
Public weighs in on pedestrian bridge over Interstate 25 to Frontier Park
CHEYENNE — Although many details remain unknown at this point, members of the public got their chance this week to weigh in on a proposed pedestrian bridge over Interstate 25 that would connect Frontier Park to a new parking lot on F.E. Warren Air Force Base.
A public meeting was held on the project Thursday night, and those who attended learned that details like the cost, funding sources and timeline remain unknown, since the project is still in its early phases.
Cheyenne City Engineer Tom Cobb said the reason for the bridge is threefold: to allow Cheyenne Frontier Days visitors to park and walk to Frontier Park, to allow pedestrian access between F.E. Warren Air Force Base and the rest of the city, and to open the potential for further development of the Greater Cheyenne Greenway path in the future.
At the meeting, two alternatives for the project were presented. The preferred alternative is the costlier option that would construct a new pedestrian walkway over the interstate directly from the parking lot to the west entrance of Frontier Park. The second option is to retrofit the Stinner Road bridge to allow pedestrian access.
The Stinner Road bridge currently runs over I-25, connecting the northwest part of Frontier Park to the Cheyenne Country Club. If the second option is selected, Hynds Road would also be converted to pedestrian-only access from Stinner Road to CFD Gate V12 during CFD shows.
I-25 pedestrian bridge rendering alternative 1
The preferred of two alternatives, which would construct a new pedestrian bridge over Interstate 25 to allow pedestrian access and develop a new 2,800-stall parking lot on a 36.5 acres of F.E. Warren Air Force Base.
I-25 pedestrian bridge rendering alternative 2
The second of two alternatives which would retrofit the Stinner Road Bridge to allow pedestrian access and develop a new 2,800-stall parking lot on a 36.5 acres of F.E. Warren Air Force Base.
Currently, the project is in the environmental assessment phase required by the National Environmental Policy Act, since the development concerns federal land, including the parking lot on the Air Force property and the connection over the interstate. This phase looks at the potential impacts of the project on air, water, noise, traffic, and cultural and biological resources.
'I know some of the folks asked questions that we don't have answers for yet. We need to make sure the project is environmentally sound before exploring the next phases of the development,' Cheyenne Mayor Patrick Collins wrote in his Mayor's Minute column this week. 'We will have additional public meetings for the next steps and answer the questions at each stage.'
Once the draft environmental assessment is complete, it will be released for public review and comment. Public comment on the project is currently being taken by the city at connect.cheyennecity.org/I-25Bridge.
When the environmental assessment is finalized, design and permitting for the project will begin.
The existing CFD Park-n-Ride lot during the summer event has a capacity of 1,300 parking spaces near the intersection of I-25 and Happy Jack Road, which is also located on Air Force property. If realized, this new development would eliminate the shuttles busing people from the lot to the park and allow people to walk directly from the new 2,800-stall parking lot to the park.
CFD CEO Tom Hirsig said CFD would still provide shuttles for some visitors with restricted mobility. He added there will be a fee to park in this lot during CFD, as there is in other CFD parking lots.
Around 30 people attended the public meeting to ask questions about the project and express concerns about certain elements of it. A common concern was the use of city funds to support this development, which some see as primarily benefiting CFD, a private entity.
Cobb said the development will be an asset to the city because it could be used year-round for pedestrian access and potential for Greenway connection.
'The intent is it's supposed to be open for the community and then have the base connect to the city,' he said.
Collins corroborated this sentiment, saying it is worth it to connect the 2,900 people living on base to the Greenway and the rest of the city.
'I think for all the money we spent on the Greenway, the more people we connect to it, the more value we get out of it,' he said. 'So, my hope would be that we can find a way to make that an access for people who live on the base to safely access the city and people who work on the base that live in the city to be able to ride a bike or walk to work.'
To access the parking lot, which Cobb said is around 90% through the design phase and has yet to be constructed, F.E. Warren AFB would allow access on Patriot Drive, and the road would be updated and extended to allow bus access.
Patriot Drive runs adjacent to the west side of I-25, north of the Randall Avenue exit at the Gate 1 entrance to F.E. Warren AFB.
As part of the plan, the existing fence on the east side of Patriot Drive would be moved to the west side to allow public access to the road, but restrict access to the rest of the base.
Representatives from F.E. Warren AFB said the new parking lot would also be separated with a new perimeter fence and be licensed out to CFD in the same way the existing Park-n-Ride is. However, any changes would need to be approved by Air Force officials.
Some attendees expressed concern that the traffic to the new lot during CFD could back up on Patriot Drive and potentially cause congestion on I-25 or Pershing Boulevard. City staff said they do not expect this to happen, but will keep it in under consideration when the project enters its design phases.
Representatives from the Cheyenne Country Club also attended the meeting to express some concerns about the project, particularly the potential impacts the second alternative could have on its property.
Some of these concerns included how the Greenway running through the property would impact the area and the potential to bring vandalism to the area, as has happened at Frontier Park in the past year. Another was the plan for dust mitigation during and after the construction of the project.
To address the first concern, Cobb said there are no current plans to make Greenway connections through the country club, and it is only something that could be considered in the future.
Matt Rhodes, a biologist with Tryhydro Corporation who is helping conduct the environmental assessment, said dust mitigation is being considered in the environmental assessment, and said he does not know what the considerations are post-construction.
He said he anticipates the environmental assessment will be approved, though he did not say when, and then the city will be able to move on to the design and permitting processes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Column: Full-size electric pickups are failed product planning experiment and industry disaster
There is a statistic in my colleague Laurence Iliff's story on the failure of full-size electric pickups that, pardon the pun, shocked me. The combustion and hybrid Toyota Tundra had more new-vehicle registrations during the first quarter than the entire industry's collection of full-size electric pickups — by a lot. That statistic is in no way a brag on the Tundra, which remains a distant No. 5 in what is now a five-horse segment since the death of the even slower-selling Nissan Titan. According to S&P Global Mobility, the Tundra recorded a meager 36,895 new registrations in the U.S. in the first quarter, while the Ford F-150 Lightning, Tesla Cybertruck, Chevrolet Silverado EV, GMC Hummer, Rivian R1T and GMC Sierra EV collectively posted about 22,000 registrations. By comparison, combustion-powered pickups from Ford, Chevrolet, GMC and Ram reached 478,823 registrations in the first quarter, S&P said. Were it not for investments and expectations that rival the size of the immense front fascias on virtually all of the aforementioned full-size behemoths, this failed experiment would already be over. The score: Newtonian Physics ∞, Hype & Hope 0. Sign up for Automotive Views, Automotive News' weekly showcase of opinions, insights, ideas and thought leadership. I can't begin to fathom how many tens of billions of dollars were spent by automakers and their suppliers developing and building those full-size electric pickups over the last decade. You can, however, get some sense of how bad the miss was when you look at the sales/production volumes auto executives anticipated, including Elon Musk's quarter- to half-million annual sales estimate for the Cybertruck, or Ford's initial F-150 Lightning estimate of up to 150,000 sales annually. So why did full-size electric pickups fail so badly? I would argue that it wasn't just physics — though the need for a bigger, more expensive battery to push these bigger vehicles farther as long as they are not towing anything shouldn't be minimized. But I think a share of the responsibility for this collective flop also lies with the companies' product planning departments. While all vehicles are compromised in some form or fashion by the time they reach consumers, full-size electric pickups lack a fundamental quality that has made their combustion-powered counterparts the U.S. sales champs for decades: Uncompromised utility. The legacy pickups are renowned for accomplishing whatever task their owners set them to. That unstoppable capability is what gave rise to the 'lifestyle' pickup in the first place, as consumers desired at least a taste of that confidence, even if they rarely, if ever, actually needed that power. Product planners and their auto executive bosses failed to account in their sales projections for just how much compromise an electric-pickup owner would face in everyday life. Sure, the trucks have some excellent features, including loads and loads of torque, but so do their combustion counterparts. And while it may cost extra fuel to tow a trailer with those combustion-powered vehicles, a heavy trailer sucks up a battery pack's juice quickly — and recharging is not nearly as quick and convenient as a gas station fill-up. It's the same reason that battery-electric semis are probably doomed to failure: It's just the wrong technology for that use case. Sorry. In a world ruled by logic and not emotion, society would consign new technologies to the areas where they have the greatest advantage. Battery-electric powertrains make the greatest sense in vehicles with limited mass and with limited demands, while hydrogen (and diesel) is more efficient in larger, demand-dependent vehicles where towing capability is paramount. We don't live in that world, unfortunately, which is why full-size electric pickups are failing. Have an opinion about this story? Tell us about it and we may publish it in print. Click here to submit a letter to the editor. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Carvana (CVNA): Buy, Sell, or Hold Post Q1 Earnings?
Since June 2020, the S&P 500 has delivered a total return of 83.5%. But one standout stock has more than doubled the market - over the past five years, Carvana has surged 201% to $342.50 per share. Its momentum hasn't stopped as it's also gained 36.3% in the last six months thanks to its solid quarterly results, beating the S&P by 38.8%. Is now still a good time to buy CVNA? Or is this a case of a company fueled by heightened investor enthusiasm? Find out in our full research report, it's free. Known for its glass tower car vending machines, Carvana (NYSE:CVNA) provides a convenient automotive shopping experience by offering an online platform for buying and selling used cars. As an online retailer, Carvana generates revenue growth by expanding its number of users and the average order size in dollars. Over the last two years, Carvana's retail units sold, a key performance metric for the company, increased by 13.8% annually to 133,898 in the latest quarter. This growth rate is among the fastest of any consumer internet business and indicates its offerings have significant traction. Free cash flow isn't a prominently featured metric in company financials and earnings releases, but we think it's telling because it accounts for all operating and capital expenses, making it tough to manipulate. Cash is king. As you can see below, Carvana's margin expanded by 30.2 percentage points over the last few years. This is encouraging, and we can see it became a less capital-intensive business because its free cash flow profitability rose more than its operating profitability. Carvana's free cash flow margin for the trailing 12 months was 6.4%. Average revenue per unit (ARPU) is a critical metric to track because it measures how much customers spend per order. Carvana's ARPU has been roughly flat over the last two years. This isn't great, but the increase in retail units sold is more relevant for assessing long-term business potential. We'll monitor the situation closely; if Carvana tries boosting ARPU by taking a more aggressive approach to monetization, it's unclear whether units can continue growing at the current pace. Carvana's positive characteristics outweigh the negatives, and with its shares beating the market recently, the stock trades at 24× forward EV/EBITDA (or $342.50 per share). Is now a good time to initiate a position? See for yourself in our full research report, it's free. Donald Trump's victory in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election sent major indices to all-time highs, but stocks have retraced as investors debate the health of the economy and the potential impact of tariffs. While this leaves much uncertainty around 2025, a few companies are poised for long-term gains regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate, like our Top 6 Stocks for this week. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-small-cap company Exlservice (+354% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today.
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Is Tesla Stock a Buy After Soaring in May?
Shares soared more than 23% in May as CEO Elon Musk recommitted to focusing on Tesla. A successful launch of Tesla's Robotaxi service could transform the company's growth trajectory. After a big run-up, the stock's valuation may already reflect much of the good news. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Shares of electric-car maker Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) soared in May, climbing more than 23%. This was far greater than the S&P 500's 5.5% gain. The sharp move higher helped Tesla recover some of its losses from earlier in the year. Shares wrapped up the month down 14% year to date -- a big improvement from declines of more than 40% earlier this year. The growth stock's surge higher came as Tesla CEO Elon Musk announced that he is stepping down from President Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative. Investors are also probably encouraged by the company's progress toward launching a self-driving ride-sharing network in Austin this summer. The autonomous ride-hailing service, which Tesla calls Robotaxi, is expected to be a game-changer for the company and the stock if it is successful. One of the biggest reasons investors have been upbeat about Tesla stock recently is Musk's decision to begin winding down his involvement at DOGE at the beginning of last month. Musk said in Tesla's first-quarter earnings call that he would be "allocating far more of my time to Tesla," starting in May. Then, last week, the CEO went even further when he officially stepped down from the agency. Musk's ambitious leadership has been pivotal to Tesla's growth over the years, and his growing number of responsibilities outside of the company was seen as a negative for the company. It's not surprising, therefore, that the stock has regained some ground as Musk followed through with his plans to give Tesla more of his attention. Musk's attention comes at a time when Tesla is trying to reinvigorate sales growth. The company's automotive revenue fell 20% year-over-year in Q1. Investors are hoping that several major initiatives, including plans for new, lower-cost models and the launch of Robotaxi, will help revitalize Tesla's growth story. It would be difficult to overstate the importance of Tesla's Robotaxi service. Given Tesla stock's price-to-earnings ratio of more than 200 as of this writing, investors are clearly expecting strong revenue and earnings growth for years to come. A successful deployment of the company's planned autonomous ride-hailing network is key to this thesis. The reason investors are so bullish on Tesla's robotaxi service is that the company has emphasized that most of the vehicles it has delivered to customers already will be capable of being deployed into the fleet. This means that the company's service can potentially reach a significant scale quite quickly, as customers who opt into the service use their existing vehicles to share in the revenue generated from the service. Therefore, the main limiting factor once Tesla proves that the service is safe will be getting the Robotaxi network approved for operation in various jurisdictions. Musk said in a post on X in May that the company had already been testing self-driving Model Y vehicles without anyone in the driver's seat. So far, the tests have been incident-free, Musk said. This puts the service's rollout a "month ahead of schedule," he noted. Importantly, Tesla is hoping that the its planned launch of its Robotaxi service in Austin, along with its new models later this year, will fuel demand for its vehicles and return the company to strong growth. Indeed, Tesla chief financial officer Vaibhav Taneja said in the company's first-quarter earnings call in April that these two catalysts should solicit "a new era of demand" for the company. With Tesla seeming to approach a pivotal moment in which sales growth could spike, is the stock a buy today? While Wall Street is right to be more optimistic about the stock given recent news about Musk's increased involvement and the company's progress toward officially launching its autonomous ride-hailing service, the stock's recent move higher arguably already priced this news in. With this in mind, shares look more like a hold than a buy today. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $366,219!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,589!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $656,825!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Daniel Sparks and/or his clients have positions in Tesla. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is Tesla Stock a Buy After Soaring in May? was originally published by The Motley Fool