Labour Minister Lucy Powell ‘Mortified' Over Grooming Gangs Remarks
Lucy Powell is 'mortified' after she made comments that appeared to describe grooming gangs as a 'dog whistle,' her Cabinet colleague Wes Streeting has said.
The leader of the House of Commons was on BBC Radio 4's 'Any Questions' programme on Friday night with Conservative Party Co-Chairman Nigel Huddleston, Liberal Democrat MP Helen Morgan, and political commentator and Reform UK member Tim Montgomerie when she was asked about grooming gangs.
When Montgomerie brought up a recent Channel 4 documentary about five women's stories of being groomed and abused by gangs, Powell replied: 'Oh, we want to blow that little trumpet now, do we? Let's get that dog whistle out, shall we?'
Her comment received widespread backlash and Powell, the Labour MP for Manchester Central, was accused of belittling the issue.
Powell posted an apology on social media on Saturday night, writing: 'In the heat of a discussion on [Any Questions] I would like to clarify that I regard issues of child exploitation & grooming with the utmost seriousness. I'm sorry if this was unclear. I was challenging the political point scoring around it, not the issue itself. As a constituency MP I've dealt with horrendous cases. This [government] is acting to get to the truth, and deliver justice.'
Streeting said Powell's comments were not interpreted as she had intended.
Related Stories
1/27/2025
4/10/2025
Speaking on the BBC's 'Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg' programme, the health secretary said: 'She's mortified and, you know, she does not want and would not want people who've campaigned on, or been victims of, these most appalling crimes to think she was in any way trying to undermine those experiences or those arguments.
'I think the point she was trying to make, and the point I would make, is on such a serious issue the more we can take the heat of the politics out of this, and get to the heart of the challenge, the better.'
Asked if he and his Labour colleagues see the grooming gangs scandal as a dog-whistle issue or a 'coded signal to racists,' the health minister told Sky News' 'Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips' programme: 'No, and I don't think that's what Lucy intended to imply in a heated debate on Radio 4, and that's why she's apologised for what she said.
'I don't think for a moment she would have meant or wanted to imply that raising these issues, talking about these issues, is dog whistle.'
'We all make mistakes' and the important thing is that 'we own it,' Streeting added.
Asked if Powell's job as leader of the House of Commons was safe, he said, 'I think she's made a genuine mistake, she's owned up to it, she's said sorry, and we'll move on.'
Montgomerie said Powell's comments were 'clearly ill-judged' but her words have 'wider resonance.'
'There's been a tendency—it's gone on for too long now—to close all sorts of important debates down by throwing that racist charge at people,' Montgomerie told Sky News.
He said people feel there is a 'stifling of debate.'
'In the context of grooming gangs, an issue of such consequence, I think it was clearly ill-judged by Lucy Powell, but she was, I think she was keen to have a very strong go at Reform, and I was the representative of Reform that night.
'But unfortunately, the words she chose have wider resonance.
'And I think the only trouble, if she really is to get in trouble [is] if survivors come out in large numbers and object to what she said.'
Conservative Co-Chairman Huddleston told Sky News Powell's statement was 'completely inappropriate.'
He said: 'Quite frankly, Lucy Powell made quite a lot of silly comments on a whole range of issues. That was one of them.
'This is a really serious issue and to kind of belittle … it is completely inappropriate.
'I think that shows that, unfortunately, Wes Streeting and the Labour Party have underestimated how big an issue this is, how it resonates with the public and how they are angry about what they perceive as this government's lack of action here.
'They made promises about having additional investigations, and now have backtracked on it, and they need to be held to account for that.'
Huddleston also insisted the matter needs 'a proper, full inquiry,' adding: 'The public demands that and I just do not understand the reasons why Labour is so reluctant.
'And this is why I'm afraid it does smack of some kind of political cover-up because they're worried that it could do some damage to Labour politicians and Labour councils.
'There's accusations that the Labour councils and some of the Labour areas that were responsible for overseeing some of the activities around here did not take appropriate action, and I think they're embarrassed about that.
'They should be embarrassed about it, to be fair, these are accusations, right?
'They are accusations, but then you clear up the accusations by having a full inquiry.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Palm Beach County, facing loss of $600 million in grant funds, suspends DEI programs
Palm Beach County commissioners have suspended all DEI programs to avoid the risk of losing more than $600 million in federal and state funds used to pay for airport improvements, highway work and scores of other capital projects. The end of diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts means the Office of Equal Business Opportunity will no longer be able to steer county work to women- and minority-owned businesses. A program it oversees required contractors to grant part of their work to certified women- and minority-owned companies. In the third quarter of 2024, minority- and women-owned companies received contracts worth more than $7 million, or about 9% of the total awards. The county department will continue to exist, but will not require any awards to be made based on race or gender. Following an emotional two-hour discussion, the commission voted 6-1 on June 3 to accept the county attorney's call for the suspension to comply with President Donald Trump's two executive orders prohibiting the use of federal funds to promote gender ideology or programs based on race and sex-based diversity. Commissioner Bobby Powell, the lone Black representative on the commission, argued that DEI programs are needed 'to level the playing field.' Powell called the executive orders 'troubling,' and said 'they will shut out hard-working Americans trying to achieve the American dream. As Dr. Martin Luther King said: 'The time is always right to do what is right.' Neither executive order is right. I can't support this (the suspension of DEI).' Most of Powell's colleagues agreed but said they had no choice but to suspend the DEI programs or risk losing hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funds. 'Disparity studies show that minorities and women have not received their fair share of county work,' Commissioner Gregg Weiss said. 'This is one of the most difficult votes I have made, but we cannot afford to lose those federal funds.' The county is in the midst of another disparity study that must now be suspended. More than $400,000 has been spent on that work so far. Weiss noted that the county attorney pointed out that a department head receiving a federal grant has to certify that the county is complying with Trump's executive orders. There is the threat of criminal charges against the county employee if he or she wrongly certifies that the grant complies with the executive orders, he said, adding: 'We cannot let that happen.' But Commissioner Sara Baxter, quoting Dr. Martin Luther King, defended the executive orders, arguing that they help ensure that everything is merit-based. 'Hiring the best person for a job is a good thing, not a bad thing," she said. "I cannot understand why we would condemn this.' Powell countered by saying: 'If you are going to quote Dr. King, quote the entirety of the quote.' In April, the Palm Beach County School district also repealed the district's diversity, equity and inclusion rules and statements, heeding a threat from the Trump administration to pull federal funds from school districts that don't drop them. At risk is $300 million from the federal government in fiscal year 2025 used to recruit, train and retain teachers working in schools with a high percentage of poor students. The money is also being used for student meals and to educate special needs students as well as those still learning English. DEI NEWS: Teachers, activists push back against Palm Beach County School Board repeal of DEI rules County Attorney Denise Coffman said that her office could legally challenge the executive orders but noted that several such challenges have already been filed. She expects the U.S. Supreme Court to make a final decision in about 12 months and suggested that the county await the outcome of that litigation. The suspension will stay in effect until then. Coffman said she urged that the commission act on an emergency basis after the Department of Airports concluded it could not certify a $10 million grant due to the DEI programs in place. Because the June 3 vote was classified as an emergency, it was necessary that it receive the six yes it did to pass. DEI NEWS: Trump's DEI threat tied to school money is in limbo. What's next? Like Weiss, Commissioner Joel Flores said he was reluctant to vote yes. He said he is 'deeply troubled' by the executive orders. He argued that DEI programs help fuel economic growth, but the executive orders punish the very communities that have helped build this country. 'That being said, I cannot allow the county to risk losing all that federal money,' he said. Mike Diamond is a journalist at The Palm Beach Post, part of the USA TODAY Florida Network. He covers Palm Beach County government and issues concerning HOAs. You can reach him at mdiamond@ Help support local journalism. Subscribe today. This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Palm Beach County suspends DEI programs
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump threatens to cut Elon Musk's government contracts as their public feud escalates
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump threatened to cut Elon Musk's government contracts as their fractured alliance rapidly escalated into a public feud Thursday. Hours after Trump lamented his breakup with Musk and said he was 'disappointed' in his former backer and adviser and Musk responded on social media, Trump escalated the feud by threatening to use the U.S. government to hurt Musk's bottom line. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote on his social media network. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!'WASHINGTON (AP) — The breakup between the president of the United States and the world's richest man is unfurling much like their relationship started — rapidly, intensely and very publicly. As President Donald Trump sat in the Oval Office on Thursday with Germany's leader, he lamented his soured relationship with Elon Musk, his adviser-turned-social media antagonist. Trump said he was 'very disappointed' with Musk after the billionaire former backer lambasted the president's signature bill of tax cuts and spending plans. 'Whatever,' Musk wrote on his social media platform while responding to Trump in real time. Musk later offered up an especially stinging insult to a president sensitive about his standing among voters: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Musk retorted. 'Such ingratitude,' Musk said in a follow-up post. Politicians and their donor patrons rarely see eye to eye. But the magnitude of Musk's support for Trump, spending at least $250 million backing his campaign, and the scope of free reign the president gave him to slash and delve into the government with the Department of Government Efficiency is eclipsed only by the speed of their falling out. Musk announced his support for Trump shortly after the then-candidate was nearly assassinated on stage at a Butler, Pennsylvania, rally last July. News of Musk's political action committee in support of Trump's election came days later. Musk soon became a close adviser and frequent companion, memorably leaping in the air behind Trump on stage at a rally in October. Once Trump was elected, the tech billionaire stood behind him as he took the oath of office, flew with him on Air Force One for weekend stays at Trump's Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, slept in the White House's Lincoln Bedroom at the president's invitation and joined his Cabinet meetings wearing a MAGA hat (sometimes more than one). 'I'll be honest, I think he missed the place,' Trump said Thursday. 'He got out there, and all of a sudden he wasn't in this beautiful Oval Office.' Musk bid farewell to Trump last week in a subdued news conference in the Oval Office, where he sported a black eye that he said came from his young son but that seemed to be a metaphor for his messy time in government service. Trump, who rarely misses an opportunity to zing his critics on appearance, brought it up Thursday. 'I said, 'Do you want a little makeup? We'll get you a little makeup.' Which is interesting,' Trump said. The Republican president's comments came as Musk has stewed for days on social media about Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' warning that it will increase the federal deficit. Musk has called the bill a 'disgusting abomination.' 'He hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that will be next,' Trump said Thursday in the Oval Office. 'But I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' Observers had long wondered if the friendship between the two brash billionaires known for lobbing insults online would flame out in spectacular fashion. It did, in less than a year. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said. The president said some people who leave his administration 'miss it so badly' and 'actually become hostile.' 'It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome, I guess they call it,' he said. He brushed aside the billionaire's efforts to get him elected last year, including a $1 million-a-day voter sweepstakes in Pennsylvania. The surge of cash Musk showed he was willing to spend seemed to set him up as a highly coveted ally for Republicans going forward, but his split with Trump, the party's leader, raises questions about whether they or any others will see such a campaign windfall in the future. Trump said Musk, the CEO and founder of Tesla, 'only developed a problem' with the bill because it rolls back tax credits for electric vehicles. 'False,' Musk fired back on his social media platform as the president continued speaking. 'This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' In another post, he said Trump could keep the spending cuts but 'ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.' The bill would unleash trillions of dollars in tax cuts and slash spending but also spike deficits by $2.4 trillion over a decade and leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance, according to an analysis by the Congressional Budget Office, which for decades has served as the official scorekeeper of legislation in Congress. Besides Musk being 'disturbed' by the electric vehicle tax credits, Trump said another point of contention was Musk's promotion of Jared Isaacman to run NASA. Trump withdrew Isaacman's nomination over the weekend, days after Musk left his government role. 'I didn't think it was appropriate,' Trump said, calling Isaacman 'totally a Democrat.' Musk, reverting to his main form of political activity before he joined forces with Trump, continued slinging his responses on social media. He shared some posts Trump made over a decade ago criticizing Republicans for their spending, musings made when he, too, was just a billionaire lobbing his thoughts on social media. 'Where is the man who wrote these words?' Musk wrote. 'Was he replaced by a body double!?'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Is the end of the dreaded airport queue in sight? Not quite
Last week, British passengers arriving at Tenerife South Airport reported 'inhumane' conditions after queueing for more than two hours without access to water or loos. 'We couldn't move our arms, we could barely breathe, and people were sweating. Some parents lifted their children onto their shoulders to stop them from suffocating,' one passenger told local media. It's a frightening image, and one that has become more common at European airports since British air passengers became 'third-country nationals' after Brexit. This effectively gives us the same rights as arrivals from, say, Venezuela, banishing us to the often snail-paced 'All Passports' queue to get a stamp on arrival. When flying home we must also pass through border control to get a second exit stamp before proceeding to the gate. This can lead to scenarios where passengers are kettled at the gates with no access to refreshments if a flight is delayed, and no way to go back to the main terminal area. Change, it seems, is on the horizon. The Labour party has struck a deal with the EU to allow British passport holders to pass through e-gates, and the introduction of the Entry/Exit System (EES) in October will automate identity checks and remove the need for manual passport stamps. So will these images of British passengers snaking out of arrival halls at European airports soon be a thing of the past? Yes, but it may take a while. When it first rolls out, EES will require British (and all non-EU) travellers to provide fingerprints and facial images when entering or exiting the Schengen Area. This process has been much-delayed, not least because implementing it requires a continent-wide tech overhaul. And as we all know, airport IT systems, often operated by third-party firms and alongside multiple other systems, have a tendency to buckle at inopportune moments. If the new tech doesn't create hold-ups, the data capture process could. Pressing thumbs on sensors and having a photograph taken may sound like a simple process, but how many times have you seen somebody push their passport into the e-gate sensor the wrong way up? Such are the fears of hold-ups that airports are planning 'safety valve' procedures, where the requirement to capture everyone's data will be temporarily waived if a checkpoint gets too busy. On e-gates, I have found this new Labour/EU e-gates 'agreement' to be somewhat smoke and mirrors. The wording in the relevant document says that 'British passengers will be able to use more e-gates in Europe'. But this does not necessarily mean we will be able to use fast-track EU e-gates. Instead, it might be that we remain in the naughty ('All Passports') queue that happens to have an e-gate at the end of it. This will ultimately be up for individual countries and airports to decide. I will allow you to decide whether we are likely to receive sympathy on this matter, or not. Perhaps I'm being overly negative. Let's say that the EES roll-out isn't as clunky as feared, and that through some miracle the majority of European airports do kindly allow Britons to use their fast-track e-gates. Surely the airport queues will have simmered down by next summer? Maybe. But we will still face the additional border check when flying home (albeit with biometrics rather than a passport stamp). And hold-ups like those seen in Tenerife are as much to do with poor scheduling as anything else. I checked the arrivals board on Tuesday June 2, and at 10.40am there were scheduled flights from Manchester (Jet2), Liverpool (Jet2), East Midlands (Tui) and Bournemouth (Ryanair). Ten minutes later, flights from Birmingham and Leeds (both Jet2) were scheduled to land, plus another from Paris. That's seven 180-or-so capacity flights touching onto tarmac, one after the other, in the space of ten minutes, at a single-runway, single-terminal airport. Even the sleekest, AI-powered biometric arrivals system would struggle to process all those passengers without the formation of a queue. There are some changes to the airport process that we can feel optimistic about. Soon, we'll be able to take greater quantities of liquids through security at all UK airports. A shake-up of UK flight paths promises to reduce air traffic delays before the end of the decade. And yes, all this new tech will eventually reduce friction at borders. But when you are stuck in a packed arrivals hall with a child on your shoulders and no access to water, you will be praying for progress now – not at some ambiguous point in the future. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
