Australia mushroom trial live: murder-accused Erin Patterson to continue evidence on day 27 of trial
Update:
Date: 2025-06-05T00:27:47.000Z
Title: Good morning
Content: Welcome to day 27 of Erin Patterson's triple murder trial.
Patterson, who began testifying on Monday afternoon, is expected to continue giving evidence this morning.
The trial will resume from 10.30am once the jurors enter the courtroom in Morwell.
Patterson, 50, faces three charges of murder and one charge of attempted murder relating to a beef wellington lunch she served at her house in Leongatha, in regional Victoria, on 29 July 2023.
She is accused of murdering her in-laws, Don and Gail Patterson, and her estranged husband's aunt, Heather Wilkinson. The attempted murder charge relates to Heather's husband, Ian.
She has pleaded not guilty to the charges.
The prosecution alleges Patterson deliberately poisoned her lunch guests with 'murderous intent', but her lawyers say the poisoning was a tragic accident.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Death cap mushrooms, foraging and a dehydrator: Erin Patterson takes the stand
After nearly a month of hearing experts, witnesses and police officers testify, this week Erin Patterson herself took to the stand. Patterson is facing three charges of murder and one of attempted murder – after she served a beef wellington lunch laced with death cap mushrooms – at her house in regional Victoria in 2023. She's pleaded not guilty to those charges. Justice and courts reporter Nino Bucci takes Reged Ahmad through some of the key moments of her evidence, as she tells her side of the story
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Foraged mushrooms, fatal doses and food binges: the week Erin Patterson told her story to triple murder trial
In Erin Patterson's telling, the moment she realised she could be blamed for harming her in-laws came before they even died. According to evidence Patterson gave at her triple-murder trial this week, she was in a Monash hospital room alone with her estranged husband, Simon, after their two children had left to buy food from a vending machine, when he asked her: 'Is that how you poisoned my parents, using that dehydrator?' It was 1 August 2003 – three days after Patterson served beef wellingtons to her parents-in-law, Don and Gail Patterson, Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, and Heather's husband, Ian. Three of her guests died before the week was out, and Ian remained critically unwell. Patterson, 50, is charged with murdering Don, Gail and Heather, and attempting to murder Ian. She has pleaded not guilty. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email 'Did that comment by Simon cause you to reflect on what might have been in the meal?' Patterson's lawyer, Colin Mandy SC, asked her this week. 'It caused me to do a lot of thinking about a lot of things, yeah … it caused me to reflect a lot on what might have happened.' Patterson was discharged from hospital later that day. In her words to the court, she was starting to feel scared, responsible, frantic. Patterson said she realised dried mushrooms from an Asian grocer, and dried mushrooms that she foraged and then dried in the dehydrator, were in a container in her pantry. 'Can you explain to us what crossed your mind then and what you were thinking about?' Mandy asked her this week. Patterson replied: 'It got me thinking about all the times that I'd used [the dehydrator] … and how I had dried foraged mushrooms in it weeks earlier, and I was starting to think, 'what if they'd gone in the container with the Chinese mushrooms? Maybe – maybe that had happened'. '[I felt] … scared. Responsible. Really worried because child protection were involved and Simon seemed to be of the mind that maybe this was intentional and I just – I just got really scared.' Erin Patterson hosts lunch for estranged husband Simon's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, and his aunt and uncle Heather and Ian Wilkinson. Patterson serves beef wellington. All four lunch guests are admitted to hospital with gastro-like symptoms. Gail Patterson and Heather Wilkinson die in hospital. Don Patterson dies in hospital. Victoria police search Erin Patterson's home and interview her. Ian Wilkinson is discharged from hospital after weeks in intensive care. Police again search Erin Patterson's home, and she is arrested and interviewed. She is charged with three counts of murder relating to the deaths of Don and Gail Patterson and Heather Wilkinson, and the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson. Jury is sworn in. Murder trial begins. Jury hears that charges of attempting to murder her estranged husband Simon are dropped. Child protection was due to visit her Leongatha property on 2 August, the day after she was discharged. After she drove the children to school that morning, she dumped a Sunbeam food dehydrator at a local tip. It was later found by police with her fingerprints and traces of death cap mushrooms on it. 'Child protection were coming to my house that afternoon, and I was – I was scared of the conversation that might flow about the meal and the dehydrator, and I just was – I was scared … that they would blame me for it,' Patterson said. 'For making everyone sick, and I was scared they'd remove the children.' This, then, was Patterson's explanation for her lies, lies the jury was told about all the way back on 30 April, the second day of the trial. And here, also, was her explanation for the tragic and terrible accident, as described by Mandy that same day. The question for the jury now was how to consider it: material in the prosecution and defence opening arguments is not, after all, evidence, but what each side says the evidence shows. The prosecution must prove there was no accident: that Patterson intended to put death cap mushrooms in the beef wellingtons, and that she meant to kill or cause serious harm to her guests when she did so. Nanette Rogers SC, for the prosecution, asked Patterson why she did not tell anyone that she had come to the realisation that death cap mushrooms might have been in the meal, nor that she might have foraged them, given she says she realised that on 1 August 2023. In his evidence earlier in the trial, Simon denied that he had made the comment about the dehydrator to Patterson. Rogers asked Patterson about photos found on devices seized by police that showed sliced mushrooms on shelves of the dehydrator, which had in turn been placed on electronic scales. Dr Tom May, a mushroom expert, earlier told the trial those same photos appeared to show death caps. Rogers asked Patterson if she was weighing them in order to calculate the fatal dose for a human. In her opening statement, Rogers said the prosecution's case was that Patterson invited her guests for lunch 'on the pretence that she'd been diagnosed with cancer and needed advice about how to break it to the children'. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Patterson agreed she never had cancer, but said evidence the court heard from Simon and Ian regarding her telling her lunch guests she had been diagnosed was incorrect. Rogers said in her opening that the prosecution also alleged Patterson did not consume death cap mushrooms at the lunch, and pretended she was suffering the same illness as her guests 'to cover that up', explaining 'why we say she was reluctant to receive medical treatment for death cap mushroom poisoning'. Patterson disputed this, but said she ate a significant amount of cake after the lunch – consistent with previous evidence of her having issues with binge eating going back to her 20s – and then vomited all the food from the meal 'back up again'. The prosecution also alleged Patterson did not feed the leftovers of the poisoned beef wellington to her children, which is why she was reluctant to have them medically assessed. Patterson denied she made two batches of wellingtons, saying the children just had the mushrooms and pastry removed from their servings. Rogers also said in her opening statement that the prosecution would not be suggesting a motive in the case, and that the jury may still be unclear at the end of the case why Patterson had done what she was accused of. 'What you will have to … focus your attention on, is whether you are satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the charges … not why she may have done so,' Rogers said. With Patterson in the box, however, Rogers started to focus on what Patterson really thought of her lunch guests. Her messages to Facebook friends, and to Simon, Gail and Don, had been referred to repeatedly throughout the case, but now the person who sent them could be asked what they meant. No, Patterson said to Rogers, the exchanges between her and her Facebook friends, which occurred at the same time as messages in a group chat with the Pattersons, did not demonstrate she was two-faced. 'You had two faces, a public face of appearing to have a good relationship with Don and Gail … and I suggest your private face was the one you showed in your Facebook message group,' Rogers said. 'Incorrect,' Patterson responded. She denied that the way she spoke about Don and Gail on Facebook, including 'this family I swear to fucking god', wanting 'nothing to do' with them, that she was 'sick of this shit' and 'fuck em', was how she truly felt. Patterson also disagreed that she never asked how any of the lunch guests were faring, despite knowing they were unwell. Rogers, staccato, rifled through them, suggesting Patterson had not shown concern about people she said she loved. Don was first, then Gail and Ian. 'And you never asked how Heather was going, and I assume you disagree?' Rogers asked. 'Correct,' Patterson responded. Her evidence will continue on Tuesday.
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Wild moment tattooed scooter rider erupts at driver in fiery clash after he was sent flying off his bike
A shocking road rage incident in the middle of a busy Melbourne street has gone viral after being captured on dashcam. The incident unfolded in April, along Bay Street in Port Melbourne. The footage shows a scooter rider weaving through traffic at speed, overtaking vehicles in a busy lane. Just seconds later, a Volkswagen Amarok 4X4 is seen tailing closely behind, driving aggressively and overtaking without indicating. Moments later, the large ute slams directly into the scooter, sending the rider flying off his vehicle. But the situation escalates further when the scooter rider, noticeably taller and larger than the ute driver, who is wearing hi-vis, gets back on his feet. A physical altercation breaks out, with the ute driver seen covering his face as he's struck by the rider. The video has since gone viral on social media, with many users slamming the Amarok driver for his reckless and aggressive behaviour, despite getting pummelled. 'Wait, did the car intentionally hit the scooter? WTF just happened?' one shocked viewer wrote. 'Lock the Amarok driver up and throw away the key. Should be in a straight jacket,' said another. Others mocked the ute driver's apparent tough-guy attitude, which quickly vanished when he was confronted by the much larger scooter rider. 'A physical representation of Facebook warriors,' one person quipped. 'Oh no… the consequences of my actions,' another joked. 'Karma was swift in her delivery today,' a commenter added. 'I love me some old-fashioned 'f*** around and find out.' Old mate found out, alright,' another viewer wrote. Other people praised the Dashcam owner for sharing the footage, saying while violent, it was incredibly entertaining. 'Big ups to the dashcam driver for capturing the entertainment.' said someone. 'Can we all give the dashcam owner a round of applause for getting us the good footage. Bravo!!' wrote another. In a statement to Daily Mail Australia, Victoria Police confirmed they were investigating the 'road rage incident' 'It is understood that a grey Volkswagen utility and a white Piaggi scooter collided at the intersection of Bay and Rouse streets about 12.30pm. The scooter rider, a 38-year-old Dingley Village man sustained minor injuries. The driver of VW, a 57-year-old St Kilda sustained minor injuries. Both declined medical treatment. Both the driver and rider are expected to be interviewed at a later stage.' No charges have been laid and investigations continue.
