
Trump heads to NATO summit fuming over Israel, Iran
President Trump is on his way to the NATO summit, emerging from the White House early Tuesday enraged over the continued fighting between Israel and Iran in the wake of parameters of a ceasefire he announced a day before.
What comes next in the nearly two-week old conflict will likely dominate a host of bilateral meetings and informal pull-asides with world leaders Trump has lined up at the two-day summit in the Netherlands.
NATO's defense spending levels will also take center stage as world leaders prepare to back a goal of spending 5 percent of gross domestic product to increase security.
That will likely be related to talks involving the Russia-Ukraine war, another major topic at hand, as well as Trump's tariffs on trading partners.
Here's what to watch for.
Trump is set to arrive in the Netherlands after a whirlwind few days of activity in the Middle East.
He left Washington, D.C. early on Tuesday fuming at both Israel and Iran for continued fighting overnight despite his announcement that the parameters of a ceasefire deal had been agreed upon.
He declared that both sides 'don't know what the f— they're doing.'
'I think they both violated it. I don't think, I'm not sure they did it intentionally. They couldn't rein people back,' Trump told reporters as he departed the White House. 'I don't like the fact that Israel went out this morning at all, and I'm going to see if I can stop it. So as soon as I get away from you, I'm going to see if I can stop it.'
Before he announced the ceasefire to bring the nearly two-week conflict to an end, the U.S. military struck three Iranian nuclear facilities. Iran retaliated with missiles targeting an American base in Qatar that resulted in no casualties.
It was a remarkable sequence of events, particularly for Trump, who had faced lingering questions and some criticism from his own base about the prospect of engaging in a foreign conflict despite his 'America first' foreign policy pledge.
The fragile ceasefire and how to approach Iran and its nuclear ambitions moving forward are likely to be a subject of discussion among world leaders at the NATO summit.
The president pushed the idea to require all NATO members to spend 5 percent of their GDP on defense, as opposed to 2 percent, after railing against allies for not paying their fair share.
The summit in The Hague is seen as a deadline for members to meet the spending threshold as the demands will be confirmed on Wednesday. The U.S would also be increasing its spending from 3 percent to 5 percent and in 2024, 23 out of 32 countries in the alliance had met the 2 percent threshold.
Spain, however, is expected to be an outlier after it made a deal with NATO to be excluded from the 5 percent and instead spend just over 2 percent of its GDP on defense needs. Spain received the exemption from NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, after Trump said on Friday that the country 'has to pay what everybody else has to pay.'
Trump has also suggested the U.S. may not defend NATO allies who do not contribute enough to defense spending, despite the core pillar of the alliance that an attack on one is an attack on all.
Asked about the United States' Article 5 obligations while en route to the summit, Trump suggested there were different definitions of what it meant.
'Depends on your definition. There's numerous definitions of Article Five,' Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One. 'But I'm committed to being their friends. You know, I've become friends with many of those leaders, and I'm committed to helping them.'
'I said, 'If you're not going to pay, we're not going to defend.' I said that seven years ago, and because of that, they paid hundreds of billions of dollars,' the president said in April.
The only time Article 5 of NATO has been invoked was after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on U.S. soil. Trump on the campaign trail said that he thinks NATO allies treat the U.S. unfairly and that the U.S. takes on a heavier burden than other members.
Rutte stressed in his preview of the summit that the alliance has to continue to be consistent with its support for Ukraine.
'We must continue to make sure Ukraine has what it needs to defend today and deter in the future. Our support for Ukraine is unwavering and will persist' Rutte said.
Ukraine and Russia's war is a particularly challenging spot for Trump, after he vowed on the 2024 campaign trail to end the ongoing war within 24 hours of taking office but has made little apparent headway. Trump is expected to meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the summit.
Russia has so far refused U.S. proposals for a 30-day ceasefire and Trump has expressed increasing frustration with Putin, while also placing blame on Ukraine for not making a deal to end the fighting.
Meanwhile, Russia condemned the U.S. strikes on the Iranian nuclear sites and vowed to support Iran on Monday, telling Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, 'for our part, we are making efforts to assist the Iranian people.'
'The completely unprovoked act of aggression against Iran has no foundation or justification,' the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement.
Trump on Monday had blasted former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev over remarks suggesting Iran's allies could supply it with nuclear warheads and boasted about the U.S. nuclear arsenal.
Trump's 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs on all trading partners expires on July 8 with only agreements with China and the United Kingdom having been announced.
Multiple key trading partners, including Canada, France and Italy, will be at the NATO summit and eager for discussions over its trading relationship with the U.S. The administration had ambitious goals for their negotiations, aiming for 90 deals in 90 days and, while they have teased that deals with trading partners like India, Japan and Vietnam are close to being finalized, but haven't announced anything concrete.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who stayed back at the G-7 meeting after Trump left early, floated that there could be some wiggle room beyond the July 8 deadline to strike deals.
At the G-7, the president and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer detailed the trade deal between the two nations, which was in the works before Trump imposed his reciprocal tariffs on trading partners.
Trump at the time said he thinks there will be 'many, many other ones coming' when it comes to trade deals with countries. But, the administration has not announced any progress in talks with other nations.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac privatization: What it means for homebuyers
When it comes to housing finance reform, few if any topics are more important than the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These government-sponsored enterprises, or GSEs – which underpin nearly half of all U.S. mortgage loans – have long been the silent engines driving mortgage accessibility, affordability and market stability. Now, as the current administration revisits privatizing these institutions, the conversation is no longer theoretical and the implications for buyers, sellers and homeowners are impossible to ignore. Established by Congress, Fannie Mae (Federal National Mortgage Association) and Freddie Mac (Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation) were created to promote liquidity and stability in the mortgage market. They purchase home loans from lenders, bundle them into securities, and sell them to investors, providing capital that allows lenders to issue more mortgages. This framework has helped make 30-year fixed-rate mortgages a standard and has supported affordable lending for millions of Americans. During the financial crisis, both entities were placed under federal conservatorship with the government investing almost $200 million in the form of preferred shares to provide needed liquidity. Since that time, the GSEs have generated dividends to the treasury far exceeding that amount, leading to the public/private debate. Some suggest taxpayers, having saved the entities, should continue to benefit from the GSE's activities, while others believe the debt is more than fully repaid, thus they should become private once again. Although technically shareholder-owned, the GSEs remain tightly controlled by the government with an implicit guarantee. Shareholders, some which are hedge funds, consider their investment compromised. Home ownership in America: Mortgage rates keep rising. Home sales keep falling. Now, with recent remarks from President Trump and reports from Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan and others indicating a renewed push for privatization, the landscape is shifting again. The proposed goal suggests the administration is exploring several options to return the GSEs to the public market, potentially with an Initial Public Offering (IPO) to bridge the gap in required capital funds while they remain under conservatorship. Supporters argue that returning Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to private ownership could reduce the government's footprint in the housing market and foster innovation, allowing the GSEs to develop more flexible mortgage products. The change could also reduce taxpayer risk, free up capital for other public priorities, and boost market confidence. Critics, however, recognize that real-world implications for homebuyers are complex. Without the government's implicit backing, investors might perceive greater risk in mortgage securities, which could lead to higher costs passed on to homebuyers. That could result in interest rates rising, placing a heavier burden on borrowers, and potentially pushing homeownership further out of reach for many. Privatization may also come with tighter lending standards, making it more difficult for those with modest incomes and limited credit histories to secure loans. Across the country, homebuyers may face elevated interest rates and more stringent loan qualifications. Those looking to refinance could find higher rates and fewer options. Popular loan products, such as the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage, may become less common or more expensive if no longer backed by GSEs. Recognizing these stakes, some within the housing industry are advocating for a balanced approach. Rather than full privatization or continued conservatorship, a hybrid model has been proposed – one that maintains a limited federal guarantee while granting the GSEs greater autonomy. The Mortgage Bankers Association, for example, supports preserving investor confidence and protecting market liquidity without placing the full weight of the mortgage system on the government's shoulders. The conversation surrounding the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is as complex as it is consequential, and the journey toward privatization, if undertaken, will be gradual. The privatization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac comes with risks and benefits. No matter where you stand on this issue, caution is the word. Budge Huskey is chief executive officer of Premier Sotheby's International Realty. This article originally appeared on Sarasota Herald-Tribune: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac privatization: What it means for homebuyers Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Microsoft (MSFT) Broadens AMD's Partnership for Next-Gen Xbox Console
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMD) is one of the 12 best cryptocurrency and blockchain stocks to buy. On June 17, Microsoft announced it had extended its partnership with the company to design next-generation chips that will go into Xbox consoles. A close up of a complex looking PCB board with several intergrated semiconductor parts. It is a significant partnership for AMD as it stands to fulfill tens of millions of chip orders over the life of the next-generation console. Additionally, the partnership is poised to last several years and span multiple generations of desktop and portable hardware, providing a reliable revenue stream. Microsoft has utilized AMD hardware for the last two console generations, beginning with the Xbox One. Despite Nvidia's dominance in PC GPUs, AMD CPUs and AMD GPUs have proved to be a powerful pairing. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMD) is a semiconductor company that provides hardware and software that power blockchain and cryptocurrency applications. AMD's technology, particularly its CPUs and GPUs, plays a crucial role in the performance and efficiency of blockchain operations like mining and transaction validation. While we acknowledge the potential of AMD as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. (MSM): A Bull Case Theory
We came across a bullish thesis on MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. on FluentInQuality's Substack. In this article, we will summarize the bull's thesis on MSM. MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.'s share was trading at $82.09 as of 19th June. MSM's trailing and forward P/E ratios were 21.60 and 20.20, respectively, according to Yahoo Finance. A factory worker operating a machine that processes steel products. MSC Industrial Direct (MSM) is a quietly essential player in the American industrial economy, ensuring the uninterrupted supply of cutting tools, fasteners, safety gear, and millions of SKUs critical to factory operations. While it doesn't manufacture these tools, MSC's core strength lies in its ability to embed itself into customers' production lines, acting as a logistics powerhouse serving over 350,000 clients, from small machine shops to Fortune 500 giants. With same-day delivery and just-in-time fulfillment, MSC eliminates costly downtime and becomes indispensable to its customers. Its moat is built on SKU density, vendor-managed inventory, and an infrastructure of 100+ fulfillment centers, on-site sales reps, and factory-floor vending machines. These elements create high switching costs disguised as convenience, leading to over 60% of sales being repeat business. This isn't e-commerce; it's industrial automation through habitual reordering and long-standing relationships. Financially, MSC is capital-efficient, generates strong free cash flow, maintains a conservative balance sheet, and requires minimal capex. Founded in 1941 and still majority-owned by the founding family, the company reflects a durable, owner-operator culture, avoiding fads and focusing on execution and discipline. It's a Buffett-style business: no hype, just high returns on tangible capital and consistent performance. With its embedded customer relationships, recurring revenue model, and focus on fundamentals, MSC offers investors a rare combination of reliability and resilience. In a world chasing the next big thing, MSC delivers something far more enduring: a business built to last. Previously, we covered a on Watsco, Inc. (WSO) by FluentInQuality in March 2025. Since then, the stock has depreciated by ~14% due to macro pressures. However, the core thesis remains intact. FluentInQuality holds a similar conviction in MSC Industrial (MSM), citing its operational moat, recurring revenue, and capital discipline as drivers of long-term resilience. MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. is not on our list of the 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 29 hedge fund portfolios held MSM at the end of the first quarter, which was 33 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the risk and potential of MSM as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 8 Best Wide Moat Stocks to Buy Now and 30 Most Important AI Stocks According to BlackRock.