logo
Thousands in Oxfordshire pledge to keep children smartphone-free

Thousands in Oxfordshire pledge to keep children smartphone-free

BBC News29-05-2025

The parents of nearly 4,000 Oxfordshire children have pledged to deny them a smartphone until at least the end of Year Nine.It is part of the "parent pact" launched by campaign group Smartphone Free Childhood.The group warns that mobiles "can cause a whole host of problems, from triggering anxiety and eating disorders, to opening the door to cyberbullying or sexual predators".It comes alongside calls to ban mobiles in all Oxford schools, though studies are mixed on whether that would make a difference to grades and behaviour.
The idea behind the pledge is to have enough parents withholding phones that their children are not left out as only one in their classes without a device.So far, students at 270 schools in the county have been signed up, with Europa School UK in Culham garnering 204 pledges.
The group's spin-off campaign Smartphone Free Schools said that a ban on devices during learning hours would "boost learning, protect mental health, improve behaviour, create safer spaces [and] protect childhood."Will Orr-Ewing, who runs the Oxfordshire branch of the campaign and works in education, said that having mobiles in lessons was extremely distracting."The average child in the UK receives 237 notifications per day. If you scale that to a class of 30 kids, that's a phone pinging every few seconds," he said."It's now known that smartphones are heavily implicated in the catastrophic decline in young people's mental health over the past decade."If young people can access inappropriate content and apps during the school day then, unintentionally though it may be, schools are neglecting the welfare of their students."Meanwhile, schools across Oxfordshire are introducing policies to restrict phone access.Students at Aureus School in Didcot have to stow their phones in a lockable pouch every day before they enter the school.
Reflecting on the change it has made, head teacher Kirsty Rogers said: "It's incredible. The lack of disruption to lessons now is huge."The school's previous policy was to confiscate phones when they were spotted in lessons, but Mrs Rogers said teachers were wary of doing this "through fear of what was going to happen". "Students are absolutely addicted to these phones, and so you don't know how they're going to react to you when you say you need to confiscate them," she said. The lockable pouches were unpopular when they were first introduced, but many students have now said they have got used to them."People used to get sad and angry because of something on their phone," one student said. "But now their presence of mind is in school and they can study better.""When I'm studying, I feel more comfortable leaving it out of my reach and focusing on my education more," another added.
Studies are divided on whether prohibiting phones in schools helps studying, however.Research by the Policy Exchange found that children at schools with an effective ban achieved GCSE results one to two grades higher than those at other schools.But a University of Birmingham study found such bans were not linked to better grades, mental wellbeing, sleep or classroom behaviour.Importantly, though, they noted that spending longer on smartphones and social media in general was linked with worse results for all of those measures.The conclusion of lead author Dr Victoria Goodyear was "those bans in isolation are not enough to tackle the negative impacts"."We need to do more than just ban phones in schools," she said.
'Everyone is on side'
Currently, there is no legislation enforcing a phones in school policy. It is down to individual head teachers what they do.But for Oxford City councillor Jo Sandelson, that is not enough.She has put forward a motion to the council calling for it to support an outright ban on smartphones in all Oxford schools for under-16s.Though the council has no powers to enforce such a ban, she said "key messages coming out from the city would really show everyone is on side"."Everyone is saying the same thing. These children are better off without the distraction of smartphones at schools," she said. "What Eric Smit, the ex-boss of Google, says is why would we run such a large, uncontrolled experiment on the most important people in the world? Which is the next generation."In March, the government said it believed head teachers already had the power to ban phones in schools, with its official guidance saying "schools should develop a mobile phone policy that prohibits the use of mobile phones" during lesson time.
You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rachel Reeves to sign off funding for Sizewell C nuclear power plant - 43 years after it was proposed
Rachel Reeves to sign off funding for Sizewell C nuclear power plant - 43 years after it was proposed

Daily Mail​

time30 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Rachel Reeves to sign off funding for Sizewell C nuclear power plant - 43 years after it was proposed

will tomorrow sign off funding for the Sizewell C nuclear power plant – more than 40 years after it was proposed. The Chancellor will announce £14.2billion to pay for a new reactor at the site in Suffolk, with the plant eventually powering 6million homes. The funding will be included in her comprehensive spending review, which was finalised last night after a bitter row with Yvette Cooper over police funding ended with the Home Secretary having to accept the Treasury's terms. Sizewell C was first proposed in 1982 and, after years of paralysis, was given the green light by the Tories in 2022. Ms Reeves will also confirm a £2.5billion investment in nuclear fusion research, while government sources said ministers would press ahead with proposals for 'mini' nuclear plants around the country. The Treasury said the funding would help create 10,000 new jobs. The last time Britain completed a new nuclear plant was in 1987, which was Sizewell B. Hinkley Point C, in Somerset, is under construction but not expected to open until 2031. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said last night: 'We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy.' But Alison Downes, of the Stop Sizewell C group, said the plant was a 'white elephant'. The Prime Minister's spokesman said: 'The review is settled. We will be focused on investing in Britain's renewal so that all working people are better off.'

The five considerable problems with the chancellor's U-turn on winter fuel payments
The five considerable problems with the chancellor's U-turn on winter fuel payments

Sky News

time43 minutes ago

  • Sky News

The five considerable problems with the chancellor's U-turn on winter fuel payments

There are considerable problems with the winter fuel payment U-turn, but perhaps the political argument in favour outweighs them all? First, Rachel Reeves has executed the plan without working out how to pay for it. This, for an iron chancellor, is a wound that opponents won't let her forget. A summer of speculation about tax rises is not a summer anyone looks forward to. Politics latest: Treasury minister challenged over reason for U-turn Second, the fig leaf that she and Treasury ministers are using is an improvement in economic conditions. If you were being polite, you'd say this is contested. The OBR halved growth this year and the OECD downgraded UK forecasts, albeit only by a little, last week. The claim that interest rates are coming down ignores that their descent is slower because of government decisions of the last six months. Third, the question immediately becomes, what next? Why not personal independent payments (PIP) and the two-child benefit cap? At this stage, it would feel like a climbdown if they did not back down over those. But then, what will the markets - already policing this closely - make of it, and could they punish the government? Fourth, this is aggravating divisions in the Parliamentary Labour Party: the soft left Compass group and ministers like Torsten Bell pushing bigger spending arguments. Those MPs in Tory-facing seats who rely on arguments that Labour can be trusted with the public finances are worried. 👉Listen to Politics at Sam and Anne's on your podcast app👈 Fifth, this has created a firm division between No 10 (the PM) and No 11 (the Chancellor). No 10 is now conscious that it does not have enough independent advice about the market reaction to economic policies and is seeking to correct. Others, I am told, are just critical of the chancellor's U-turn - for she wobbled first. Read more:UK to become 'AI maker not taker', says PMHow much cash will Reeves give each department? Given the litany of arguments against, why has it happened? Because the hope is this maxi U-turn lances the boil, removes a significant source of pensioners' anger and brings back Labour voters, a price they calculate worth paying, whatever the fiscal cost. We wait to see who is right.

Nigel Farage says Brits have ‘every right to be angry' about cost of hotels for migrants
Nigel Farage says Brits have ‘every right to be angry' about cost of hotels for migrants

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Nigel Farage says Brits have ‘every right to be angry' about cost of hotels for migrants

BRITS struggling to live have 'every right to be angry' about illegal migrants getting cushy hotel rooms, Nigel Farage said yesterday. The Reform leader hailed The Sun's front page for laying bare the crippling cost of asylum accommodation. 1 We told the case of Stuart Whittaker - a former factory worker from Hull who is now homeless - feeling he had been 'shoved to the back of the queue'. Downing Street yesterday admitted it was 'absolutely not' fair that locals like him are sofa-surfing while taxpayers fork out for migrant hotels. Also addressing the story in Port Talbot, Mr Farage said: 'What I tell your man from Hull, is he has every right to be upset. 'Every right to be angry. 'Just don't say anything on social media or Keir Starmer will put you in prison.' He said that while legal migration has a bigger strain on public services, it is the 'sheer unfairness of these young men' coming across the Channel illegally that rubs people up. The cost of paying for asylum support has ballooned to around £4.7billion annually, and around 15,000 migrants have arrived from France this year already. Sir Keir Starmer's spokesman said: 'It's not fair that tens of thousands of people are stuck in an asylum backlog that's wasting billions of pounds of taxpayers money, and that's why we're focused on taking the action needed to reduce the number of asylum seekers and hotels.' Minister Chris Bryant yesterday insisted that the 'best deterrent' against small boats was processing asylum claims quicker. He was slammed by Tory Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp, who said: 'This is dangerous nonsense from a weak Labour Government. 'Giving illegal immigrants asylum faster is no deterrent - it will just attract even more to come here. 'A real deterrent would be removing every single illegal immigrant who arrives in the UK to somewhere like Rwanda.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store