logo
Yes, Flying in the U.S. Is Safe

Yes, Flying in the U.S. Is Safe

Yahoo11-02-2025

A crane removes airplane wreckage from the Potomac River, where American Airlines flight 5342 collided with a US Army military helicopter, near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport in Arlington, Virginia, on Feb. 3, 2025. Credit - AFP—Getty Images
Flying in the U.S. has rarely looked as dangerous as it has in the past two weeks. Yesterday, one person died and three were injured when a private jet attempting a landing at Scottsdale Airport in Arizona collided with a parked plane. That accident occurred after the Feb. 6 crash of a commuter plane near Nome Alaska killed all 10 people on board, an accident that itself followed the Jan. 31 crash of a twin-engine Medevac plane in Philadelphia that killed seven people, including one victim on the ground. And all of this was in the wake of the Jan. 29 mid-air collision over the Potomac River near Virginia's Reagan International Airport, between a commercial jet carrying 64 people and a military helicopter with three on board, claiming all 67 lives.
Such a string of bad luck makes for a jumpy public. Plenty of passengers and potential passengers are likely questioning whether their flights are safe or if the U.S. is facing something of an industry meltdown, due perhaps to understaffing in air traffic control towers, high turnover of pilots, or the mere fact that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is currently without a permanent administrator. Government officials have hastened to quell any panic.
"Air travel is the safest form of travel in the country. So you can travel and feel good about it on American airplanes," said Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy during a Feb. 3 interview on Fox News.
There are numbers to back that up. According to the FAA, an average of 45,000 commercial and private flights take off each day in the U.S., carrying 2.9 million passengers across 29 million sq. mi of air space. For all that, any one person's odds of dying in an air disaster are vanishingly small—about one in 13.7 million according to a 2024 study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (In comparison, the odds of dying in a car accident are 1 in 95.)
Experts say the four recent accidents should not be viewed as a systemic, nationwide problem, but rather as four random events that happened to cluster together in time. 'It's understandable when people see these accidents happen so close together that there's concern,' says Hassan Shahidi, president and CEO of the Flight Safety Foundation, an international nonprofit that advocates for keeping the skies safe. '[But] these accidents are all independent of each other. They're all different. They are unique circumstances, and they're being investigated.'
Adds Juan Browne, a commercial pilot and host of the Blancolirio YouTube blog: 'Statistically, we're on average overall for aircraft accidents. [It's] just that, we've had a couple of bad fatal ones recently, specifically the D.C. mid-air crash. That was the first major fatality we've had with a major airliner here in the United States since 2009. [The recent crashes] could be random clustering.'
The Washington disaster, involving two aircraft and more than five dozen victims, is far and away the most complex and the most tragic of the four. The investigation into the accident is still very much ongoing, but the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) reports that the military helicopter was flying at an altitude of 325 ft., plus or minus 25 ft.—well above its proper ceiling of 200 ft., placing it directly in the landing path of the incoming jet.
'That only gives 100 ft. of possible error,' says Browne, 'and that is just much too tight. We need to separate that traffic out altogether and not allow the helicopters to proceed while the airliners are landing.'
An error like that could lay the problem at the feet of air traffic control, but piloting error could also be to blame. The three-person crew of the helicopter included one pilot who was getting a 'check ride,' or proficiency test, in the right hand seat. The commanding pilot had about 1,000 hours at the stick, but the officer taking the proficiency test had just 450, according to Browne.
'So that lack of experience may very well come out to be a factor in the final investigation,' he says.
The cause of the Medevac crash is not yet known, but the cockpit voice recorder was recovered and sent to the NTSB for investigation. Icing is thought to have been the cause of the Alaska crash, which occurred when the pilot circled while the runway was being cleared of snow.
The Scottsdale crash was caused by mechanical failure, specifically the collapse of the left main landing gear. Pilot error might have been involved in that, says Browne. He cites data from an FAA aviation surveillance system that suggests the plane was descending at a speed of 1,600 ft. per minute, well above the 1,000 ft. per minute maximum.
The fact that such different sets of circumstances led to very different kinds of accidents, should provide some reassurance to the flying public, with no connective tissue linking one accident to another. That's not to say the aviation system couldn't be safer still.
Browne worries about a steady erosion of experience in commercial aviation—a problem that may not be leading to system-wide breakdowns at the moment, but could in the future. There's 'huge turnover in aviation that's been exacerbated by things like COVID and early retirements,' he says. 'I'm 62 years old. I'm coming up on retirement from the airlines, and I'm joined by thousands of others, and suddenly there's a whole lot of training going on. And it's not only just pilots; I'm talking every aspect of aviation—maintenance, ATC [air traffic control], dispatch.'
Washington bureaucracy may play a role as well. The NTSB investigates accidents and makes recommendations to improve safety in the future. But its authority is only advisory; it's up to the FAA to heed the suggestions—and sometimes it doesn't. 'Quite often, the NTSB and the FAA are at loggerheads for getting those recommendations implemented,' says Browne.
The FAA could also tighten rules for pilots. Commercial airlines operate under a set of federal aviation regulations known as FAR Part 121—the most stringent set of safety and maintenance rules. Charters for hire operate under looser FAR Part 135 rules. Private pilots flying small planes—so-called general aviation—are governed by the least restrictive regulations, called FAR Part 91. 'The accident statistics also kind of follow,' says Browne. 'In general aviation, we get overall lack of experience, and it leads to a higher accident rate than certainly that of the airlines.'
None of this, however, changes those one in 13.7 million mortality odds that MIT calculated. Air travel has never been no-risk—but in American skies it continues to be low-risk. 'We have trained pilots that do their jobs well, trained air traffic controllers that do their jobs well,' says Shahidi. 'We have a safe transportation system in this country.'
Write to Jeffrey Kluger at jeffrey.kluger@time.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Keep your mouth closed;' Kings Island visitors joined by thousands of cicadas
‘Keep your mouth closed;' Kings Island visitors joined by thousands of cicadas

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘Keep your mouth closed;' Kings Island visitors joined by thousands of cicadas

Cicadas from Brood 14 have made their way to one of the area's favorite summer spots. [DOWNLOAD: Free WHIO-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] 'This brood, Brood 14, was first seen by the pilgrims in 1634. There's a little bit of American history involved with this particular brood,' Dr. Gene Kritsky from Mount St. Joseph University told our news partners at WCPO. Over the weekend, several people shared their experiences on TikTok of cicadas joining them at Kings Island, including Butler County mom Hope Daniels. Daniels shared the moment where her young son Oliver realized a cicada had decided to land on his shirt as they entered the park. Daniels shared the moment where her young son Oliver realized a cicada had decided to land on his shirt as they entered the park. TRENDING STORIES: Air India flight crashes moments after takeoff, more than 240 on board Missing 24-year-old woman found 'safe,' police say Officers arrest armed scooter rider, recover suspect meth during traffic stop 'He loves all things bugs and earth, but when it comes to the cicadas, I don't know if it's the legs or the noises that they make; it creeps him out,' Daniels said. Daniels was one of many people sharing their cicada-filled trip to the amusement park over the weekend. 'I think we are starting to embrace and make them our friends. We're taking them with us on the roller coasters, we are loving on them, so I'm hoping that it's moving more from fear to embracing and loving the cicadas,' Daniels said. Kritsky said that if you're enjoying your day at Kings Island over the coming weeks, he does have one important piece of advice. 'Just enjoy the cicadas and when you're on the ride, keep your mouth closed,' Kritsky said. Daniels said her 6-year-old already knew that advice and made sure everyone else with him was prepared. 'So, while boarding our first roller coaster of the night, he reminded our group that we all needed to keep our mouths tightly sealed so we did not get a cicada in the mouth. And he was very proud at the end when we told me that he had not screamed the entire roller coaster,' Daniels said. You can learn more about cicadas and their cycles by going to the Cicada Safari website. [SIGN UP: WHIO-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]

Traveling in the Trump era: No, you don't have to apologize for being American
Traveling in the Trump era: No, you don't have to apologize for being American

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

Traveling in the Trump era: No, you don't have to apologize for being American

President Trump's return to the White House has revived a familiar media genre — columns lamenting how 'ashamed' Americans supposedly feel when traveling abroad. USA Today's recent headline blared, ''I didn't vote for him': How American tourists are navigating global perceptions.' It tells the story of how a couple actually canceled their overseas vacation out of fear they'd be mistaken for Trump supporters. The BBC followed with, ''People might treat us differently': Trump era leaves U.S. tourists in Paris feeling shame.' A Boston Globe columnist also chimed in: 'Trump's behavior makes me embarrassed to be an American.' To quantify the hand-wringing, a recent survey found that 72 percent of 'experienced' U.S. travelers worry they might feel unwelcome abroad. The underlying assumption is clear: Foreign distaste for Trump taints every U.S. passport holder. But that anxiety reveals more about the worldview of those making the claim — usually progressive, elite, Western — than it does about how Americans are actually received overseas. It also reveals how media narratives shape public expectations. Of course Americans fear being unwelcome — after all, the media keep telling them they will or should be. In the time since Trump won last November, I have spent significant time in Greenland, Vietnam, England, Panama and Mexico — countries that have all been in Trump's crosshairs in some way. Not once did I experience hostility. After traveling through dozens of countries on five continents under both Republican and Democratic presidents, I have found the fretting about being American abroad to be wildly overstated — a projection of domestic political angst, not a reflection of global reality. Yes, most foreigners know who our president is, especially when he is as headline-grabbing as Trump. And yes, they often have opinions — don't we all? But the idea that everyday Americans are routinely shunned, judged, or made to feel unwelcome abroad because of Trump is a fantasy born of our own political obsessions. In truth, Americans are generally welcomed abroad. And when we aren't, it has less to do with politics than with other things — for example, our cultural obliviousness, our sheer numbers traveling, or the pressure that affluent travelers inevitably place on their local housing markets. Sure, some people abroad dislike Trump and may judge Americans accordingly. But most are preoccupied with their own politics, lives, and problems and understand that a president doesn't define his entire population. Yes, Trump is a globally recognized figure — so are Lebron James and Taylor Swift. Recognition is not reverence, nor is it revulsion. If you include the entire population, about 23 percent of American citizens voted for Trump. The odds are good that any American you meet abroad did not. And more to the point, most foreigners — like most Americans and even most Trump supporters — hold nuanced views about Trump. Last month in Nuuk, Greenland, I met an EU bureaucrat who said she had been alarmed by Trump's 2016 election, since his 'rocket man' tweets about North Korea initially had her fearing nuclear war. But after watching his unexpectedly cordial summit with Kim Jong Un, she reconsidered. 'Don't just look to where Trump is hitting the ball,' she said of Trump's approach to foreign affairs. 'It will ricochet a couple of times and then perhaps fall in the pocket.' She, like others I have met abroad, holds a view of Trump that is simultaneously skeptical and strangely admiring — a nuance absent from the editorial pages of most American newspapers. In Greenland, I met some who despised Trump and some who genuinely admired him. Most responded to Trump's talk of purchasing Greenland with wry amusement. Some even gave a grinning, shrugging acknowledgment that at least he'd put their country on the map. All the while, a thousand think-pieces back home were insisting that everyone in Greenland loathed him. In Hanoi, a woman told me she initially admired Trump's unconventional approach to adversaries. She said she has grown more skeptical as his tariffs have hurt her country. That's not blind praise or a knee-jerk rejection — it's nuance, the kind many reporters fail to register even among Americans. Just as often, the response is indifference. When I asked a Peruvian friend in Lima what she thought of Trump voters, she replied flatly: 'I don't.' When I visited Peru, I didn't know the name of its president — why should she be consumed with ours? The U.S. wields outsized global influence, but it is narcissism to assume the world is constantly thinking about us. Maybe we should get over ourselves. Many liberals feel compelled to grovel, to disavow Trump the moment they leave U.S. soil. I never have, any more than I expected praise during earlier travels because global media darling Barack Obama was our president. I don't buy into reflected glory any more than I do reflected shame. Americans reluctant to travel while Trump is president should not let pundits and alarmists talk them out of seeing the world. A U.S. passport is one of the greatest privileges of being American, opening nearly every border, often visa-free. Yes, being American might at times make you a target. Far more often, though, you will find respect, curiosity, and kindness. Most people abroad aren't interested in judging strangers for their country's politics. They are more likely to judge you for how you behave. So, to my fellow Americans: Use that passport proudly. Be ambassadors for the best of American values: our openness, our generosity, our eagerness to learn. That is what people abroad will remember most — not our president, but us. Daniel Allott, the former opinion editor at The Hill, is the author of 'On the Road in Trump's America: A Journey into the Heart of a Divided Country.'

Boeing Stock Faces Fresh Crisis After 787 Dreamliner Crash
Boeing Stock Faces Fresh Crisis After 787 Dreamliner Crash

Forbes

time4 hours ago

  • Forbes

Boeing Stock Faces Fresh Crisis After 787 Dreamliner Crash

COPENHAGEN, DENMARK - 2024/05/22: An Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner landing at Copenhagen Kastrup ... More airport. The Air India Boeing 787-8 aircraft seats 256 passengers in a two-class configuration and is used on long-haul routes. This aircraft have 18 seats in Business Class and 238 Economy. (Photo by Fabrizio Gandolfo/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) Boeing's stock tumbled 6% in extended trading following news of a tragic crash involving one of its 787 Dreamliner aircraft. The Air India flight, carrying 242 passengers and crew members, crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad, India, en route to London Gatwick. This latest incident adds to Boeing's mounting challenges over the past year. The aerospace giant has been grappling with a series of safety concerns that have damaged its reputation and operational capacity. The company's troubles began escalating with a dramatic midair incident on January 9, 2024, when a cabin side panel detached from an Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 Max 9 during Flight 1282. The Federal Aviation Administration responded swiftly, halting Boeing's production expansion plans for the 737 Max aircraft line. Additional problems emerged in February when one of Boeing's suppliers discovered defects in fuselages on several unfinished 737 Max planes. These issues compounded existing concerns. Look at – What's In Store For Boeing Stock In 2025? – for more details on Boeing's issues. Separately, see – Boeing's Valuation Comparison Despite these setbacks, Boeing has implemented corrective measures to address the 737 Max issues and has worked to increase production capacity. While the cause of the latest 787 Dreamliner crash remains unknown, the incident casts fresh doubt on the company's safety record. The aviation industry has already shown signs of shifting preference toward Boeing's European rival, Airbus. This latest major incident threatens to accelerate that trend, as airlines may further reassess their fleet procurement strategies in favor of alternative manufacturers. For perspective, Transavia Airlines is continuing its gradual transition from an all-Boeing fleet to an all-Airbus fleet, with Boeing 737-700 and -800 aircraft being gradually phased out as it introduces larger A320neo family aircraft. Similarly, the British low-cost carrier – easyJet – has completely switched from 737s to A320s, having previously operated 84 Boeing 737s, all of which have been retired. Also, United Airlines has signed at least 36 leases for the A321neo, the Airbus model that competes with Boeing's 737 Max 10, though this was due to Boeing delivery delays rather than safety concerns. The crash represents a critical moment for Boeing as it struggles to rebuild confidence among regulators, airlines, and passengers while managing the financial and operational impacts of its ongoing safety challenges. Also, check out – How Low Can Boeing Stock Fall In A Market Crash?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store