Ukraine and Russia Exchange Wounded, Ill Prisoners of War
Reuters
Freed Ukrainian prisoners of war (POWs) return after a swap, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in an undisclosed location in Ukraine June 12, 2025.
All of the Ukrainian troops need treatment, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said in a message on the Telegram messaging app that did not go into details on the numbers involved.
Kyiv and Moscow agreed to a large exchange of POWs and the remains of thousands of dead soldiers during talks in Istanbul earlier this month.
Since then, Russia and Ukraine have swapped dozens of prisoners of war, focusing on under-25s and the severely wounded and sick. There are hopes they could build into some of the biggest exchanges in the war that was triggered by Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
Russia's defence ministry said a group of Russian troops had returned from Ukraine and crossed into neighbouring Belarus, in accordance with the agreements made on June 2.
'They are being provided with the necessary psychological and medical assistance,' the ministry said on Telegram.
On Wednesday, Ukraine said it had brought home the bodies of 1,212 bodies of troops killed in the war with Russia. Kremlin aide Vladimir Medinsky said Ukraine had returned the bodies of 27 Russian soldiers.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
4 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Iran Says Talks with US ‘Meaningless' after Israel Attack, But Yet to Decide on Attending
Reuters People look at damaged buildings at an impact site following missile attack from Iran on Israel, in Ramat Gan, Israel, June 14, 2025. CAIRO, June 14 (Reuters) – Iran said the dialog with the U.S. over Tehran's nuclear program is 'meaningless' after Israel's biggest-ever military strikeagainst its longstanding enemy, but said it is yet to decide on whether to attend planned talks on Sunday. 'The other side (the U.S.) acted in a way that makes dialog meaningless. You cannot claim to negotiate and at the same time divide work by allowing the Zionist regime (Israel) to target Iran's territory,' state media on Saturday quoted foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei as saying. 'It is still unclear what decision we will make on Sunday in this regard,' Baghaei was quoted as saying. He said Israel 'succeeded in influencing' the diplomatic process and the Israeli attack would not have happened without Washington's permission, accusing Washington of supporting the attack. Iran earlier accused the U.S. of being complicit in Israel's attacks, but Washington denied the allegation and told Tehran at the United Nations Security Council that it would be 'wise' to negotiate over its nuclear program. The sixth round of U.S.-Iran nuclear talks was set to be held on Sunday in Muscat, but it was unclear whether it would go ahead after the Israeli strikes. Iran denies that its uranium enrichment program is for anything other than civilian purposes, rejecting Israeli allegations that it is secretly developing nuclear weapons. U.S. President Donald Trump told Reuters that he and his team had known the Israeli attacks were coming but they still saw room for an accord.
Asahi Shimbun
6 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
VOX POPULI: Ultimately, international law our only ‘tool' to resolve conflicts
Missiles launched from Iran are seen from Jerusalem on June 13. (REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun) Israel on June 13 mounted a sustained offensive against Iran by targeting nuclear and military sites as well as other structures. But why now, when something of this magnitude could escalate into a global crisis? Reading Israel's statement justifying its actions as 'self-defense' and 'pre-emptive' in nature, I recalled the words of a certain scholar of international law I interviewed years ago. I visited Italian jurist Antonio Cassese (1937-2011) at his home to hear his views on war and the international criminal justice system. But he also went on to discuss the Iraq War and the Middle East. When I asked his opinion on 'preventive pre-emptive strikes,' he cited an example, which went to the following effect: 'Let's say you believe Iran will use a nuclear weapon one year from now (and launch a pre-emptive strike against Iran) and justify it as self-defense, you must satisfy three conditions. 'One, you must be able to provide the United Nations with solid proof (of Iran's intent to use a nuclear weapon). Two, your pre-emptive attack must be aimed solely at 'dangerous targets,' not the Iranian government or its administrative system. And three, when you realize later that you were wrong to have attacked Iran, you must agree to be tried in an international court of law.' But if the pre-emptive strike did not meet those three conditions, what then, I asked, and Cassese replied without missing a beat, 'Then, that's an act of aggression.' He said conflicts cannot be resolved by armed force, only by international law, adding that multinational efforts to end conflicts are also of crucial importance. Dutch humanist Hugo Grotius (1583-1645), widely considered the 'father of international law,' published his seminal work 'On the Law of War and Peace' exactly 400 years ago. I feel despair when I think that we humans cannot stop going to war, even though we regret it later, every time. I wondered how Cassese would have reacted to the latest Israeli offensive, were he alive today. Would he have raged against Israel for ignoring his three conditions? My sense is that he probably would have appealed to the international community to act on international law, which he believed to be the only way to resolve conflicts. --The Asahi Shimbun, June 14 * * * Vox Populi, Vox Dei is a popular daily column that takes up a wide range of topics, including culture, arts and social trends and developments. Written by veteran Asahi Shimbun writers, the column provides useful perspectives on and insights into contemporary Japan and its culture.
Yomiuri Shimbun
10 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
‘We Knew Everything,' Trump Tells Reuters about Israel's Strikes on Iran
Reuters U.S. President Donald Trump attends the Congressional Picnic at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 12, 2025. WASHINGTON, June 13 (Reuters) – After months of urging Israel not to strike Iran while he worked toward a nuclear deal, President Donald Trump told Reuters in a phone interview on Friday that he and his team had known the attacks were coming – and still saw room for an accord. 'We knew everything, and I tried to save Iran humiliation and death. I tried to save them very hard because I would have loved to have seen a deal worked out,' Trump said. 'They can still work out a deal, however, it's not too late,' he added. Trump had repeatedly pushed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to delay an Israeli attack to give diplomacy more time, though the president himself had threatened to bomb the Gulf nation if nuclear talks failed. Trump's shifting stance around the Israeli strikes, which he called 'excellent' and 'very successful' in a series of media interviews on Friday, offered one of the most striking examples yet of how he conducts high-stakes negotiations through both frank public rhetoric and behind-the-scenes maneuvers. The U.S. president offered support for Israel's decision to launch a series of devastating raids in Iran, showing a willingness to embrace the use of military force to set back Tehran's nuclear program. In contrast, some allies stressed the need for restraint. Asked if the U.S. would support Israel against Iranian counterattacks, Trump said he supported Israel. He said he was not concerned about a regional war breaking out as a result of Israel's strikes but did not elaborate. 'We've been very close to Israel. We're their number one ally by far,' Trump told Reuters, adding, 'We'll see what happens.' Later on Friday, two U.S. officials said the U.S. military had helped shoot down Iranian missiles headed toward Israel. Talks in doubt Still uncertain is whether Trump's attempt to reach an agreement with Iran to halt uranium enrichment is still viable, with a sixth round of talks still scheduled for Sunday in Oman but now in doubt after the attacks. In negotiations with Iran, Trump sought to persuade the Iranians to give up uranium enrichment and was awaiting a counter-proposal from Iran. Tehran had balked at giving up enrichment, seemingly leaving little room for an agreement. 'They seek enrichment. We can't have enrichment,' Trump told reporters on Monday. As the week wore on, Trump sounded increasingly resigned to the prospect that Israel would strike and hinted that he knew more than he was willing to talk about publicly. 'I don't want to say it's imminent, but it looks like something that could very well happen. Look, it's very simple, not complicated. Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Other than that, I want them to be successful,' he told reporters on Thursday before the raids began. Speaking to Reuters on Friday, Trump said he had given the Iranians 60 days to come to an agreement and that the time had expired with no deal. 'We knew just about everything,' he said. 'We knew enough that we gave Iran 60 days to make a deal and today is 61, right? So, you know, we knew everything.' Trump said it was unclear if Iran still has a nuclear program following Israeli strikes on the country. 'Nobody knows. It was a very devastating hit,' Trump said. Israel said it had targeted Iran's nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories and military commanders at the start of what it warned would be a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran from building an atomic weapon. Trump said the U.S. still has nuclear talks planned with Iran on Sunday but he was unsure they would take place. U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff was scheduled to meet an Iranian delegation in Oman. 'They're not dead,' Trump said of the U.S.-Iran talks. 'We have a meeting with them on Sunday. Now, I'm not sure if that meeting will take place, but we have a meeting with them on Sunday.' The president had convened his top national security advisers at Camp David on Sunday night for what he said were discussions that included Iran, and he spoke to Netanyahu on Monday about Iran. A White House official said Trump spoke with Netanyahu again on Friday. Trump also held talks about the attacks with his National Security Council in the White House Situation Room. No details of the discussions were immediately available.
