logo
Arizona's "privatization scam" is starving public schools. Trump wants to take it national

Arizona's "privatization scam" is starving public schools. Trump wants to take it national

Yahoo09-04-2025

In 2022, Arizona lawmakers made a state school voucher program universal, just four years after voters shot down the proposal by a two-to-one margin. Now, at least 42 educators, counselors and other support staff in Mesa Public Schools, Arizona's largest school district, are feeling the hurt, receiving notice that they're the victims of a reduction in force earlier this year.
Kelly Berg, an educator at Dobson High School and local union leader who's spent nearly 30 years teaching in the state, told Salon that cuts like these will have dire consequences for public schools.
'Just slightly over half [of the 42 Mesa Public Schools employees] were counselors. So that's a big impact. We no longer are going to have full-time counselors in our elementary schools,' Berg told Salon. 'Having that extra layer of support for when a student needs some extra support is going to be detrimental because now that's gonna fall on the teachers.'
Berg, who is also concerned about losing federal funding as the Trump administration dismantles the Department of Education, says the impacts on students and faculty will be sweeping.
'It might be that we have fewer instructional assistants for those [special education] classrooms… [or] instead of having a dedicated instructional assistant for the classroom, they now have to share that person,' Berg said. 'So it's gonna impact student behavior and the workload for the teacher. The students might not get one-on-one assistance like they used to get if we have to spread ourselves thinner and thinner.'
Programs like Arizona's allow parents to claim more than $7,000 in vouchers for educational expenses – like private school tuition, homeschooling costs, even a piano or ski resort visit – if their kids exit the public school system. The purported goal is to give parents more flexibility over their students' education and enable working-class families to attend non-public schools.
President Donald Trump signed an executive order in January prioritizing federal government support for 'educational choice' initiatives in the states, many of which have taken action to create voucher programs since.
Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation's policy manifesto for the second Trump term, called for the Trump administration to follow in the footsteps of Arizona's education voucher program and pave a path for universal school choice, a policy the document calls 'a goal all conservatives and conservative Presidents must pursue.'
But educators, advocates and officials in Arizona say the White House and other state governments should heed their warnings on the massive costs to taxpayers, students and public school employees that voucher programs can have.
Marisol Garcia, the president of the Arizona Education Association, the state's labor union for public school teachers, told Salon in an interview that the state had become known as the 'chemistry lab of terrible ideas.'
'We hit a head last year when we got to spending almost $700 million out of the general fund to the universal voucher system,' she said. 'That's money that could be going to not just education – because our general fund provides for education – but healthcare, transportation, housing, a lot of the money that goes to state-funded wildfire protection. The impact is now broader than just education and students, and it keeps getting bigger.'
In addition to the $900 million that the state paid out to support the voucher program in 2024, far surpassing the $64 million estimate from the state's budget committee, Economic Policy Institute economist Hilary Wething told Salon there was another indirect cost plaguing public school students.
'It's the cost to public schools from students who were previously attending public school and then take up the voucher and leave and go to private school,' Wething said. 'The cost of providing that same level of education to the remaining students in public school is this second indirect cost of vouchers.'
Certain school expenses – physical real estate, equipment, desks, even some staff – are difficult or impossible to scale back on a year-to-year basis, so planning ahead requires accurate headcounts of students for years into the future. However, voucher programs have made estimating enrollment more difficult.
'What we have continued to find is that a lot of students who do go to a charter school using the voucher monies may or may not find what they're looking for and then they'll return to the public schools,' Berg told Salon, adding that students in need of special resources are especially likely to make the switch back into public schools. 'When there's a constant ebb and flow of students and parents moving in and out of the public school systems, it's incredibly challenging to come up with a budget.'
Wething agrees, adding that schools 'can't effectively educate children if they can't plan.'
'In the long run, all of these costs are variable, right? In the long run, you can actually close a building down,' she told Salon. The problems really stem from the short-run unpredictability of enrollment due to voucher programs.'
This uncertainty means that per-student variable expenses are often the first to get cut. For public school students, that means less equipment, fewer books and even larger class sizes as more districts are forced to make cuts to educator and support staffing and keep teacher pay stagnant.
'We're having to do more with the same amount of pay… if a position goes unfilled, someone has to pick up the work from that position,' Berg told Salon.
'It's not good for morale. It never is. As long as I've been teaching in Arizona – and next year, I'll reach my 30th year of teaching in Arizona. – we have always been underpaid compared to the rest of the nation,' Berg said. 'It's a labor of love that we do what we do, we would just like to be paid what we're worth.'
And while cuts could mean bigger class sizes, experts also worry the impacts are disproportionately harmful to lower-income Arizonans.
Studies conducted since the program went universal suggest that the vast majority of voucher beneficiaries are those who could already afford a private education. A Brookings Institute analysis last year found that those in the state's highest-income ZIP codes were the most frequent voucher users, while the lowest-income areas were approximately a fourth as likely to make use of the program.
With COVID-era federal funds drying up and a 2016 voter-approved funding measure expiring this summer, the state's public schools face an impending crisis, despite already ranking near last place in per-pupil spending.
'Public schools should be public for every single student,' Garcia told Salon. 'Over 70% of the students that are utilizing the ESA voucher programs never attended a public school… We are now essentially giving these families a $7,000 almost tax break for sending their child to this private school.'
And while just about one-third of the recipients of vouchers are leaving public schools, reducing headcounts by a small margin, the funds exiting the public system can have a dramatic effect on education quality.
'If I had a class size of 32, and it goes down to 29, I still have 29 kids in my classroom, so I still have to provide everything for those kids,' Garcia explained. 'If you're not investing in salaries, investing in upkeep, investing in resources, the strain on the workforce, the strain on the district becomes untenable.'
While wealthier families can choose to opt out of a public school system with rapidly dwindling funding, not all students in the state can. Wething told Salon that 'school choice' is a 'false dichotomy' for many students in low-income neighborhoods or rural areas, who don't have access to charter or private school options anyway.
'Public school students who are not enrolling in voucher programs, they are bearing the brunt of the cost in terms of, one, fewer dollars to spend on their educational needs,' Wething said. 'Many students, particularly students in rural areas, public schools are the only option. So when a state invokes these voucher programs, they're getting stuck in terms of risking having fewer costs, fewer resources coming to their districts for a choice that doesn't exist for them.'
As for the private schools that students are moving to, advocates say they're a black box.
'Private schools have very little accountability, standards or transparency in how they provide education, who they provide education for, and what that looks like,' Wething told Salon. That lack of transparency doesn't just hurt students, it makes long-term planning more difficult for public schools, too, she added.Families receiving vouchers frequently jump back into the public school system, either because of disappointment with instruction quality or unexpected disruptions to their students' enrollment. Wething says non-public schools in the state have 'very low accountability and transparency on how they select students, how they keep students and how they retain students.'
Berg, too, worries that students outside of public schools are working with unvetted and unevaluated educators.
"A lot of charter schools and private schools that can now use the voucher money aren't held to the same standards that public schools are held to in terms of funding in terms of state testing that they have to take, so it's just not equitable," she said.
And there aren't many guidelines for who can take state dollars and work with kids outside the public school system, either.
'There is a huge concern for the safety of these students. There is no mandatory reporting [for private entities],' Garcia said, warning that there aren't any safety measures for voucher students. 'Anyone who is around children under 18 and any sort of educational capacity, so receiving an ESA voucher, even a karate class, a bouncy house or Catholic church, they should all be fingerprinted. That's not happening.'
Garcia added that Governor Katie Hobbs' proposals to add fingerprint requirements and tighten the rules on what expenses funds could be put towards in the last budget session went nowhere in the GOP-controlled legislature.\
With momentum building in state legislatures across the country to implement their own voucher programs and an ongoing dismantling of the Department of Education, Garcia's advice to Americans is to keep schools public.
'At least once a week I'm on the phone with leaders, public school champions throughout the country on why not to be Arizona,' Garcia told Salon. 'This is a privatization scam. The intent of this is to help privatize public education.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Diplomatic win for UK hosting US-China trade talks
Diplomatic win for UK hosting US-China trade talks

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Diplomatic win for UK hosting US-China trade talks

Sky News understands that the Trump administration approached the UK government to ask if it would host round two of the US-China trade talks. This is a useful 'diplo-win' for the UK. The first round was held in Geneva last month. News of that happening came as a surprise. The Chinese and the Americans were in the midst of a Trump-instigated trade war. President Trump was en route to Saudi Arabia and suddenly we got word of talks in Switzerland. They went surprisingly well. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent and his Chinese counterpart He Lifeng, met face-to-face and agreed to suspend most tariffs for 90 days. But two weeks later, the Trump administration accused Beijing of breaking the agreements reached in Geneva. Beijing threw the blame back at Washington. On Wednesday, Donald Trump and Xi Jinping spoke by phone. The Chinese claimed this call was at the Americans' request. Either way, the consequence was that the talks were back on track. "I just concluded a very good phone call with President Xi of China, discussing some of the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, trade deal," President Trump said this week. From that call came the impetus for a second round of talks. A venue was needed. In stepped the UK at short notice. Beyond being geographically convenient, UK government sources suggest that Britain is geopolitically in the right place right now to act as this bridge and facilitator. The UK-China relationship is in the process of a "reset". Other locations, like Brussels or other EU capitals, would have been less workable. Crucially too, for the UK, this is also potentially advantageous as it seeks to get its own UK-US trade agreement, to eliminate or massively reduce tariffs, over the line. Talks on reaching the "implementation phase" have been near-continuous since the announcement last month, but having the American principals in London is a plus. Sideline talks are possible, but even the presence of the US team in the UK is helpful. Read more from Sky News:Man wrongly deported from US to El Salvador has been returned to face criminal chargesMore than 40 'narco-boat' drug smugglers arrested in major police sting For all the chaos that President Trump is causing with his tariffs, he has instigated face-to-face conversations as he seeks resets. Key players are sitting down around tables - yes, to untangle the trade knots which Trump tied, but this whole episode has pulled foes together around the same table; it has forced relationships and maybe mutual understanding. That's useful. And for this next round, between superpowers, the UK is the host. Also useful.

Healey touts state tuition savings, criticizes federal cuts to Pell Grants
Healey touts state tuition savings, criticizes federal cuts to Pell Grants

Boston Globe

time17 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Healey touts state tuition savings, criticizes federal cuts to Pell Grants

Overall, MASSGrant Plus Expansion program saved more than 34,000 Massachusetts students an estimated $110 million in the 2023-2024 academic year, the statement said. More than 7,730 middle income students saved an average of $3,856 each, according to data from the state Department of Higher Education, the statement said. Advertisement In the same statement, Healey urged the US Senate to reject Pell Grant cuts included in the federal budget reconciliation bill recently passed by Republicans in the U.S. House and supported by President Trump. The proposed cuts and eligibility restrictions would results in 42,000 Massachusetts students at public institutions losing $57 million in funding each year, according to Healey's statement said. 'Massachusetts is home to the best schools in the country, but we need to make sure that they are affordable for all of our students,' Healey's statement said. 'That's why I took action to increase financial aid at our public colleges and universities, which has already lowered costs for tens of thousands of students.' The drastic cuts proposed to the Pell Grant program would 'roll back the progress we have made and increase costs,' Healey said. Advertisement 'This is bad for our students and bad for our economy, as it would hold back our next generation of workers from being able to afford to go to school,' she said. Healey announced $62 million in new state funding to expand the MASSGrant program during a ceremony at Salem State University in November 2023. The new funding covered the full costs of tuition and mandatory instructional fees for Pell Grant-eligible students, and as much as half for middle-income students. Middle-income students are those whose families earn between $73,000 and $100,000 annually in adjusted gross income. The program was retroactive to the start of the fall 2023 semester for Massachusetts students at the states public institutions, including its 15 community colleges, nine state universities, and four University of Massachusetts undergraduate campuses. Funding for the expansion of the program also drew on $84 million Healey and the legislature had set earmarked for financial aid expansion in the FY24 budget, Healey's office said at the time. 'The dramatic enrollment increases our community colleges have seen over the last two years make it clear that free community college and expanded financial aid is a game changer for students in Massachusetts,' Luis Pedraja, chair of the Community College Council of Presidents, and president of Quinsigamond Community College said in the statement. 'The proposed Pell eligibility changes would be devastating to our students' ability to afford higher education and the community college presidents in Massachusetts urge the Senate to reject this ill-advised change,' Pedraja said. Education Secretary Patrick Tutwiler said he feared the impacts proposed cuts could have on students who struggle to afford college. Advertisement 'Low-income students deserve to go to college just as much as their higher income peers, and these changes are going to take us backwards – increasing dropout rates and leaving students saddled with more debt and no degree," Tutwiler said in the statement. Tonya Alanez can be reached at

Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check a real thing? What we know
Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check a real thing? What we know

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check a real thing? What we know

In February, President Donald Trump said he was considering a plan to pay out $5,000 stimulus checks to American taxpayers from the savings identified by billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Are they happening? No official plan or schedule for such a payout has been released, and a decision on the checks would have to come from Congress, which has so far been cool to the idea. And there have been questions as to how much DOGE has actually saved. The idea was floated by Azoria investment firm CEO James Fishback, who suggested on Musk's social media platform X that Trump and Musk should "should announce a 'DOGE Dividend'" from the money saved from reductions in government waste and workforce since it was American taxpayer money in the first place. He even submitted a proposal for how it would work, with a timeline for after the expiration of DOGE in July 2026. "At $2 trillion in DOGE savings and 78 million tax-paying households, this is a $5,000 refund per household, with the remaining used to pay down the national debt," he said in a separate post. Musk replied, "Will check with the President." "We're considering giving 20% of the DOGE savings to American citizens and 20% to paying down the debt," Trump said in a during the Saudi-sponsored FII PRIORITY Summit in Miami Beach the same month. DOGE has dismantled entire federal agencies, wiped out government contracts and led the firings of tens of thousands of federal workers, leaving many agencies struggling to continue operations. DOGE checks? Elon Musk dodges DOGE stimulus check question during Wisconsin rally: Here's what he said. Fishbeck suggested that the potential refund go only to households that are net-income taxpayers, or households that pay more in taxes than they get back. The Pew Research Center said that most Americans with an adjusted gross income of under $40,000 effectively pay no federal income tax. They would not be eligible. If DOGE achieves Musk's initial goal of stripping $2 trillion from U.S. government spending by 2026, Fishback's plan was for $5,000 per household, or 20% of the savings divided by the number of eligible households. If DOGE doesn't hit the goal, Fishback said the amount should be adjusted accordingly. 'So again, if the savings are only $1 trillion, which I think is awfully low, the check goes from $5,000 to $2,500,' Fishback said during a podcast appearance. 'If the savings are only $500 billion, which, again, is really, really low, then the [checks] are only $1,250.' However, while Musk talked about saving $2 trillion in federal spending during Trump's campaign, he lowered the goal to $1 trillion after Trump assumed office and said in March he was on pace to hit that goal by the end of May. At a Cabinet meeting in April, Musk lowered the projected savings further to $150 billion in fiscal year 2026. Musk left the White House at the end of May when his designation as a "special government employee" ended. DOGE, the advisory group he created, is expected to continue without him. That depends on who you ask. On its website, DOGE claims to have saved an estimated $175 billion as of May 30, "a combination of asset sales, contract and lease cancellations and renegotiations, fraud and improper payment deletions, grant cancellations, interest savings, programmatic changes, regulatory savings, and workforce reductions." The site says that works out to $1,086.96 saved per taxpayer. However, many of DOGE's claims have been exaggerated and several of the initiatives to slash agency workforces have been challenged in court. DOGE has been accused of taking credit for contracts that were canceled before DOGE was created, failing to factor in funds the government is required to pay even if a contract is canceled, and tallying every contract by the most that could possibly be spent on it even when nothing near that amount had been obligated. The website list has been changed as the media pointed out errors, such as a claim that an $8 million savings was actually $8 billion. On May 30, CNN reported that one of its reporters found that less than half the $175 billion figure was backed up with even basic documentation, making verification difficult if not impossible. Some of the changes may also end up costing taxpayers more, such as proposed slashes to the Internal Revenue Service that experts say would mean less tax revenue generated, resulting in a net cost of about $6.8 billion. Over the next 10 years, if IRS staffing stays low, the cumulative cost in uncollected taxes would hit $159 billion, according to the nonpartisan Budget Lab at Yale University. The per-taxpayer claim on the website is also inflated, CNN said, as it's based on '161 million individual federal taxpayers' and doesn't seem to include married people filing jointly. This article originally appeared on Florida Times-Union: DOGE dividends: Will American taxpayers get a $5,000 check?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store