Trump's 50 percent tariff bombshell sparks cross-border chaos, industry panic, and fears of a new trade war with Canada
Canada's steel industry is at risk
Live Events
A human story behind the tariffs
Background: Why tariffs?
What's next?
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
US President Donald Trump 's recent decision to double tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, from 25 to 50 percent, has sent shockwaves through the North American steel industry.Canada's steel producers warn this move will cause 'mass disruption' and could deeply harm workers and businesses on both sides of the border.On Friday(May 30), Trump announced the steep tariff increase during a rally at US Steel's Mon Valley Works near Pittsburgh, asserting it would protect and revive American steel manufacturing. 'Our steel and aluminum industries are coming back like never before,' Trump said. 'Nobody is going to get around that.'While the president celebrates a rebirth of US manufacturing, Canada's steel industry paints a starkly different picture.'The Canadian and US steel industries are so tightly linked that tariffs at this level will disrupt entire supply chains,' said Catherine Cobden, president and CEO of the Canadian Steel Producers Association (CSPA). 'This move essentially closes the US market to half of Canada's steel production.'Cobden called on the Canadian government to respond immediately by reinstating retaliatory tariffs on US steel and aluminum imports, and by implementing new protections to prevent unfairly traded steel from flooding Canadian markets.The CSPA warns that a trade war between the two countries would have 'unrecoverable consequences' for workers, businesses, and communities that depend on steel production. For many towns in both countries, steel mills are more than factories, they are lifelines that provide stable jobs and economic security.Take Hamilton, Ontario, known as Canada's 'Steel City.' Generations of families have worked in steel mills that now face uncertainty. Workers like Jamie Thompson, who has spent 20 years at a local plant, worry the tariffs will trigger layoffs or plant closures. 'This isn't just numbers on a page. It's our livelihoods,' Thompson said.Similarly, in Pennsylvania's steel towns, the sentiment is mixed. While some cheer the tariffs as a lifeline, others worry that retaliatory tariffs will make steel exports to Canada and Mexico more difficult, potentially leading to lost business.The US first imposed 25 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum in March, citing concerns about 'dumping', the practice of countries selling steel at a loss to undercut US producers. Trump claims these tariffs will bring manufacturing jobs back to the US after years of decline.However, experts warn that such tariffs often lead to higher costs for manufacturers who rely on steel, such as the automotive and construction sectors, driving up prices for consumers.The new 50 percent tariff takes effect next week, leaving little time for governments and businesses to prepare. Canadian officials have reportedly been consulting on possible countermeasures, and Cobden stresses: 'The time for the Canadian government to act is now.'As the two countries brace for a potential trade escalation, workers and communities on both sides of the border face uncertainty, caught between political decisions and economic realities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump Unleashes Biden 'Clone' Bombshell; Outrage Erupts Over ‘Execution' Claim
Donald Trump has reignited controversy with a shocking late-night post on Truth Social, implying that Joe Biden was "executed" in 2020 and replaced by engineered lookalikes. The post contained no context, just a link to a bizarre claim filled with phrases like 'soulless robots' and 'bio-engineered doubles.' While Trump didn't explain further, the internet exploded with divided reactions, critics slammed him as a conspiracy theorist, while loyal supporters echoed the wild claim. The uproar comes days after Trump publicly called Biden 'vicious' and 'not very bright,' urging Americans not to feel sorry for him. Meanwhile, Biden faces a deeply personal battle after being diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer. His team has confirmed it's serious, but treatable through hormone therapy.
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Framing the narrative war against Pakistan
Nobody ever really wins the war of narratives. Each side tells its own story — shaped by perceived triumphs, real or imagined — and believes in the glory of its version. No one cares what the other side claims, unless one side was materially and visibly vanquished in a physical fight. That rarely happens. Sample this: As India began striking terror infrastructure across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May 7, Pakistan claimed it had shot down six Indian aircraft. India denied it. In fact, New Delhi refused to confirm any losses until last week, when the Chief of Defence Staff tacitly acknowledged that a jet (maybe more, unspecified) had been downed, but that 'the tactical mistake was remedied, and the plan reimplemented' — an implicit way of saying: 'It matters not what we lost, as long as we ultimately won.' The standoff ended in a ceasefire, with each side walking away convinced it had the better of the exchange. India believes it called out Pakistan's nuclear bluff; Pakistan insists it gave as good as it got — claims that remain unverifiable in the fog of war. Meanwhile, Pakistan says little about the pounding its airbases received in the Indian response. So steeped in denial is the country's military establishment that its Army Chief has assumed the rank of Field Marshal — an honorific that reveals more about narrative vanity than battlefield reality. For its part, Delhi is convinced it humbled Pakistan. Islamabad, however, couldn't disagree more. 'We have shattered India's illusion of superiority,' says Pakistan's PM. 'New Delhi has been taught a lesson in respecting the sovereignty of its neighbours.' Even Washington had its version of events. President Trump triumphantly claimed that he convinced both countries to back off. 'I talked trade with them,' he said. India denies it. Pakistan agrees. Who's telling the truth? Hard to say. Perhaps none of them care. Each sticks to its own version. Last week, seven multi-party Indian delegations visited global capitals to explain Delhi's position. Many in the West are sympathetic to India's position — its long-standing concerns about cross-border terrorism and Pakistan's duplicity in dealing with extremist groups. They recognise the provocations India faces and the public pressure on Delhi to respond. Even so, some take India's account with a pinch of salt. Yes, Pakistan was complicit in the Pahalgam terror attack — but why didn't India go after the real perpetrators? Why not share intelligence? Why the secrecy, the social media bans, the coyness in accepting losses, and the reluctance to engage with the international media? Back home, a few seem interested. Most people are content with the version of events presented to them. Perhaps that's the point of a good narrative — to remove the burden of inquiry, so the prevailing storyline is accepted, repeated, and quietly folded into national pride. And therein lies the rub. Narratives are, by their very nature, misleading. They mix fact, half-truth, and convenient fiction to produce a favourable picture. In the end, they mostly convince only the teller. You can believe deterrence has been restored — but it means little if your adversary doesn't agree. The deeper challenge lies in coming to terms with Pakistan's strategic culture. As Christine Fair, Professor at Georgetown University and a keen Pakistan watcher, has long argued, the Pakistan Army operates with an insurgent mindset. It wins simply by not losing. It thrives on confrontation and political relevance. That makes it almost immune to traditional deterrence logic. This is what India must keep in mind. The next time there's a provocation from Pakistan — and there might well be another — New Delhi would do well to resist the urge for political signalling. It's this compulsive need to cater to public opinion and control the narrative that often gets us into trouble. Showing resolve is tricky because it casts restraint as weakness and risks turning action into theatre. The smarter course is to hold fire, stay alert, and choose response over optics. For that, it's important to retain the element of surprise. In the days following the start of the operation, Pakistan's military claimed it had anticipated an Indian strike and was lying in wait. While the details remain unclear, Islamabad suggested it had adopted a restrained posture until Indian aircraft reportedly struck what it described as civilian targets, after which Pakistani forces retaliated by targeting Indian jets. Whether this sequence played out exactly as claimed is open to question. It's also unclear if not targeting the Pakistan military in the opening salvo was a strategic misstep. Yet the broader point stands: Military action, meant more as political messaging, is a risky undertaking. Combat aimed mainly at signalling, not effect, is almost always a mistake. It's worth bearing in mind that in conflicts like the four-day engagement in May, narrative dominance is an illusion. The real contest is not about who speaks loudest, but who adapts, who endures, and who denies the adversary what it wants most: Relevance. The writer is a retired naval officer and strategic affairs commentator based in New Delhi
Mint
20 minutes ago
- Mint
Weak dollar reprises its role as carry trade funder
Trump's presidency boosts dollar-funded carry trades Goldman Sachs sees carry trades as a major theme Rupee, rupiah and real among top picks for their carry MUMBAI, June 2 (Reuters) - The U.S. dollar's weakness since the start of Donald Trump's presidency has made it the preferred funding currency for popular "carry" trades, fuelling heavy flows into higher-yielding emerging market currencies. Dollar-funded carry trades in the Indonesian rupiah, Indian rupee, Brazilian real, Turkish lira among other currencies, are back in vogue, fund managers said. In a typical currency carry trade, investors use cheap-to-borrow currencies to fund investments in those with better yields. Returns are boosted if the borrowed currency weakens. The dollar, traditionally less favoured than the Japanese yen or Swiss franc for such trades, has become the funding currency of choice as Trump's trade war stokes recession worries and an investor retreat from U.S. Treasuries. Carl Vermassen, a portfolio manager at Zurich-based asset manager Vontobel, has added to carry trades on the rupee and rupiah. "Emerging market local currency was basically shunned for the simple reason: to avoid local currency risk at a time of an almighty dollar," he said. "But, given most investors deem U.S. exceptionalism to have ended, things are changing." Claudia Calich, head of emerging market debt at M&G Investments, also expects dollar weakness to persist and support carry trades. The London-headquartered fund oversees more than 312 billion pounds ($423.5 billion) and favours the rupee and Philippine peso for carry positions within Asia and the Brazilian real and Mexican peso in Latin America. The more investors rush back into dollar carry trades, the deeper the dollar's losses are likely to be, analysts said. The dollar index has fallen 8.5% so far this year, dropping below the critical 100 mark in mid-April for the first time in nearly two years. It was last seen at 99.30. That means investors are finding good carry not just in the likes of the rupee and rupiah, whose yields are above those in the United States, but even those with low interest rates such as the South Korean won. The won has led gains in Asian currencies this year with a 6.7% rally against the dollar. The yield advantage over dollars, or the "carry", measured by the three-month tenure is 2% on the Indian rupee and 1.2% for Indonesia's rupiah. Brazil's real gives a much higher carry at 9% but is far more volatile, meaning the trade could go horribly wrong if the currency depreciates, instead of appreciating. The future expected 3-month volatility, also called implied volatility, for the real is 8.1% compared with 4.7% for the rupee. Goldman Sachs said carry trades were "a big theme" in recent meetings with its New York clients, with interest growing in Latin American and European markets. "If volatility settles some more, we will start to hear more about dollar-funded carry trades," ING Bank said. "This could be a story for this summer." Since "FX carry trades" typically involve investments in bond or money markets in these destinations, analysts expect to see heavy flows into emerging markets. Data for April shows investors bought bonds worth $8.92 billion, the highest for any month since last August, in South Korea, India, Indonesia, Thailand and Malaysia. While some of those flows could have been straight real-money investments into these markets, analysts say carry trades also boomed. In South Korea, foreign investors bought $7.91 billion in bonds, the most since May 2023. Tom Nakamura, vice-president and head of fixed income & currencies at Canadian fund AGF Investments, finds carry trades in Turkey attractive since the central bank's adoption of more orthodox monetary policy. Turkey's benchmark rates are at 46%. (Reporting by Nimesh Vora; Additional reporting by Jaspreet Singh Kalra in Mumbai and Johann Cherian in Bengaluru; Editing by Vidya Ranganathan and Jacqueline Wong)
