
How a small wine importer took On Trump's tariffs
Victor Owen Schwartz is the founder of a family-run wine and spirits importer called VOS Selections.
Victor Owen Schwartz was preparing linguine and clams for dinner Wednesday night when he spotted an email from his lawyers with some good news. 'I wasn't shocked," said Schwartz. 'I thought we were right, but I know that's not always the way the world works."
Schwartz, a small wine importer and distributor, is the lead plaintiff in a lawsuit that was filed in April by the Liberty Justice Center, a libertarian legal group, to challenge President Trump's tariffs. The email told him that a federal court had ruled in his favor and invalidated almost all of Trump's tariffs.
'This is really a win for small business in America and the right of free trade," Schwartz said.
The 66-year-old businessman is the unlikely face of tariff resistance. He is one of five small businesses that agreed to take on the U.S. government. Big corporations, powerful CEOs and trade groups didn't mount legal challenges to the Trump administration's tariffs.
An appeals court Thursday granted a government request to pause the decision while it considers an appeal. Other tariff challenges, including one by a group of states, have been filed, but Schwartz's case is front and center.
An unhappy banker, Schwartz started his business, VOS Selections, 39 years ago after working for five years as a commercial lender. His New York City company imports wines, sakes and spirits from small producers in 16 countries. European wines account for the bulk of sales.
He was introduced to Ilya Somin, a George Mason University constitutional law professor and co-counsel in the case, by a family member who had been a student of Somin's. The professor had written a February post on the blog Volokh Conspiracy calling the tariffs unconstitutional. Lawyers at the Liberty Justice Center had reached out to him to help bring a case.
'We are importers. We are canaries in the coal mine, on the front line of this issue," said Schwartz, who started as a two-person operation and now has about 20 employees. His firm sells to restaurants, small liquor stores and big chains such as Total Wine.
Schwartz said he was nervous about the political repercussions of challenging the Trump administration but decided to go ahead anyway. 'If I didn't do it, who is going to do it?" he said. 'It was not a political decision. It was a business decision."
Schwartz started his wine business 39 years ago after working for five years as a commercial lender.
The Liberty Justice Center, which is based in Texas, has brought more than 135 lawsuits since it launched in 2011. The libertarian, nonprofit public-interest litigation law firm previously was best known for a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 that allowed government employees to opt out of union dues.
The group initially spoke with about a dozen small-business owners about joining the tariffs lawsuit but had little success finding potential plaintiffs. 'A lot of people we contacted were hesitant to challenge the administration," said Jeffrey Schwab, senior counsel at the Liberty Justice Center and lead counsel on the tariff lawsuit.
In early April, Somin wrote in a post that he and the Liberty Justice Center were looking for plaintiffs for a lawsuit challenging the tariffs that they would represent on a pro bono basis.
'I think the ideal client would be a privately held company affected by the tariffs that imports materials directly from one of the countries subject to the tariffs," Somin wrote. 'The company doesn't have to be a small business, but since I suspect many small businesses will be disproportionately harmed by the tariffs, that may be an ideal plaintiff."
The post generated a lot of interest. The group spoke with about three dozen businesses before settling on at least 10 they liked. Some decided not to participate.
Somin said being counsel on a case was new for him, as he mostly spends his time writing amicus briefs and doesn't litigate cases. However, the libertarian scholar did represent himself about 30 years ago at a hearing in front of a Massachusetts state board to fight points being added to his auto insurance. 'I was successful in that case," he said.
Along with VOS, four other small businesses joined the case: a fishing tackle retailer in Pennsylvania, a women's cycling apparel brand based in Vermont, a Utah manufacturer of plastic pipe, and MicroKits, a Virginia-based maker of educational electronic kits.
The five plaintiffs, collectively, import goods from more than three dozen countries, Schwab said, and represented a variety of industries. VOS was selected as the lead plaintiff in part because 'wine illustrated why the broad-based tariffs don't make any sense," Schwab said.
David Levi, the owner of MicroKits, which sells do-it-yourself electronics kits for students and hobbyists, gets about 60% of his parts from China. 'Either you can't find them in the U.S., or they are five to 10 times more expensive," he said.
Levi started the business in 2020 and has one part-time employee. When the tariffs hit, he stopped placing parts orders. 'I was petrified," he said. 'The meaning of petrified is you are so scared, you don't take any action."
With fewer parts on hand, he had to slow production and cut his part-time employee to 15 hours a week from 25. He also raised prices. A kit that produces sounds now sells for $49.95, up from $39.95 before the tariffs.
VOS also had to review each of its products to quantify the tariff impacts. Schwartz and his daughter Chloë Syrah Schwartz, who helps run the business, decided to put off purchases of some new items and slower-selling products.
Tariffs are particularly painful, Schwartz said, because they must be paid when the goods arrive in the U.S., not when they are sold. The company has paid about $20,000 in new tariff costs this year.
'The simple word is contraction," said Schwartz. 'We have to buy less. We have to buy more carefully. We can't take the same risks we normally would."
Write to Ruth Simon at Ruth.Simon@wsj.com and James Fanelli at james.fanelli@wsj.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
24 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump signs order imposing 50% tariffs for steel and aluminum, spares UK
In a bold escalation of his trade agenda, US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order doubling tariffs on imported steel and aluminium to 50 per cent, calling the move essential to protecting America's national security and industrial new tariffs, which go into effect just after midnight on Wednesday, also cover derivative products made from steel and aluminum. Trump's proclamation marks a sharp turn in trade policy, aimed at what he described as "excessively low-priced" imports that he says threaten the viability of US my judgment, the increased tariffs will more effectively counter foreign countries that continue to offload low-priced, excess steel and aluminum in the United States,' Trump said. The decision was made after Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick provided updated information about the current state of the steel and aluminum sectors, which Trump said highlighted the urgency of stronger protective measures.'I doubled the rates after receiving new information about the sector from Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick,' Trump most countries will now face the 50 per cent tariff, the United Kingdom will remain subject to the current 25% rate due to an existing framework trade deal. However, the proclamation warns that those rates could be adjusted as soon as July 9 if the British government is found to be non-compliant with the deal's higher tariffs will ensure that imported steel and aluminum will not threaten to impair the national security,' Trump Trump first introduced tariffs on steel in 2018, prices for steel products have climbed nearly 16 per cent, based on government data. Upon returning to office in January, Trump reinstated these trade measures, including new tariffs on aluminum. In March, a 25 per cent tariff on most imported steel and aluminium was implemented. He also considered a 50 per cent tariff on Canadian steel but eventually decided against InMust Watch


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Judge extends ban on Trump administration canceling COVID school aid
NEW YORK, - A federal judge in Manhattan has extended an injunction banning the Trump administration from canceling unspent funding to help elementary and high schools in 16 U.S. states and Washington, D.C., address the COVID-19 pandemic. U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos' preliminary injunction blocks Education Secretary Linda McMahon from rescinding unspent aid, originally totaling more than $1.1 billion, from the American Rescue Plan Act while the states' lawsuit is pending. Tuesday's extension directs the Department of Education to process current and future funding requests "without delay," and to provide a status report on its progress within one month. It also prevents the department from enforcing a May 11 "Dear Colleague" letter giving states until May 24 to claim remaining funds. Ramos originally issued his injunction on May 6. New York Attorney General Letitia James led the lawsuit, joined by 15 other attorneys general and Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro. All are Democrats. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Washington had authorized about $190 billion of aid to help K-12 schools recover from the pandemic, including for tutoring, feeding homeless students and upgrading school buildings. Democratic President Joe Biden's administration had extended the aid's availability through March 2026. But in a March 28 letter, McMahon, a member of Republican President Donald Trump's cabinet, said states had had enough time to spend the money and there were better uses for it. The Education Department also said it would be irreparably harmed if forced to distribute money it could not recover if it won the lawsuit. Before the case began, Maryland had $245.9 million of unspent money, more than any other state that sued, while New York had $134.2 million. The case is New York et al v U.S. Department of Education et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 25-02990.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Rubio says 'world will never forget' Tiananmen crackdown
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio vowed Tuesday not to let China erase the memory of the Tiananmen Square demonstrators crushed 36 years ago, in a rare return to human rights rhetoric. The Chinese Communist Party "actively tries to censor the facts, but the world will never forget," Rubio said in a statement. "Today we commemorate the bravery of the Chinese people who were killed as they tried to exercise their fundamental freedoms, as well as those who continue to suffer persecution as they seek accountability and justice for the events of June 4, 1989," he said. Rubio during a long Senate career was an outspoken advocate for human rights, especially in China, and he spearheaded legislation imposing sanctions in response to the country's treatment of the mostly Muslim Uyghur minority. As President Donald Trump's top diplomat, Rubio has been more selective, focusing his rights criticism on US adversaries including China and Cuba. In a restructuring of the US State Department, Rubio has gutted the office focused on human rights, which he accused of bias against Israel and Trump-aligned right-wing populists in Hungary, Poland and Brazil, and Trump made no public mention of rights during a business-oriented tour last month of energy-rich Gulf Arab monarchies. Rubio's predecessors have issued statements each year to mark the anniversary of the bloody crackdown on pro-democracy protesters in central Beijing, an episode that China's rulers have sought to eliminate from public memory, especially online. But Rubio's statement also had subtle differences his Democratic predecessor Antony Blinken last year urged China to accept recommendations in a UN-backed rights review and to respect freedoms enshrined in the post-World War II Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Rubio did not reference the United Nations, a frequent target of criticism by the Trump administration. Instead, Rubio said that the Tiananmen protesters' "courage in the face of certain danger reminds us that the principles of freedom, democracy and self-rule are not just American principles. They are human principles the CCP cannot erase." sct/jgc