'He's acting like a king': Lawmaker sues Oklahoma governor
OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) – A lawmaker has filed a lawsuit against Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt claiming overreach.
The lawmaker is Representative Andy Fugate (D-Del City). It's in response to the governor's executive order that sent state workers back to the office and put a stop to remote work.
'He's acting like a king,' said Rep. Fugate.
The lawsuit is looking for a preliminary injunction as soon as possible. It challenges the order, stating that Stitt 'simply doesn't have the power under the Oklahoma Constitution to make such a law. It's entirely within the purview of the legislature.'
Gov. Stitt mandates state agencies to return to in-office work
The order was signed at the end of 2024 but its due date to bring workers back to the office ended on February 2, 2025.
'The governor's executive order has a direct cost to taxpayers. It has a direct cost to human capital. And it is an erosion of the separation of powers established in our constitution,' said Rep. Fugate.
In January, the Oklahoma Department of Health Commissioner Keith Lee told the Senate that the cost to bring back workers to the physical office would cost hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Lee also made it clear that they could try to find the funds through possible federal means if they could.
News 4 reached out to DHS on Friday to see if they have the numbers on employees before and after the order's end date. They said they are working on getting that information.
The lawsuit claimed that 'DHS (with more than 6,200 employees) had nearly half (44%) of its workforce teleworking in fiscal year 2024. This practice arose partly from early pandemic office closures and embedded social services placements across the state.'
Fugate claimed that 'according to Oklahoma's Office of Management and Enterprise Services (OMES) budget documents for fiscal year 2024, nearly 30% of their employees worked fully remote, and 60% were on a hybrid schedule. With the new order, these arrangements face curtailment.'
News 4 reached out to OMES to confirm this and to see the fiscal impact. They responded that they have until March 31 to gather all of the agency's data surrounding this and are continuing to get responses from around the state.
Governor Stitt responded to the lawsuit and said:
'Typical big government, democrat behavior by Rep. Fugate. Suing to let people stay home and not work? That's insane. State employees work for the taxpayer. The data is clear, employees are more productive and accountable when they are working in the office. For the good of the taxpayer, work from home is over.'
'He wants to make this into some partisan issue. It's not. If this is the right policy for the state of Oklahoma, the legislature can enact it. That's our job,' said Rep. Fugate in response.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
39 minutes ago
- CNN
Sen. Padilla explains why he interrupted Noem's press conference
CNN's Erin Burnett speaks with Sen. Alex Padilla (D-CA) after he was forcibly removed from a Department of Homeland Security press conference in California.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
21 bills still waiting on decision by Gov. Stitt
OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) – Governor Kevin Stitt still has to make a decision on 21 bills that made it to his desk by the end of session. During the session, the Governor has five days to sign or veto a bill. Now that the session is over, he will have until June 14 to take action on the remaining bills. 'He can sign them. He can do a direct veto or he can do a pocket veto, which is basically where he just holds on to it and it doesn't become law,' said Sen. Julia Kirt (D-Oklahoma City). Kirt said it was not unusual for a few remaining bills to be waiting on the Governor's signature after the session concludes. But the way legislators wrapped up the final days, with chaotic overrides on 47 vetoes, has some lawmakers worried. Lawmakers override majority of Gov. Stitt's vetoes Lawmakers also voted to oust Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Commissioner Allie Friesen, who was handpicked by Stitt. 'I wouldn't be surprised if he'd veto some things just because he's upset with the Senate or upset with the House or specific members,' said Kirt. Stitt announced an interim preplacement to lead the department on Tuesday. He tasked retired Rear Admiral Gregory Slavonic with the job. Among the 21 bills, five deal with public education. Senate Bill 235 is one of them. It included a match of $5 million to the state's 'Grow Your Own' program. The program would help school districts grow their teacher pipeline by paying for their certification. 'You are taking dedicated paraprofessionals, teacher's aids, and other support staff personnel who have been in that district – some of them maybe for two decades – and they're on a path to teacher certification,' said Sen. Adam Pugh (R-Edmond). House Bill 1727 is another one. It would modify and fund 'Oklahoma's Promise' to allow college scholarships for children of state teachers.'If their kid goes to Oklahoma, a higher ed institution for them to get Oklahoma Promise even if they don't qualify financially,' said Kirt. 'It's, I think, meaningful to educators to know they'd have that option.'Here is a list of the remaining 21 bills waiting on Governor Stitt's desk: SB 130 – Directing Corporation Commission to conduct certain feasibility study subject to certain process. SB 140 – Creating the Oklahoma Math Achievement and Proficiency Act. SB 207 – Establishing the Oklahoma Rare Disease Advisory Council. SB 235 – Providing grant application process, funding for the Grow Your Own Educator Program. SB 1039 – Modifying grounds for certain denials for medical marijuana license. HB 1087 – Extending the amount of classroom instruction time; minimum salary schedule for teachers. HB 1166 – Annexation of territory without consent of majority of owners. HB1282 – Oklahoma Rising Scholars Award; remaining; eligibility; awards; waivers. HB1287 – Authorizing the Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma to create a math tutoring pilot program for certain students. HB 1378 – Sales tax exemptions for agriculture, including timber. HB 1486 – Designating various memorial roads and bridges. HB 1727 – Oklahoma Higher Learning Access Program; eligibility for children of certain teachers. HB 2104 – Classification of felony offenses HB 2262 – Alzheimer's Dementia and Other Forms of Dementia Special Care Disclosure Act. HB 2513 – Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services; addressing the consent degree. HB 2610 – Nonrecurring adoption expenses credit. HB 2645 – Practice of medicine, tax credit. HB 2646 – Revenue and taxation; adjustments; wagering, tax year. HB 2752 – Eminent domain of electricity, facilities on private property. HB 2753 – Rural Jobs Act. HB 2758 – Preserving and Advancing County Transportation Fund. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Noem Says National Guard Occupation Is Meant To ‘Liberate' LA From Its Mayor And Governor
Just before Sen. Alex Padilla (D-CA) was forcibly removed from a Department of Homeland Security press briefing, forced to the ground and then handcuffed for asking a question, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem was in the middle of making a bizarre but crucial point. 'We are not going away,' she said, referring to the National Guard and DHS presence in Los Angeles this week amid protests against Trump's sweeping and drastic deportation mission in the city. 'We are staying here to liberate the city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor have placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into the city.' The statement said the quiet part out loud: the military was there to 'liberate' a city from its democratically elected governor and mayor. (It was also not entirely clear what 'burdensome' actions she was referring to.) Leading up to this moment in the press briefing, Noem spent several minutes thanking the National Guard, FBI, local law enforcement and the IRS (??) for their efforts on the ground in LA. (Apparently, per Noem, IRS agents have been there in person working to determine what groups are organizing the protests in the city! Normal stuff!) She then said that the National Guard and DHS were working to 'make every single community great again and safe again' before lamenting that the people of LA were 'suffering' 'under the policies of Governor Newsom and under the policies of Mayor Bass.' Those remarks combined with the liberation speak amount to a pretty pellucid admission of the Trump administration's ultimate vision here. As I noted earlier this week, much of the effort to deploy troops to LA to clamp down on mostly peaceful protesters in the city can be seen through the lens of the president's months-long effort to punish blue cities and states. While he is hiding behind the guise of targeting Democratic-led states and cities that function as sanctuaries for undocumented immigrants, Trump's barely disguised his bloodlust for using his second term to punish all of his perceived political enemies. Gov. Gavin Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass most certainly fall into this category. Moments after Noem made the remarks about, essentially, trying to undermine the authority of local and state elected Democrats in California, Padilla was forcibly removed from the briefing room, forced to lay on the ground face-down and placed in handcuffs. Because he tried to ask a question. You can catch up on the details of the incident in our liveblog coverage of today's events here. My colleague Josh Kovensky articulated the depravity of the moment well this afternoon: In some ways, it's a microcosm of how the Trump administration has intentionally conflated peaceful protest with criminal activity over the past week. Just as the White House order authorizing the military deployment to LA declares that 'protests' which 'inhibit' law enforcement 'constitute a form of rebellion' against the U.S. government, so does a U.S. Senator asking a question at an open presser make him a threat. 'If you're driving on one of those streets and a mob comes and surrounds your vehicle and threatens you, you have a right to flee for your safety, and so if you drive off and you hit one of these people, that's their fault for impinging on you,' DeSantis told podcaster Dave Rubin in an episode of his podcast that went live Wednesday night. 'You don't have to sit there and just be a sitting duck and let the mob grab you out of your car and drag you through the streets.' 'You have a right to defend yourself in Florida,' he added. You may recall similar sentiments about vehicular assault articulated by Republicans in the past. In response to the George Floyd protests that broke out in the summer of 2020, Republicans in state legislatures across the country passed laws directly attacking the constitutional right to lawfully assemble. Many states passed laws that provided substantial immunity to drivers who, intentionally or not, strike protesters with their vehicles. This 2021 piece in the New York Times breaks down the groundswell of bills that become law in the months following Floyd's murder by Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin. Their aim has been pretty blatant for some time as they attempt to normalize casual violence against people exercising their right to protest. A few years back I wrote about Sen. Tom Cotton's (R-AR) ongoing relationship with encouraging violence against protesters. At the time he was openly mulling whether some protesters might need to have 'their skin ripped off.' Also relevant: Cotton was also one of the early adopters of MAGA's newfound advocacy for the deployment of the military to the streets of U.S. cities to violently break up protests. As my colleague Emine Yücel reported earlier this afternoon, House Republicans voted to rubber-stamp the Trump administration's constitutionally backward power grab by passing the rescissions package the White House sent over. The whole endeavor is meant to give an air of legitimacy to Elon Musk's DOGE cuts, which lawlessly froze and rescinded federal funds. Musk, of course, then left the administration and got into a fight with Trump on Twitter. At least three Senate Republicans have signaled some unease about being force-fed the Musk bros' dangerous handiwork. Stay tuned. Abrego Garcia Wants A Judge To Seize Pam Bondi's Phone Jeffries Calls Out Republicans For Ceding Their Authority To Trump In Rubber-Stamping DOGE Cuts First Hearing In California's Lawsuit Against Trump's Deployment Gets Underway Funding The War on Yourselves Trump administration appears to be pausing plans to ramp up Guantanamo transfers House Dems demand testimony from Noem after Padilla handcuffed in LA Iran Is Breaking Rules on Nuclear Activity, U.N. Watchdog Says
