
Trump is pushing 'school choice,' but some Republicans aren't on board
Tyler Hansford, superintendent of schools in rural Union, Mississippi, voted for Donald Trump three times.
But Hansford, 36, who leads a district of just under 1,000 students, disagrees with the president on one big issue: using public money to send children to private schools.
"School choice," as its proponents call it, is a Trump priority that has divided Republicans, drawing support from many conservative governors who see it as an issue of parents' rights but opposition from small communities concerned about losing much-needed public school funding. Hansford also worries that the private school tuition support proposed in Mississippi wouldn't help local families who are unable to drive to reach those schools and may not find the special education services they rely on once they get there.
'How is it 'choice' when there's no transportation or special education services provided?' Hansford wrote recently on Facebook about the Mississippi bill. 'School choice with no transportation for families without a car is no choice at all.'
Last month, Trump signed an executive order directing the Education Department to identify ways federal funding could support students attending private and faith-based schools. On social media, he has urged legislators in Texas and Idaho to pass proposals to create private school vouchers or similar programs, and Linda McMahon, his nominee for education secretary, has backed the programs, as well.
Idaho's bill, which would provide up to $5,000 in tax credits for many students attending private school, 'has my complete and total support, MUST PASS!' Trump posted Sunday on Truth Social.
Idaho's Senate did just that Wednesday, and is now set to join the more than two dozen other states that have some form of public funding for private schools, according to EdWeek. The Texas bill appears likely to succeed, as well.
But Republicans in some states where Trump has won by wide margins, including Mississippi and South Dakota, this year chose not to advance bills that would expand financial support for private schools.
It's one of the few visible chasms in a party that has widely supported Trump 's agenda. Some conservatives see sending public money to private schools as antithetical to the philosophy of less government and less spending, while Trump has framed it as a way to give parents more control over their children's education. A White House spokesperson said Trump's executive order aims to allow families to choose schools that "fit" their children's needs.
To Patrick Wolf, a professor studying education policy at the University of Arkansas, the debate shows a looming battle in the Republican Party 'between pushing national policies that they think are good everywhere and respecting their commitment to federalism,' he said, referring to the idea of sharing power between local and federal governments.
The stakes for those who don't comply with the national party's view are rising.
'It's become a litmus test,' Wolf said. 'Republicans who voted against school choice do have a target on their backs. It certainly leaves them vulnerable to being primaried.'
That's what happened in Texas, where at least nine Republicans who rejected previous voucher bills were ousted in primaries last year.
'Politics in Texas is a blood sport,' said Brandon Rottinghaus, a political science professor at the University of Houston.
This is the first session since those primaries, and voucher proponents are excited about a bill the Senate has passed t o give families $10,000 — or more if their child ren ha ve disabilit ies — for private school tuition.
'I think this push from President Trump is kind of what the proponents needed in the final 500 yards,' Rottinghaus said. 'It's an accelerant for the last and hardest push.'
The Texas bill also drew strong support from Gov. Greg Abbott, who has crisscrossed the state promoting voucher legislation, appearing this week with a San Antonio legislator who ousted an anti-voucher Republican. The legislation is now before the House, where, Speaker Dustin Burrows said Monday, 'the votes are there.'
In Idaho, too, legislators have faced primaries for opposing vouchers. At least four Republican lawmakers who had blocked bills previously lost their seats in the most recent elections. Two of them faced opposition from the American Federation for Children, a conservative nonprofit group, whose Idaho affiliate spent more than $500,000 in Idaho's elections last year. A Democratic incumbent the group opposed was also unseated. "Politicians should fear losing their seats if they ignore their constituents on this issue," Tommy Schultz, the group's CEO, said in a statement.
Between those electoral challenges and Trump's recent post, "you see why there might be pressure to compromise," said Jaclyn Kettler, a political science professor at Boise State University.
However, in South Dakota, which Trump won by 29 points last fall, three 'school choice' bills have failed this year.
Kyle Schoenfish, a Republican who chairs the Senate Education Committee, said he worried that a proposal to siphon off property taxes to help fund private school scholarships could harm public school districts. That could lead communities to raise property taxes, in contrast with the conservative aim to 'look for ways to lower them,' he said.
'It's not opposition to school choice necessarily, just the question of what should government pay for and what's more fiscally conservative or responsible,' Schoenfish said.
In Mississippi, where Republicans hold all statewide offices and control both legislative chambers, lawmakers quickly aligned themselves with Trump's crackdown on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives by passing bills this session to ban such programs in public schools and universities.
But a House proposal to allow children from academically struggling districts to receive state-funded scholarships to private schools died without the chamber's taking a vote.
Grant Callen, the founder and CEO of Empower Mississippi, which promotes 'school choice,' attributed the failure to lobbying from local school officials.
For some legislators, he said, 'you're more concerned about what your superintendent thinks than what your president thinks.'
Hansford, the Union superintendent, agreed. While Trump's messaging on the economy and 'America First' resonates, he said, 'when it gets to the minutiae of it, it's more about what's personal to people.' And in his town, that's the Union Yellow Jackets.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Doechii blasts Trump administration's ‘ruthless attacks' in LA amid Ice raids
The rapper Doechii turned her acceptance speech at the BET awards on Monday night into a powerful call for justice as she criticized the Trump administration's deployment of military forces on protesters in Los Angeles. The Grammy winner used the stage to highlight the immigration raids and protest crackdowns happening just miles from where the ceremony took place in Los Angeles. After being named best female hip-hop artist – her first-ever BET award – Doechii acknowledged her fellow nominees, then shifted the spotlight to the issues unfolding outside the venue. 'There are ruthless attacks that are creating fear and chaos in our communities in the name of law and order,' said Doechii, who won a Grammy for best rap album, only the third woman to win in that category. The BET ceremony took place as tensions simmered across Los Angeles following a weekend of protest over immigration raids that took place on Friday, with dozens of people arrested. On Monday, Donald Trump authorized the deployment of an additional 2,000 national guard members in response to the protests, bringing the total number of guards deployed to the city to more than 4,100. 'Trump is using military forces to stop a protest,' Doechii said in her speech. 'I want you all to consider what kind of government it appears to be when every time we exercise our democratic right to protest, the military is deployed against us. What type of government is that?' Doechii's words drew applause from the audience at the Peacock Theater, where the awards airing live. 'People are being swept up and torn from their families,' she continued. 'I feel like it's my responsibility as an artist to use this moment to speak up for all oppressed people … We all deserve to live in hope and not fear. I hope we stand together.' As Doechii delivered her message as demonstrations continued in Los Angeles and cities across the US, including New York, Chicago, Dallas and San Francisco. In downtown Los Angeles on Monday evening, law enforcement were seen pushing several hundred protesters east through Little Tokyo as night began to approach. Officers, who all appeared to be from the Los Angeles police department, used flash bangs and shot projectiles into the crowd as they pushed the protesters through a crowded, popular commercial area where bystanders and restaurant workers rushed to get out of their way. Some protesters set off fireworks and threw water bottles at the officers, yelling 'Shame!' or chanting, 'ICE out of LA'. California leaders have condemned Trump's actions as inflammatory. Karen Bass, the Los Angeles mayor, criticized the deployment of national guard troops and marines as a 'deliberate attempt' by the Trump administration to 'create disorder and chaos in our city'. 'I feel like we are part of an experiment that we did not ask to be a part of,' Bass said on Monday.


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
'We're happy to have this fight': Trump administration leans into California protests
President Donald Trump's immigration agenda has met a groundswell of opposition in Los Angeles, the country's second-largest city. At least 56 people have been arrested so far in massive protests against the administration's immigration raids in the city Friday. The demonstrations have spilled over onto one of the region's largest freeways, and federal authorities are facing criticism after they arrested, and apparently injured, a prominent labor leader. In response, the White House has threatened to arrest California's governor and mobilized Marines to support National Guard troops in defending federal property — even though state officials say they don't want the assistance and are now suing the administration. For the White House, this scene — Trump battling a blue state over his signature issue — is a win. It's a nationally watched saga of the sort that has long defined his career: a made-for-TV moment. 'We're happy to have this fight,' a White House official said, emphasizing that politically, the administration sees it as a winning issue. Democrats and immigration activists have broadly blasted the Los Angeles operation as illegal and inhumane and insisted that it's all about politics — and not about sound public policy. 'This Administration's actions are not about public safety — they're about stoking fear,' former Vice President Kamala Harris, a Los Angeles resident who ran against Trump last year, wrote in a statement. But Trump allies argue that it's simply Trump carrying out the hard-line immigration agenda that was the centerpiece of his campaign. NBC News spoke with four White House officials, in addition to other Trump supporters, who requested anonymity to speak candidly. 'This is what America voted for, period,' a Trump adviser said. 'This is the America First focus that got the president elected and is driven by nothing else than what he promised American voters.' 'Look at the violence, the attacks on law enforcement,' the adviser added. 'If Democrats want to support that, let them. This is why we win elections and they do not.' Trump advisers also pointed to the fact that the president's immigration policies continue to get high marks in most public polling. A CBS/YouGov poll conducted just before the Los Angeles immigration raids found that 54% of respondents approved of the administration's ' program to deport immigrants illegally.' Those numbers help clarify why the administration and more broadly congressional Republicans are politically comfortable leaning into support of the raids over vocal opposition from critics — and a persistent threat of legal challenge. 'I know there's no question places like California have thumbed their nose at the American people and decided they want to be a sanctuary for criminals,' Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., said Monday, adding, 'I think he's exercising exactly what he said he'd do and what people elected him' to do. Trump advisers say the president also points to the fact that he got more votes in California in 2024 than in his previous campaigns, even though he still badly lost the heavily Democratic-leaning state. The administration's response to the protests does seem to have one eye on the reaction in conservative media, a space increasingly dominated by pro-Trump influencers. Some of those influencers have been posting from the protests — most notably Phil McGraw, a well-known Trump supporter better known as 'Dr. Phil,' who embedded with Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents during the Los Angeles raids, as he did during similar immigration raids in Chicago this year. The Trump adviser, asked about McGraw's involvement, said: 'This is an important moment in American history. People have a right to see it in a way not unfairly skewed by a biased mainstream media.' The adviser wouldn't elaborate on how McGraw, whose presence was first reported by CNN, was able to have front-line access to the federal immigration operations. A spokesman for McGraw didn't respond to a request for comment. Republicans more broadly also see the fight as a political winner and say Democrats are functionally taking the bait on an issue in which polling has given Trump an advantage. 'I think it is a symptom of how far left this party has done when you have major Democrats standing on the side of illegal aliens that are torching vehicles,' Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis told Fox News on Monday. 'It is one of the reasons the Democratic Party is struggling so much nationally,' he added. Matthew Bartlett, a Republican strategist and former Trump administration official, said the raids shouldn't be a surprise because immigration is a 'legitimate issue' the voters have signaled they care about. 'There is no political upside in defending or denying the images of burning cars, rioters and looting and the destruction,' he said of Democrats. 'A feeling that things have spun out of control in California and that government can't effectively govern. … It has changed the conversation from illegal immigration to a breakdown in society.' Still, there has been some disagreement — at least in public messaging — about how far to push in going after California Democrats, a break between what may be politically popular with the base and what's politically realistic. The clearest example centers on the Trump administration's authorizing the deployment of National Guard troops over the opposition of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass have argued that inserting National Guard troops will inflame tensions and potential violence — a response that has led Trump to signal he would consider arresting Newsom if he were to continue what the administration considers to be his interference. 'I would do it if I were Tom,' Trump said, referring to his 'border czar,' Tom Homan. 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity. But I do think it would be a great thing.' While detaining Newsom would no doubt please Trump's MAGA base, White House officials privately say it's not currently in the cards. 'It's not being actively planned or considered,' a senior White House official said. 'But anyone who breaks federal law puts themselves at risk of being arrested. That's just a basic fact.' A second White House official said that if either Newsom or Bass, a former Democratic congresswoman, do something at odds with federal immigration law, they could be detained. But the official also acknowledged that the optics of arresting California officials amid an immigration fight they believe most Americans support could backfire with some Republican voters because, at the moment, it doesn't appear they have actually broken any immigration laws. The official said there isn't some grand strategy to deploy National Guard troops in blue cities across the country; the administration is simply waiting to see whether other protests get out of control. Meanwhile, Newsom has leaned into the threats, practically daring the administration to arrest him rather than focusing on the protesters. 'He's a tough guy. Why doesn't he do that? He knows where to find me,' Newsom told MSNBC on Sunday. Referring to Homan, he added: 'That kind of bloviating is exhausting. So, Tom, arrest me. Let's go.' On Monday, California sued the Trump administration, arguing that Trump's federalizing the state's National Guard is 'unlawful.' 'Let me be clear: There is no invasion. There is no rebellion,' Democratic state Attorney General Rob Bonta said. 'The president is trying to manufacture chaos and crisis on the ground for his own political ends. Federalizing the California National Guard is an abuse of the president's authority under the law — and not one we take lightly. We're asking a court to put a stop to the unlawful, unprecedented order.' Trump supporters have lined up behind him, with some even offering to head to Los Angeles to help, despite having no law enforcement experience. 'Preparing to deploy … to Los Angeles,' vocal Trump supporter Benny Johnson said on X. He followed up with a post to his 3.7 million followers showing him wearing military-style gear with his name on it. The increasingly contentious political fight over Los Angeles, administration officials admit, is no longer about just deporting those with criminal records, which was Trump's main pitch to voters on the campaign trail. On Monday, an MSNBC host asked Homan whether everyone ICE has arrested as part of the Trump administration's immigration efforts had criminal records, and he had a blunt response. 'Absolutely not,' he said.


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump, Musk and the end of a bromance
It started with a tweet. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' wrote Elon Musk. Donald Trump's tax and spending bill was a 'disgusting abomination'. What followed was a remarkable – and remarkably public – feud between the world's richest man and the US president: insults were traded, threats were made, shares in Musk's publicly traded companies plummeted. It was quite the turnaround for the pair. Last year, Musk had given Trump's re-election campaign more than $280m in donations. And only two weeks ago, when Musk stood down from his position in Trump's administration, the two were still insistent that their relationship was good. Yet even then, as the Guardian's global affairs correspondent Andrew Roth reports, there were signs of tension. And as he tells Michael Safi, they were about more than a clash between two big egos, but over the future direction of the Maga movement itself.