logo
How To Deal With Your MAGA Relatives Without Ruining Relationships, According To Cult Experts

How To Deal With Your MAGA Relatives Without Ruining Relationships, According To Cult Experts

Yahoo27-05-2025

In an era where misinformation spreads faster than the truth, and political extremism often feels more like a full belief system than a policy stance, many of us have found ourselves in painfully surreal situations. Maybe it's a relative who sends you a link to a fringe conspiracy site, or an old friend who insists the government is run by subterranean lizard people — and they mean it.
Often, these interactions aren't just absurd or frustrating, they're heartbreaking. How do you keep a relationship alive when someone you care about seems captured by a worldview that's not only disconnected from reality, but openly hostile to yours?
This guide was born from that question. We spoke with experts in cult recovery and high-control groups, including those familiar with the tactics, language and emotional binds of movements like MAGA to bring you practical tools for navigating these encounters.
These aren't scripts to win an argument or 'deprogram' someone in one conversation. Instead, they are strategies to help you make it through these (often exhausting) interactions and respond as best you can to those you love.
First and foremost, you have to remember who it is that you're speaking to, explained Steven Hassan, Ph.D., founder and director of Freedom of Mind Resource Center, and author of 'The Cult of Trump.'
'If you're speaking with someone who is a relative or a childhood friend, you can go back in your mind to remember who they were before, and keep telling yourself they're still there,' said Hassan. 'They've been hacked. They're going to come out. So how can I help them just realize for themselves that they're not happy there?'
From there, he said to remember those good memories and focus on cultivating a warm and curious rapport that is centered around simple, effective and concise questions that you already know the answers to.
The questions can be along the lines of 'Tell me more about why you believe this to be true?' or 'Where did you get this information from?'
'And then be patient and quiet while the person thinks and responds,' said Hassan. 'And I often recommend to my clients to mirror back by saying, 'So did I understand you correctly?' 'You believe this and this and this?', and the person gets to say 'yes' and know that you were really listening to them, and then you ask a follow-up question and a follow-up question.'
From there, the person you're speaking with will understand that you're truly listening and trying to understand, which can help to build a respectful relationship that can allow for further dialogue.
'Remember that a lot of people are genuinely ensnared by manipulative systems of belief,' Daniella Mestyanek Young, cult survivor and author of 'Uncultured,' said. 'They didn't choose misinformation so much as fall into it, often due to loneliness, fear or a need for significance.'
She suggested some ways you can respond:
'I've looked into this, and it's actually been widely debunked. Would you be open to reading a source I trust?'
'I know this feels true, but it's coming from a site known for disinformation. Can I share why I'm concerned?'
'It's really hard to talk about this stuff with all the false information out there. Maybe we can focus on something else?'
'You're not likely to change their mind in a single message,' said Young. 'But you can plant a seed of doubt — especially if you do it with kindness, not condescension.'
The last thing you want to do is get entangled in an argument where everyone leaves the conversation more angry and isolated than they were before.
'One of the critical things is self-awareness,' Hassan said. 'It's important to understand triggers and how to neutralize triggers. This is going to take time, but identify the key points in them that's going to help them exit, as opposed to what's important to me, for me to have them in my life again.'
He adds that these people have been brainwashed, and attacking or coming at them with hostility is only going to make them retreat further into their own belief system. People do not like to be isolated from family and friends. They respond to love and respect and kindness and praise,
'And the good news is that it's not a permanent condition,' said Hassan. 'Human beings can change and grow.'
Of course, there might be instances where keeping that door open to communication might just be too much or too hard, and that's where you have every right to back away.
Young recommends saying phrases like:
'I love you too much to argue with you about this.'
'I've learned that these conversations don't feel good or helpful to me. I'm setting a boundary.'
'I want to focus on connecting with you, not debating you.'
'Let's keep this space politics-free.'
And if they keep pushing, remember: Boundaries aren't about changing their behavior — they're about protecting your peace.
'You can step away,' Young said. 'You're not obligated to stay in conversations that harm you, especially when they're built on misinformation or power games.'
Connection doesn't always mean agreement. It means curiosity, boundaries and a willingness to stay grounded in your own values — even when the people you love most are swept up in something you no longer recognize.
'We're living through a time of spiritual intoxication, where misinformation is more than a problem — it's a path to belonging for some people,' Young said. 'And so the most radical thing you can do might be the quiet, grounded choice: not to argue, but to refuse to play the game. Remember: The goal isn't always to win the argument. Sometimes the goal is just to stay whole in the face of it.'
Even if it feels impossible to have meaningful conversations, keeping a light tether to the relationship can be incredibly important. This is because one of the most hidden — and cruel — exit costs for people leaving cults, extremist groups, or even online rabbit holes is that they have to admit they were wrong.
'That's a brutal kind of shame,' said Young. 'Sometimes the thing that keeps people stuck in a harmful ideology is not the belief itself — it's the fear of what it will cost them to walk away.'
They have to go back to the people they cut off or belittled and say, 'You were right, and I got conned.'
'So, even if all you can manage is sending a birthday text or commenting on a photo of their dog, that thread of connection might one day be the thing they use to climb back out,' she continued. 'A life raft doesn't have to be big — it just has to float.'
Here's What Therapists Would Tell People Considering Severing Ties With Family Over Politics
Trump's Post About Taylor Swift Is So Immature, We Needed Child Psychologists To Explain
One J6 Rioter Says Trumpers Are In A Cult. She's Right ― Here's How I Know.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MAGA Celebs Trapped in Israel Amid Airstrikes
MAGA Celebs Trapped in Israel Amid Airstrikes

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

MAGA Celebs Trapped in Israel Amid Airstrikes

CNN pundit Scott Jennings and Olympian Caitlyn Jenner—both stalwart supporters of President Donald Trump—are stuck in Israel as the country exchanges airstrikes with Iran. The Israeli government shut down the country's main airport, Ben Gurion, in Tel Aviv on Thursday after launching what it described as a 'preemptive' air strike on Iran, killing several military commanders. 'Don't think I am getting out of Israel today!' Jennings wrote on X Friday Morning. 'But will continue to report on what I see and hear.' Jennings later posted a Daily Mail article reporting that both he and MAGA diehard Caitlyn Jenner had been marooned in Israel, joking, 'This headline is an all-time mad lib.' 'Good company,' Jenner replied. Jennings first posted about his visit to Israel on Monday, June 9, writing on X that he was taking a break from CNN for the week to 'journey through Israel.' Jenner, meanwhile, arrived in Tel Aviv on Wednesday to attend the city's Pride parade, according to The Hollywood Reporter. After Israel attacked Iran, Iran launched hundreds of ballistic missiles at Israel overnight. Israeli authorities later reported that most Iranian missiles had been intercepted. Jennings told the Daily Mail he was moved to a safe room when the strikes began. In a series of videos posted to X on Thursday and Friday, Jennings describes 'hearing booms in the distance' and adds, 'Iran missile attacks, I presume.' Jenner, 75, told an Israeli news station Friday morning that she'd spoken with her daughter, Kylie Jenner, and assured her, 'I'll keep myself safe, and they'll take care of me.' Jenner took to Instagram on Friday afternoon to express her continued support for Israel. Alongside a photo of her visit to the Western Wall in Jerusalem, she wrote, 'My heart is with Israel now and forever. Evil shall not prevail!' Jennings and Jenner are also both strong supporters of President Trump, who stood behind Israel's airstrikes on Iran, calling them 'excellent' on Friday morning. The United States is now assisting Israel in shooting down Iranian missiles. In her latest update, the former athlete shared an image of the sky in Tel Aviv during the airstrikes, writing, 'Pray for us all.'

Tucker Carlson Blasts Former Fox News Colleague Sean Hannity: 'Warmongers'
Tucker Carlson Blasts Former Fox News Colleague Sean Hannity: 'Warmongers'

Newsweek

time3 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Tucker Carlson Blasts Former Fox News Colleague Sean Hannity: 'Warmongers'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Right-wing commentator Tucker Carlson blasted his former Fox News colleague Sean Hannity on Friday, calling Hannity and other MAGA hawks "warmongers" for cheering Israel's missile strikes against the Iranian regime. The Context Israel launched a series of strikes against Iran early Friday, local time, which decimated the regime's military chain of command, hit critical nuclear facilities and took out top Iranian nuclear scientists. After the strikes, Iran pulled out of scheduled nuclear talks with the U.S. and retaliated against Israel with a wave of rocket attacks that struck Tel Aviv, Israel's commercial center and also home to the country's central military base. Israel and Iran have been engaged in an increasingly destructive array of tit-for-tat strikes against one another since Hamas—backed by the Iran-led Axis of Resistance—carried out its attack against Israel on October 7, 2023. But the strikes commenced by Israel early Friday marked the most serious escalation yet between Jerusalem and Tehran. What To Know When Israel struck Iran, it capped a long-running foreign policy battle being waged in President Donald Trump's inner circle. Carlson, a staunch isolationist, was among the voices urging against escalating tensions between Iran and Israel, which were at a tipping point before Israel's strikes against the regime early Friday. He also supported Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, as he spearheaded the nuclear discussions with Iran. Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson gestures during an interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin in Moscow on February 6, 2024. Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson gestures during an interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin in Moscow on February 6, 2024. Gavriil Grigorov, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP On the other side of the coin were Hannity and conservative media host Mark Levin, who, among others, were deeply skeptical that Iran would agree to end its nuclear program and expressed support for Israel taking military action. On Friday, Carlson tore into Hannity, Levin, conservative media mogul Rupert Murdoch and conservative megadonors Isaac Perlmutter and Miriam Adelson. "The real divide isn't between people who support Israel and people who support Iran or the Palestinians. The real divide is between those who casually encourage violence, and those who seek to prevent it — between warmongers and peacemakers," Carlson wrote on X, formerly Twitter. He added: "Who are the warmongers? They would include anyone who's calling Donald Trump today to demand air strikes and other direct US military involvement in a war with Iran. On that list: Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Rupert Murdoch, Ike Perlmutter and Miriam Adelson. At some point they will all have to answer for this, but you should know their names now." Newsweek reached out to Fox News for comment via email on Friday. Hannity and Levin took a victory lap on Fox News shortly after Israel carried out its first strike against Iran early Friday, with Hannity rattling off a list of Iran's provocations and nuclear threats and Levin saying that "the Iranians are about to get their asses kicked and it's been coming since Jimmy Carter." "They think this is Joe Biden's administration, that they would get away, get nuclear weapons and then the world would sit there, wouldn't know what to do about it," he said, adding that Israel "is not going to sit there and take it." Hours after the strikes, Carlson put out what he called his potential "final newsletter before all-out war" and accused Trump of being "complicit." "While the American military may not have physically perpetrated the assault, years of funding and sending weapons to Israel, which Donald Trump just bragged about on Truth Social, undeniably place the U.S. at the center of last night's events. Washington knew these attacks would happen," Carlson wrote. "They aided Israel in carrying them out. Politicians purporting to be America First can't now credibly turn around and say they had nothing to do with it. Our country is in deep." "Despite being complicit in the act of war, the president hopes last night's events will help his ongoing nuclear negotiations with Iran," Carlson added. "Steve Witkoff was scheduled to participate in the next round of talks on Sunday, but whether that will still happen is up in the air." Israel's strikes against Iran came after months of Trump urging Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to attack Tehran, saying that it would torpedo America's already tenuous negotiations with the Iranian regime. What People Are Saying On Friday, after Israel's strikes, Trump again pushed Iran to come back to the table, writing on Truth Social: "Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire. No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE. God Bless You All!" After Iran initiated its retaliatory rocket attacks against Israel, a U.S. defense official told Newsweek: "Yes, the U.S. is assisting in shooting down missiles targeting Israel." What Happens Next Israel and Iran have been bombing each other since the first wave of strikes early Friday, with Israel saying it plans to "escalate" in response to Iran's retaliatory attack. Iran, meanwhile, has warned that it will target the military bases of any countries that assist Israel.

Trump's balancing act on the Israel-Iran conflict: From the Politics Desk
Trump's balancing act on the Israel-Iran conflict: From the Politics Desk

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's balancing act on the Israel-Iran conflict: From the Politics Desk

Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. In today's edition, we examine how the escalating tensions between Israel and Iran are splitting President Donald Trump's base. Plus, Kristen Welker writes that Trump's showdown with California is testing his political strength on a core issue. And Gordon Lubold answers a reader question on Trump's military parade this weekend. Sign up to receive this newsletter in your inbox every weekday here. — Adam Wollner As the percussion of Israeli munitions rattled Tehran on Thursday night, President Donald Trump's MAGA movement observed a rare silence — a sign, influential Republicans say, of the divide within their own party when it comes to the prospect of a war between Israel and Iran. It took Trump, who comments publicly more often than any president in recent memory, about 10 hours to put out a statement on his Truth Social platform, in which he urged Iran to give up its nuclear weapons program. The first official U.S. assessment had been issued by the White House under Secretary of State Marco Rubio's name, and it emphasized that America was 'not involved' in the strikes. In the meantime, Charlie Kirk, the co-founder of Turning Point USA, polled his 5 million X followers on the question of whether America should 'get involved in Israel's war against Iran.' By Friday afternoon, the poll showed more than 350,000 votes, with an overwhelming proportion in the 'No' column. When Kirk read Rubio's statement on the strikes during a podcast Thursday night, Jack Posobiec, a right-wing activist popular with the MAGA audience, interjected that it was 'not a supportive statement at all.' Earlier Thursday, before the strikes, Posobiec had warned on X that a 'direct strike on Iran right now would disastrously split the Trump coalition.' And Steve Bannon, host of the 'War Room' podcast, which is influential with MAGA adherents within the administration and outside of it, steered clear of public commentary Thursday night. It all adds up to a demonstration of the quandary facing Trump as he and other elected Republicans seek safe political turf. Trump's electoral success owes in no small part to his isolationist-leaning 'America First' platform and his fierce criticism of drawn-out U.S. engagements in Iraq and Afghanistan. But Israel's latest action pits traditional Republican support for the Jewish state — and antipathy toward Iran — against the MAGA base's fear that the U.S. will be drawn into a new foreign war. And even within Trump's MAGA wing, there's a long-running split over American backing of Israel. Trump has always been on the pro-Israel side of the divide. Read more from Jon and Henry → Catch up on our latest coverage of the Israel-Iran conflict: U.S. assists Israel in shooting down Iranian missiles, by Monica Alba and Courtney Kube How Israel's Iran strikes might open 'Pandora's box' for the region — and the U.S., by Alexander Smith Israel's strikes highlight its military superiority over Iran, experts say, by Dan De Luce Oil prices surge, stocks tumble as Israel and Iran clash, by Rob Wile Follow live updates → The ongoing protests in Los Angeles and legal standoff over President Donald Trump's decision to federalize California National Guard troops dominated the headlines this week, providing a pressure test for the president on one of his signature issues. Immigration has consistently been one of the bright spots for Trump when it comes to his poll numbers. Even as Americans soured on his handling of the economy and inflation throughout the course of his first 100 days in office, they tended to be split over his handling of immigration. It may still be too soon to gauge how Americans feel about the ramped-up immigration raids and the decision to deploy National Guard troops over Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's objections, since events are still unfolding. But a new Reuters-Ipsos poll released suggests some cracks may be emerging. Half of Americans surveyed said they do not approve of the president's response to protests in Los Angeles, with 35% approving and 15% saying they were unsure or did not answer. A similar share of Americans (49%) said Trump has gone too far with arrests of immigrants, while 40% did not believe he has gone too far, and 11% unsure or not answering. (The poll was conducted from June 11-12 and has a margin of error of +/- 3 percentage points.) Around half of Americans (48%) said that the president should deploy the military 'to bring order to violent protests,' while 41% say he should not do so, and 11% were unsure or did not answer. California leaders have disputed Trump's claims that the L.A. protests were violent, saying the 'majority' have been peaceful. Surveys conducted as the Los Angeles protests were unfolding had mixed more results. A Quinnipiac University poll, which was in the field June 5-9, found majorities of registered voters disapproving of Trump's handling of deportations (56% disapprove and 40% approve) and immigration broadly (43% approve and 54% disapprove), though immigration was still one of Trump's better-testing issues. (The poll had a margin of error of +/- 2.8 points). An Economist/YouGov survey conducted June 6-9 found Americans gave Trump a net-positive rating on his handling of immigration, with 49% approving and 45% disapproving. That survey, which had a margin of error of +/- 3.5 points, also found varying levels of support for deportations, with less support for deporting those who have not committed violent crimes. And on Sunday, we'll have our own set of numbers. Steve Kornacki will join 'Meet the Press' to unpack our latest NBC News Decision Desk poll, powered by SurveyMonkey, which will look at Americans' views of the Trump presidency, including his handling of immigration and other issues. We'll also discuss the latest in Los Angeles and the future of Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill with Sens. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and Rand Paul, R-Ky. Thanks to everyone who emailed us! This week's reader question is about this weekend's military parade in Washington, D.C. 'How much is it going to cost? Who approved spending it?' To answer that, we turned to national security reporter Gordon Lubold. Here's his response: The estimated cost for the parade was put at about $45 million by the U.S. Army, which pays for the range of things required to put it on, like transporting the slew of tanks, helicopters and vehicles as well as the roughly 7,000 soldiers brought from around the country to participate and provide support for the big event. The parade is celebrating the Army's 250th birthday, which happens to fall on President Donald Trump's 79th birthday. While the parade is the centerpiece event, the Army is planning several other events, including static stations for Americans to see its many vehicles, drones and other things, areas for group workouts, a flyover and even a jump by the Army's Golden Knights demonstration parachute team, weather permitting. The estimated cost includes the $3 million it cost to install large metal plates onto some of the streets in the nation's capital to mitigate damage that the tracks of the tanks was expected to cause. The $45 million also includes a $16 million estimate to repair the streets and other damage to the city following the event, which is expected to draw as many as 200,000 or more people. In an interview with NBC News' 'Meet the Press' last month, Trump said the cost of the parade was 'peanuts compared to the value of doing it.' 🔵 Finding their footing: The forced removal of Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., during Homeland Security Kristi Noem's news conference has galvanized Democrats, giving them some momentum after months of intraparty squabbling. Read more → 💨 Prison break: Four people detained at an immigration detention center in New Jersey have escaped, the Department of Homeland Security said. Read more → ⚖️ In the courts, part 1: The Trump administration can maintain control of several thousand National Guard troops in California and continue to deploy them in Los Angeles, a federal appeals court ruled, pausing a lower court ruling that determined the federalization of the guardsmen was unlawful. Read more → ⚖️ In the courts, part 2: A federal appeals court won't reconsider Trump's challenge to a $5 million verdict won by E. Jean Carroll after a jury found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation. Read more → ⚖️ In the courts, part 3: Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Maryland resident who was erroneously sent to a prison in El Salvador and returned to the U.S. last week, pleaded not guilty to human smuggling charges. Read more → 🪧 In the streets: Event organizers said thousands of 'No Kings' protests will be held across the country Saturday, including in Chicago, Philadelphia, Atlanta, New York City, Minneapolis and Houston. Millions of people are expected to attend. Read more → That's all From the Politics Desk for now. Today's newsletter was compiled by Adam Wollner and Dylan Ebs. If you have feedback — likes or dislikes — email us at politicsnewsletter@ And if you're a fan, please share with everyone and anyone. They can sign up here. This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store