‘Economically Reckless' Businesses Slam Bill to Bar Immigrant Kids From School

Yahoo

12-04-2025

This article was originally published in Tennessee Lookout.
More than two dozen Chattanooga business owners are condemning a bill to require student immigration background checks in Tennessee's public schools as 'economically reckless.'
The Tennessee Small Business Alliance represents restaurants, real estate firms, retail stores and other local employers operating within the district represented by Sen. Bo Watson.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
Watson, a Republican, is cosponsoring the legislation to require proof of legal residence to enroll in public K-12 and charter schools. The bill would also give public schools the option of charging tuition to the families of children unable to prove they legally reside in the United States – or to deny them the right to a public education altogether.
House Leader William Lamberth of Gallatin is a co-sponsor of the bill, which has drawn significant — but not unanimous — support from fellow Tennessee Republicans. Lamberth's version of the bill differs from Watson's in that it would make it optional — rather than mandatory — to check students' immigration status in all of Tennessee's more than 1700 public schools.
The bill, one of the most controversial being considered during the 2025 Legislative session, has significant momentum as the Legislature winds down for the year even as it has drawn raucous protests at times. The legislation will next be debated on Monday in a House committee.
A statement released by the business alliance described the legislation as a 'political stunt that's cruel, economically reckless, and completely out of step with local values.'
Citing estimates compiled by the nonprofit advocacy organization, American Immigration Council, the statement noted that more than 430,000 immigrants in Tennessee paid $4.4 billion in taxes – more than $10,000 per immigrant.
Watson, in an emailed statement from Chattanooga public relations firm Waterhouse Public Relations, said his bill 'raises important questions about the financial responsibility of educating undocumented students in Tennessee—questions that have long gone unaddressed.'
The statement said the Supreme Court's 1982 decision in Plyler v. Doe, which established the right to a public school education for all children regardless of immigration status, has 'never been re-examined in the context of today's challenges.' The statement said Watson is committed to a 'transparent, fact-driven discussion about how Tennessee allocates its educational resources and how federal mandates impact our state's budget and priorities.'
Watson has previously also said the legislation was prompted, in part, by the rising costs of English-language instruction in the state's public schools.
Democrats have criticized that argument as based on inaccurate assumptions that English language learners lack legal immigration status.
Kelly Fitzgerald, founder of a Chattanooga co-working business and one of 27 employers that signed onto the statement of condemnation, criticized lawmakers.
'Do our representatives believe that undocumented children — who had no say in their immigration status — should be denied a public education, even though their families already pay taxes that fund our schools?' said Fitzgerald, whose own children attend Hamilton County Public schools
'My children are receiving a great education in our public schools, and I want every child to have the same rights and opportunities as mine do,' she said.
'In my opinion, this is not something our legislators should be spending their resources on when there are much larger issues at hand in the current environment,' she said. 'We should leave children out of the conversation.'
Tennessee Lookout is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Tennessee Lookout maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Holly McCall for questions: [e-mail].