
‘Drop' in migrant numbers is nothing to celebrate… there are still 1,180 people arriving in the UK every DAY
YIPPEE! Break out the champagne, folks, because we need to celebrate the happy news that the Government is now totally in control of our borders.
After years of politicians' failed promises and even a referendum vote to 'take back control', finally we can see the fruits of our labours in the latest immigration figures published by the Office for National Statistics.
5
Hold onto your hats because this is mind-blowing stuff: net migration has FALLEN BY HALF in just a year, from 860,000 in 2023 down to 431,000 last year.
This is an undeniably enormous drop in the number of people arriving on our shores to live, work and study over and above the number of people leaving to go overseas.
So why, you might ask, isn't anyone popping those corks, putting out the bunting and dancing in the street?
Well, the answer to that is pretty obvious. The numbers may finally be going in the right direction but they are still STAGGERINGLY big and far too HIGH.
The 431,000 net population increase is the equivalent of adding the inhabitants of the city of Bristol to our country every year.
That's an extra 1,180 more people coming to live here EVERY SINGLE DAY last year — a rate of almost 50 people an HOUR.
And every single one of them needed somewhere to live, access to healthcare, transport and schools for their children.
So if you wondered why you are struggling to afford to buy a home or pay your rent, or to get a doctor's appointment or find a good school for your child, or why the roads are jammed and the buses are crowded, the last few decades of exploding immigration statistics can provide the obvious answer.
Far too little, too late
Sir Keir Starmer took to social media to boast that the fall in net migration last year proves 'we're taking back control' but in truth he didn't have anything to do with it.
The drop in numbers is actually due to changes made by Rishi Sunak when he was Prime Minister, when he drastically cut the number of work visas and their dependents allowed to come to Britain.
Sir Keir Starmer has unveiled a sweeping immigration overhaul - vowing to -finally take back control of our borders
But even Sunak doesn't get any credit from the public for that as he only acted in response to widespread anger over the 'Boris Wave' of migrants post-lockdown delivered by Boris Johnson that saw a mind-blowing 1.3million new arrivals in 2023.
The latest figures published on Thursday may look better in comparison, but they still mean that 100,000 more people arrived here last year than in 2016, the year we voted for Brexit and for more control of our borders.
In fact — and this won't come as a surprise to anyone who doesn't live in Westminster's ivory towers — most immigrants aren't billionaire entrepreneurs
It's also 50 per cent higher than the 'tens of thousands' pledged by former Tory PM David Cameron way back in 2010. And of course it's far higher than the 20,000-30,000 net migration we had before Tony Blair decided to open up our borders.
In fact — and this won't come as a surprise to anyone who doesn't live in Westminster's ivory towers — most immigrants aren't billionaire entrepreneurs.
Instead they are low-wage, low-skilled workers who bring their families with them and end up costing more to the nation's coffers than they contribute.
No wonder, then, that most of us will conclude this fall in net migration is far too little and far too late.
And, after years of failed promises, immigration isn't anywhere close to where the British people want it to be.
A recent poll by Merlin Strategy revealed that an astounding 85 per cent of Brits now want net migration levels below the 100,000 mark, while HALF of voters want zero or less than zero net migration a year.
One in 20 people said they were happy with the current level of immigration — all of whom presumably work at the Home Office, the Guardian or the BBC.
Labour and the Tories may be keen to talk tough on immigration but no one believes them after years of failure to put that talk into action — and, as the latest polls show, their voters are flocking to Reform UK who have promised to deliver net zero immigration if they win power.
5
5
Could they — would they — actually do that? Well, why not? After all, what the latest migration figures actually prove is that the number of people coming to our shores every day, every week, every month, every year, has been in the hands of the Government all this time.
Prime Ministers and Home Secretaries have had the ability — and the voter mandate — to cut those numbers any time that they chose. And they very deliberately chose NOT to cut them, time and time again.
They've used every excuse under the sun. First Tony Blair lied to us and falsely claimed that the new arrivals would be a boon to our economy when he decided to open the UK up early to migrants from eastern Europe in 2004, resulting in net migration of 200,000 the following year.
That was just a fraction of the 3.6million total of legal arrivals during his time in office.
Politicians kept telling us that they couldn't cut immigration because we were in the EU so the British people voted for Brexit so we COULD finally control the numbers.
So what did the Tory government do then? They handed out work and student visas like confetti to migrants from further afield — mostly India, Pakistan, Nigeria and China — hoping we wouldn't notice.
If our politicians can't get on top of LEGAL immigration, is it any wonder that they are also dismally failing to get a grip on ILLEGAL immigration?
Then they had the cheek to pretend to be as shocked by the numbers as we all were when they were finally made public!
And now Labour ministers plan to allow a youth mobility scheme for up to 100,000 young EU citizens to live and work here.
What could possibly go wrong when so many young Europeans live in countries with up to 50 per cent youth unemployment?
It doesn't seem to matter what voters tell the political elite, or what they promise in their manifestos at election time, the overall numbers just keep heading in the same upward direction.
Our political rulers would rather listen to business chiefs and the civil servants who are religiously wedded to the belief that more immigration is the answer to everything.
Can't get the staff to work on low wages as carers, pick fruit or wait tables? Don't bother training up young Brits on the dole, just bring in a never- ending supply of cheap labour from abroad!
Dismally failing
We don't have enough doctors or nurses? Don't fund more places for our brightest students to get medical training, just import them from overseas! Our universities are facing financial crisis?
Then offer places to thousands more foreign students paying triple the tuition fees of British undergraduates!
And if our politicians can't get on top of LEGAL immigration, is it any wonder that they are also dismally failing to get a grip on ILLEGAL immigration?
The champagne, bunting and dancing will have to wait until politicians start listening to voters and finally deliver on their immigration promises at long last
The latest forecasts predict another record year ahead of Channel boat arrivals with a possible 50,000 migrants, while the latest ONS figures show a record high of 109,000 people claimed asylum in the past year, up 17 per cent on the year before.
More and more are coming every week, with some 165,000 mostly undocumented men of fighting age arriving on Channel dinghies since 2018.
This number dwarfs the size of the British Army, now only 75,000-strong, with an entire infantry division of young men coming to our shores since the New Year.
To add insult to injury, a flotilla of 66 'Little Ships' crossing the Channel to commemorate the 85th anniversary of the Dunkirk evacuation this week was forced to change course to make way for a single migrant boat.
So despite the 50 per cent fall in net migration, there won't be many Brits cheering today.
The champagne, bunting and dancing will have to wait until politicians start listening to voters and finally deliver on their immigration promises at long last.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
27 minutes ago
- Sky News
Rachel Reeves turning around UK's finances 'like Steve Jobs did for Apple', claims minister
Rachel Reeves will turn around the economy the way Steve Jobs turned around Apple, a cabinet minister has suggested ahead of the upcoming spending review. Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle compared the chancellor to the late Apple co-founder when asked on Sky News' Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips where the £86bn for his department is coming from. The package, confirmed ahead of the full spending review next week, will see each region in England granted £500m to spend on science projects of their choice, including research into faster drug treatments. Asked by Trevor Phillips how the government is finding the money, Mr Kyle said: "Rachel raised money in taxes in the autumn, we are now allocating it per department. "But the key thing is we are going to be investing record amounts of money into the innovations of the future. "Just bear in mind that how Apple turned itself around when Steve Jobs came back to Apple, they were 90 days from insolvency. That's the kind of situation that we had when we came into office. "Steve Jobs turned it around by inventing the iMac, moving to a series of products like the iPod. "Now we are starting to invest in the vaccine processes of the future, some of the high-tech solutions that are going to be high growth. We're investing in our space sector... they will create jobs in the future." The spending review is a process used by governments to set departmental budgets for the years ahead. Asked if it will include more detail on who will receive winter fuel payments, Mr Kyle said that issue will be "dealt with in the run-up to the autumn". "This is a spending review that's going to set the overall spending constraints for government for the next period, the next three years, so you're sort of talking about two separate issues at the moment," he said. 0:42 Scrapping universal winter fuel payments was one of the first things Labour did in government - despite it not being in their manifesto - with minsters saying it was necessary because of the financial "blackhole" left behind by the Tories. But following a long-drawn out backlash, Sir Keir Starmer said last month that the government would extend eligibility, which is now limited to those on pension credit. It is not clear what the new criteria will be, though Ms Reeves has said the changes will come into place before this winter. Mr Kyle also claimed the spending review will see the government invest "the most we've ever spent per pupil in our school system". However, he said the chancellor will stick to her self-imposed fiscal rules - which rule out borrowing for day-to-day spending - meaning that while some departments will get extra money, others are likely to face cuts.


Reuters
39 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump's travel ban on 12 countries goes into effect early Monday
WASHINGTON, June 8 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's order banning citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States goes into effect at 12:01 am ET (0401 GMT) on Monday, a move the president promulgated to protect the country from "foreign terrorists." The countries affected by the latest travel ban are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The entry of people from seven other countries - Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela - will be partially restricted. Trump, a Republican, said the countries subject to the most severe restrictions were determined to harbor a "large-scale presence of terrorists," fail to cooperate on visa security, have an inability to verify travelers' identities, as well as inadequate record-keeping of criminal histories and high rates of visa overstays in the United States. He cited last Sunday's incident in Boulder, Colorado, in which an Egyptian national tossed a gasoline bomb into a crowd of pro-Israel demonstrators as an example of why the new curbs are needed. But Egypt is not part of the travel ban. The travel ban forms part of Trump's policy to restrict immigration into the United States and is reminiscent of a similar move in his first term when he barred travelers from seven Muslim-majority nations. Officials and residents in countries whose citizens will soon be banned expressed dismay and disbelief. Chad President Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno said he had instructed his government to stop granting visas to U.S. citizens in response to Trump's action. "Chad has neither planes to offer nor billions of dollars to give, but Chad has its dignity and its pride," he said in a Facebook post, referring to countries such as Qatar, which gifted the U.S. a luxury airplane for Trump's use and promised to invest billions of dollars in the U.S. Afghans who worked for the U.S. or U.S.-funded projects and were hoping to resettle in the U.S. expressed fear that the travel ban would force them to return to their country, where they could face reprisal from the Taliban. Democratic U.S. lawmakers also voiced concern about the policies. "Trump's travel ban on citizens from over 12 countries is draconian and unconstitutional," said U.S. Representative Ro Khanna on social media late on Thursday. "People have a right to seek asylum."


The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
Spending review: Schools to get more funding but police warned to ‘do their bit'
Schools are set to receive a funding boost in the spending review, a Cabinet minister has indicated, as he insisted other public services must 'do their bit' amid concerns about cuts to other budgets. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said the Government will commit to investing 'the most we've ever spent per pupil' next week, but declined to rule out the prospect of a real-terms squeeze on areas such as policing. Facing questions from broadcasters on Sunday about which public services will be prioritised, Mr Kyle said 'every part of our society is struggling' and numerous sectors had asked Chancellor Rachel Reeves for more money. 'On the fact that the police have been writing to the Chancellor, they have,' the Cabinet minister told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme. 'We also have letters from the universities, we have letters from doctors about the health service, we have letters from campaigners for child poverty writing to us, and other aspects of challenges in Britain at the moment. 'Every part of our society is struggling because of the inheritance that we had as a country and as a Government.' He pointed to the £1.1 billion extra funding already earmarked for police this year, warning that public services would be expected to 'do their bit' alongside Government as he defended Ms Reeves' stewardship of the country's finances. 'We expect the police to start embracing the change they need to do, to do their bit for change as well. We are doing our bit,' Mr Kyle said. 'You see a Chancellor that is striving to get investment to the key parts of our country that needs it the most… You will see the priorities of this Government reflected in the spending review, which sets the departmental spending into the long term. 'But this is a partnership. Yes, the Treasury needs to find more money for those key priorities, but the people delivering them need to do their bit as well.' The Department of Health is set to be the biggest winner in Ms Reeves' spending review on Wednesday, with the NHS receiving a boost of up to £30 billion at the expense of other public services. Economists have said the expected 2.8% annual increase in its day-to-day budget, which amounts to a rise of about £30 billion by 2028, or £17 billion in real terms, will see other departments squeezed. Speaking on Sunday, Mr Kyle said the schools system, along with an £86 billion funding package for research and development, would be top priorities as the Government seeks to 'invest in the future.' 'You will see in this spending review that we are investing the most we've ever spent per pupil in our school system,' he told Sky News. Mr Kyle said Labour was 'absolutely laser-focused' on delivering manifesto pledges amid questions about how competing commitments will be balanced with little room for manoeuvre amid narrow fiscal headroom. Asked about the Government's plan to build 1.5 million new homes by the end of the Parliament, the minister declined to guarantee Housing Secretary Angela Rayner's department would not face cuts. But he added: 'We made a manifesto commitment. We are absolutely laser-focused on delivering that.' He said the Government was also 'on the way' to delivering 13,000 new police officers, another manifesto pledge. Ms Reeves has acknowledged that she had been forced to turn down requests for funding in a sign of the behind-the-scenes wrangling over her spending review. She blamed the former Conservative government's stewardship of the economy rather than her self-imposed fiscal rules, which include a promise to match day-to-day spending with revenues. It comes after the Government announced science and technology sectors would receive new funding as part of an £86 billion package set to be confirmed next week. Mr Kyle's Department for Science, Technology and Innovation (DSIT) said the money would help research into new drug treatments and microchips used to power mobile phones and electric cars. The Tories accused Labour of copying their own plans in office over the commitment. Shadow technology secretary Alan Mak said: 'Labour's central budget announcement seems to be a reheat of Conservative plans just showing this Chancellor will copy and paste anyone's ideas to get out of the mess that she's put herself in. 'As Labour and Reform squabble over how to spend more taxpayers money, only the Conservatives are creating a serious plan for government to deliver growth and give you your country back.'