
Obesity Care Roadblocks: Insurers vs Clinical Guidelines
Caissa Troutman, MD, recently treated a patient in her early 50s who she planned to prescribe the anti-obesity medication Zepbound. The patient's insurance covered Zepbound but required prior authorization.
After going through the 'tedious' prior authorization process, Troutman learned the insurer would only cover Zepbound for patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40. Troutman's patient did not meet the approval criteria, despite clinical guidelines that recommend medication management for patients with a BMI of 27 who have a medical comorbidity.
'It was ludicrous,' said Troutman, an obesity medicine specialist and founder of WEIGHT reMDy, a direct care wellness practice in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania. 'It's so frustrating to spend all that time and effort trying to help patients get the care they need, only in the end, to confront these insurance-specific rules that do not follow evidence-based guidelines.'
Troutman had to forgo the Zepbound plan and prescribe another medication to help the patient.
Prior authorization required by insurers for certain treatments have long been a headache for physicians and patients. In a 2024 American Medical Association survey, 93% of physicians said prior authorization delay patients' access to necessary care. Data also show that on average, practices complete 39 prior authorization requests per physician per week, and doctors and staff spend about 13 hours per week completing the requests.
Common Reasons for Prior Auth Denials
Compounding the prior authorization problem for obesity care is the underlying confusion that exists among insurers about obesity and what it is, said Leslie Golden, MD, a family physician and obesity specialist based in Watertown, Wisconsin.
Golden said she's had patients lose insurance coverage simply because their BMI dropped below 30 due to effective treatment.
'That's like stopping insulin when a person with diabetes' A1c improves,' said Golden, founder of Weight In Gold, a clinic specializing in sustained weight health using health coaching and the latest medications. 'It reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of obesity as a chronic disease, not a temporary condition.'
For physicians, it's 'demoralizing' to spend time and energy fighting for care that should be standard, Golden said. In her practice, she has two dedicated staff members whose primary role is managing prior authorizations and appeals.
'That's not just my time away from patient care — it's a cost-driver for the entire healthcare system,' she said. 'We're diverting resources to navigate bureaucracy instead of investing in care delivery.'
At the practice of Anila Chadha, MD, a typical reason insurers give for denying a prior authorization is that the patient does not have morbid obesity, she said. But Chadha emphasizes the term 'morbid obesity' is no longer acceptable and is not used in any of the practice's documentation as obesity is now classified as class I, II, or III.
''Morbid obesity' is a very stigmatizing term,' said Chadha, a family physician and obesity medicine physician at Dignity Health in Bakersfield, California. 'It is very frustrating that we really don't want to use that term, and that is the reason [the insurer provides].'
Another common reason for medication denial is that the patient did not complete 6 months of doctor-supervised weight management in the last year, Chadha said. Such delays mean another 6 months before patients can access the medication, when in many cases, patients have tried weight management multiple times over their lifetime, she said.
Golden often sees denials for medications that have full US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, she said, even when patients meet all clinical indications. Some payers require extensive documentation — years of weight loss history, repeated measurements, detailed metabolic labs — just to consider treatment, she added.
'One of the most frustrating and dangerous issues is the inconsistency,' Golden said. 'I've had prior authorizations denied because the plan required trial of a generic medication that isn't even approved to treat obesity, yet the same plan might deny another option for being off-label, all in the name of cost control.'
Meanwhile, Chadha has faced instances where insurers would only cover an obesity medication for her patients if they were able to dictate the dosage. For example, one patient's insurer approved the drug Wegovy. However, the insurer required that Chadha keep upping the patient's dosage.
'The dosage of medication should be a shared decision making between the physician and the patient,' Chadha said. 'The insurance company should not guide us.'
Catherine Varney, DO, said the most significant prior authorization issue her practice faces is denials due to claim information not being provided, despite the information clearly being included in the progress notes submitted with the original prior authorization.
The 'erroneous denials' create unnecessary stress for patients and significantly increase administrative workload, as she and staff are required to draft appeal letters that simply restate the same information already provided, said Varney, an assistant professor of family medicine at the University of Virginia and obesity medicine director for University of Virginia Health, both in Charlottesville, Virginia.
'I have tracked the time spent addressing this recurring problem, and on average, it adds approximately 110 minutes — nearly 2 hours — of additional work to my week,' Varney said.
Strategies for Prior Auth Pushback
Documentation is central to getting around prior authorizations and helping patients get approved, said Troutman.
'It comes down to writing down in detail what patients have done with regards to lifestyle modifications,' she said. 'Some [insurers] require proof of diets (like food logs) or of physical activity (like activity trackers).'
When patients first visit, make sure to discuss and record exactly what they have tried in the past as it relates to weight management, Chadha added. This could be working with a personal trainer or dietitian, or any online program they may have tried, she said.
Physicians should also document what treatments they are recommending to patients, such as diet and exercise guidance, protein intake recommendations, and what treatments have helped, Chadha said.
Be thorough, and tie everything back to comorbidities, clinical guidelines, and FDA indications, Golden said. Golden's practice has developed templates for letters of medical necessity, appeals, and peer-to-peer talking points that save time and strengthen their cases.
'It also helps to get familiar with your regional insurance plans,' Golden said. 'Build relationships with medical directors when possible, and don't be afraid to push back. It's tedious work, but advocacy at the individual case level can open doors for future patients.'
Varney said it's also vital to have staff who are educated about prior authorization processes and who understand the ins and outs of each major insurer. 'Having dedicated personnel in this role is essential, as learning the nuances of prior authorizations takes time and consistency,' she said.
Another crucial step is making note of any obesity-related conditions patients may have, such as obstructive sleep apnea. Tirzepatide, for example, is now FDA-approved for obstructive sleep apnea, she said. Wegovy is also more apt to get approved if a patient has a history of coronary artery disease, has had stents placed, or had a prior myocardial infarction, she said.
Equally important is clear communication with patients, Golden said. Let patients know what to expect: What documentation may be required, what steps their insurance or employer plan might demand, and how physicians will support them through it.
'This clarity gives patients a sense of control and hope, rather than leaving them feeling overwhelmed or defeated,' Golden said. 'When patients feel they have to 'earn' care, it reinforces the message that their disease is their fault. The strategy isn't just about navigating the system — it's also about standing with patients and helping them feel seen and supported while we do it.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
6 hours ago
- New York Times
Party Politics Is Said to Have Played a Role in Kennedy's Firing of Vaccine Advisers
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has promised to make decisions rooted in 'gold-standard science,' fired an entire committee of vaccine advisers in part because all were appointed by a Democratic president and some had made donations to Democrats, according to a White House official and another person familiar with Mr. Kennedy's thinking. When he announced the firings on Monday, Mr. Kennedy cited the members' financial ties to industry and their 'immersion in a system of industry-aligned incentives.' But according to the White House official and the other person, both of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss an internal matter, Mr. Kennedy was also concerned with 'political conflicts.' The mass firing was another example of the unusually muscular — and sometimes chaotic — way that Mr. Kennedy has exercised his authority, often while setting vaccine policy. Like President Trump, Mr. Kennedy inserts himself in policy matters ordinarily left to underlings, and sometimes announces new policies on social media, with scant or no evidence to support them. Delegates to the American Medical Association, the nation's largest doctors group, which is holding its annual meeting in Chicago this week, adopted a resolution on Tuesday calling for Mr. Kennedy to immediately reverse his decision, and directed its leadership to ask the Senate Health Committee to investigate it. Two public health law experts said on Tuesday that Mr. Kennedy had the authority to fire all 17 members of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices, or A.C.I.P., which gives guidance to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But both said that federal law required him not to act in an arbitrary manner. 'The secretary has ultimate authority, but he can't exercise that authority arbitrarily, casually, haphazardly — he actually needs to use a deliberative process,' said one of those experts, Lawrence O. Gostin, a professor of global health law at Georgetown University. 'I think he's very vulnerable to a judicial challenge.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Chicago-based American Medical Association to ask Senate to investigate RFK Jr.'s firing of vaccine committee members
The Chicago-based American Medical Association plans to ask a U.S. Senate committee to investigate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision to overhaul a key vaccine advisory group, the medical association said in an emergency resolution passed Tuesday. The House of Delegates of the AMA, which is the nation's premier doctors group, adopted the emergency resolution at its annual meeting in Chicago. The adoption came just one day after Kennedy, who is the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary, announced that he had removed all 17 members of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices. That advisory committee is tasked with making recommendations on the use of vaccines to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which then sets U.S. adult and childhood immunization schedules. Kennedy said he planned to replace the 17 members with new members. 'Today we are prioritizing the restoration of public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda,' Kennedy said in a news release Monday. 'The public must know that unbiased science — evaluated through a transparent process and insulated from conflicts of interest — guides the recommendations of our health agencies.' It's a move, however, that has met with sharp criticism, including from the American Medical Association. Kennedy has long been a vaccine skeptic, putting him at odds with doctors and scientists who tout vaccines as lifesaving. The AMA's emergency resolution also says that it will send an open letter to Kennedy asking him to reverse his recent changes to the committee. And the association will 'identify and evaluate alternative evidence-based vaccine advisory structures,' according to the resolution. On Monday, outgoing American Medical Association President Dr. Bruce Scott said in a statement that the advisory committee has long been a trusted source of science and data-driven guidance on vaccines. 'Today's action to remove the 17 sitting members of ACIP undermines that trust and upends a transparent process that has saved countless lives,' Scott said. 'With an ongoing measles outbreak and routine child vaccination rates declining, this move will further fuel the spread of vaccine-preventable illnesses.'

Miami Herald
9 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Domino's Pizza, McDonald's rating surprise tied to persistent consumer issue
Even the Hamburglar didn't see this one coming. Excessive weight has been a persistent problem in America, where at least one in five adults in each U.S. state is living with obesity, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter As obesity rates have risen, so have scientists' efforts to address this serious health issue, which can cause asthma, heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes and even some cancers. Early attempts to treat obesity came to the market as early as the 1930s. Amphetamines were the prevalent treatment in the 1940s and 1950s and demand continued into the 1990s. Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists, which mimic the action of the naturally occurring hormone GLP-1, have been available for about two decades. GLP-1 medications, including Ozempic, Wegovy, Zepbound and Mounjaro, have been used for years to treat Type 2 diabetes, and studies have found that they are also effective at encouraging weight loss. Wegovy and Ozempic are manufactured by Novo Nordisk (NVO) , while Eli Lilly (LLY) makes Zepbound and Mounjaro. Image source:One investment firm says increased use of these medications could have serious implications for two of the biggest names in the fast-food industry: McDonald's (MCD) and Domino's Pizza (DPZ) . The market for anti-obesity drugs, particularly those using injectable versions of GLP 1-based drugs, is still new and continuously evolving, Goldman Sachs said in a May 22 report. More Restaurants Beloved Mexican restaurant closing iconic location after 63 yearsMajor restaurant chain quietly closes several locationsIconic restaurant closing its doors after 32 years The investment firm lowered its projections for such medication and now forecasts the global market to reach $95 billion by 2030. That's down from the previous estimate of $130 billion to reflect trends influencing how the drugs are priced, how long patients stay on them, and how patient populations are segmented. Goldman lowered its U.S. market projections to a peak of $70 billion, but the firm sees room for greater penetration in markets outside the U.S. Goldman forecasts a market peak of $50 billion outside the US, compared with $35 billion previously. A survey of more than 50 doctors in the US found that lower doses of anti-obesity medications are working well for a majority of patients and insurance coverage is the most important factor in the decision-making process, Goldman Sachs wrote. "But to be clear, even with this moderated forecast, we see a significant growth opportunity for both existing players as well as new entrants into this market," said Asad Haider, head of the health-care business unit within Goldman Sachs Research. Demand for GPL-1 drugs could dramatically hinder the food and restaurant industries, according to a study from Cornell's SC Johnson College of Business and the data firm Numerator. The report, entitled "The No Hunger Games," found that households with at least one user of GLP-1 drugs reduced its grocery spending by about 6% within six months of starting the drugs. The spending cut was as much as 9% for higher-income households. "We also find an 8.6% decline in spending at fast-food chains, coffee shops and limited-service restaurants," the study said. "Our findings highlight the potential for GLP-1 medications to significantly change food demand, a trend with increasingly important implications for the food industry as GLP-1 adoption continues to grow." The study warned that common side effects of GLP-1 medications, such as nausea, vomiting and gastrointestinal discomfort, have reportedly led to reduced adherence or discontinued use for some patients. Related: McDonald's analyst grills new stock price target on McCrispy reaction "Moreover, their long-term efficacy and safety remain areas of ongoing investigation," the report said. Redburn Atlantic analyst Chris Luyckx focused on the growing adoption of GLP-1 in recent research reports. Luyckx double-downgraded McDonald's to sell from buy with a price target of $260, down from $319. The analyst expects the GLP-1 weight-loss drugs to suppress consumer appetites and says they present an underappreciated longer-term threat for McDonald's. A 1% drag on sales today "could easily build to 10% or more over time," particularly for restaurant brands skewed toward lower-income consumers, the analyst tells investors in a research note. McDonald's stock was down about 1.3% at last check and is up 18.5% from a year ago. Redburn Atlantic also initiated coverage of Domino's Pizza with a sell rating and $340 price target. Domino's, the world's largest pizza chain, faces the heaviest pressure from adoption of GLP-1 weight loss drugs, with high exposure to dinner occasions and lower-income consumers, the firm said. Redburn Atlantic said the company's organic traffic remains weak, with carry-out far outpacing delivery. Challenged system-sales growth and elevated consensus expectations present downside risk for Domino's, the firm said. McDonald's closed regular trading on June 10 down 1.4% at $300.43. Domino's shares were off 2.7% at $455.49. Related: Fund-management veteran skips emotion in investment strategy The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.