'Uber driver dropped a cigarette – then I got letter that tore my life apart'
Heartbroken Abar Ahmed was left stunned after receiving a letter from Manchester council giving him a whopping fine for an offence he says he didn't commit - it has put his family through hell
A devastated Manchester dad has been slapped with a huge fine for dropping a cigarette in the street, but he and his family insist it wasn't him.
Heartbroken Abrar Ahmed, from Crumpsall, couldn't believe his eyes when he saw a letter from Manchester council in March. It told him he was being fined £433 for littering. Mr Ahmed then got in touch with the council having not been in the area and being a non-smoker. He requested access to the body-worn footage from an officer, and it emerged it was not him. But the case was adjourned because an appropriate interpreter had not been provided, meaning the fine has remained.
Speaking on his behalf due to a language barrier, Mr Ahmed's brother-in-law Zahor Hussain told Manchester Evening News: 'His elder brother passed away from cancer in December, he's gone through absolute hell and back, as have the rest of our family.
'This is not something he needs and he is at the end of his tether. Someone who is not a criminal, now has to go before the court. They are pursuing the wrong person.'
In the footage, the individual tells the enforcement officer that his name is 'Abrar Ahmed' and gives the same date of birth, yet gives an address in Bury. He also tells them he is a taxi driver and is seen to step out of the driver's seat of an Uber.
Mr Hussain said: 'He doesn't smoke, he is a business manager and runs a food manufacturing business. This person was a taxi driver, and had parked up near to the Uber office.
'My brother-in-law has difficulties speaking English. This man is speaking English, they are speaking over each other. He gave the same name and date of birth as Abrar, but gave an address in Bury.
'The letter then came here, to my brother-in-law's address. He has never lived in Bury. The man in the footage is not my brother in law.'
As a result, Mr Ahmed has been suffering with his mental health. 'We feel like we have gone to hell and back. We shouldn't have to do this,' he said.
The family have since sent the investigations team evidence including images of the footage and Mr Ahmed. 'We are extremely anxious and have been left with mental anguish and distress. We don't know what to do,' Mr Hussain added.
A hearing at Tameside Magistrates Court was convened to withdraw the conviction but the hearing had to be adjourned due to issues providing an appropriate interpreter by the court. A further hearing has been planned in June to formally withdraw the fine.
'We are not getting anywhere and it feels like smashing my head against a brick wall. It is a wrongful conviction - clearly they are two different individuals. We are being passed from pillar to post. How is that justified?,' said Mr Hussain.
A Manchester City Council spokesperson said: "We have been made aware of a case of mistaken identity involving Mr Abrar Ahmed who was fined for littering a cigarette after another individual allegedly provided false details to an enforcement officer.
"Mr Ahmed has since provided evidence that suggests he was not at fault and our investigation officers have reopened the case to withdraw the fine as soon as possible through the courts.
"We want to sincerely apologise to Mr Ahmed and his family for the distress caused by this incident and investigations are ongoing to locate the real suspect."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
8 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Son of Brit couple Craig & Lindsay Foreman detained in Iran for 150 days on spying charges reveals shock at arrests
THE young son of a British couple imprisoned in Iran on spying charges has revealed how devastated he was after hearing of his parents' arrest. Husband and wife Craig and Lindsay Foreman have spent almost 150 days in jail since being detained during a round-the-world motorbike trip. 8 Craig and Lindsay Foreman have spent almost 150 days in an Iranian jail since being arrested on spy charges Credit: Rex 8 Ever since their incarceration, the pair have hardly spoken to their loved ones and mainly had contact with the Foreign Office Credit: Rex 8 The British couple had been on a round-the-world motorcycle trip Credit: Facebook/PPK2K RTW Motorcycle Mission The Brits entered Iran despite being warned by the Foreign Office and their family to avoid passing through the notoriously strict state. The couple, both in their 50s, were held back in January on unspecified espionage charges. The Iranian government continues to claim they were 'posing as tourists' to gather intelligence against the Middle East nation. Ever since their incarceration, the pair have hardly spoken to their loved ones and mainly had contact with the Foreign Office. Now the teenage son of Craig, a carpenter, and wife Dr Lindsay, a life coach, has revealed how hard the past few months have been on the family. Anxious Toby said Foreign Office officials visited his mum on Tuesday and handed her a letter from her closest loved ones back home. He told the Mirror: 'There was a visit yesterday day. Someone from the Foreign Office, checking if she's okay. "We have been able to pass on a message to the Foreign Office, everyone wrote a letter to give them to them, but we don't know what they received. 'We just don't want to make things worse. We're waiting to see if anything big happens over the next few months.' The 19-year-old university student described hearing about his parent's arrest as a "real shock". My dad has been sentenced to death in Iran on trumped-up charges and faces imminent execution - we must save him He said: 'Everyone in the family is dealing with it in different ways. I had never heard about English people being detained out there. 'I thought there was more of a security concern with them taking relatively expensive bikes out there. 'We were not expecting for them to get detained." Toby is holding on to hope that due to his mum's long career in psychiatry she will be able to cope with her prison stretch as best as possible and help Craig too. At the time of Craig and Linday's arrest a spokesperson for the Iranian judiciary said: "These individuals were cooperating with covert institutions linked to the intelligence services of hostile Western countries under the guise of investigative and research activities. "According to the observations of intelligence and security institutions, the connection of these individuals with several institutions affiliated with intelligence services has been confirmed, and additional investigations are ongoing in this regard." The judiciary spokesperson also said the pair "were monitored with the cooperation of security agencies and arrested". The pair first travelled into Iran from Armenia on December 30, and reportedly planned to leave by January 4, as they headed for Australia. 8 The pair shared pictures of them in Iran before their arrest Credit: Facebook/PPK2K RTW Motorcycle Mission 8 Brit couple Craig & Lindsay Foreman (whose faces were blurred) meeting British ambassador Hugo Shorter Credit: X/Iran Nuances 8 The couple were warned not to travel to Iran by their family and friends Credit: Rex While in Iran they visited Tabriz, the capital Tehran, and Isfahan before staying in Kerman. It was here where they were picked up by police and arrested. At the time, the Foreign Office said the couples arrest had "caused significant concern". The couple, who had previously been featured on Channel 4's A New Life in the Sun, had ignored pleas from friends, family and the Foreign Office (FCDO) not to enter Iran. FCDO guidance explicitly warns against all travel to the country, cautioning that British citizens could be arrested simply for their nationality. Brits 'face torture and years in hellhole jail' on 'fabricated' espionage charges CRAIG and Lindsay Foreman could be left to languish in a hellhole jail for years, sources fear. Insiders believe Iran's merciless leaders have made a "fabricated case" to use Craig and Lindsay as pawns in their sick game to get Western countries to give in to their demands. United Against Nuclear Iran's (UANI) policy director Jason Brodsky told The Sun while they are unlikely to face execution, they could be jailed for years and face torture. He said: "Iran uses hostage diplomacy as a means to extract concessions from Europe and the United States. "Hostages have languished for years behind bars in Iran. "The Iranian regime has executed dual-nationals previously, or those with Iranian citizenship in addition to American or European nationality. "Since the Foremans do not have dual-nationality, an execution is unlikely but the danger of harm remains. "The Iranian regime employs both psychological and physical torture methods depending on the situation." Insiders and campaigners say it is likely the couple were arrested simply for being British. It is feared they have been taken "hostage" to put pressure on the UK. Hossein Abedini of the National Council of Resistance told The Sun: "All of these actions are aimed at gaining leverage from the country to which the hostages belong therefore, any verdicts could arise. "This is a repetitive process that has occurred many times, but due to the concessions made by the West, the regime assesses this as a profitable business." Despite this, the pair acknowledged the extreme risk in a social media post on December 30. It read: 'Despite the advice of friends, family, and the FCDO (which strongly advises against travel to Iran for British nationals), we've chosen to keep moving forward. 'Why? Because we believe that, no matter where you are in the world, most people are good, kind humans striving for a meaningful life. Yes, we're aware of the risks. 'We also know the rewards of meeting incredible people, hearing their stories, and seeing the breathtaking landscapes of these regions could far outweigh the fear.' The UK government has been urged to act quickly to try and free the pair. Richard Ratcliffe, whose wife Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe was imprisoned in Iran for six years, urged officials to move faster than they did in her case. He said: 'My heart goes out to them, and I hope they are not in for a long ordeal, and that the government is able to respond more promptly than it did in our case." 8 The couple previously featured in Channel 4's A New Life In The Sun show Credit: Channel 4
Daily Mirror
10 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Teenage son of Brit couple held captive in Iran prison issues desperate plea
Craig and Lindsay Foreman have spent nearly 150 days in prison held on unspecified spying charges, with Iran accusing them of 'posing as tourists' to gather intelligence The family of a British husband and wife held captive in Iran over spying charges have written desperate letters to her but received no response. Craig and Lindsay Foreman were taken into custody while motorbiking across the country after being warned by the Foreign Office and their family not to visit because of the dangers posed by the rogue state. The couple, in their 50s, were held in January on unspecified spying charges, with Iran accusing them of 'posing as tourists' to gather intelligence. Now, as they have spent nearly 150 days in prison, it has emerged the Foreign Office has been supporting Craig, a carpenter and Dr Foreman, a life coach. Lindsay's son Toby spoke for the first time about the heartache the family faced. He said Foreign Office officials visited his mother on Tuesday. He told the Mirror: 'There was a visit yesterday day. Someone from the Foreign Office, checking if she's okay. We have been able to pass on a message to the Foreign Office, everyone wrote a letter to give them to them, but we don't know what they received. 'We just don't want to make things worse. We're waiting to see if anything big happens over the next few months.' The 19-year-old university student said the news that his mother had been detained over alleged espionage offences came as a 'real shock'. He said: 'Everyone in the family is dealing with it in different ways. I had never heard about English people being detained out there. 'I thought there was more of a security concern with them taking relatively expensive bikes out there. 'We were not expecting for them to get detained. She has studied a lot of psychology so she's probably in a better place mentality than other people.' Craig and Lindsay crossed into Iran from Armenia on December 30 and planned to leave by January 4 on their way to Australia. After entering the country they stayed in Tabriz, Tehran and Isfahan. But they never reached their next hotel in Kerman. In February Craig and Lindsay were accused of entering Iran 'posing as tourists' conducting research before their arrest near the city of Kerman. The couple, both aged 52, were also accused of 'gathering information from several provinces' and said to be 'cooperating with covert institutions linked to the intelligence services of hostile and Western countries'. Toby praised the Foreign Office for their support so far. He said: 'The Foreign Office has been pretty helpful - I have nothing bad to say about them.' The Foremans had been documenting their time spent in Iran on social media before their arrest. One clip, captioned 'We are in Iran', showed Lindsay in the front seat of a car while her husband waves behind her at the camera. A separate video shows her sat eating at a traditional Iranian restaurant. Lindsay, who has a PhD in psychology, was preparing a research project which she was due to present in Brisbane, Australia, at the conclusion of the trip. She was asking people at points along their trip what it means to be human and how you can live a good life. Before entering Iran, she posted online that the couple were about to 'tackle one of the most challenging - and let's be honest, slightly scary - sections of our journey'. The couple said they chose to ignore warnings from friends, family and the Foreign Office because they believed 'no matter where you are in the world, most people are good, kind humans striving for a meaningful life'. They added: 'Yes, we're aware of the risks. But we also know the rewards of meeting incredible people, hearing their stories, and seeing the breathtaking landscapes of these regions could far outweigh the fear. From the vast deserts of Iran to the towering peaks of Pakistan, we hope to share the beauty, hospitality, and humanity that often go unnoticed.' The Foremans previously featured on Channel 4 show A New Life in the Sun, which documented their move from Sussex to a villa in Andalusia, Spain.
Belfast Telegraph
11 hours ago
- Belfast Telegraph
BBC could be left with legal bill of up to £4.2m after Gerry Adams libel case
The libel trial could end up costing 'many millions' The BBC has been compelled to pay Gerry Adams €100,000 (£84,000) in damages after a jury decided that a story linking him to the murder of a British agent was defamatory – but the total legal bill facing the corporation could be as much as £4.2m. The staggering sum has prompted criticism from unionists including the leader of the DUP who said the corporation has 'significant questions' to answer about how it ended up in the position of being on the hook for 'many millions' of pounds. The BBC itself has reported that the legal bill for the case is understood to be between £2.5 and 4.2m according to sources with knowledge of the case. That would make it one of the most expensive cases the corporation has ever fought. The five week trial centred on a BBC NI Spotlight programme broadcast in 2016 and an accompanying online article focusing on the murder of Denis Donaldson in Co Donegal back in 2006 just months after he admitted his role as a police and MI5 agent – the story was based on an anonymous source who claimed the killing was sanctioned by the political and military leadership of the IRA with Mr Adams giving 'the final say'. The 76-year-old – who has always denied any involvement in the shooting and described the allegation as a 'grievous smear' – welcomed the verdict as he read a statement in Irish and English to reporters outside the High Court in Dublin on Friday. Mr Adams said the case "was about putting manners on the British Broadcasting Corporation" as he accused the BBC of upholding 'the ethos of the British state in Ireland'. He also claimed the BBC is 'out of sync in many, many fronts with the Good Friday Agreement' and suggested that 'political interference' prevented the broadcaster from settling sooner. Within hours of solicitor Paul Tweed saying his client was 'very pleased with this resounding verdict' and that the award 'speaks for itself', the daughter of Mr Donaldson called for an 'urgent public inquiry' into her father's assassination. Jane Donaldson accused the Adams trial of trivialising her family's pain by reducing the events that inflicted so much damage on her family to 'a debate about damage to his reputation' 'Daddy's murder and surrounding circumstances devastated our family, ' she said. "The plaintiff prioritised his own financial and reputational interests over any regard for retraumatising my family. 'We are still no closer to the truth. No-one spoke for my family in court. We supported neither side in this case.' Mr Adams did stress in his statement that he was very mindful of the Donaldson family during the trial urged the Irish Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan to meet with them as quickly as possible. "There's an onus on both governments and everyone else, and I include myself in this, to try and deal with these legacy issues as best that we can,' he said. DUP leader Gavin Robinson was also quick to react and focused his thoughts on 'the innocent victims who suffered at the hands of the IRA - ruthless terrorists who were victim-makers for many years'. "I would struggle to find a victim of IRA violence who has changed their view of Gerry Adams,' he said. But the East Belfast MP was also critical of the BBC. "While journalists must always be able to scrutinise and investigate in the public interest, the BBC have significant questions to answer,' he continued. "How have they found themselves in a situation where allegations were insufficiently evidenced with the consequence that license payers money will now be spent on both damages and reputed legal costs running into many millions?" The head of BBC NI was at pains to point out that the organisation 'has insurance and makes financial provision for ongoing and anticipated legal claims' while he defended the 'careful editorial processes and journalistic diligence applied to' the offending programme. "it was accepted by the court and conceded by Gerry Adams' legal team that the Spotlight broadcast and publication were of the highest public interest,' he stressed, while warning of 'profound' implications to the jury's decision. 'As our legal team made clear, if the BBC's case cannot be won under existing Irish defamation law, it is hard to see how anyone's could, and they warned how today's decision would hinder freedom of expression'. The High Court heard four weeks of evidence from 10 witnesses, including Mr Adams and BBC NI reporter Jennifer O'Leary. The jury found words used in the programme and accompanying article meant Mr Adams sanctioned and approved Mr Donaldson's murder. They also found the BBC did not report the allegations in good faith before settling on the €100,000 award. The 11-person jury came reached the decision after six hours and 49 minutes of deliberations. SDLP MLA and leader of the opposition at Stormont, Matthew O'Toole, said Gerry Adams 'is entitled to petition a court and a jury has given its verdict' as he too said the BBC will have questions to consider. "But today I'm thinking of the thousands of victims of the IRA, loyalists and the state who will never get a single day in court, let alone justice," he posted on X. Meanwhile TUV leader Jim Allister said "the people of NI know that Gerry Adams stood front and centre in justifying and defending thirty years of brutal IRA terror" regardless of the verdict. 'His active role at the heart of the Republican terror machine is well documented — not merely in hearsay, but in the detailed testimonies and investigations contained in multiple authoritative books on the IRA," he added. "These include the works of Peter Taylor, Toby Harnden, Ed Moloney, and Eamon Collins — all of which remain available and uncontested in the public domain. 'For the countless innocent victims of IRA violence, the one abiding consolation is this: Gerry Adams will one day stand before a higher court than any convened in Dublin.' Here's how the day played out: Today 03:31 PM The BelTel podcast Gerry Adams wins his defamation case against the BBC A jury in Dublin has awarded Gerry Adams €100,000 in damages. Today 03:05 PM TUV leader says Gerry Adams will 'stand before a higher court' North Antrim MP Jim Allister said "regardless of the verdict" delivered by a jury in Dublin on Friday, "the people of Northern Ireland know that Gerry Adams stood front and centre in justifying and defending thirty years of brutal IRA terror". 'His active role at the heart of the Republican terror machine is well documented — not merely in hearsay, but in the detailed testimonies and investigations contained in multiple authoritative books on the IRA," he added. "These include the works of Peter Taylor, Toby Harnden, Ed Moloney, and Eamon Collins — all of which remain available and uncontested in the public domain. 'For the countless innocent victims of IRA violence, the one abiding consolation is this: Gerry Adams will one day stand before a higher court than any convened in Dublin.' Today 02:11 PM Sam McBride on Gerry Adams Gerry Adams is a man of towering ambition who'd no moral qualms about securing his goal through murder Gerry Adams is one of the world's most enigmatic, most controversial, and most consequential living political figures. Today 02:08 PM DUP leader says BBC faces 'significant questions' DUP leader Gavin Robinson says the BBC faces "significant questions" amid reports that costs of fighting Adams' libel action will be "many millions". The East Belfast MP also said his thoughts today are with innocent victims who suffered at the hands of "ruthless" IRA terrorists. "The Dublin jury decision relates to a specific allegation broadcast and published online by the BBC about Gerry Adams," Mr Robinson said. "Our thoughts today are with the innocent victims who suffered at the hands of the IRA - ruthless terrorists who were victim-makers for many years. I would struggle to find a victim of IRA violence who has changed their view of Gerry Adams. "While journalists must always be able to scrutinise and investigate in the public interest, the BBC have significant questions to answer. How have they found themselves in a situation where allegations were insufficiently evidenced with the consequence that license payers money will now be spent on both damages and reputed legal costs running into many millions?" Today 02:00 PM Donaldson's family said Adams trial 'trivialised our tragedy' Speaking on behalf of the immediate family, Denis Donaldson's daughter Jane said the trial 'trivialised our family tragedy'. The case centred on claims contained in a BBC Spotlight programme that Mr Adams had sanctioned the killing of Mr Donaldson, a Sinn Féin official who spied for British authorities. The statement issued following the outcome of the trial said that "by reducing events which damaged our lives to a debate about damage to [Mr Adams ] reputation" the trial had "trivialised our family tragedy." "Daddy's murder and surrounding circumstances devastated our family," the statement added. The statement continued: 'No-one spoke for my family in court. We supported neither side in this case. Although the plaintiff claimed sympathy for my family, his legal team objected to me giving evidence to challenge the account of his witnesses." In the statement the family said they "are still no closer to the truth." They added that the case had demonstrated the need for a public inquiry into the death of Mr Donaldson. Today 12:43 PM Court report: Gerry Adams awarded €100k in damages after winning defamation action over BBC programme Gerry Adams has won his High Court defamation action against the BBC and has been awarded €100,000 in damages. Today 12:28 PM Images from outside Dublin High Court following verdict BBC journalist thanks sources used in documentary BBC journalist Jennifer O'Leary, who worked on the Spotlight programmed at the centre of the case, thanked the sources she relied upon for the broadcast. 'I said in the witness box that I had nothing to hide, only sources to protect and I want to thank them for trusting me,' she said. 'I also want to acknowledge and thank our witnesses in court – Trevor Ringland, Senator Michael McDowell and Ann Travers – who spoke so courageously. And there are thousands of Ann Travers across this island and in Britain - victims and survivors of the Troubles AND the years after the peace agreement who carry the burden of their grief and trauma with incredible courage. "They are the people I'm thinking of – all of them. Thank you.' Today 11:47 AM 'I've always been satisfied with my reputation': Gerry Adams reacts to case outcome Gerry Adams was asked about what the outcome of the case means for his reputation. He replied: 'I've always been satisfied with my reputation. 'Obviously, like yourself, we all have flaws in our character, but the jury made the decision and let's accept the outcome, and I think let's accept what the jury said.' Today 11:34 AM Adam Smyth, director of BBC Northern Ireland, expresses disappointment in the outcome Speaking to media outside court, Mr Smyth said: 'We are disappointed by this verdict. 'We believe we supplied extensive evidence to the court of the careful editorial processes and journalistic diligence applied to this programme, and to the accompanying online article. Moreover, it was accepted by the court and conceded by Gerry Adams' legal team that the Spotlight broadcast and publication were of the highest public interest. 'We didn't want to come to court but it was important that we defend our journalism and we stand by that decision. 'Our past is difficult terrain for any jury and we thank them for their diligence and careful consideration of the issues in this case. 'The implications of their decision, though, are profound. As our legal team made clear, if the BBC's case cannot be won under existing Irish defamation law, it is hard to see how anyone's could, and they warned how today's decision would hinder freedom of expression. 'Of course, a case of this importance, duration and complexity involves significant expense. In common with other media organisations, the BBC has insurance and makes financial provision for ongoing and anticipated legal claims.' He added they will take some time to consider the implications of the ruling. Today 11:25 AM Paul Tweed says Gerry Adams is 'very pleased with this resounding verdict' Solicitor Paul Tweed said his client Gerry Adams is 'very pleased with this resounding verdict', adding the award of damages 'speaks for itself'. 'The jury, 12 people from different walks of life, having listened to extensive evidence during the course of the past four weeks, has come to the unequivocal conclusion that the subject allegation was highly defamatory,' he said outside court. 'It therefore follows that the BBC Spotlight team at the time should not have included it in their broadcast. Not only had the false allegation regarding our client been the focus of the Spotlight documentary, but it had been utilised to sensationalise and publicise their programme. 'Furthermore, the fact that the false allegation has been left online for almost nine years has, in my opinion, done much to undermine the high standards of accuracy that is expected of the BBC. 'This case could and should have been resolved some considerable time ago.' Today 11:24 AM Gerry Adams said this case was 'about putting manners on the British Broadcasting Corporation' Outside court, Gerry Adams, who spoke in both Irish and English, said this case was 'about putting manners on the British Broadcasting Corporation'. Mr Adams told reporters: 'From my perspective, taking this case was was about putting manners on the British Broadcasting Corporation. 'I know many, many journalists. I like to think that I get on well with the most of them, and I wish you well, and I would uphold your right to do your job. 'But the British Broadcasting Corporation upholds the ethos of the British state in Ireland, and in my view it's out of sync in many, many fronts with the Good Friday Agreement. 'It hasn't caught on to where we are on this island as part of the process, the continuing process, of building peace and justice, and harmony, and, hopefully, in the time ahead, unity.' Gerry Adams said there is an onus on everyone, including himself, to deal with these legacy issues. He said: 'I'm very mindful of the Donaldson family in the course of this long trial, and indeed of the victims' families who have had to watch all of this. 'I want to say that the Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan should meet the family of Denis Donaldson as quickly as possible, and that there's an onus on both governments and everyone else, and I include myself in this, to try and deal with these legacy issues as best that we can.' Today 11:15 AM What was the jury's verdict? A jury at the High Court in Dublin found in Gerry Adams favour on Friday, after determining that the programme had defamed the former Sinn Fein leader. It also found the BBC's actions were not in good faith and that it had not acted in a fair and reasonable way. The jury determined that Mr Adams should be awarded 100,000 euros, which the jury heard falls on the medium scale for defamation. The jury had been tasked with determining whether the words in the BBC spotlight programme and accompanying article, on which Mr Adams brought the complaint, mean that he sanctioned and approved the murder of Denis Donaldson. Today 11:11 AM What was the defamation case about? In the BBC programme broadcast in September 2016, an anonymous source given the pseudonym Martin claimed the shooting was sanctioned by the political and military leadership of the IRA and that Gerry Adams gave 'the final say'. Mr Adams said the allegation was a 'grievous smear' while the BBC has described the legal action as a 'cynical attempt to launder his reputation'. The high-profile republican sought damages of at least 200,000 euro (£168,000) from the BBC. However, the British public service broadcaster had argued it would be a 'cruel joke' to award the former Sinn Fein president any damages.
