Where Labor and the Coalition stand on nature and environment policies this federal election

Australia Broadcast Center

30-04-2025

One face you may not have seen this election belongs to the Irwin's turtle ( Elseya irwini ).
The freshwater snapping turtle, named after zookeeper and wildlife documentarian Steve Irwin and his dad Bob, was one of 23 additions to the national threatened species list this year.
With one of the highest rates of extinction in the world and more than 7.7 million hectares of threatened species habitat destroyed since 2000, Australia is considered by many to be in a biodiversity crisis.
So what are political parties offering when it comes to our nature laws?
What happened to Labor's 'nature positive' plan?
Labor has increased funding to national parks and threatened species during its time in power.
The party's biggest new commitment this election has been $250 million to put 30 per cent of Australian land into some sort of protected reserve by 2030.
The Labor government also used its 2024–25 budget to allocate $96.6 million over four years towards speeding up environmental approvals related to critical minerals projects and renewable energy generation and transmission.
But there has been little electioneering around Labor's "nature positive" plan that was revealed last term.
That was Labor's policy to change several environment-related laws to ensure threatened species and their habitat were not lost.
Australia's central piece of nature legislation is the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act.
The Act is supposed to protect ecosystems, native species and cultural heritage. It also enables a key regulatory process for would-be developers that might harm these values.
The scathing 2020 Samuel's review of the EPBC Act, commissioned by the previous Liberal government, found it was not effective in protecting the environment, which had, overall, declined and was under increasing threat.
When Labor took power, it took a staged approach to addressing some of the review's recommendations but reform has since stalled, with neither the Coalition nor Greens backing it.
Federal election live updates: Get the latest news from the campaign trail
Catch the latest interviews and in-depth coverage on ABC iview and ABC Listen
Will there be an environment watchdog?
One of the key hurdles for Labor's nature reforms has been legislation to make an independent Environment Protection Authority (EPA) that could decide the outcome of major developments and police compliance.
An EPA has been a Labor commitment since 2019, but there are concerns in the resources industry that it would create more paperwork.
The Coalition is also against the formation of an EPA which it claims would drive up housing and energy costs.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese reportedly shut down negotiations to get an EPA through the senate where Labor lacks the numbers to pass laws itself.
But he said in March Labor would still pursue the creation of the watchdog post-election using a different model.
"What we'll do is work it through, we'll consult widely, make sure that we get it right and that is what we will legislate," Mr Albanese said.
"Something that provides certainty for industry and the way that processes occur, but also provides for sustainability. That's what we're after."
Chamber of Minerals and Energy WA chief executive Rebecca Tomkinson says the resources industry wants better outcomes for the environment but bureaucratic double-ups on approvals must be fixed. ( ABC News: Jack Stevenson )
Chamber of Minerals and Energy WA chief executive Rebecca Tomkinson said her organisation, which represents major resource companies, questioned the need for a federal EPA in WA when a state-based version already existed.
"The resources sector has long advocated that future environmental reforms be grounded in genuine consultation to ensure outcomes that deliver for both the environment and for business," she said.
"The aim must be to protect Australia's environment while removing duplication, providing a higher degree of process certainty for proponents and speeding up project assessments."
Labor's nature positive plan had included a mechanism for state and territory governments to be accredited to make decisions on national environmental approvals.
Reform is still on the agenda and a government taskforce has continued to work on legislative proposals.
Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek says Labor still wants nature reform. ( ABC News: Luke Stephenson )
Environment Minster Tanya Plibersek told ABC News Weekend Breakfast last month Labor still wanted to see stronger environmental laws.
"They're not fit for purpose, they don't protect the environment, they're not good for business," she said.
"We know we need to reform them, but it's going to take commonsense and compromise, and that means the Greens can't hold out for everything they want, and the Liberals and the Nationals will have to agree to better protect our environment."
Coalition's nature approach
Many of the Coalition's commitments around environment law reform focus on cutting "green tape" for industry.
Opposition leader Peter Dutton told a mining conference last year that a Coalition government would "unequivocally and unashamedly champion our mining and resource sectors".
Peter Dutton's policies as opposition leader have been geared around speeding up development. ( ABC News: Matt Roberts )
The Coalition also wants to speed up housing development environmental approvals.
Both promises would be met through a range of measures including:
halving environmental approval times for projects
halving environmental approval times for projects introducing a "national interest" test to give greater consideration to economic and social interests in environmental approval decisions
introducing a "national interest" test to give greater consideration to economic and social interests in environmental approval decisions accrediting state and territory governments processes for national environmental approvals
accrediting state and territory governments processes for national environmental approvals restricting use of the "stop the clock" provision, which is where the government halts an environmental assessment as it seeks more information
restricting use of the "stop the clock" provision, which is where the government halts an environmental assessment as it seeks more information finalising environmental applications for housing developments within 12 months
finalising environmental applications for housing developments within 12 months "simplifying" environmental assessment processes
"simplifying" environmental assessment processes "clarifying" rules for project offsets (schemes where you create a nature covenant or give the government land with habitat similar to what you plan to remove).
Mr Dutton has also promised to defund the Environmental Defender's Office (EDO), a not-for-profit community legal office, after he accused the organisation of using taxpayer funds to wage "lawfare" to impede resource projects.
The EDO was reprimanded by a federal court judge last year for coaching a witness while representing traditional owners from the Tiwi Islands against a gas development by Santos.
Mr Dutton wants to end the $8.2 million grant agreement between the EDO and the federal government before it expires in 2026. A review by the federal government last year found the EDO had not breached the conditions of its grant.
Another promise by Mr Dutton to fast-track an approval decision on the North West Shelf extension gas project, within 30 days of being elected, could leave a Coalition-led government open to a future legal challenge.
James Trezise from the Biodiversity Council says the Coalition policies do little for the environment. ( ABC News: Claire Moodie )
Biodiversity Council director James Trezise was critical of the Coalition's environment policies, and said there was nothing on offer that would meaningfully benefit Australia's biodiversity.
"In simple terms, their agenda is entirely geared towards fast-tracking development, seemingly irrespective of its potential environmental impact," he said.
"There have also been no commitments to investing in recovering our iconic threatened species or protecting Australia's unique ecosystems, which is critical if we are to stem the loss of wildlife across the country."
Shadow environment minister Jonathon Duniam said an environmental law overhaul was the portfolio's foremost priority.
"The uncertainty from the secret consultations with select groups has alienated environmental stakeholders and industries, and set the path of reform backwards, not forwards," he told the ABC.
"The Coalition will continue our considered approach to reform that we took in government to get the balance right between the need to have a functioning economy and our ability to protect our environment."
What might happen in a hung parliament?
With tight polling between the major parties, there is a possibility of a hung parliament this election.
That's where no single party has a majority of seats in the lower house, which means they need support from cross-benchers or the opposition to pass laws.
Want even more? Here's where you can find all our 2025 federal election coverage
If this happened, the ruling party might need support in not just the lower house but the Senate too, meaning they will need to negotiate what's in legislation.
Independent politicians have previously supported nature positive reform.
In April last year, independent politicians Zali Steggall, Kate Chaney, Zoe Daniel, Helen Haines, Kylea Tink, Monique Ryan, Sophie Scamps, Allegra Spender, and Andrew Wilkie all asked Labor to pass a complete package of reforms in response to the Samuel review.
The Greens also put forward a wishlist of environment policies the party would take to the negotiating table if its numbers in the lower house and senate are needed to legislate:
invest 1 per cent of federal budget into protecting and restoring nature
invest 1 per cent of federal budget into protecting and restoring nature provide $20 billion for biodiversity restoration over 10 years
provide $20 billion for biodiversity restoration over 10 years create a $5 billion protected areas fund
create a $5 billion protected areas fund establish a land and sea country commissioner as an independent First Nations voice
establish a land and sea country commissioner as an independent First Nations voice introduce a climate trigger that could stop fossil fuel projects getting environmental approval
introduce a climate trigger that could stop fossil fuel projects getting environmental approval end forest logging
end forest logging moratorium on koala habitat clearing
moratorium on koala habitat clearing mirror climate disclosures by business with a mandatory nature risk disclosure.
The Biodiversity Council, formed by 11 Australian universities to provide expert advice on biodiversity issues, has graded the major parties' policies and given the Greens top marks.
Former Queensland chief scientist and Biodiversity Council co-chair Hugh Possingham said Labor's nature policies were "minimal" and the Coalition's were a "failure".
In contrast, Professor Possingham said The Greens' policies, if enacted through a balance of power, could have meaningful improvements for Australia's environment.
Biodiversity Council grades