
Edmonton police officer reprimanded for using force on handcuffed man in 2019 arrest
Social Sharing
An Edmonton police officer has been reprimanded nearly six years after an arrest where he shoved a handcuffed man's head into a brick wall.
According to a disciplinary decision released Wednesday, the officer admitted to unlawful exercise of authority in the incident on June 11, 2019. He was among several officers who pursued a man speeding in a stolen truck into a downtown apartment parking lot.
Frad Kamins, a retired RCMP chief superintendent who presided over the hearing, accepted a joint submission for a formal reprimand as the penalty.
Kamins said it's "on the lighter side" of penalties he might impose, but he accepted the agreement for "a restorative approach versus the usual suspension without pay penalty."
The decision identifies the officer only by anonymized initials, but he was publicly named as Const. Dylan Awid in 2021, when the Alberta Serious Incident Response Team charged him with assault in the wake of CBC reporting on video footage of the arrest.
The Alberta Crown Prosecution Service stayed the charge about a month after it was laid, saying in a statement at the time that after a review, it was determined the case did not meet the standard for prosecution.
According to Kamins's discipline decision, "The officer admitted the situation and the intensity got the better of his emotions.
"While some degree of force was necessary to subdue the driver of the stolen vehicle, the force used by Constable [Awid] was not. It was a case of poor judgment and a spontaneous reaction."
WATCH | Video shows arrest that led to EPS officer discipline:
Videos reveal extent of violent arrest by Edmonton police
6 years ago
Duration 1:36
Security video obtained by CBC News along with civilian cell phone video reveals the full extent of police violence in the June arrest of an alleged truck thief. The videos show the alleged thief being struck with what appears to be a gun before he is repeatedly kicked, thrown headfirst into a brick wall, elbow smashed in the head and then pushed hard against a cruiser. Officers then appear to re-enact the violence.
Kyle Parkhurst, the man who was arrested, filed a lawsuit in 2022 against Edmonton Police Service and the individual officers involved.
In his statement of claim, he says one EPS officer shouted "You're going to die!" and another called him a "maggot." He says he "received no medical attention despite being visibly injured" once he was in the back of an EPS car.
The allegations have not been proven in court. All parties have filed statements of defence denying the allegations against them.
Parkhurst initially also sued Alberta Health Services and the province, alleging he didn't get proper medical attention while he was in custody at the Edmonton Remand Centre and Fort Saskatchewan Correctional Centre. Court documents show that action was discontinued this year.
In a statement issued by his lawyer, Chris Wiebe, Parkhurst said Thursday that he wasn't given an opportunity to participate in the EPS disciplinary proceedings, and he continues to fear and distrust police because of what he experienced.
"Almost six years is a long wait just for minimum consequence," he said.
Kamins's decision characterizes the incident as a case of "serious misconduct," but says the officer has taken responsibility, shown remorse and apologized for his actions.
Parkhurst said he hasn't received an apology.
"It's like I matter less to them because I struggle with using drugs and I have a criminal record," he said.
Officer admitted 'screw-up' in EPS conduct investigation
Security video from the arrest shows two police vehicles box in the truck, with Parkhurst behind the wheel, after it rams both police cars.
Once Parkhurst is outside the vehicle, police get him to the ground to arrest him.
According to an agreed statement of facts from Awid's EPS discipline proceedings, video from an EPS helicopter, as well as footage recorded by a person in a nearby building, shows Awid jump from the cab of the truck onto Parkhurst's leg, then kick him in the torso three times.
A different officer involved in the arrest also used a Taser on Parkhurst while he was on the ground, according to the statement of defence filed by EPS in Parkhurst's civil case.
Parkhurst is then handcuffed and pulled to his feet, and video shows Awid shove his head into a wall. After walking him to a police vehicle, still in handcuffs, Awid shoves him again into the side of the car.
The officer acknowledged to an EPS Professional Standards Branch investigator that the second shove against the car wasn't necessary, the agreed facts say. Awid was forthcoming with the investigator about the incident, according to the discipline decision, saying, "It was a screw-up and you own it."
Parkhurst pleaded guilty to several criminal charges about six months after he was arrested, admitting that during a drug-fuelled crime spree, he stole several vehicles and drove dangerously through Edmonton, evading police and at one point rear-ending another car with enough force that the female driver lost consciousness.
His defence lawyer at the time initially told the court he'd seek to have all the charges from the day of Parkhurst's arrest stayed, claiming a breach of his client's Charter rights.
The Crown prosecutor told the court that "police did use unnecessary force once [Parkhurst] was already in custody," and the Crown took that into account in the joint-sentencing submission for three and a half years in prison.
Kamins wrote in his decision that Awid had been on the force less than two years at the time of the arrest.
"He got caught up in the 'heat of the moment' though, admittedly, that is usually the case with such matters."
The disciplinary proceedings also credited Awid for subsequent volunteer work with Santas Anonymous and a food bank initiative.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
36 minutes ago
- CTV News
Popeyes accused of using ‘unsafe' chicken allegedly stored in residential garages in Ontario
A lawsuit filed against Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is accusing the fried chicken chain of buying 'unsafe' meat from an unauthorized seller that was allegedly storing and packaging raw chicken in residential garages in Ontario. The lawsuit was filed at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on May 26 by ADP, a former raw chicken supplier to Popeyes. The company alleges they lost their contract with Popeyes after bringing forward its concerns about the 'unsafe supply' of products. Popeyes, Restaurant Brands International (RBI)—the Toronto-based company that owns the fast-food chain—and Restaurant Services Canada Inc. (RSCI), the supply chain manager, are all named in the lawsuit. Popeyes, for its part, said in a statement to CTV News that the claims from ADP Direct Poultry Ltd. are unfounded and that it found 'no evidence' to support them following an investigation. The lawsuit also names another company as the unauthorized supplier that allegedly provided, at times, 'rotten or expired' chicken deemed 'unfit for human consumption' to various franchisees across Ontario. The documents continue to say this chicken created a public health risk because it was delivered in vehicles that did not have the proper refrigeration to prevent it from spoiling. The statement of claim alleges that these tainted products were bought by various franchisees—both known to ADP and not, all named in the suit—due to their lower prices. The lawsuit also alleges the franchisees continued to sell the chicken to customers, even after ADP brought forward its concerns that the products did not adhere to food health and safety standards. The allegations have not been tested in court. As laid out in the documents, Popeyes had a system of authorized suppliers and distributors who adhered to the company's specifications and standards, meaning franchisees were required to purchase from within their approved list of vendors. Any restaurant looking to purchase ingredients outside of the company's list of vendors had to write a formal request, after which the supplier in question would have to submit to an inspection to ensure it meets the requirements as well as health and safety standards. ADP claims the chicken sold by the unauthorized company was not inspected by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) or any other inspector. CTV News Toronto contacted the CFIA for comment. The supplier claims RSCI, meanwhile, did not investigate the unsafe supply of chicken as they promised and instead conspired to 'manufacture a rationale for removing ADP' from their authorized vendors list. In turn, the filings further allege franchisees were 'upset about the reporting of the unsafe supply' and worked with the RSCI to lodge 'false or misleading' complaints about the quality of their products. CTV News has reached out to Restaurant Services Inc., parent company to RSCI, for comment but has not yet heard back. 'We believe this former supplier is lashing out after losing our business for a variety of legitimate reasons,' Emily Ciantra, Popeye's director communications, told CTV News Toronto in a statement. 'We have always been committed to rigorous safety standards, including regular inspections by third party auditors who verify our strict standards are being followed.' ADP seeks $35 million in damages from Popeyes, RBI and RSCI, citing breach of contract and breaches of the Competition Act. The documents state that $30 million is to cover ADP's loss of profits after their contract—which was expected to continue until 2027—was prematurely terminated. An additional $5 million is to cover the costs the supplier incurred after boosting its production facilities to meet Popeyes' increased production demand, the documents state. ADP also seeks $1 million in punitive damages. The supplier adds it also lost out on business opportunities, such as providing products to other fast-food chains like Wendy's. Additionally, the raw chicken supplier is seeking at least $10 million in damages from the unauthorized company, who it deems liable for 'unlawfully interfering' with ADP's economic relationship with Popeyes, as well as $500,000 in aggravated damages. ADP also seeks $150,000 from each franchisee and an account detailing the quantity of 'unsafe supply' they bought from the company as well as how much they profited from the unauthorized products. 'The defendants' conduct was malicious, high handed, intended to cause harm to ADP, endangered the public, and warrants aggravated and punitive damages,' the filings state.


CTV News
36 minutes ago
- CTV News
Crash closes Spring Creek Road in South Bruce Peninsula
Spring Creek Road in South Bruce Peninsula closed after serious early-morning crash. Fri., June 6, 2025. File photo An early-morning serious collision has forced the closure of Spring Creek Road in South Bruce Peninsula. Grey Bruce Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) responded to a call shortly after 3 a.m. of a single-vehicle collision on Spring Creek Road. Due to the ongoing investigation and the presence of emergency personnel, Spring Creek Road is currently closed between Legion Road and Allenford Road. Police ask motorists to avoid the area and seek alternate routes.


Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
The man behind the wrong number
A Regina officer is accused of using police resources to prey on vulnerable women. These are their stories Jana G. Pruden Regina The Globe and Mail Illustration by Rob Dobi to view this content.