Israel to deport Greta Thunberg, other activists
Greta Thunberg accused Israel of kidnapping her in international waters. (AFP Pic)
JERUSALEM: Greta Thunberg and other pro-Palestinian activists have been taken to Tel Aviv airport ahead of their deportation, the Israeli foreign ministry said on Tuesday, after the Israeli navy prevented them from sailing to Gaza.
Israeli forces boarded the charity vessel as it neared Gaza early on Monday, trying to break through a years-old naval blockade of the coastal enclave, and seized the 12-strong crew, including Swedish campaigner Thunberg.
The British-flagged yacht was taken to the Israeli port of Ashdod and the foreign ministry said the activists were transferred overnight to Ben Gurion airport.
'Some of the 'Selfie Yacht' passengers are expected to leave within the next few hours,' the ministry said in a statement. 'Those who refuse to sign deportation documents and leave Israel will be brought before a judicial authority, in accordance with Israeli law, to authorise their deportation.'
Consular representatives from the passengers' home countries met them at the airport, it added.
The activists had been carrying a small cargo of humanitarian aid, including rice and baby formula, and said they wanted to raise international awareness about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, which has been devastated by months of war.
Israel dismissed the voyage as a pro-Hamas publicity stunt. 'The tiny amount of aid that was on the yacht and not consumed by the 'celebrities' will be transferred to Gaza through real humanitarian channels,' the foreign ministry said.
Thunberg accused Israel of kidnapping her in international waters. 'I urge all my friends, family and comrades to put pressure on the Swedish government to release me and the others as soon as possible,' she said in a video that was recorded ahead of the Israeli navy action.
US President Donald Trump dismissed Thunberg's claim of being kidnapped. 'I think Israel has enough problems without kidnapping Greta Thunberg,' he said. 'She's a young, angry person … I think she has to go to an anger management class.'
Israel has imposed a naval blockade on the coastal enclave since Hamas took control of Gaza in 2007, saying it aims to stop weapons from reaching Hamas.
The blockade has remained in place through conflicts including the war, which began when Hamas-led fighters rampaged through southern Israel on Oct 7, 2023, killing more than 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, by Israeli tallies.
Israel's retaliatory offensive against Hamas has since killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, according to health officials in Hamas-run Gaza, and destroyed most of the homes of its 2.3 million residents.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
US envoy: Palestinian state no longer policy goal
WASHINGTON: Washington's ambassador to Israel said he did not think an independent Palestinian state remains a US foreign policy goal, prompting the State Department to say he spoke for himself while the White House referred to past comments from President Donald Trump expressing doubts about a two-state solution. "I don't think so," US Ambassador Mike Huckabee said in an interview with Bloomberg News published on Tuesday, when asked if a Palestinian state remains a goal of US policy. Asked about Huckabee's comments, the White House referred to remarks earlier this year by Trump when he proposed a US takeover of Gaza, which was condemned globally by rights groups, Arab states, Palestinians and the UN as a proposal of "ethnic cleansing." The White House also referred to remarks by Trump from last year before he won the 2024 election when he said: "I'm not sure a two-state solution anymore is going to work." Asked whether Huckabee's remarks represented a change in US policy, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce declined to comment on Tuesday, saying policy-making was a matter for Trump and the White House. "I'm not going to explain them or really comment on them at all. I think he certainly speaks for himself," Bruce told reporters. Huckabee, an evangelical Christian, is a staunch pro-Israel conservative. "Unless there are some significant things that happen that change the culture, there's no room for it," Huckabee was quoted as saying by Bloomberg. Those probably won't happen "in our lifetime," he said. Trump, in his first term, was relatively tepid in his approach to a two-state solution, a longtime pillar of US Middle East policy. Trump has given little sign of where he stands on the issue in his second term. Huckabee suggested a piece of land could be carved out of a Muslim country rather than asking Israel to make room. "Does it have to be in Judea and Samaria?" Huckabee said, using the biblical name the Israeli government favours for the Israeli-occupied West Bank, where some 3 million Palestinians live. Huckabee, a former Arkansas governor, has been a vocal supporter of Israel throughout his political career and a longtime defender of Jewish settlements in the West Bank. Trump has pursued strongly pro-Israel policies as president and his choice of Huckabee as ambassador signaled that they would continue. The United States has for decades backed a two-state solution between the Israelis and the Palestinians that would create a state for Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza alongside Israel. The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered in October 2023, when Palestinian Hamas fighters attacked Israel, killing 1,200 and taking about 250 hostages, according to Israeli allies. US ally Israel's subsequent military assault on Gaza has killed nearly 55,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's health ministry, while internally displacing nearly Gaza's entire population and causing a hunger crisis. The assault has also triggered accusations of genocide at the International Court of Justice and of war crimes at the International Criminal Court. Israel denies the accusations.--REUTERS
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Israel strike on Lebanon kills two
BEIRUT: Lebanon said an Israeli drone strike on Tuesday killed a man and his son in a southern village, the latest deadly attack despite a November ceasefire, with Israel claiming the two were militants. The Lebanese health ministry said in a statement that 'an Israeli enemy drone carried out a strike in the village of Shebaa, killing two people and wounding one'. The two dead were a father and his son, with the state-run National News Agency saying the man wounded was also his son. The Israeli military said it had killed a Hezbollah member and an operative with the Lebanese Resistance Brigades, which is affiliated with the Iran-backed militant group. A military statement said the two men were 'handling weapons used by Hezbollah for terrorist purposes and for observation of (Israeli) soldiers in the area', near the border. Israel has repeatedly bombed its northern neighbour despite the November ceasefire that ended more than a year of hostilities with Hezbollah including two months of full-blown war. In the capital Beirut, a Lebanese military official told AFP that army forces had launched a search in a building in the city's southern suburbs, a densely populated area where Hezbollah holds sway. The official said the forces were looking for weapons at the request of a five-member committee supervising the Israel-Hezbollah ceasefire. Israel warned on Friday that it would keep up its strikes on Hezbollah targets across Lebanon. The Lebanese government has condemned a massive Israeli strike on south Beirut last week, on the eve of the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha. Hezbollah said the Israeli air raid levelled nine residential blocks. The Israeli military said the strikes targeted underground drone factories. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun condemned the attack as 'a flagrant violation' of the ceasefire agreement.
Malay Mail
5 hours ago
- Malay Mail
When the powerful fear justice — Che Ran
JUNE 11 — It's always the same playbook. When justice starts sniffing too close to the men with blood under their fingernails, they don't argue facts. They don't invite transparency. They threaten. They bully. They pick up the phone and speak slowly, like they're doing you a favour by not tearing the whole thing down. And that's exactly what David Cameron did. The former Prime Minister—Britain's once-chosen steward of democracy and human rights—called the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court and told him that holding Israeli leaders accountable for alleged war crimes would be like 'dropping a hydrogen bomb.' Let that sink in. Not a court ruling. Not a verdict. A bomb. This wasn't diplomacy. This was a warning shot dressed up in a suit and tie. What Cameron said wasn't just inappropriate—it was an act of sabotage. A deliberate attempt to undermine the last scraps of credibility that international law still clings to. Because if the ICC can't investigate crimes when the accused are politically powerful or deemed 'friends' of the West, then what's the point of any of it? Why have a court at all if the people who need to be judged the most are immune? There is a deeper sickness here. A double standard so naked, it burns. When the ICC issued an arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin, the Western world applauded. Justice, finally. Accountability, finally. But when the same court looked toward Tel Aviv, everything changed. Suddenly, the court became 'unhelpful,' 'biased,' 'a threat to peace.' The same nations that trumpet the rule of law from their podiums at the UN started hurling stones at the very institution they once helped build. You cannot cherry-pick justice. You cannot hold it high when it suits you, and gut it when it challenges your allies. That isn't justice—it's empire in drag. It's colonialism wrapped in legalese. And it's killing any hope that the law can protect the weak from the strong. The story doesn't end with Cameron. He was just the loudest voice on the line. Across the Atlantic, American lawmakers have been snarling too. Threats of sanctions, visa bans, financial strangulation—all aimed at shutting down an investigation into Israeli actions in Gaza. And behind the scenes, there are reports of intimidation, surveillance, even smear campaigns against court officials. A full-scale assault, not just on the investigation, but on the very idea that no one is above the law. The International Criminal Court building is seen in The Hague, Netherlands, January 16, 2019. — Reuters pic It should chill us to the bone. Because once justice becomes conditional—once we allow politics to decide who gets prosecuted and who doesn't—we are no longer in a world of law. We are back in the jungle, clawing and snarling, where might is right and innocence is irrelevant. And still, amid this storm, one man stood his ground. Karim Khan, the British prosecutor at the ICC, didn't back down. He didn't cave. He didn't roll over for the threats of former prime ministers or the pressure of global superpowers. He just said, calmly: 'I don't like being threatened.' In that moment, something rare happened. A flicker of integrity, flickering stubbornly in the dark. But flickers don't last forever. They need fuel. They need public outrage. They need people to care. Because if we let this go—if we let the Camerons of the world silence investigations with threats and handshakes—then we are saying, loud and clear, that war crimes only matter when poor men commit them. That starving civilians, bombing hospitals, or reducing entire neighbourhoods to ash is forgivable, so long as the pilot's accent is Western and the missiles are paid for in dollars or sterling. We cannot let this stand. If international law means anything, it must mean something when it's hard. It must mean something when the accused are rich, powerful, and uncomfortably close. Otherwise, it's just theatre. And we've all seen enough performances. What Cameron did was not a slip. It was not a moment of poor judgment. It was a deliberate act to protect power from accountability. And we must call it what it is: an assault on justice. Because the moment we start excusing the inexcusable, the moment we let politics decide who gets to face the scales and who walks free—we lose something essential. Not just as nations. Not just as institutions. But as human beings. We lose our claim to conscience. * This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
