Donald Trump likens U.S. strike on Iran to WWII atomic strikes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
An American intervention likened to the atomic bombs dropped on Japan in World War II has set back Iran's nuclear program by 'decades,' U.S. President
Donald Trump
claims.
Speaking at a gathering of NATO leaders in The Hague, Trump disputed reports that the bunker buster bombs dropped by American war planes during the Israel-Iran war had failed to completely destroy the Iranian nuclear facilities.
CNN, which
first reported
on the confidential Pentagon assessment, said that the attacks had delayed Iran's nuclear production efforts by just a few months.
The report contradicts statements from U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the status of Iran's
The report contradicts statements from U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the status of Iran's
Describing as 'scum' those journalists who reported on the assessment that there had been only limited damage to Iran's nuclear program, Trump said that the intelligence was 'very inconclusive' and concluded that the damage 'could have been very severe.'
Saying that there had since been additional intelligence reports as well as physical visits, he insisted Wednesday that Iran's nuclear ambitions had instead been set back by 'basically decades.'
'They just went through hell. I think they've had it. The last thing they want to do is enrich,' he said, adding that the American bomb strike 'ended the war.'
'I don't want to use an example of Hiroshima, I don't want to use an example of Nagasaki, but that was essentially the same thing. That ended that war. This ended the (Israeli-Iran) war. If we didn't take that out, they'd be fighting right now.'
Iran has enriched uranium to 60 per cent purity, just short of the 90 per cent required to make a nuclear weapon. About 400 kilograms of that highly enriched uranium is currently unaccounted for, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Trump said that American officials would be meeting with the Iranians next week, but brushed off the notion that Iran would try to restart its nuclear program or that he wanted a new formal deal to limit the country's atomic ambitions.
Asked if he would order more strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities if nuclear enrichment activities continued or resumed, Trump said: 'Sure, but I'm not going to have to worry about that.'
'It's gone for years, years. It's very tough to rebuild because the whole thing has collapsed. In other words, inside it's all collapsed. Nobody can get in to see it because it's collapsed. You can't go in to see a room that's got 10 million tonnes of rock in it.'
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tuesday that his country's military efforts had sent Iran's nuclear program 'down the drain.'
There were more modest impact assessments from the IAEA, which monitors nuclear facilities programs around the world.
On Tuesday, Director-General Rafael Mariano Grossi
said in a statement
that there has been 'extensive damage at several nuclear sites in Iran' as well as 'some localized radioactive as well as chemical release inside the affected facilities that contained nuclear material.'
But he said there has been no reports of increased radiation levels outside of the nuclear facilities.
Grossi said the Fordow nuclear site, which was build deep underground, beneath a mountain, has likely suffered damage to access roads close to the facility and at one of its entrances.
The strikes to the Natanz nuclear facility, used to enrichment activities and storage of enriched uranium, 'may have caused localized contamination and chemical hazards.'
Iran's Parliament voted Wednesday to suspend nuclear safety co-operation with the IAEA, though a formal decision to cut ties has not yet been taken.
In a June 22 statement in response to the U.S. attacks, the head of the Atomic Energy Agency of Iran, Mohammad Reza Kardan, said that officials had anticipated attacks on its nuclear facilities and taken defensive measures.
'Due to the previously planned measures and the measures taken, no radiation contamination or nuclear radiation has been observed outside these sites and facilities.'
Trump provided no details on negotiations between Israel and Iran that might result in a longer-term peace deal between the bitter enemies, but he suggested that the American strikes on Iran had resulted in 'great progress being made on Gaza.'
'Because of this attack that we made, I think we're going to have some very good news.'
Israel is still seeking the return of hostages taken by Hamas in the attack of Oct. 7, 2023. United Nations officials are managing a humanitarian catastrophe affecting Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.
Earlier this week, in a briefing for journalists, the head of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, Jonathan Whitall, said that more than 400 Palestinians have been killed, most of them 'shot or shelled trying to reach U.S.-Israeli distribution sites purposefully set up in militarized zones.'
'Just a few days ago more than 60 people were killed and hundreds injured when a tank opened fire on a crowd of people waiting for food trucks to arrive,' he said. 'It shouldn't be this way. There shouldn't be a death-toll associated with accessing the essentials for life.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How will Canada reach its new defence spending commitments?
The NATO summit wrapped up Wednesday with major concessions from alliance countries to U.S. demands to further hike military spending. Here is a rundown of what happened and what it means. Canada has signed on to the NATO pledge to increase defence spending to 5 per cent of annual GDP by 2035. That means that Canadians at that point will be spending $150 billion annually on defence and security. The NATO plan involves investing 3.5 per cent of GDP into core military needs, which includes armaments and equipment. Another 1.5 per cent will be spent on related infrastructure, cyber defence and security. The spending hike is a direct result of ongoing pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump who floated the idea in January that alliance countries need to spend 5 per cent of their GDP on defence. Trump has repeatedly focused his ire on a number of nations, including Canada, claiming they are taking advantage of the U.S. by not spending enough on their militaries. The spending boost announced by NATO could also prove to be a big winner for the American economy. The U.S. is the world's largest arms manufacturer and such massive increases in spending on defence equipment could mean significantly more business and American jobs. Prime Minister Mark Carney has said that Canada should have no problem reaching the 1.5 per cent infrastructure portion by concentrating on projects that are already under way or currently being planned. That would include the development of the mining and stockpiling of critical minerals, an initiative that could see Canada becoming a trusted supplier to western nations for such material. 'A little less than a third of that overall number is spending on things that quite frankly we're already doing to build the resilience of our economy,' Carney told CNN. 'So, it would be domestic resilience, it would be defending the areas that are important to defend, but also supporting critical minerals development.' But Carney has also hinted at cuts coming in other areas to fund the military spending boost. 'If we are moving to the higher and higher levels of defence spending because that's necessary then we will have to make considerations about what less the federal government can do, in certain cases, and how we're going to pay for it,' Carney told journalists at the NATO conference. Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux has said he doesn't have enough information to determine how the Carney government will meet its spending commitments. But shortly before the NATO meeting, Giroux told Bloomberg News that for Canada to finance the 5 per cent GDP defence hike it 'would require a major shift of government priorities — away from social spending, for example — to free up some of the resources currently allocated to these types of expenses towards defence.' The spending hike could also be financed by 'some tax increases, for sure, or much higher deficits,' Giroux added. Retired senior military officers such as Gen. Wayne Eyre, the former chief of defence staff, and Lt. Gen. Michel Maisonneuve have previously suggested that cuts to social programs might be needed to fund more defence spending. Critics have repeatedly pointed out that the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Forces have a well deserved reputation of mismanaging funds and bungling various military equipment procurement projects at a cost to taxpayers of billions of dollars. Just before Carney headed to the NATO summit, Canada's auditor general revealed that yet another military procurement project had gone way over budget. The audit examined the Liberal government's commitment in 2023 to buy 88 F-35 fighter jets at a cost of $19 billion. But now that program has jumped in cost to $27.7 billion. Carney has ordered a review of the F-35 program because of ongoing threats by Trump to economically harm Canada. Defence insiders, however, are confident Canada will proceed with the purchase of the U.S. jet. Another major procurement program to buy new warships has also skyrocketed in cost. The Canadian Surface Combatant project, which had an original $26 billion price tag, is now expected to cost more than $80 billion, according to the Parliamentary Budget Officer. With the NATO spending commitment now at 5 per cent of GDP, the onus will be on DND and military leaders to deliver value for the massive influx of tax dollars they are to receive. Whether they are capable of accomplishing that remains to be seen. Before the NATO meeting Trump said he didn't believe the U.S. needed to adhere to the 5 per cent agreement. He stated that since the U.S. has funded NATO for years there was no need for his country to follow the 5 percent figure he pushed for. 'I don't think we should, but I think they should,' he said, referring to the other NATO nations. Before the NATO meeting, Spain had told the alliance it would not agree to the 5 per cent spending target. Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez outlined his concerns that he would have to cut social programs to fund the NATO target and that would create a backlash among the public. Sanchez also warned that such an increase would force his government to increase taxes on the middle class and scale back other key programs. 'It is the legitimate right of every government to decide whether or not they are willing to make those sacrifices,' he wrote to NATO. Spain wanted to stick to the 2 per cent GDP figure that was originally agreed upon. The country's government believes that the 2 per cent GDP spending level would fulfill its defence needs. Shortly before the summit, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico posted on social media site X that his country 'has other priorities in the coming years than armament,' adding that it doesn't see such an increase in defence spending as necessary. Belgium also questioned the NATO spending hike. In the end, the countries did not stand in the way of the 5 per cent spending boost. Even still, Trump was not happy that Spain raised concerns. As a result, he has threatened to punish Spain. 'I think it's terrible. You know, they (Spain) are doing very well … And that economy could be blown right out of the water when something bad happens,' Trump said. He stated that Spain would face tough trade negotiations with the U.S. as a result of their reluctance to follow the NATO plan. David Pugliese is an award-winning journalist covering Canadian Forces and military issues in Canada. To support his work, including exclusive content for subscribers only, sign up here: U.S. warns Canada is not yet ready to handle F-35 fighter jets No deadline set for F-35 review as Carney repeats pledge to explore alternatives to U.S. fighter jet
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iran's Khamenei Says US Intervention in War Achieved Nothing
(Bloomberg) -- Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei claimed victory in the war with Israel and said the US's intervention achieved nothing, in his first comments since a ceasefire came into effect earlier this week. US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs US State Budget Wounds Intensify From Trump, DOGE Policy Shifts Commuters Are Caught in Johannesburg's Taxi Feuds as Transit Lags Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown 'The Islamic Republic emerged victorious and delivered a harsh slap to America's face' he said in a pre-recorded video message, adding the US 'gained no achievements from this war.' The comments come amid conflicting assessments about the effectiveness of the US strikes. European officials believe Tehran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium remains largely intact, the FT reported Thursday, citing people briefed on preliminary intelligence assessments. Oil rose to a session high following the report. In the US, President Donald Trump suggested no uranium was removed from targeted sites. He's claimed they were 'obliterated,' contradicting a Pentagon intelligence report. Iran has only said that its facilities were 'badly damaged.' Khamenei hasn't appeared in public since the start of the war on June 13, when Israel launched surprise attacks on nuclear and military targets across Iran. In a frenetic 12-day period, several Iranian military leaders and scientists were killed, the US joined Israel with strikes on Iran's nuclear sites and Tehran targeted a US base in Qatar. A truce was eventually announced by Trump on Tuesday and has broadly held since — despite early violations threatening to unwind it. 'Should any aggression occur, the enemy will definitely pay a heavy price,' Khamenei said, warning Iran could repeat its attack on US bases in the region in future. Nuclear Standoff In Tehran, lawmakers have been focused on curtailing Iran's cooperation with the United Nations nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. A law suspending Tehran's cooperation with the IAEA came into effect after approval on Thursday by the country's powerful Guardian Council — an unelected chamber responsible for vetting legislation. Iranian officials have heavily condemned the IAEA for violating its own rules on neutrality. They've also accused the agency of providing Israel with a pretext to launch its attacks on Iran. The law would appear to violate the terms of Iran's agreements with the IAEA. The Islamic Republic can only legally end cooperation with the agency if it formally withdraws from the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. The IAEA has been unable to conduct inspections in Iran since the start of the conflict, and has said it needs to confirm the whereabouts of Tehran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium. (Adds detail on US strikes' impact from third paragraph, status of law in second section.) Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push How to Steal a House Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
San Francisco Chronicle
8 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
States can cut off Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood, the Supreme Court rules
WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court allowed states to cut off Medicaid money to Planned Parenthood in a ruling handed down Thursday amid a wider Republican-backed push to defund the country's biggest abortion provider. The case centers on funding for other health care services Planned Parenthood provides in South Carolina, but the ruling could have broader implications for Medicaid patients. The court split 6-3 in the opinion, with the three liberal justices dissenting. Public health care money generally can't be used to pay for abortions. Medicaid patients go to Planned Parenthood for things like contraception, cancer screenings and pregnancy testing, in part because it can be tough to find a doctor who takes the publicly funded insurance, the organization has said. South Carolina's Republican governor says no taxpayer money should go the organization. The budget bill backed by President Donald Trump in Congress would also cut Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood. That could force the closure of about 200 centers, most of them in states where abortion is legal, the organization has said. Gov. Henry McMaster first moved to cut off Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood in 2018 but was blocked in court after a lawsuit from a patient named Julie Edwards. Edwards wanted to keep going there for birth control because her diabetes makes pregnancy potentially dangerous, so she sued over a provision in Medicaid law that allows patients to choose their own qualified provider. South Carolina, though, argued that patients shouldn't be able to file those lawsuits. The state pointed to lower courts that have been swayed by similar arguments and allowed states such as Texas to block Medicaid funding from Planned Parenthood. Public health groups like the American Cancer Society, by contrast, said in court papers that lawsuits are the only real way that Medicaid patients have been able to enforce their right to choose their own doctor. Losing that right would reduce access to health care for people on the program, which is estimated to include one-quarter of everyone in the country. Rural areas could be especially affected, advocates said in court papers. In South Carolina, $90,000 in Medicaid funding goes to Planned Parenthood every year, a tiny fraction of the state's total Medicaid spending. The state banned abortion at about six weeks' gestation after the high court overturned it as a nationwide right in 2022. ___
