University of Virginia president resigns facing DOJ pressure: Report
University of Virginia's president has resigned amid a Department of Justice probe into the school's diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, according to reports from The New York Times.
James Ryan's resignation will be effective 'no later than August 15,' a person familiar with the matter told the Times.
University board members had alleged the school was not in compliance with President Trump's January executive order barring DEI practices at institutions that receive federal funding.
Harmeet Dhillon, the head of the Justice Department's civil rights division, wrote a letter to Ryan on April 28 saying the office had received complaints the university's administration had failed to follow Trump's directive.
The Times reported that the DOJ wrote another letter on June 17 saying, 'Time is running short, and the department's patience is wearing thin.'
The school and Justice Department did not immediately respond to The Hill's request for comment on the matter.
Axios reported earlier Friday the Trump administration was trying to push out Ryan.
A university spokesperson told the outlet, 'UVA is committed to complying with all federal laws and has been cooperating with the Department of Justice in the ongoing inquiries. The federal government's support of the University is essential to continue the core mission of research, education and clinical care.'
Ryan served as the dean of the Harvard Graduate School of Education before joining the University of Virginia in August 2018.
Virginia's Democratic senators blasted the Trump administration following news of his departure.
'It is outrageous that officials in the Trump Department of Justice demanded the Commonwealth's globally recognized university remove President Ryan — a strong leader who has served UVA honorably and moved the university forward — over ridiculous 'culture war' traps,' Sens. Mark Warner and Tim Kaine said in a statement.
'Decisions about UVA's leadership belong solely to its Board of Visitors, in keeping with Virginia's well-established and respected system of higher education governance. This is a mistake that hurts Virginia's future.'
The Trump administration has picked fights with various universities over diversity programs and their alleged failure to tackle antisemitism on campus.
Columbia University caved to those demands in an attempt to maintain federal funding, while Harvard University has so far stood its ground.
The Times reported this week that Harvard's leaders are debating how to reach a deal without being seen as capitulating to Trump.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
7 minutes ago
- Fox News
Mom reacts to Costco's new Peaches and Cream Bar Cake
All times eastern FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: 'Vote-a-rama' begins as senators offer amendments to Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
Los Angeles Times
7 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump administration freezes $6.8 billion in education funds nationwide, California hard hit
The Trump administration on Monday moved to withhold a projected $6.8 billion nationwide in education funds — including at least $811 million from California — money appropriated by Congress to boost teacher training, after-school programs, classroom technology and to help students who are learning English and those who are from migrant families. While the frozen funds make up less than 1% of California's total education budget, they are massive in their cumulative impact. And they involve dollars that already are accounted for in terms of staff hired and programs planned. The disruption would be substantial — and state education leaders, including Supt. of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond, said Monday evening that the problems are unfolding immediately. 'There have been many rumors about the Trump Administration cutting education funding, and now that rumors have become reality, it is worse than we imagined,' Thurmond said in a statement to The Times. 'Trump is illegally impounding billions of dollars appropriated by Congress to serve students this fiscal year.' 'This illegal action will harm students starting now,' he added. 'It cannot stand!' The administration listed the frozen programs by their federal designation: Title III-A, for example, supports students who are learning English. Title I-C helps overcome the learning challenges of the children of migrant workers. Both programs had all their funds withheld. Word of the federal action began to trickle out to consternated school systems Monday afternoon. The notification, in an email, from the federal Department of Education was 84 words in length — and, according to education officials and advocates, included no amplification: 'Given the change in Administrations, the Department is reviewing the FY 2025 funding for the [Title I-C, II-A, III-A, IV-A, IV-B] grant program(s), and decisions have not yet been made concerning submissions and awards for this upcoming academic year,' the email began. 'Accordingly, the Department will not be issuing Grant Award Notifications obligating funds for these programs on July 1 prior to completing that review.' The notification concluded: 'The Department remains committed to ensuring taxpayer resources are spent in accordance with the President's priorities and the Department's statutory responsibilities.' The four programs noted in the email make up more than 10% of federal spending on K-12 schools in 33 states, according to the Learning Policy Institute. The targets of the freeze are not especially surprising — all of the withheld funds are from programs the administration wants to slash or eliminate. And those details — and the justification for them — are clearly spelled out in Trump's budget proposal for the next federal fiscal year, which begins in October. But the Trump administration is freezing funds that Congress approved for the fiscal year already in progress, which began in October 2024. Because of the way federal, state and local budgets line up, this money was due to reach states on July 1 — Tuesday — and to be spent as part of the budget for the school district fiscal year, which begins on July 1. School districts — on the expectation they would receive these funds appropriated by Congress — have generally already hired those expected to carry out these programs; many are longstanding efforts. The Education Department declined to comment late Monday — referring inquiries to the Office of Management and Budget. That office, too, had no immediate comment. But the administration already has made clear its rationale for ending these efforts in its budget proposal, inching closer to congressional approval Monday. 'To end overreach from Washington and restore the rightful role of State oversight in education, the Budget proposes to eliminate the misnamed English Language Acquisition program which actually de-emphasizes English primacy by funding [non-governmental organizations] and States to encourage bilingualism,' the administration stated. 'The historically low reading scores for all students mean States and communities need to unite — not divide — classrooms using evidence-based literacy instruction materials to improve outcomes for all students.' Advocates for English learners support 'evidence-based literacy instruction,' but take issue with much of the rest of the administration's assertions, including the claim that programs to help students learning English are divisive. 'We want our students to gain proficiency in English so that they can access their education in English,' said Martha Hernandez, executive director of Californians Together, a coalition of groups that advocates for English learners. 'And the majority of English learners are in English-only settings. These funds help students learn English.' Hernandez said there are about 5 million English learners speaking 100 different languages nationwide — about 1.1 million in California. The cut to migrant education is justified in budget documents as eliminating 'programs that work to the detriment of children's academic success by encouraging movement from, rather than stability and consistency in, a single location. These programs have not been proven effective, are extremely costly, and encourage ineligible non-citizens to access [services] , stripping resources from American students.' The migrant program's effectiveness is open to reasonable debate, but the assertion that it encourages lack of stability is difficult to square with the reality on the ground. Los Angeles Unified uses this funding for academic support to provide stability and academic continuity for these students and their families. The program in Nebraska describes itself as providing 'educational services for migrant children to help reduce obstacles that result from repeated moves across school district boundaries. For students ages 3 to 5, the effort includes 'promoting interest in learning and filling educational gaps at home to prepare students for Kindergarten' and also 'helping families find affordable preschool options.' The funding freeze has become yet another area of conflict between the Trump administration and local educators, especially in blue states and urban areas. However, this funding pull back, if it stands, also will fall heavily on rural areas and red states. Trump's authority to withhold these funds will almost certainly be challenged in court. It is uncertain whether it will survive scrutiny within Congress. Federal law prohibits the executive branch from refusing to distribute congressionally appropriated dollars although the president can ask Congress for permission to hold back funds. Congress has 45 days after such a request is made to approve the president's action. Otherwise, the money must be spent as originally intended.
Fox News
17 minutes ago
- Fox News
‘Gutfeld!' breaks down Trump's week of successes
All times eastern FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: 'Vote-a-rama' begins as senators offer amendments to Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
