible in Missouri.
And not the untold number of children who go hungry and without medical care because the state can't figure out how to fix its broken-down application processes for SNAP and Medicaid. Those kids are on their own.
The children of keen interest to Missouri Republicans are the very small number who may, as teenagers, seek medical treatment to deal with strong feelings that they are meant to be another gender than the one they were assigned at birth.
These are children who, with the consent of their parents, may try to slow down changes in their bodies with puberty-blocking medications, or use hormones consistent with the gender they identify with. A very small number may opt for gender-affirming surgery.
We're not talking about a lot of kids here. Less than 1% of the state's population is estimated to be transgender, and that percentage holds true for teenagers. Missouri Republicans, however, are fixated on them. They spend hours in committee meetings and floor debates professing concern for their health — while at the same time obsessing over what bathrooms they can use at school and the prospect that someone assigned male at birth might show up on a girls' softball roster.
Most recently, Republicans awarded transgender children a starring role in a piece of legislation that's destined to make Missouri meaner and angrier than we currently find it. That would be their attempt to overthrow the will of voters and reinstate an abortion ban.
HJR 73, the resolution that caused the 2025 legislative session to dissolve into chaos last month, asks voters to approve a constitutional amendment that would outlaw abortion except in a few circumstances. It would also, as its proposed ballot language states, 'protect children from gender transition' by banning the use of puberty blockers, hormones and surgeries.
Missouri already has a law that outlaws gender-affirming health care for minors through 2027, when the statute would have to be renewed. The unnecessary ballot provision is a cynical ploy to lure social-issues voters who might otherwise support abortion rights.
'The legislature chooses to use the word 'protect,' but that's not the word that the community of trans and queer folks and parents of trans kids would use,' said Katy Erker-Lynch, the executive director of PROMO, an advocacy group for LGBTQ citizens in Missouri.
Neither would many of us. Responsible adults don't drag vulnerable teenagers into an incendiary debate, expose them to intense public scrutiny and deprive them of health care that a consensus of medical groups agree can lower risks of suicide.
But, to state the obvious, this isn't about the kids. This is about power and deception.
A majority of Missouri voters support abortion rights. They made that clear in November when they approved Constitutional Amendment 3, which enshrined the right to abortion in the state.
Legislative Republicans can't let that stand, but they also know they're crosswise with the will of the people. And so they are throwing transgender children into the line of fire.
'It is cruel, but it is the only chance they have at overturning the right to abortion,' said state Sen. Patty Lewis, a Democratic from Kansas City.
Missouri politicians have long sought to use transgender people, and youth especially, to further their careers.
The state's senior U.S. senator, Josh Hawley, has launched numerous attacks on transgender health care. The current attorney general, Andrew Bailey, is in an ongoing fight to obtain sensitive health care records from clinics in the state that provide gender-affirming care to minors.
As this year's legislative session approached, PROMO tracked at least a dozen bills targeting transgender people, most centered on curbing their health care. Many were linked to attacks on abortion rights, using the contentious rationale that the U.S. Supreme Court Dobbs decision hands states the authority not only to regulate abortion but transgender health care as well.
'Threats to abortion care and trans health care are interconnected,' Erker-Lynch said. 'They're very strategic and intentional.'
In a survey last year of Missouri youth who identify as LGBTQ, conducted by The Trevor Project, a research and advocacy group, 92% said recent politics harmed their well being and 61% said they or their parents had thought about leaving the state for that reason. Among people who identified as transgender and nonbinary, 67% wanted to leave.
That's a lot of people who don't seem to feel protected. And the survey predated HJR 73.
'If our legislators really seek to protect children,' Erker-Lynch said, 'they can look at the way they're encouraging bullying, the way that they're encouraging discrimination, the way they're refusing access to care.'
They should, but they won't. Not with their desperate effort to ban abortion in the balance.
The transgender health care provision in Republicans' proposed constitutional amendment is being called 'ballot candy' — a sweetener for voters who are swayed by social issues.
Too much candy is bad for childrens' health. And so are the Missouri Republicans who callously placed transgender kids in the midst of their deceptive effort to ban abortion.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
11 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Is Elon Musk right to oppose the budget bill? What Americans said in a new poll
During his public falling out with President Donald Trump, Elon Musk slammed the president's proposed spending bill — dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' — claiming it will balloon the deficit. It turns out, most Americans agree with his critique, new polling reveals. In the latest Economist/YouGov poll, half of respondents were asked to react to a statement from Musk on the GOP-backed spending bill, which passed in the House without a single Democratic vote. The legislation, Musk wrote on X on June 3, 'will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion and burden (American) citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' A majority of respondents, 56%, said they agreed with this statement, while just 17% said they disagreed. More than one-quarter, 27%, said they were unsure. The answers were largely linked to partisan affiliation, with Democrats largely siding with Musk for a change. Seventy-two percent of Democrats said they concurred with the billionaire's statement about the spending bill, as did 55% of independents. Among Republicans, a plurality, 44%, said they agreed. The poll — which sampled 1,533 U.S. adults June 6-9 — posed the same statement before the other half of respondents, but this time, it did not attribute it to Musk. Without reference to Musk, a slightly smaller share, 49%, said they agreed with the statement, while 23% said they disagreed. Smaller shares of Republicans, independents and Democrats agreed, though Democrats saw the largest decrease in support — from 72% to 60%. The poll has a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points. More on the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' The spending bill, which provides funding for fiscal year 2025, passed in the House in a 215-214 vote in late May and is now under consideration in the Senate. It contains many pieces of Trump's agenda, including a road map to extend the 2017 tax cuts, as well as an increase in funding for the Pentagon and border security, according to previous reporting from McClatchy News. At the same time, it slashes funding for social programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Further — to Musk's point — it would increase the federal deficit by $3.8 trillion over the next 10 years, according to an analysis from the Congressional Budget Office, a nonpartisan agency. In addition to Musk, the bill has received criticism from several other prominent conservatives in Congress. One of the most vocal opponents has been Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, who wrote on X that 'the spending proposed in this bill is unsustainable, we cannot continue spending at these levels if we want to truly tackle our debt.' Other Republican lawmakers have come out in defense of the bill, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has said the legislation will deliver 'historic tax relief, ensure our border stays secure, strengthen our military, and produce historic savings.' Meanwhile, Democrats have been united in their opposition. In a statement, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries labeled the bill 'the GOP Tax Scam' and said it would rip 'healthcare and food assistance away from millions of people in order to provide tax cuts to the wealthy, the well-off and the well-connected.'


E&E News
28 minutes ago
- E&E News
Senate Republican questions megabill deadline — and says Musk ‘missed an opportunity' to shape it
Utah Republican Sen. John Curtis raised doubts on Tuesday the GOP could pass its megabill by its self-imposed Independence Day deadline. Curtis, speaking at the POLITICO Energy Summit in Washington, said, 'I think a lot of us would be surprised if it passed by July 4.' He added: 'I think that's a false deadline. I don't think that we need to put a specific deadline on it. Let's get it right.' Advertisement Curtis, who has been pushing for specific changes to the House-passed tax cut, energy and security spending budget bill, said the package would unfairly phase out tax credits from the Democrats' 2022 climate law. He said the rollbacks could harm energy workers and the economy.


The Hill
29 minutes ago
- The Hill
Three dozen House Republicans urge Senate GOP against ‘budget gimmicks,' deficit increases
More than three dozen House Republicans are warning Senate GOP leaders against approving additional deficit increases or using 'budget gimmicks' to count additional savings in the 'one big beautiful bill' of President Trump's tax cut and spending priorities. 'As the Senate considers changes, we remain unequivocal in our position that any additional tax cuts must be matched dollar-for-dollar by real, enforceable spending reductions,' the 37 members, led by Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-Pa.), said in a Tuesday letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), adding that the principle is the 'cornerstone' of the budget resolution framework passed by the House and is the 'minimum standard for our support.' The letter further asserted that the members would consider 'genuine savings only' as established by that House resolution. 'Offsets must come from permanent reforms that make the budget more sustainable, not timing shifts or other budget gimmicks,' the letter said. Among the signatories are House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas), House Republican Conference Vice Chair Blake Moore (R-Utah), and many members of the House Freedom Caucus, including its chairman Andy Harris (R-Md.). The Senate is currently considering and expected to make changes to the House-passed megabill that includes extension of tax cuts that Trump signed into law in 2017; boosts to border, deportation, and defense funding; and new restrictions on Medicaid and food assistance programs that are project to result in millions of individuals losing their health insurance. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated the proposed tax cuts in the plan would decrease revenues by more than $3.6 trillion over a decade, while measures to cut federal spending — including reforms to Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program —would reduce outlays by $1.2 trillion over the same period, resulting in a net deficit increase of $2.4 trillion. Several matters under consideration in the Senate would add to the deficit impact of the bill. Some GOP senators are unhappy with provisions to terminate clean energy tax breaks, while others are objecting to the around $800 billion in cuts to Medicaid through provisions like increased work requirements and $267 billion in cuts to food assistance through provisions like making states share the cost of the program for the first time. 'A reconciliation bill that relaxes fiscal discipline reflected in the House-passed bill would invite higher borrowing costs and undermine the economic growth that Americans need to maximize opportunity,' the 37 House GOP members said in the letter. 'We urge Senate leadership to keep the reconciliation measure compatible with the House framework while seizing every opportunity to deepen savings.'