Shaikin: 'Another log on the fire.' Yankees eager to avenge World Series meltdown against Dodgers
Yankees outfielder Aaron Judge (99) makes an error in the fifth inning of Game 5 of the World Series against the Dodgers at Yankees Stadium on Oct. 30. (Robert Gauthier/Los Angeles Times)
For Dodgers fans, the must-have souvenir from last year's World Series was not a cap or T-shirt commemorating the team's championship. It was one of the stickers that popped up all over town, reproducing the Fox Sports score box that showed the New York Yankees leading, 5-0, with two out in the fifth inning.
For the Yankees, it was the image that encapsulated an inning of extremely unfortunate events: Aaron Judge dropped a fly ball, Anthony Volpe committed a throwing error, Gerrit Cole did not cover first base.
Advertisement
The Dodgers tied the score before the Yankees could secure that third out and, a couple hours later, boisterously raised the championship trophy atop a makeshift stage in the Yankee Stadium outfield.
The celebrations raged for days, including a Mookie Betts podcast on which Chris Taylor said the Yankees had "s— down their leg' and a 'Baseball Isn't Boring' podcast on which Joe Kelly said the Dodgers' scouting reports had highlighted the Yankees' deficiencies: 'They can't make a play.'
Dodgers third base Kiké Hernández is safe at second base after an error by Yankees outfielder Aaron Judge (99) (not shown) in the fifth inning of Game 5 of the World Series on Oct. 30.
(Wally Skalij/Los Angeles Times)
You cannot glorify bat flips, as Major League Baseball itself does these days, and you cannot encourage players to market themselves and share their personalities, as the league also does, without running the risk of what the old-fashioned among us might call poor sportsmanship. To the Yankees' credit, they get it.
Advertisement
'The way I personally look at it is, when you go out and you are on the right side of the victory, you've got a leg to stand on,' Yankees closer Luke Weaver told me this week at Angel Stadium. 'When you lose, you ain't got much to say.
'They said what they said. That's what they felt. I don't take it too personally. In a perfect world, yeah, you don't want to hear that type of stuff. We know what happened. We know we had to do a better job. We just didn't quite do what we wanted to do. With that being said, it is what it is.'
For the first time since the World Series, the Yankees return to Dodger Stadium this weekend. The Dodgers are sold out of suites advertised this week for as much as $15,000 per game. As of Wednesday, available tickets on the team website for Friday's series opener ranged from $103 to $567 in general, $146 to $607 with early entry included.
Read more: How one 'crazy' inning ignited Dodgers' comeback in World Series clincher
Advertisement
The entire series will be nationally broadcast: Friday on Apple+, Saturday on Fox, Sunday on ESPN.
'I understand that it's going to get a lot of eyeballs,' Yankees manager Aaron Boone said. 'I think that's great for our sport.'
Said Weaver: 'It'll be a big series because, one, they're a great team, and we feel like we're a great team. It's hard to say it's not a rematch.
'To be honest, there's probably some deeper pride that wants to go in there and play good ball and play clean ball, and make sure that we take the series and do our job.'
ESPN played up the 'rematch' angle during last Sunday's Dodgers broadcast. However, of the 10 players that started that fateful Game 5 of the World Series for the Yankees, only three are active on the Yankees' roster: Judge, Volpe and catcher Austin Wells.
Advertisement
Gone in free agency: outfielders Juan Soto and Alex Verdugo and infielders Anthony Rizzo and Gleyber Torres. On the injured list: Cole, infielder Jazz Chisholm Jr. and designated hitter Giancarlo Stanton. New to New York: former Dodger Cody Bellinger, former Dodger-killer Paul Goldschmidt and L.A.'s own Max Fried, who is Friday's scheduled starting pitcher.
Dodgers celebrate with pitcher Walker Buehler (21), back left, after defeating the Yankees during Game 5 of the World Series, clinching the championship at Yankee Stadium on Oct. 30.
(Wally Skalij/Los Angeles Times)
In spring training, Judge said there was a simple solution to whatever verbal shots the Dodgers took in the wake of the World Series: 'Play better.'
At the time, Boone said he hoped the Yankees would 'handle things with a little more class' if they won the World Series this year. He also noted the Dodgers' stars did not say anything to diminish the Yankees.
Advertisement
'Some guys are more inclined to spout off and be a little more colorful than others, and that's their right. They won,' he said then. 'And again, hopefully we're in that position and do things a little better."
Have the Yankees used that fifth inning for motivation or just flushed it?
'I've used the phrase 'another log on the fire,'' Boone said this week. 'We've had some really tough ends to the season, and probably in some way, shape or form serve as some motivation.
'But I'd like to think that, had we won the World Series last year, we'd be hell bent on getting back again. You put this uniform on, and this hat, and what it represents, and our goal is to get back and do that again.'
Advertisement
Read more: Shaikin: Apple's documentary on Dodgers provides 'all-access' look at World Series run
The Detroit Tigers, not the Yankees, have the best record in the American League. The Philadelphia Phillies, not the Dodgers, have the best record in the National League.
Yet the projections at Baseball Prospectus and Fangraphs say the most likely World Series matchup is a Dodgers-Yankees rematch. That would be great for L.A. and New York, and for Fox, but that also would make a lockout after the 2026 season even more likely than it already is.
You can hear the owners now: If the price of admission to the World Series again is a team in one of the two largest markets in baseball, how can a team in any other market hope to compete? And, if the Dodgers spend $1 billion on free agents, win, spend another half-billion on free agents, and return to the World Series, are the Dodgers ruining baseball?
Advertisement
'It's difficult for most of us owners to be able to do the kinds of things that they're doing,' an owner said last January.
Read more: 'You want your chance to win one.' New Dodgers feel World Series hunger during celebrations
Oh, wait: That was Hal Steinbrenner, owner of the Yankees, the one team that CNBC estimated generated more revenue than the Dodgers last year.
This, we hope, is Steinbrenner being a team player. One high-ranking sports industry executive told me he never has seen baseball owners so united on pursuing major changes to the sport's economic structure, salary cap or otherwise. Either the large-market owners and small-market owners truly are on the same page, or at least they need the players' union to believe they are.
Advertisement
It is difficult to imagine Steinbrenner willfully offering to surrender some of the Yankees' competitive advantage so the Pittsburgh Pirates can squander a few more bucks. What Steinbrenner said is reasonable at a time cable television revenue has dried up for many teams, even as the Dodgers and Yankees continue to cash in, but the 'us' makes the comment look silly.
If a couple players on the Dodgers can make a silly comment, so can the owner of the Yankees. Bring on the World Series rematch.
Sign up for more Dodgers news with Dodgers Dugout. Delivered at the start of each series.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Screen Geek
9 minutes ago
- Screen Geek
Netflix Now Streaming One Of The Best Movies Of 2024
Many subscribers wait until a major movie hits Netflix so they can see it after its theatrical run. Whether watching a movie for the first time or revisiting a title, it offers a new life and that happens to be the case with one of the best movies of 2024 which was recently added to Netflix. This is actually the second streaming service to carry the title, which had its initial release on Peacock, but licenses tend to move from one streaming platform to another. Now, at the time of this writing, the critically-acclaimed movie has made its way to Netflix where it's taken the number one spot on the United States. This places the film above the likes of new releases like Fear Street: Prom Queen and other recent fan-favorites like Despicable Me 4 . Interestingly, this title happens to be an animated movie similar to the latter, but one that's received very high reviews from critics and audiences alike. This animated film from DreamWorks Animation was distributed by Universal Pictures and it's none other than The Wild Robot . The animated sci-fi feature adapts the 2016 novel of the same name by Peter Brown, and it revolves around a robot named Roz that finds a new life on an uninhabited island after being shipwrecked. It's a beautiful title written and directed by Chris Sanders that revolves around the existence of technology combined with nature. Its voice cast includes the likes of Lupita Nyong'o, Pedro Pascal, Kit Connor, Bill Nighy, Stephanie Hsu, Matt Berry, Ving Rhames, Mark Hamill, and Catherine O'Hara, all of whom have received praise from viewers. It's an incredible example of an original animated film connecting with viewers in new and impressive ways, having earned several awards in addition to grossing $334.1 million worldwide on a $78 million budget. In fact, a sequel to The Wild Robot is also in the works, which gives another reason for Netflix subscribers to check out this 2024 hit. Stay tuned to ScreenGeek for more news regarding the latest trending titles on streaming and any other news regarding The Wild Robot as we have it. For now, it looks like Netflix is the place to go if you'd like to stream the film.


Forbes
11 minutes ago
- Forbes
FINRA Defeats Legal Challenge By Penny Stock Broker Alpine, But Faces Ongoing Legislative Threat
The Supreme Court just declined to hear a penny stock broker's legal challenge to FINRA's constitutionality. Despite it, a new bill aims to strip the self-regulatory body of its key powers, moving them to the SEC. Wall Street's top watchdog, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), faces a pivotal moment amid converging legislative and legal challenges that could potentially reshape the future regulatory landscape. The regulator notched a win on Monday, however, as the Supreme Court declined to hear a penny stock broker's legal challenge to FINRA's constitutionality. Until recently, adding pressure to FINRA's current predicament was its legal battle with Utah-based brokerage Alpine Securities, which was fighting against an expulsion order imposed by the regulator and contended that FINRA's disciplinary process is unconstitutional. In an investigation published in September 2024, Forbes delved into the contentious history between Alpine's owner, John Hurry, and FINRA. Alpine and Hurry's second firm, Phoenix-based Scottsdale Capital Advisors, specialize in 'liquidating' risky penny stocks and have a long track record of enforcement actions brought against them by regulators like FINRA and the SEC. FINRA originally attempted to expel Alpine in March 2022 for rule violations that revolved around the firm spiking customer account fees by 60,000% three years prior and then repeatedly violating a cease-and-desist order. Alpine's subsequent arguments on FINRA's constitutionality hinge on the private nondelegation doctrine and the Appointments Clause, raising questions about the extent to which a private entity and self-regulatory organization can wield governmental power without governmental accountability. A federal appeals court in D.C. sided partially with Alpine in November 2024, ruling that FINRA can no longer expel brokerages like Alpine without first getting approval from the SEC. Alpine then asked the U.S. Supreme Court to completely halt all of the proceedings against them, however, Chief Justice John Roberts denied this request in March 2025, allowing FINRA to continue—though the requirement for SEC review remained. The broader constitutional challenge mounted by Alpine remained in play—with the firm requesting for the Supreme Court to step in and take on the full case. Just last week, the Justices met to discuss the request and on June 2, it was announced that the Supreme Court had turned down Alpine's appeal and declined to take up the case. The decision is a major win for FINRA on one front of a broader battle against threats to the authority of SROs. 'FINRA is pleased with the Supreme Court's ruling,' according to a spokesperson for the organization. 'It is FINRA's position that, for multiple reasons discussed in its brief opposing Alpine's petition for writ of certiorari, the case did not meet the Supreme Court's standards for review.' While FINRA appears to have warded off Alpine's years-long legal challenge, debate around self-regulatory organizations (SROs) continues to persist. At the heart of this continuing discussion is H.R. 2689, the 'Restoring Accountability in Market Supervision (RAMS) Act,' a bill introduced on April 10 by Congresswoman Lisa McClain (R-Mich.). The introduction of this bill by a prominent member of the House Financial Services Committee is a strategically timed move that amplifies existing debate around FINRA as a private SRO. Though brief—consisting of only several pages, the bill never explicitly mentions the financial regulator. The legislation itself proposes to transfer the rule-making, examination, and enforcement authorities of all "registered national securities associations" to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), but McClain has made it clear in public statements that FINRA is her target. 'FINRA has drifted far from its intended purpose of safeguarding investors and ensuring fairness in financial markets,' she said in a press release announcing the bill. 'It's past time for Congress to put an end to FINRA's abuse of its authority,' said McClain. 'This bill puts the power back where it belongs—with a federal agency that is subject to congressional appropriations and oversight.' Requests for comment from Congresswoman McClain's office went unanswered. In response to the mounting scrutiny, FINRA has defended its long-standing role in the financial ecosystem. 'For 85 years, FINRA, the private, self-regulator of broker-dealers, has protected investors, promoted market confidence and safeguarded market integrity at zero cost to the American taxpayer,' a spokesperson for the organization told Forbes. They underscored FINRA's model, which allows it to 'keep pace as capital markets constantly evolve' by taking input from all market participants. FINRA licenses and oversees 628,000 brokers and 3,300 firms including Charles Schwab, Merrill Lynch and Fidelity. It has 4,300 employees and a budget (mostly funded by its members) of $1.5 billion—rivaling the SEC's 5,000 employees and $2.2 billion budget. Experts in financial regulation express considerable skepticism regarding the practical implications of transferring FINRA's vast responsibilities to the SEC. 'This strikes me as really irresponsible to take the cop off the beat without making any provision for additional funding or resources for the SEC to assume FINRA's responsibilities,' says Benjamin Edwards, a professor of law at the William S. Boyd School of Law at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. He highlights the sheer scale of FINRA, noting it is roughly as large as the SEC and questioned the logic of transferring its duties without commensurate appropriations for the federal agency. 'The SEC simply does not have the capacity to take over FINRA's operations,' he says, concluding, 'I doubt this legislation has any serious chance of passing.' Alma Angotti, a former senior enforcement attorney at both the SEC and FINRA who now works as a senior managing director at FTI Consulting, echoed these concerns. 'The SEC absolutely could not absorb FINRA's functions, which include regulation, inspections, and enforcement, without a significant increase in funding and personnel," she says. FINRA employs a large number of people working in each of those functions, she notes: 'It's hard to see how the SEC could perform them with significantly fewer personnel.' Angotti also highlighted the financial implications, noting that while FINRA is industry-supported, if the SEC were to take over, it would likely need to impose significant additional fees on industry members to fund any new activities. Angotti further warns of potential regulatory gaps during such a transition: 'At least for a while, there is going to be a lot of uncovered territory... Nobody is going to be enforcing it in theory.' She emphasizes the value of FINRA's self-regulatory model, particularly the input from industry experts whose contributions to rules and training were invaluable during her time working at the organization. The legislative push by Congresswoman McClain is not an isolated event but rather part of a broader trend of intensified scrutiny facing FINRA. Some experts have noted that the bill could be a signal of support for the Project 2025 agenda, which calls for abolishing FINRA. McClain and other Republicans like Representative Ann Wagner (R-Mo.) have characterized FINRA as an 'overzealous and unaccountable quasi-governmental entity' that imposes 'unnecessary and excessive costs' on the industry. Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), the highest-ranking Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, has also been vocal, criticizing the regulator for being 'controlled by the financial industry,' imposing 'weaker penalties' and lacking a cap on executive compensation. Congresswoman Waters did not respond to requests for comment by press time. The self-regulatory model still faces unprecedented levels of scrutiny and debate. While experts like Edwards and Angotti doubt the immediate passage of the McClain bill due to the immense logistical challenges of having the SEC absorb FINRA's functions, there is a consensus that some internal reforms, particularly around enforcement and arbitration processes, are likely inevitable. The debate now has more broadly grown into one about the fundamental balance between industry self-regulation and direct governmental oversight of markets. The outcome of these converging pressures and subsequent decisions could shape the future of financial market regulation for years to come.


Bloomberg
12 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Uber Promotes Company Veteran to COO as CEO Says He's Not Going ‘Anywhere'
Uber Technologies Inc. named longtime executive Andrew Macdonald as its first chief operating officer since 2019, part of an executive shake-up that includes the departure of the company's top delivery leader. Pierre-Dimitri Gore-Coty, senior vice president of delivery, has decided to leave Uber after nearly 13 years, Chief Executive Officer Dara Khosrowshahi said in a memo seen by Bloomberg News.