South African president to meet Trump on Wednesday over rising tensions
JOHANNESBURG: South African President Cyril Ramaphosa will meet with his US counterpart Donald Trump in Washington next week amid strained ties between the two countries, Pretoria said Thursday.
Tensions have been rising for months over a range of policy issues, culminating this week with the US resettling a first group of white Afrikaners that Trump claims are facing 'persecution' in South Africa.
'On Wednesday, 21 May 2025, President Ramaphosa will meet with President Donald Trump at the White House in Washington DC to discuss bilateral, regional and global issues of interest,' the presidency said in a statement released late Wednesday.
The visit 'provides a platform to reset the strategic relationship between the two countries,' it said.
Trump has repeatedly shared unfounded claims that white Afrikaners are facing a 'genocide,' a conspiracy theory that has been widely dismissed.
White South Africans, who make up 7.3 percent of the population, generally enjoy a higher standard of living than the black majority of the country.
Pretoria has said Trump's offer of refugee status to Afrikaners is 'entirely politically motivated and designed to question South Africa's constitutional democracy.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
‘Better if he was dead': Kenyan mother's search for son year after protests
NAIROBI: Susan Wangari has lost count of the morgues, hospitals and police stations she has visited in search of her son, who went missing at the height of Kenya's mass protests last June. She last saw Emmanuel Mukuria, 24, on the morning of June 25, 2024, the day that thousands of Kenyan youths thronged the streets of Nairobi and stormed parliament in protest at planned tax rises and corruption. 'It would be better if my son were dead; at least I could visit his grave,' she told AFP. Rights groups say at least 60 people were killed during the protests in June and July, and more than 80 abducted by the security forces since then, with dozens still missing. Mukuria's friends say he was arrested during the protests in the city center, where he worked as a minibus tout. 'We do not have peace in this house,' his mother, 50, told AFP during a visit to her single-room home in the Kasarani slum area. 'I sleep lightly at night in case he comes knocking at my window like he always did,' she said. 'Every time we hear that bodies have been found somewhere, we are anxious to know whose they are.' Two men told her they shared a cell with Mukuria, but they are too afraid to speak publicly about their ordeal. One was only released in February, giving her hope that her son is still alive in captivity. 'They told me they were beaten and questioned about the protests. They were being asked who paid them to participate,' Wangari said. Last month, President William Ruto, in a clear admission that security forces had engaged in kidnappings, said all those abducted during the protests had been 'returned to their families.' Rights groups say dozens are still missing and police have shown little progress in investigating the disappearances despite Ruto claiming an 'accountability mechanism' was put in place. Questioned by AFP, the president's office said the police were 'handling the brief,' while a police spokesman referred AFP back to the president's office. The police spokesman said they had no information on Mukuria's case. An officer-in-charge at the station where Wangari reported him missing said the matter was still under investigation. Many other families are still dealing with the aftermath of the violence. Rex Masai, 29, was the first to die during the protests, shot and killed in the city center on June 20. The inquest into his death is still dragging on. 'We are hoping for the best but we are not near the truth,' Masai's mother Gillian Munyao told AFP at her home, where a photo of her dreadlocked son hangs on the wall. She found her son lying lifeless in a pool of blood at a clinic where he was taken that day. The state prosecutor has said a lack of witnesses has delayed progress in the case. One potential witness was scared off for fear he might be 'forcibly disappeared' by the police, Munyao said. Hussein Khalid, head of rights group Vocal Africa, blamed a 'lack of cooperation by the authorities.' 'When you get evidence, the unfortunate bit is you have to take it to the police themselves,' he said. He lost count of the number of funerals he attended after the protests, estimating between 20 and 30. 'Was it necessary to unleash this kind of brute force against young, innocent Kenyans?' he said. Politicians have shown little interest in accountability or learning from the unrest. 'People were killed, we sympathized, we moved on,' Bashir Abdullahi, a member of the ruling coalition, told parliament during a debate on the protests last month. But for victim's families, the search for justice 'means a lot,' said Masai's father, Chrispin Odawa. 'The wound will never heal,' he said.
Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Elon Musk and Donald Trump's ugly divorce
In one of his emotional outbursts, Elon Musk wrote months ago on his platform 'X': 'I love [Donald Trump] as much as a straight man can love another man.' Since then, we've seen him – with his son – accompanying Trump more often than we see the president with his own wife and son, Barron. Yet this affection and personal attraction were, in reality, built on fragile foundations of mutual interest and benefit. It was expected that this tangled relationship would end quickly – but not in the bitter and ugly way it did, when Musk accused his former boss of ties to the infamous Jeffrey Epstein case and called for his ouster. Trump, known for firing his staff in humiliating ways – sometimes without them even knowing – and calling them 'idiots,' couldn't treat the richest man in the world the same way. Elon Musk is no ordinary man, and he played a critical role in Trump's re-election. That's why Trump tried to ease him out gracefully and with minimal damage. In a bland farewell ceremony before reporters in the Oval Office, he handed Musk – who was in a state of turmoil – a golden key in honor of his service. In his parting words, Musk said he would remain a supporter and friend to Trump, who, despite Musk's remarks, tried to absorb the blow and calm the tension. But just a few days later, Musk launched a furious, unhinged attack on his former boss, declaring that he hadn't meant what he said in front of millions. Musk is an emotional and volatile figure, difficult to contain. This is one of the key reasons behind the rift between him and Trump that led to this ugly split. While Trump seeks to weaken established institutions and challenge the so-called deep state, Musk operates entirely outside traditional government structures, disregarding its norms and conventions altogether. Trump, despite rebelling against Washington and its elite, still adhered to some rules and never became an absolute destructive force – after all, he is the president of the United States. Musk, on the other hand, has never worked in government, but wants to change it as he does his corporate leadership teams – without oversight or accountability. His clash with members of Trump's administration over the government efficiency board known as 'DOGE' sparked much controversy. He used a harsh management style, and although Trump publicly supported him at first, Musk's employee purge campaign ultimately damaged Trump's political image and failed to deliver the promised financial savings. It was a chaotic project doomed to fail from the very beginning. Another rift between Musk and Trump lies in their worldviews. After Trump's victory, Musk entered into a state of hysterical celebration, declaring that the win would serve human civilization and the interests of mankind. Musk's motivations are cosmic and idealistic, whereas Trump speaks in terms of individual interests, 'America First,' egg prices, and tariffs. While Musk saw Trump's win as a turning point in human history, Trump was busy attacking Biden and blaming him. Their conflict was a collision of extremes – excessive idealism versus self-serving realism, visionary romanticism versus cold materialism. For all these reasons, the split wasn't surprising – it was a logical conclusion to a fragile relationship between two personalities who were never meant to meet in the first place.
Arab News
10 hours ago
- Arab News
Trump banned citizens of 12 countries from entering the US. Here's what to know
DAKAR, Senegal: President Donald Trump has banned citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States and restricted access for those from seven others, citing national security concerns in resurrecting and expanding a hallmark policy from his first term that will mostly affect people from Africa and the Middle East. The ban announced Wednesday applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The heightened restrictions apply to people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the US and don't hold a valid visa. The policy takes effect Monday at 12:01 a.m. and does not have an end date. Here's what to know about the new rules: How Trump justified the ban Since returning to the White House, Trump has launched an unprecedented campaign of immigration enforcement that has pushed the limits of executive power and clashed with federal judges trying to restrain him. The travel ban stems from a Jan. 20 executive order Trump issued requiring the Department of State, Department of Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence to compile a report on 'hostile attitudes' toward the US The aim is to 'protect its citizens from aliens who intend to commit terrorist attacks, threaten our national security, espouse hateful ideology, or otherwise exploit the immigration laws for malevolent purposes,' the administration said. In a video posted on social media, Trump tied the new ban to a terrorist attack Sunday in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. The man charged in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. US officials say he overstayed a tourist visa. Who is exempt from the ban, Which countries are affected Trump said nationals of countries included in the ban pose 'terrorism-related' and 'public-safety' risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also said some of these countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their citizens. His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report about tourists, businesspeople and students who overstay US visas and arrive by air or sea, singling out countries with high percentages of nationals who remain after their visas expired. 'We don't want them,' Trump said. The inclusion of Afghanistan angered some supporters who have worked to resettle its people. The ban makes exceptions for Afghans on special immigrant visas, who were generally the people who worked most closely with the US government during the two-decade war there. The list can be changed, the administration said in a document, if authorities in the designated countries make 'material improvements' to their own rules and procedures. New countries can be added 'as threats emerge around the world.' State Department guidance The State Department instructed US embassies and consulates on Friday not to revoke visas previously issued to people from the 12 countries listed in the ban. In a cable sent to all US diplomatic missions, the department said 'no action should be taken for issued visas which have already left the consular section' and that 'no visas issued prior to the effective date should be revoked pursuant to this proclamation.' However, visa applicants from affected countries whose applications have been approved but have not yet received their visas will be denied, according to the cable, which was signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. And, unless an applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban, his or her application will be rejected starting on Monday. How the ban differs from 2017's Early in Trump's first term, he issued an executive order banning travel to the US by citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries, including Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. It was one of the most chaotic and confusing moments of his young presidency. Travelers from those nations were either barred from getting on flights to the US or detained at US airports after they landed. They included students and faculty, as well as businesspeople, tourists and people visiting friends and family. The order, often referred to as the 'Muslim ban' or the 'travel ban,' was retooled amid legal challenges until a version was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. That ban affected various categories of travelers and immigrants from Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Syria and Libya, plus North Koreans and some Venezuelan government officials and their families. Reactions to Trump's order Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro's government condemned the travel ban, characterizing it in a statement as a 'stigmatization and criminalization campaign' against Venezuelans. Chad President Mahamat Deby Itno said his country would suspend visas for US citizens in response to the ban. Aid and refugee resettlement groups also denounced it. 'This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America. But reactions to the ban ran the gamut from anger to guarded relief and support. In Haiti, radio stations received a flurry of calls Thursday from angry listeners, including many who said they were Haitians living in the US and who accused Trump of being racist, noting that the people of many of the targeted countries are Black. Haitian-American Elvanize Louis-Juste, who was at the airport Sunday in Newark, New Jersey, awaiting a flight to her home state of Florida, said many Haitians wanting to come to the US are simply seeking to escape violence and unrest in their country. 'I have family in Haiti, so it's pretty upsetting to see and hear,' Louis-Juste, 23, said of the travel ban. 'I don't think it's a good thing. I think it's very upsetting.' William Lopez, a 75-year-old property investor who arrived from Cuba in 1967, supports the travel ban. 'These are people that come but don't want to work, they support the Cuban government, they support communism,' Lopez said at a restaurant near Little Havana in Miami. 'What the Trump administration is doing is perfectly good.'
