
Swinney: Only independence can fix UK's broken system
An independent Scotland, he will add, is "within reach."
READ MORE
Last week, The Herald revealed that senior SNP figures had warned the First Minister he had two weeks to do more to push Scottish independence or face a potential leadership challenge at the party's conference in October.
Some party critics argue he is not doing enough to make the case for independence—failing to energise members or mobilise the SNP's core vote in seats like Hamilton, where Labour won by just 602 votes.
Mr Swinney scrapped Humza Yousaf's minister for independence and ended Nicola Sturgeon's series of Scottish Government independence papers.
One source told The Herald: 'The ability to make the case for independence is not a desirable part of the job description — it is essential — and he has failed on probation."
Over the weekend, MSPs loyal to the First Minister told the Sunday Times that the SNP would need a fresh independence offer in time for next year's Holyrood election.
In his speech to the Scotland 2050 conference, Mr Swinney is expected to say: 'It is only by taking charge of our own destiny, with our own hand on the tiller, that we are better able to ride the waves of change, that we are better able to shape our own future.
'I have long believed that Scotland is an afterthought to successive UK governments. Scotland is not on Westminster's radar in the same way, say, as London, the Midlands or the South East.
'It holds us back in ways big and small, leaving us waiting and praying, hoping that decisions taken at Westminster are not too damaging.
'We are prey to a broken system and a failing economic model—a system that delivers for a very few at the very top, while living standards stagnate and real wages are squeezed for the vast majority.
'All this when we have the capacity to stand and flourish on our own two feet.'
He will argue that independence is the 'defining choice for this generation' because the status quo 'has proved itself incapable of delivering on the hopes and ambitions of the people of Scotland.'
'That is why, like a clear majority of Scots, I believe that our nation should have the right to choose.
'A Scotland that is modern, dynamic and forward-looking, living in anticipation of what more can be done, what else can be achieved. Moving forward as one, moving forward with hope and self-belief.
'Such a Scotland is within reach, I have no doubt. But if we want it, we have to work for it, we have to vote for it, we have to actively, purposefully, and I hope also joyfully, make it happen.'
The most recent Norstat poll for the Sunday Times had support for leaving the UK at 54%.
The eight-point lead—excluding don't knows—increased to 16 points if people were asked to imagine Nigel Farage as Prime Minister.
The lead was also 20 points higher than support for the SNP.
However, polling also shows that the constitution is not a top priority for Scots, who are generally more concerned about health, the economy and education.
There is also seemingly little prospect of a second referendum in the near future. Earlier this month, Sir Keir Starmer said he could not imagine one taking place during his time as Prime Minister.
Asked if there would be another independence referendum if a nationalist majority emerged after next year's Holyrood election, Sir Keir said: 'I think it's really important to focus on the priorities that matter most.
'We got a big election win last year on the basis that we would stabilise the economy and ensure that on that foundation we build a stronger Scotland in a stronger United Kingdom, and that's what I intend to do.'
Pressed further, he said: 'No, and nobody's raising that with me as their first priority.
'Certainly, in the discussions I'm having with the First Minister, that is not—we're talking about jobs, energy, security, and dealing with the cost-of-living crisis.'
READ MORE
Meanwhile, in his speech to the Scotland 2050 summit, Anas Sarwar will say it is time to move on from the 'same old arguments.'
The Scottish Labour leader is expected to say: 'All of us have a stake in the future of our country and all of us want to see a thriving and fairer Scotland in 2050.
'But if we want Scotland to thrive by 2050 then we face a choice—are we going to be a Scotland that is having the same old arguments and talking about only what Scotland cannot do, or are we going to have a hopeful, outward-looking Scotland that is maximising our potential?
'That is the choice before us, and to make sure we thrive by 2050, we need to reject the old ideas and divisions now.
'That is why I am clear that we need big, bold, meaningful change to deliver a brighter future for Scotland.
'That is why Scottish Labour has bold plans to fix our NHS, renew our public services, fix our schools, end the housing crisis and unlock the potential of our businesses.
'This is the choice we face—managed decline with the SNP or a new direction and a thriving Scotland with Scottish Labour.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
11 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
What's behind the drive to cut public spending 'waste'?
Why does the Scottish Government need to cut spending in this way? Mr Sousa explained: "The Scottish Government is not allowed to borrow cash to fund any day-to-day spending, so it must make sure that its spending matches its funding. "This includes the block grant, as well any additional tax revenues from devolved Scottish taxes (including income tax) and the transfer of funds for social security devolution. "The Scottish Government's more generous pay policy in recent years means that the average wage of public sector employees in Scotland is about 5% higher than the UK average. READ MORE: "Coupled with Scotland's larger share of employment made up of public sector workers, this creates significant pressure for the Scottish Government. "The Scottish Government's social security system is also forecast to cost £2 billion a year more than the block grant adjustments [from the UK Government], between both devolved payments and payments without an equivalent outside of Scotland. This must be paid from a Budget that is only modestly growing year-on-year. "If we project recent growth rates for expenditure on some of the largest areas – pay, procurement, funding for local government – and even under conservative paybill arrangements relative to recent years, spending would exceed the projected funding (using data from the SFC and applying that to the Spending Review settlement) by well in excess of £1 billion. "And that's before we take account – for example – of any grants to third sector organisations or subsidies to public and private companies in charge of delivering transport." How can the Scottish Government cut back on 'public sector inefficiencies'? Mr Sousa: "If the Scottish Government doesn't want to change social security or tax, that would mean discretionary [or reduced] spending. "It could mean fewer public sector employees – be it through redundancies or not filling vacant posts, although that runs the risk of not having the right skills to deliver the Scottish Government's priorities. "It could also mean a less generous public sector pay policy, although that of course means more difficulty in avoiding industrial action. It could also mean cutting back on procurement spending, which has been growing – even if we abstract from the pandemic peak – by 7% a year in cash terms in recent times. And it could also mean less funding available for councils – although given the pressures in local government, that might mean difficulties in delivering services and pressure on council tax." Is the Scottish Government's objective to cut waste by up to £1bn a year by 2029/30 doable? Mr Sousa: "Every government always want to cut inefficiencies and not impact on service delivery. "And of course there are things that could be better. Last week, the Fraser of Allander Institute highlighted that the UK Government's targets on efficiency stretch credulity in the Spending Review, and the Scottish Government's appear headed the same way. "It's inconceivable that the exact same services will be delivered by spending £1 billion less. Rather, the Scottish Government will need to prioritise what really is important. "To govern is to choose, and choices will be coming down the track. In some sense, the limits on borrowing the Scottish Government is subject to will make this hard to avoid by the end of the decade. The timetable doesn't seem impossible – but it'll take time to implement, and no doubt will mean real decisions about what to do and crucially what not to do."


The Herald Scotland
15 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Energy bills swollen by Scottish windfarm switch off costs
However, critics focused on the revelation that the Westminster administration planned to use £2.5bn allocated to the fledgling Great British Energy operation to fund work on a new generation of small modular nuclear reactors. SNP supporters slammed the move which they claimed would leave a big hole in the £8.3bn budget that GB Energy had promised would be used to support the development of technologies such as floating offshore wind and tidal energy. Keir Starmer decided to put the official headquarters of GB Energy in Aberdeen to mollify critics of his cabinet's decision to curb oil and gas activity. But the SNP Government has opposed North Sea field developments that could create thousands of jobs. It has pinned its hopes on the expansion of wind power, which acting climate change minister Alasdair Allan claimed recently could create thousands of high-quality jobs in support of a just transition from dependence on oil and gas. The number of renewables jobs created in Scotland, however, has fallen below expectations for years. READ MORE: Just transition furore reignited as SNP Government flounders Mr Allan put the onus on the UK Government to help accelerate windfarm development in Scotland by improving the support provided for developers under the flagship Contracts for Difference programme. Energy secretary Ed Miliband has held out the prospect that the budget for the forthcoming CfD allocation round will be much bigger than the £1.6bn set for the last one. The costs will be added to the bills of householders regardless of their income. But figures from the body that regulates the national energy system show bill payers have reason to be concerned about the wisdom of accelerating a programme that imposes costs on them that many can't afford. The National Energy System Operator revealed that the size of the bill it has to pay to deal with supply issues stemming from the fact that output from renewables such as windfarms is intermittent soared to £2.7bn in the latest year from £2.5bn in the preceding period. The balancing payments include amounts that NESO pays to compensate windfarm operators that are asked to constrain generation when there is insufficient demand. They also include payments made to operators of gas fired power stations to increase output when there is not enough wind power to meet energy requirements. READ MORE: Israeli-owned firm takes control of UK's biggest gas field NESO said the increase was driven by a rise in constraint costs and made clear that this was largely due to the fact that so much windfarm capacity has been added in Scotland although demand is much higher south of the border. 'Whilst payments to generators are distributed throughout the country the cause of cost is concentrated in Scotland,' it said. The organisation underlined the absurdity of the situation we find ourselves in after rushing to develop windfarms without ensuring the required infrastructure was in place to transport the power produced to where it is needed or to store it. The Seagreen windfarm off the Angus coast became fully operational in 2023 (Image: SSE) Noting that wind curtailment is currently a major driver of balancing costs, NESO said: 'This is because a large proportion of wind capacity in GB is connected in Scotland, which at present is a constrained region of the network. 'This means that when wind generation is high we must take actions to turn down wind output and turn on replacement energy in unconstrained regions to keep the system balanced.' The NESO report emphasises that the costs resulting from this situation fall on householders. In 2024/25 balancing charges added around £3 a month to a typical domestic electricity bill. That may not sound much but household bills are also inflated by other charges such as those related to CfDs and the Climate Change Levy. NESO's analysis indicates that developing more windfarms will make things worse for the time being. It warned: 'Balancing costs are expected to rise in the short term, reaching a peak of ~£8bn in 2030.' Part of the solution will involve a massive expansion of electricity transportation networks in the face of potential opposition from locals in areas affected and of storage facilities. However, energy giants such as SSE and Drax have made clear they will only make the hefty investment required to develop hydro storage facilities if the UK Government provides enough support for revenues to ensure they can generate strong returns. READ MORE: Scottish hydropower hopes fade amid threats to bumper projects This all means that power generation assets that can ensure the country can keep the lights on irrespective of weather conditions will be required for years. The case for SSE to be allowed to develop a new gas fired power station at Peterhead has been strengthened after the UK Government agreed to provide £200m initial development funding for the Acorn carbon capture scheme. This will take emissions from the plant for storage in depleted reservoirs in the North Sea. Friends of the Earth Scotland insists the Peterhead plant would be a climate disaster and has berated the Scottish Government for failing to properly interrogate SSE's assurances about related emissions. The organisation is bitterly opposed to plans for the Scottish carbon capture cluster which it reckons could be used to excuse continued production of oil and gas. The SNP Government, however, has spent years pressing UK ministers to fund the Scottish cluster, which could cost around £12bn to develop in full. Scottish Gas owner Centrica recently underlined the scale of expected demand for gas by agreeing a £20 billion deal to secure supplies from Norway until 2035. That deal may have been timely as oil and gas prices have soared in the wake of Israel launching attacks on Iran last week. READ MORE: SNP Government oil hypocrisy shocking amid Scottish jobs cull Against that backdrop it makes sense for the UK to maximise production of its own oil and gas. The case for investing in nuclear plants that can provide baseload power is also reinforced by concerns about the UK's dependence on imports of oil and gas. Nuclear plants take years to develop but could remain operational for decades. Add in the fact that work on a plant could create thousands of construction jobs and many more in the supply chain and it is little wonder the SNP Government is under pressure from trades unions to abandon its opposition to the development of nuclear power stations in Scotland.


The Herald Scotland
24 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Glasgow and Edinburgh swap places as Scottish FDI strong
Scotland secured 135 FDI projects last year, the EY figures show. Although down by 4.9% on the all-time high annual number of 142 FDI projects won, in 2023, the figure for 2024 was the second-highest on record. Scotland's share of UK FDI projects was 15.8% last year, up from 14.4% in 2023 and significantly higher than the average of 11.5% over the last decade. In 2022, Scotland's share was 13.6%. Glasgow, with 27 projects, became Scotland's leading city for FDI for the first time in five years - a position that Edinburgh held between 2020 and 2023. And Glasgow was the second-most popular UK city outside London for FDI, after Manchester, which won 44 projects in 2024. Scotland's 'three major cities are once again in the UK top 10 cities', EY observed, with Edinburgh having secured 24 projects and Aberdeen 12 projects. EY's figures show Scotland has been second only to London in terms of the number of FDI projects won in every year since 2015. Scotland was also second only to London in 2010 and 2012. For 2024, Scotland is ranked sixth among the top 10 FDI locations in Europe. The UK recorded 853 FDI projects in 2024, a 13% decline from 2023, making it Europe's second-top country for attracting inward investment. France ranked first in Europe in 2024 with 1,025 projects - a decline of 14% year on year. Read more Around 25% of global investors planning to establish operations in the UK over the next year said they expected to choose Scotland. This put Scotland second only to London, for which the figure was 62%. The US remains Scotland's top source of FDI projects. Scotland attracted 37 FDI projects from US players in 2024 - a rise of 37% on 2023 and bringing the total over the last decade to 356, EY noted. The US accounted for 27.4% of Scotland's total number of FDI projects during 2024. This was a higher proportion than the 23.7% of UK FDI projects originating from the US. The number of FDI projects attracted by Scotland from German players fell by 40% to 12 last year. Even so, Germany remained the second-biggest source of FDI projects for Scotland in 2024, followed by France with eight projects. Ally Scott, managing partner of EY Scotland, said: 'Put simply, Scotland continues to punch above its weight with inward investment. While project numbers slipped back slightly in 2024 from their record high the previous year, a much sharper fall in projects into the UK overall saw Scotland's share increase for the sixth year running. In doing so, Scotland consolidated its decade-long position in second place for UK FDI.' He added: 'While FDI is only one part of the Scottish economy, the challenge is ensuring the policy landscape continues to react to changing business and demographic needs. Many priorities of international investors considering Scotland are very similar to those of our homegrown business community - future-proofed infrastructure, an efficient planning system, a skilled workforce, simplified tax structure - improve these levers and you're activating broader economic growth. 'Far from relaxing after a job well done, it's time for Scotland to take some confidence from these findings and to double-down and cement its hard-won position.' Peter Arnold, EY UK chief economist, said: 'London remains the leading UK destination for investment, while Scotland has now achieved second position for each of the last 10 years.' Scotland's top FDI sectors in 2024 were machinery and equipment, with 19 projects; software and information technology, with 15 projects; and agri-food and utility supply, in joint-third place with 14 projects. Meanwhile, Scotland was the UK leader in FDI in oil and gas, with seven projects, as well as in inward investment in the utility supply, electronics, and machinery and equipment sectors. Scotland attracted 11 financial services FDI projects in 2024, representing a decade high, and is the top location outside London for inward investment in this sector. Edinburgh, with six FDI projects in financial services, is the joint-top city outside of London for inward investment in this sector, alongside Manchester.