A family digs through trash for bits of food, showing Gaza's growing desperation
DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip (AP) — With flies buzzing all around them, the woman and her daughter picked through the pile of garbage bags for scraps of food at the foot of a destroyed building in Gaza City. She found a small pile of cooked rice, a few scraps of bread, a box with some smears of white cheese still inside.
Islam Abu Taeima picked soggy bits from a piece of bread and put the dry part in her sack. She will take what she found back to the school where she and hundreds of other families live, boil it and serve it to her five children, she said.
'We're dying of hunger,' she said. 'If we don't eat, we'll die.'
Her rummaging for food is a new sign of the depths of desperation being reached in Gaza, where the population of some 2.3 million has been pushed toward famine by Israel's nearly three-month blockade. The entry of a small amount of aid in the past week has done almost nothing to ease the situation.
Before the war, it was rare to see anyone searching through garbage for anything, despite the widespread poverty in the Gaza Strip.
Since Israel launched its military campaign decimating the strip after Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attacks, it has been common to see children searching through growing, stinking piles of uncollected garbage for wood or plastic to burn in their family's cooking fire or for anything worth selling — but not for food. For food, they might search through the rubble of damaged buildings, hoping for abandoned canned goods.
But Abu Taeima says she has no options left. She and her 9-year-old daughter Waed wander around Gaza City, looking for leftovers discarded in the trash.
'This is our life day to day,' she said. 'If we don't gather anything, then we don't eat.'
It's still not common, but now people picking food from trash are occasionally seen. Some come out after dark because of the shame.
'I feel sorry for myself because I'm educated and despite that I'm eating from the trash,' said Abu Taeima, who has a bachelor's degree in English from Al-Quds Open University in Gaza.
Her family struggled to get by even before the war, she said. Abu Taeima has worked for a short time in the past as a secretary for UNRWA, the main U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees and the biggest employer in Gaza. She also worked as a reader for blind people. Her husband worked briefly as a security guard for UNRWA. He was wounded in the 2021 war between Hamas and Israel and has been unable to work since.
Israel cut off all food, medicine and other supplies to Gaza on March 2. It said the blockade and its subsequent resumption of the war aimed to pressure Hamas to release the hostages it still holds. But warnings of famine have stoked international criticism of Israel.
It allowed several hundred trucks into Gaza last week. But much of it hasn't reached the population, either aid trucks were looted or because of Israeli military restrictions on aid workers' movements, especially in northern Gaza, according to the U.N. Aid groups say the amount of supplies allowed in is nowhere near enough to meet mounting needs.
Abu Taeima and her family fled their home in the Shati refugee camp on the northern side of Gaza City in November 2023. At the time she and one of her children were wounded in a tank shelling, she said.
They first headed to the strip's southernmost city of Rafah where they sheltered in a tent for five months. They then moved to the central town of Deir al-Balah a year ago when Israel first invaded Rafah.
During a two-month ceasefire that began in January, they went back to Shati, but their landlord refused to let them back into their apartment because they couldn't pay rent, she said.
Several schools-turned-shelters in Gaza City at first refused to receive them because they were designated for people who fled towns in northern Gaza. Only when she threatened to set herself and her family on fire did one school give them a space, she said.
Abu Taeima said her family can't afford anything in the market, where prices have skyrocketed for the little food that remains on sale. She said she has tried going to charity kitchens, but every time they run out of food before she gets any. Such kitchens, producing free meals, have become the last source of food for many in Gaza, and giant crowds flood them every day, pushing and shoving to get a meal.
The risk of catching disease isn't at the top of her list of worries.
'Starvation is the biggest disease,' she said.
Magdy reported from Cairo.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
2 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
What A.M. And P.M. Actually Stand For May Surprise You
Americans use many abbreviations in everyday speech and writing. Shorthands like 'yd' for yard and 'a/c' for air conditioning are pretty straightforward, but there are some misconceptions about others. For example, take 'a.m.' and 'p.m.' People in the US are constantly thinking and talking about time in terms of a.m. and p.m., but if you ask someone what those letters stand for, you may be surprised how little people actually know about the abbreviations. Some say it's 'after midnight' or 'past midday,' but that isn't exactly true... In fact, like many words and phrases in the English language, a.m. is short for a Latin phrase, 'ante meridiem' (or 'before midday'), while p.m. is short for 'post meridiem' (or 'after midday'). While there isn't a ton of information out there about when exactly a.m. and p.m. came into popular use in the English language, the 12-hour timekeeping system dates back to ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia. During the Renaissance period, mechanical clocks with 12-hour analog dials appeared in churches and palaces throughout Europe. Today, most of the world uses a 24-hour system, while many English-speaking countries follow the 12-hour clock. In the places that use the 12-hour standard, there is some debate around what to use for noon and midnight. By convention, people in the US say 12 p.m. in reference to noon and 12 a.m. for midnight. But some believe that going from 11 p.m. to 12 a.m. and from 11 a.m. to 12 p.m. is confusing. Others would argue that noon and midnight are neither a.m. nor p.m. since noon IS midday, it can't technically be ante meridiem or post meridiem midday. Likewise, midnight is both 12 hours before midday and 12 hours after midday, which makes it confusing to choose between a.m. or p.m. To avoid this confusion, many prefer '12 midnight' or '12 noon,' but that can seem a bit redundant, given that 'noon' or 'midnight' alone convey the same information. A lesser-known option is to denote noon with 'm' for 'meridiem,' as in 12 m ― though you run the risk of people interpreting that as '12 midnight.' Given all the confusion and debate, maybe we should go with the 24-hour military time and be done with it? After all, who doesn't love staying up late on Dec. 31 to shout 'Happy New Year!' at zero hundred hours? (Or is it twenty-four hundred hours?)
Atlantic
2 hours ago
- Atlantic
Questions From the Bomb Shelter
Some dreams do come true. At night, I dream of the rising screech of sirens across Jerusalem, of running to a bomb shelter, of thinking wildly about my grown children elsewhere in Israel dashing through dark streets for safety as missiles whoosh overhead. I dream of distant booms that I hope are interceptions and not direct hits on apartment buildings. I wake to a chorus of sirens and to the harsh clack of the army's Home Front Command app on my phone, announcing how many minutes we have to seek cover. Outside, running to the shelter, I see the red flash of rocket engines overhead and their long white trails, and I hear far-off explosions. After the all clear, I get texts from my children: 'Safe.' News flashes appear of buildings hit in other cities by Iranian missiles that evaded interception, and of the search for the wounded and dead. I do not sleep again. Until dawn, I ask questions about why this is happening: Are the reasons we have been given for war true; can we possibly trust the people who gave those reasons; how in the world will this end? Life is a warped jigsaw puzzle: The pieces of the normal and the abnormal do not fit together. The small grocery on the next street seems fully stocked; the air-conditioning works in my apartment; faucets give water. The streets have not been this quiet since the pandemic lockdowns. I take morning runs through my untouched neighborhood, with my map app set to show public bomb shelters. Sometimes a workout ends with a sprint for cover. A news site shows pictures of an apartment building in another town: The 'before' image looks like my building, a 1950s housing project; 'after' shows savaged concrete and the gaping squares of what were people's homes. Everyone I know is sleepless because of the nighttime attacks. People who do not have bomb shelters or the reinforced rooms required by regulation in newer buildings camp out with friends or family members, if they can. Leaving Israel is virtually impossible, because all flights out have been canceled. In WhatsApp groups, friends trade long lists of suggestions for dealing with stress: dance and laugh with your family, breathe slowly, don't scarf sweets, stop doomscrolling war news an hour before bedtime (who are you kidding?). I receive a text message purporting to be from the Israeli military warning that terrorists will target bomb shelters, so people should stay away from them. A news item cautions citizens to ignore such digital warfare. As a journalist, I get repeated emails from the military censor, reminding me that the location of direct hits cannot be published, lest it help the enemy aim better. Some people work from home; some are not working. Many are serving in the reserves, as they have, off and mostly on, since the other war started more than 600 days ago. The Israelis killed by missiles get less coverage, my daughter points out, than if they'd been killed in terror bombings during the Second Intifada. The dead in Tehran are only a number. The dead in Gaza—our soldiers, many more Palestinian civilians—have mostly been relegated to back pages. Mass protests demanding that Israel's government reach a deal with Hamas for the release of our hostages and the end of the war have stopped, because a missile could hit a crowd. Iran is the news. That the unfinished war in Gaza has now barely become background is, itself, a reason to begin asking questions. On June 12, media reports said a nighttime meeting of senior ministers would be held to discuss hostage-deal negotiations. Afterward, it emerged that the announced topic was a ruse, a diversion aimed at Iran. In reality, the ministers moved from the normal meeting room to a bunker, where they approved the attack. Or, I ask: Is this new conflict itself a diversion from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's war in Gaza, where he has promised but cannot deliver 'absolute victory'? At 3 a.m. on June 13, sirens woke everyone in Israel. The Houthis again, I assumed. Just another single missile from Yemen that would be intercepted within 10 minutes, as has happened often over the past months. My wife and I ran for shelter, where we learned from news bulletins that Israel was bombing Iran. And yet, no missiles had been fired at Israel. The messages on the Home Front Command app, we realized once we had caught our breaths, warned only that we must be ready for Home Front Command instructions in case of an attack. This was strange, as people around me noticed. Sirens normally sound only when missiles are on their way, when danger is immediate. At a press conference that first day, the army spokesperson explained that the aim was that citizens would 'be alert and attentive' to instructions. This may be the full explanation. But trust in this government has been so strained that I consider other possibilities. I find myself wondering whether the oddly timed alert had a political origin, meant to create the sudden solidarity and support for fighting that sweeps a country when war begins. At the outset of the Iran campaign, that support appeared to materialize. A survey conducted from the third to the fifth day found that 70 percent of Israelis favored the offensive. Prominent commentators repeated and expanded on Netanyahu's explanation: that 'within a short amount of time' Iran could build nuclear weapons. 'The knife is at [our] throat,' one columnist wrote. 'Israeli intelligence has uncovered the fact that Iran has begun the process of the 'breakthrough'' to creating a bomb. I cannot dismiss this evaluation. If it's true, it's nightmarish. What if one of those warheads that hit Tel Aviv were nuclear? But, lacking our own sources of data, we journalists cannot verify or challenge this claim. Governments publish or leak intelligence for political purposes, which may not require that what is made public offers a complete or true picture of what secretive agencies have uncovered. And even when an intelligence community is convinced of its conclusions, it can be mistaken. Americans need only recall the lead-up to the Iraq War in 2003. Israeli espionage obviously penetrated Iran to an extraordinary extent, as shown by the ability to locate Iranian generals. But this doesn't mean its evaluations of Iranian intent are accurate. The U.S. assessment that Iran was not on the verge of building a bomb is at least as questionable. Regardless, the attack on Iran is under way. How long can Israel, already exhausted by the Gaza war, keep fighting on a new front? Would Netanyahu, who rejected Barack Obama's diplomatic agreement to stop Iran's nuclear effort, accept a new one? Without an accord, how long would it take Iran to rebuild, and create a nuclear weapon? Iran's air defenses have failed. Its stock of ballistic missiles did not deter Israel. For Tehran, a nuclear deterrent may have just grown all the more attractive. This danger did not end with the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear sites, including the deep-underground Fordo facility. Arms-control experts have warned that Iran already had a significant supply of highly enriched uranium, and Tehran has now threatened to withdraw openly from the Non-Proliferation Treaty. I am turning over these questions not just because they are the unanswerable anxieties of war but because we Israelis have so many reasons to distrust the man who has led us here. Perhaps no one said it better than Benjamin Netanyahu himself, back in 2008. At that time, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert was under police investigation even as he was exploring peace talks with Syria. Netanyahu challenged Olmert's motives in a television interview: 'We're talking about a prime minister who is up to his neck in investigations, and who doesn't have a public and moral mandate to decide such fateful matters for the state of Israel. There's a real concern … that he will make decisions on the basis of his personal interest in political survival and not the national interest.' The same is now true of Netanyahu, who has refused to leave office despite being indicted in three corruption cases in 2019. His trial has dragged on for five years, and the prosecution finally began cross-examining him early this month. Because of the war with Iran, though, courts are holding only urgent hearings and the trial is on hold. Since the Hamas attack of October 7, Netanyahu has resisted public pressure for a judicial inquiry into the catastrophe. Last week, his government just barely survived a coalition crisis. These conditions hardly inspire confidence in his decision to drag the country into a potentially calamitous war.
Buzz Feed
3 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
Are Eggs Dairy? The Internet Debates Over Cake
So you made a cake to bring to a friend who was making you dinner. They asked if you could make it dairy-free, so you triple-checked your recipe. And then, seemingly out of nowhere, you're the dinner party villain because… it had eggs. That's the drama Reddit user Sea-Neighborhood6638 walked into when her thoughtful dessert sparked a meltdown over what, exactly, counts as dairy. In the now-viral post on r/AITAH, an unfortunate dinner guest recapped how she got into a milk-fueled debate, saying: "My friend invited me over for dinner. Our tradition is to bring food when invited to dinner. I asked if I should bring a dessert. She said that would be great, but it needs to be dairy-free because her daughter stopped eating dairy." She continued: "I know a great cake recipe with no dairy. I brought it to the dinner and it was a big hit. My friend asked for the recipe and I told her. When I got to the eggs, her daughter became upset and ran upstairs." "My friend asked why I put eggs in the cake. I said the eggs were responsible for the spongy texture. She said the cake wasn't dairy-free. I said it was. There is no milk or milk products in the cake, no cheese, no butter, etc..." "My friend said, 'Eggs are dairy.' I was confused. Dairy is milk and milk products, to my understanding. She said, 'Dairy is anything that comes from an animal.'" "I asked if honey is dairy, then. She said no, because bees are insects. I apologized, but I could tell she was still upset." So Sea-Neighborhood6638 turned to the Reddit community for judgement, "Am I the asshole? I've never heard of eggs being dairy before." Curious Redditers immediately swarmed to this story, because whether you or someone you love has dietary restrictions, you know the drama they can cause... and many people sided with the cake maker. User TarzanKitty shut down the OP's (original poster's) concerns quickly: 'Eggs are not dairy. If she wanted vegan, she needed to say vegan.' Candid-Solid-896 said plainly, "I think that mom is confused about the terminology." And Defiant_Ingenuity_55 brought the logic hammer: "When people can show you a cow laying an egg… I'm lactose intolerant, eggs are not included." Others speculated this wasn't a misunderstanding — it was misdirection. 'Yeah, it sounds like she didn't want to say her daughter is going through a vegan 'phase' and instead said no dairy, like to sound like an allergy almost?' wrote daydreamingofkittens. Yikes. According to some, this cake drama begs a question that goes beyond baking into something more existential... 'English is a language we share in common to communicate with each other,' said tha_4101, continuing: 'It boggles my mind how many people think they can just make stuff up.' But other folks sympathized with the friend's confusion and had their own explanations for where their lines got crossed: 'I bet it's because of the 'dairy aisle' at the grocery store,' noted cele311. 'I thought the same thing when I was a kid.' Others referenced the old-school food pyramid that lumped eggs and milk together, giving '80s kids a lifetime of nutritional gaslighting. Accurate-Arachnid-64 took that argument even further, taking the friend's sid, commenting: "You are the asshole. Dairy regularly refers to eggs and milk products, even if dairy is just milk and milk products. It's been that way since the 1870s." Even Redditors' spouses weighed in, with one user sharing: 'I just asked my husband if eggs are dairy... he said yes....... when I asked him how they are dairy he went 'derriere.'' So at least someone's getting laughs out of this. Johnniegirl1970 came to this wise conclusion: "The real issue wasn't the cake, but the communication." They elaborated: "While eggs are considered an animal product as far as vegetarians and vegans are concerned, they are not considered a dairy product, which are made from the milk of mammals, such as cheese, yogurt, sour cream, and those kinds of things. Your friend needs to understand that, and she needs to explain that to her daughter." For the next dinner party (if there is a next one), one commenter had a piece of advice for the OP: "I'd bring wine next time and ignore the kid." An adults-only peace offering might be just what this situation needs. But I want to know: how would you feel in the cake maker's shoes? What do you think qualifies as dairy? Let us know in the comments! For future dinner parties (if she's ever invited again), download the free Tasty app, where you can follow step-by-step instructions for over 7,500 recipes — no subscription required.
