Pensacola selects two non-profits to host 27 'pallet shelters' for the homeless
Pensacola is moving forward with bringing in 27 'pallet shelters' for the homeless.
Pensacola Mayor D.C. Reeves said two local non-profits were selected to use the shelters for homeless individuals they serve based on a recommendation from the Northwest Florida Homeless Taskforce.
Re-Entry Alliance Pensacola will take at least 14 units at its West Blount Street location, and Offentsive Corp will take at least 13 units at a North Palafox location. Both locations are inside the city limits.
'Both of them have done a great job,' Reeves said. 'They've spoken to the neighbors. They've done all of the due diligence that we expect. And I appreciate the task force digging in, certainly deeper than my expertise, to make sure that all of those things make sense.'
Last year, the city allocated $1.1 million to buy shelters from Pallet PBC, a public benefit corporation based in Everett, Washington, that specializes in building 'pallet shelters' for homeless relief and disaster response. The funds are coming out of the city's share of the American Rescue Plan Act.
Pallet PBC builds small, one-room, movable temporary buildings that range from 70 square feet to 120 square feet. The buildings range from $17,970 to $23,595 a piece, plus a $1,200 shipping cost for most variations. Those prices do not include installation costs at the sites.
Reeves said there is still work to be done to determine how much sitework and preparation needs to be done to determine how much of the $1.1 million will be remaining for additional shelters.
The city has not taken possession of any shelters, and Reeves said that was done so the city could be flexible in how it rolls out this program.
'Once we diagnose what we need and exactly what we need, then we order, they bring them in, and they can be put up in a matter of hours,' Reeves said.
The announcement came a day after it was reported that REAP's Max-Well Respite Center was closing because the organization can no longer afford to rent the building.
The city contributed $400,000 in ARPA funds in 2022 to help REAP start the Max-Well Center.
Reeves said he was personally disappointed with the ownership of the building charging the organization a market-rate rent. Last year, the News Journal reported REAP was paying 2200 N. Palafox LLC $15,000 a month in rent for the shelter.
'Looking for market rate when, when we're trying to house people, I was really disappointed with that, and have been for a long time,' Reeves said. 'I appreciate Vinnie (Whibbs) and REAP trying to make it work. And I do know they came back to the table, and lowered that rent some, but it's just a tough situation.'
The shelters will be leased to the two non-profits, and the city will retain ownership of them, so if anything changes with the sites in the future, the shelters will go back to the city to be reused by another organization.
'In a situation like the Max-Well center, if they were to close or something were to change, we have the ability to go get them,' Reeves said. 'They're not lost to the citizens forever.'
The pallet shelter plan arose after the city found it would be too expensive to start a low-barrier homeless shelter on its own. Reeves said he still believes the city needs a low-barrier shelter, but it will have to be driven by the entire community, including private companies and the federal government.
'We cannot be the sole solution for every issue in the city,' Reeves said. 'We need private development to get off the sidelines and work with us. We need—in case of low barrier—we need health care to get off the sideline to help us. I'm not saying that they aren't willing to, but when I say a community conversation, it's not just me and the county commissioners. It's going to have to be me, and the county commissioners, and our health care partners and our nonprofits. It's going to have to be a significant, significant conversation with Congressman Patronis. There's going to be a lot of conversation to capital stack this thing for it to be successful.'
This article originally appeared on Pensacola News Journal: Pensacola will order 27 'pallet shelters' for the homeless
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Germany's Merz to 'adapt' to Trump during high-stakes meeting on tariffs, defense
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is set to meet with President Donald Trump on Thursday as major geopolitical issues ranging from war in Europe, the Middle East and massive trade disputes are expected to be discussed. Germany and the Trump administration, both during his first term and again upon re-election, have butted heads with both sides expressing public frustration with one another. But recent positive chats between Merz and Trump suggest the meeting on Thursday will remain cordial as Berlin looks to make headway when it comes to lifting Trump's 25% tariff on imported vehicles and parts, as well as the existing 10% tariff on all goods, which was temporarily lowered from 20% earlier this year. The trip to D.C. this week is Merz's first since becoming chancellor last month, and comes as European nations have increasingly banded together following Trump's geopolitical positions regarding trade and defense since re-entering the White House. Nations like France and the U.K. have successfully toed the line when it comes to maintaining a relationship with Washington under the Trump presidency, while also drastically expanding relations to decrease future dependence on the U.S. Germany's Merz is also expected to attempt to strike this balance – a strategy he said he had already begun working on when speaking with German media earlier this week. "It's always important that you don't talk for too long, but that you talk for a moment and let him talk too", Merz told German outlet WDR. "You have to adapt to him and get involved with him – and at the same time you can't make yourself smaller than we are. "That's my most important requirement anyway, that we can talk to him sensibly: We're not supplicants," he added. But despite efforts to bolster relations with Trump from afar, Oval Office meetings with the president are anything but predictable, as witnessed by the explosive interaction during Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's February visit, as well as when the president accused South African President Cyril Ramaphosa's government of committing "genocide" last month. Ramaphosa rejected the claims. One area where Merz could earn points with Trump is when it comes NATO defense spending and the president's push for nations to not only increase spending on defense to the 2% threshold, but to spend 5% GDP on defense – a push the U.S. is not yet close to achieving. While Germany does spend more than 2% of its GDP on defense, Merz has backed the call to spend up to 5%, and he could use this to rally Trump to increase his support for Kyiv, and push for greater European involvement in future peace talks.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rachel Reeves's days as Chancellor are numbered
The Labour Left is reportedly delighted about reports that Chancellor Rachel Reeves has been forced to back down from attempts to cut spending on a key net zero programme. The Prime Minister chose to side with Ed Miliband rather than his own Chancellor over the climate secretary's £13 billion warm homes programme, which will now emerge largely undiluted following next week's spending review. The latest reversal for Reeves's attempts to impose some fiscal discipline on her cabinet colleagues will not help dispel rumours that she is being lined up for a change of job at the next reshuffle. In a speech yesterday she warned that 'not every department will get everything that they want next week' and that she has had to 'say no' to spending requests that, in an ideal world, she would support. But such repeated assertions of tough spending choices and ruthless budget decisions, all for the long term good of the country, sound increasingly meaningless when they coincide with a series of U-turns on spending cuts already made. Reeves's infamous decision to scrap winter fuel payments for some pensioners has already been walked back by the Prime Minister, even though it remains unclear where the money necessary to reverse at least part of the cut will come from. Meanwhile Reeves remains under political pressure from the direction of the Deputy Prime Minister's office: Angela Rayner has boosted her own popularity among backbenchers by suggesting in a (conveniently leaked) memo to the Chancellor that tax rises, rather than departmental budget cuts, should be considered to fund extra spending. This is music to the ears of Labour activists too, who never met a tax rise they didn't like. The next big spending challenge for Reeves and the Government is more complicated than an attempt to divert billions away from benefit claimants and towards other priorities: the Work and Pensions Secretary, Liz Kendall, believes structural changes to the benefits regime are needed in order to create new incentives for claimants to seek paid employment. This is a generational change that would also, as it happens, save money in the long term. But that is not how many backbenchers see it. Long-term plans don't help MPs hoping to defend their parliamentary majorities in the next four years and even fewer of them are willing to defend the changes that came to the Chancellor's aid over the winter fuel payments. Reeves is seen increasingly as a bean counter; she doesn't have the same reach in the party that one of her predecessors, Gordon Brown, had as Chancellor, and which gave him so much leeway when making tough and 'prudent' economic choices. All it will take for her to lose all the authority necessary to remain in her job is one more policy reversal. She certainly cannot afford to lose any more spending battles with cabinet colleagues while retaining what is left of her stated willingness to tell them 'no'. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Conflicted Tennessee Senate overwhelmingly passed business tax refund
Sen. Shane Reeves, R-Murfreesboro, received a $1 million grant from the Tennessee Department of Economic and Community Development to start a business which has since received a tax rebate from the state. (Photo: John Partipilo/Tennessee Lookout) Thirteen of Tennessee's 33 senators declared a conflict of interest before voting on a $1.9 billion business tax break in 2024, including one whose companies reaped the benefits of the cut and a prior state grant. Two years before winning the seat in 2018, Republican Sen. Shane Reeves of Murfreesboro received a million-dollar FastTrack grant from the state Department of Economic and Community Development when he opened TwelveStone Health Partners in Rutherford County in 2016. The company invested nearly $15 million to create 200 jobs for the packaged medication, healthcare services and medication equipment company. A pharmacist by trade, Reeves started the business after he and his former business partner, Rick Sain, sold Reeves-Sain Drugstore and EnTrustRx, a specialty pharmacy business, to Fred's Inc. for $66 million. TwelveStone has expanded several times over nine years, opening infusion centers in multiple locations, including Virginia and Georgia. Senators declaring a conflict of interest with tax rebate bill: Paul Bailey, R-Sparta Ferrell Haile, R-Gallatin Joey Hensley, R-Hohenwald Jack Johnson, R-Franklin Adam Lowe, R-Calhoun Jon Lundberg, R-Bristol (no longer in office) Bill Powers, R-Clarksville Kerry Roberts, R-Springfield Paul Rose, R-Covington John Stevens, R-Huntingdon Page Walley, R-Savannah Bo Watson, R-Hixson Dawn White, R-Murfreesboro Ken Yager, R-Kingston Nearly a decade later, TwelveStone Health Partners and TwelveStone Holdings are two of 16,000 Tennessee businesses receiving a franchise tax refund of more than $10,000 after Republican lawmakers pushed the measure backed by Gov. Bill Lee through the legislature last year. Reeves told the Lookout this week that TwelveStone met all requirements for receiving the 2016 grant and now employs nearly 300 people. Asked whether he's concerned about the appearance of double-dipping, Reeves described himself as a 'part-time citizen legislator' the first four months of the year and chief executive officer of TwelveStone the rest of the time. 'My job is to do what's best for our company. I would never expect any more or less for my business than anyone else's,' Reeves said in a text statement. Chairman of the Senate Energy, Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee, Reeves said he is 'comfortable' with the reporting ranges in the refund law, calling them a 'fair compromise' for transparency. Listings on the state Department of Revenue website show categories for companies receiving refunds up to $750, between $750 and $10,000 and more than $10,000. The lists totaling 60,000 companies were posted May 31 and are to remain available to the public for 30 days. Senators were reluctant to publicize any of the companies when they took up the bill last year, passing it 25-6, with former Sen. Art Swann of Maryville the only Republican to vote in opposition. Two members did not vote. But the House demanded some form of transparency, though Democrats and public records advocates say the ranges aren't specific enough considering the amount of money rebated to some of the world's largest companies, including FedEx and 13 subsidiaries, Ford Motor Co. and AT&T. The House passed the measure 69-23, largely along party lines. The Tennessee Senate uses a policy called Rule 13 as part of its code of ethics that allows senators to declare a conflict of interest, without giving details, but allowing them to vote based on their conscience and obligation to constituents. The House has no rule requiring members to state a conflict of interest before votes that could affect them or their businesses financially. In addition to Reeves, Democratic Sen. Jeff Yarbro of Nashville, who voted against the tax cut and refund, declared Rule 13 before last year's vote. World's top businesses, Lee Company receive biggest Tennessee tax rebates Yarbro told the Lookout this week he pulled out of the partnership track at Bass, Berry & Sims law firm so he wouldn't be part of its financial decisions. 'I'm not opposed to any business or citizen taking a refund from the government. Who wouldn't? If I qualified for a refund, I'd take it. But I still think it's bad public policy,' Yarbro said in a statement to the Lookout. Yarbro added that, while he felt the bill ran contrary to public interest, he understood it would benefit many businesses in his Senate district, including the firm where he works, thus he declared the potential conflict of interest before the vote. Yarbro and state Rep. John Ray Clemmons of Nashville also proposed a bill they said would enable the state's franchise tax law to withstand constitutional muster without making rebates. Republican leaders declined to consider it. When the matter arose last year, the Department of Revenue told lawmakers it received a challenge to the state's franchise tax on business property, leading most to say the tax cut and refund was justified in averting an expensive legal fight. Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti also advised lawmakers to avoid litigation. Other key legislators such as House Majority Leader William Lamberth of Portland said the reductions were simply good tax policy and not necessarily based on concern about a legal threat. No lawsuit was filed against the state in advance of the vote. Republican Sen. Brent Taylor, former owner of Brentwood Funeral Services in Shelby County, voted for the measure last year after declaring Rule 13 but didn't apply for the tax refund. 'I just didn't think it was appropriate for me to have voted for the franchise tax cut and then go out and benefit from it, because I knew I'd have reporters … calling and wanting to know if I thought it was appropriate to take the refund and also vote for it,' Taylor said.
