
iPhone exports to US trump last year numbers by 76%
Apple
's vendors shipped 2.9 million iPhones to the United States from India in April, according to market research firm Omdia, a 76% surge year-on-year, as the American tech firm persisted with its plan to meet domestic demand from the South Asian nation despite President Donald Trump's mounting pressure to switch to manufacturing locally. Similar numbers are expected in May, following the company's move to shift production out of China to reduce its overreliance on a single production base. In April, China suffered a commensurate 76% fall in iPhone exports to the US, at 900,000 units, from 3.7 million a year ago, Omdia said. Market tracker Counterpoint Research said its initial estimates peg iPhone exports from India to the US in April to be around 2.9-3 million.
The April numbers were, however, lower than in March, when the Cupertino-based company raced to meet the April 2 deadline when the US imposed steep retaliatory tariffs on countries with which it had a trade deficit, with China the hardest hit. Industry executives said that Apple's shift toward India was accelerating and that the lower export volume in April was in line with the weak shipments usually seen in the April-June period, ahead of the launch of new models in the September quarter.
Tariff Threat
Apple has to contend with President Trump's threat this week of imposing a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US that are not made locally.
However, producing iPhones in the US is likely to increase sticker prices substantially, with some experts estimating the Pro models to cost well over $3,000 apiece, from $1,119 now, on account of higher labour cost and complex logistics in sourcing the necessary components. 'In terms of profitability, it's way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US,' said Ming-Chi Kuo, Apple analyst at TF Securities, Hong Kong.
Live Events
CAPACITY EXPANSION
Last week, Apple's manufacturing partner Foxconn (Hon Hai) announced a fresh $1.5 billion investment in expanding its Chennai facility in a bid to strengthen capacity. The manufacturer has also constructed a new facility in Karnataka which will start shipping iPhones from June. Similarly, Tata Electronics, the company's second largest vendor for making iPhones in India, is expanding capacity at its Hosur facility for both enclosures and full-scale iPhone assembly. It has also acquired the majority stake in Pegatron's facility, which is Apple's third supplier in India.
Some say India's manufacturing capacity is unlikely to scale up fast enough to fully meet the US demand for Apple.
According to Omdia, the US market requires about 20 million iPhones per quarter, but India is expected to meet only about 80% of that demand by 2026.
PARTIAL SHIFT LIKELY
In the first quarter of 2025, India accounted for 21% of global iPhone shipments, with projections suggesting an increase in its share to 25-26% by the end of the year. The constraint India faces is not technical, but that of scale, as per analysts. With Apple now making even the high-end Pro and Pro Max models in India, much of the workforce training is complete, said Omdia.
'A full transition of US-bound iPhone production to India within a year remains unlikely. A partial shift is more feasible, though it still requires substantial investment in infrastructure and continued reliance on China for key components,' said Sanyam Chaurasia, analyst at Canalys (now part of Omdia). Apple is navigating a complex balancing act among its three most critical markets — China, US and India – not just as customer bases, but as an integral part of its global supply and production network, experts said.
'China remains deeply entrenched in Apple's manufacturing ecosystem, home to over 200 key suppliers. Shifting assembly to the US is not a logical move. It would mean attempting to relocate a tightly interwoven supply chain,' said Chaurasia.
Meanwhile, India has rapidly evolved from a secondary hub to a central pillar of global tech manufacturing, underscored by the sharp increase in iPhone exports from India, he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
38 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Anthropic hits $3 billion in annualized revenue on business demand for AI
Artificial intelligence developer Anthropic is making about $3 billion in annualized revenue, according to two sources familiar with the matter, in an early validation of generative AI use in the business world. The milestone, which projects the company's current sales over the course of a year, is a significant jump from December 2024 when the metric was nearly $1 billion, the sources said. The figure crossed $2 billion around the end of March, and at May's end it hit $3 billion, one of the sources said. While consumers have embraced rival OpenAI's ChatGPT, a number of enterprises have limited their rollouts to experimentation, despite board-level interest in AI. Anthropic's revenue surge, largely from selling AI models as a service to other companies, is a data point showing how business demand is growing, one of the sources said. A key driver is code generation. The San Francisco-based startup, backed by Google parent Alphabet and is famous for AI that excels at computer programming. Products in the so-called codegen space have experienced major growth and adoption in recent months, often drawing on Anthropic's models. This demand is setting Anthropic apart among software-as-a-service vendors. Its single-quarter revenue increases would count Anthropic as the fastest-growing SaaS company that at least one venture capitalist has ever seen. "We've looked at the IPOs of over 200 public software companies, and this growth rate has never happened," said Meritech General Partner Alex Clayton, who is not an Anthropic investor and has no inside knowledge of its sales. He cautioned that these comparisons are not fully precise, since Anthropic also has consumer revenue via subscriptions to its Claude chatbot. Still, by contrast, publicly traded SaaS company Snowflake took six quarters to go from $1 billion to $2 billion in such run-rate revenue, Clayton said. Anthropic competitor OpenAI has projected it will end 2025 with more than $12 billion in total revenue, up from $3.7 billion last year, three people familiar with the matter said. This total revenue is different from an estimated annualized figure like Anthropic's. Reuters could not determine this metric for OpenAI. The two rivals appear to be establishing their own swim lanes. While both offer enterprise and consumer products, OpenAI is shaping up to be a consumer-oriented company, and the majority of its revenue comes from subscriptions to its ChatGPT chatbot, OpenAI Chief Financial Officer Sarah Friar told Bloomberg late last year. OpenAI has not reported enterprise-specific revenue but said in May that paying seats for its ChatGPT enterprise product have grown to 3 million, from 2 million in February, and that T-Mobile and Morgan Stanley are among its enterprise customers. In the consumer race, Anthropic's Claude has seen less adoption than OpenAI. Claude's traffic, a proxy for consumer interest, was about 2% of ChatGPT's in April, according to Web analytics firm Similarweb. Anthropic, founded in 2021 by a team that departed OpenAI over differences in vision, closed a $3.5 billion fundraise earlier this year. That valued the company at $61.4 billion. OpenAI is currently valued at $300 billion.

Deccan Herald
38 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
US court won't lift judge's block on Trump's government overhaul
The decision by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals means that, for now, the Trump administration cannot proceed with plans to shed tens of thousands of federal jobs and shutter many government offices and programs.


Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump hails Nippon Steel as 'great partner' as deal awaits approval
U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday lauded an "agreement" between Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel at a political rally but stopped short of approving the companies' diplomatically sensitive merger. On a stage near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, decorated with signs celebrating "American steel," Trump declared the American steel company would remain American, while extolling its prospective new Japanese partner. "We're here today to celebrate a blockbuster agreement that will ensure this storied American company stays an American company," Trump told more than 1,600 people, including hard hat-wearing workers. "You're going to stay an American company, you know that, right? But we're going to have a great partner." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Later, though, he said the deal still needed his final go-ahead, leaving unresolved whether he would allow Nippon Steel to take ownership, as they had proposed. "I have to approve the final deal with Nippon, and we haven't seen that final deal yet," Trump told reporters when he returned from Pennsylvania. Live Events The Japanese firm's planned acquisition of U.S. Steel, initially floated in 2023, divided the politically important state of Pennsylvania and its heavily unionized blue-collar workforce. It also introduced tension into normally friendly relations between Tokyo and Washington. Proponents of the transaction had hoped Trump's visit would end a tumultuous 18-month effort by Nippon Steel to buy the iconic American company, beset by opposition from union leadership and two national security reviews. Trump's remarks on Friday shed little light on the contours of a deal that he would approve or whether a formal green light was in the offing. He vowed to workers that U.S. Steel would be "controlled by the USA," no layoffs would occur, and that Nippon would invest billions of dollars to modernize U.S. steel mills to increase production. He later suggested to reporters that the company's board would be U.S.-"controlled." The president also announced a plan, to be implemented on Wednesday, to double tariffs on imported steel to 50%, from 25%. "I have to tell you about Nippon, they kept asking me over and I kept rejecting - no way," Trump said, adding "I'm going to be watching over it." The White House and the companies have not responded to requests for comment on the status of deal talks. Trump announced the rally and appeared to endorse the merger last Friday in a social media post, sending U.S. Steel's share price up over 20% as investors bet he would soon give it the go-ahead. On Sunday, he sowed doubt, describing the deal to reporters not as the full takeover Nippon is seeking but as an investment with "partial ownership." U.S. Steel is headquartered near Pittsburgh, which symbolized both the erstwhile strength and more recent decline of U.S. manufacturing as the Rust Belt's steel plants and factories lost business to international rivals. Trump won closely contested Pennsylvania in 2024. "We would not be here today without President Trump, who has secured the company's future by approving our partnership," said Nippon Vice-Chair Takahiro Mori, who spoke before Trump. In a sign of the many open questions that remain, Japan's top trade negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, told reporters on Friday he could not yet comment on the tie-up. "I am aware of the various reports and posts by President Trump on social media. However, there has not yet been an official announcement from the U.S. government," Akazawa, in Washington for tariff negotiations, said at a briefing at the Japanese Embassy in Washington. Trump technically has until Thursday to decide whether to formally approve or scuttle the deal, after the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. last week completed a second review of the merger. But the timeline could slip. The road to Friday's rally has been a bumpy one. Nippon Steel offered $14.9 billion for U.S. Steel in December 2023, seeking to capitalize on an expected ramp-up in steel purchases, thanks to a bipartisan infrastructure law. But the tie-up faced headwinds from the start, with then-President Joe Biden and Trump both asserting U.S. Steel should remain American-owned as they sought to woo voters ahead of November's election. Following the previous review, Biden blocked the deal in January on national security grounds. The companies sued, arguing they did not receive a fair review process, a charge the Biden White House disputed. The steel giants saw a new opportunity in the Trump administration, which opened a fresh 45-day national security review into the proposed merger last month. But Trump's public comments, ranging from welcoming a simple "investment" in U.S. Steel by the Japanese firm to suggesting a minority stake for Nippon Steel, did little to shore up investor confidence. Reuters reported last week that Nippon Steel floated plans to invest $14 billion in U.S. Steel's operations, including up to $4 billion in a new steel mill if the deal wins Trump's approval.