Russian vessels in UK waters tracked by Royal Navy for second time this month
A five-day operation which began on May 18 tracked Russian vessels and escorted them through UK waters, the Royal Navy said.
It followed the activation of HMS Tyne three weeks ago.
Warships and helicopters were activated in a bid to 'ensure the security and integrity of the UK's critical sea-lanes', Lieutenant Commander James Bradshaw said.
Russian intelligence-gathering ship Yuri Ivanov was monitored in waters off the Outer Hebrides following the completion of major Nato exercise Formidable Shield nearby, on May 21-23, the Navy said.
HMS Dragon, a destroyer based in Portsmouth, launched a Merlin helicopter to collect aerial information until the Yuri Ivanov headed north towards its base in the Arctic.
Three Russian vessels, two cargo boats and a warship, RFN Stoikiy, were shadowed by HMS Ledbury, HMS Hurworth and 814 Naval Air Squadron, the Royal Navy added.
Stoikiy, a Steregushchiy-class corvette, sailed west through the Channel to meet two merchant vessels, Sparta IV and General Skobelev, which were returning from the Mediterranean.
HMS Ledbury met Stoikiy late on May 18, monitoring the warship through the Dover Strait during its westbound journey – before HMS Hurworth took over the next day off Brighton, and kept watch as Stoikiy met the two merchant vessels south-west of Land's End.
The minehunter then tracked the group eastbound through the Channel and into the North Sea until the operation ended on the afternoon of May 22.
During the eastbound trip, a Merlin Mk2 helicopter from 814 Naval Air Squadron based at Royal Naval Air Station Culdrose monitored the Russian group, with aircraft and warships from Nato allies also involved.
The warship subsequently escorted the two cargo ships eastbound, watched by HMS Hurworth, also based in Portsmouth.
L/Cdr Bradshaw, commanding officer of minehunter HMS Hurworth, said: 'Monitoring activity on the seas and seabed around the UK is one of the core roles of the Royal Navy's 2nd Mine-Countermeasures Squadron.
'This operation was all in a day's work for the ship's company, who have shown great professionalism.
'We have kept a constant watch to ensure the security and integrity of the UK's critical sea lanes.'
Lieutenant Commander Craig Clark, commanding officer of HMS Ledbury, said: 'Escorting Russian vessels through UK waters is a vital demonstration of our unwavering commitment to national security.'
Able seaman mine warfare Wayne Slater, from HMS Hurworth, said: 'Driving the ship close to the Russian vessels has been a new experience for me as a helmsman.
'Everything has been safe and professional but we're all trained to make sure we can respond to any aggression or incident whenever non-allied warships are operating near UK waters.'
Lieutenant Patrick Bingham, gunnery officer from HMS Hurworth, added: 'As a former merchant navy officer, I know how important freedom of the seas is to the lifeline of goods and raw materials upon which our economy depends.
'The Royal Navy has been a guardian of the freedom of the seas for centuries and I am privileged to have contributed to this mission.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
13 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on UK military strategy: prepare for a US retreat – or be left gravely exposed
With the prime minister's Churchillian claims that 'the front line is here', the public might expect a military posture that meets the drama of the moment. Yet the promised rise in defence spending – from 2.3% to 2.5% of gross domestic product by 2027 – suggests something less than full-scale mobilisation. The strategic defence review is systematic and detailed, but it remains an exercise in tightly bounded ambition. It speaks of daily cyber-attacks and undersea sabotage, but proposes no systemic institutional overhaul or acute surge in resilience. Given the developing dangers, it is surprising not to spell out a robust home-front framework. Instead, it is a cautious budget hike in the costume of crisis – signalling emergency while deferring real commitment for military financing. The review suggests that the more ambitious spending target of 3% of GDP, still shy of Nato's 3.5% goal, is delayed to the next parliament. The plan is not to revive Keynesianism in fatigues. It is a post-austerity military modernisation that is technocratic and geopolitically anxious. It borrows the urgency of the past without inheriting its economic boldness. The review marks a real shift: it warns of 'multiple, direct threats' for the first time since the cold war and vows to reverse the 'hollowing out' of Britain's armed forces. But in an age of climate emergencies and democratic drift, UK leadership should rest on multilateralism, not pure militarism. Declaring Russian 'nuclear coercion' the central challenge, and that the 'future of strategic arms control … does not look promising', while sinking £15bn into warheads, risks fuelling escalation instead of pursuing arms control. Given the war in Ukraine, there is an ominous warning about changing US 'security priorities'. This calls into question the wisdom of being overly reliant on America, which is now internally unstable and dismantling global public goods – such as the atmospheric data that drones rely on for navigation. Left unsaid but clearly underlying the report is the idea that the old defence model is no longer sufficient – for example, when maritime adversaries can weaponise infrastructure by sabotaging undersea cables, or where critical data systems are in commercial hands. It cannot be right that Ukraine's sovereignty depends on the goodwill of the world's richest man. But the private satellite network Starlink keeps Ukrainian hospitals, bases and drones online, leaving Kyiv hostage to the whims of its volatile owner, Elon Musk. The menace of hybrid warfare – including disinformation, cyber-attacks, economic pressure, deployment of irregular armed groups and use of regular forces – intensified in the last decade. This should see Britain forge deeper institutional ties with European partners, not just military but in infrastructure and information technologies. This would allow for a sovereign digital strategy for European nations to free them from dependency on mercurial actors. Though the review gestures toward greater societal involvement, it stops short of articulating a whole-of-society doctrine like Norway's. This, when some analysts say the third world war has already begun with a slow, global breakdown of the post-1945 institutional order. The defence review should be about more than missiles and missions. It must also be about whether the country can keep the lights on, the gas flowing, the internet up and the truth intact. This review sees the threats, but not yet the system needed to confront them. In that gap lies the peril.
BBC News
13 hours ago
- BBC News
Britain's defence review has grand ambition. Now it needs the money
The British defence review was asked to make its recommendations within the budgetary constraints of spending 2.5% of GDP on defence. But it is already clear that to meet its goals of transforming Britain's armed forces, to make them ready for war, there'll have to be more review welcomes the government's "ambition" to spend 3% by 2034. But it also states that "as we live in more turbulent times it may be necessary to go faster". Several Nato allies are already spending more than 5% of their GDP on a defence source told the BBC that even the government's commitment to build up to 12 new attack submarines, as outlined in the review, would require an increase in defence spending to at least 3% of GDP. At a glance: Key points from government defence strategyMinisters say they believe they will reach that target in the next parliament, but there are no timelines or review highlights the war in Ukraine as evidence of rising threats and the fast pace of change. The over-riding message is that Britain's armed forces and the nation needs to transform to be ready for the possibility of war. Russia is described as an immediate threat. China is a sophisticated and persistent challenge. Iran and North Korea are described a regional disruptors. The review warns the unpredictability of these threats, along with the speed of change "has created alarming new threats and vulnerabilities" for review says Britain's military needs to undergo a revolution – a pivot to new ways of fighting. One of the reports author's, General Sir Richard Barrons, described it as the "most profound" change in UK defence in 150 years. There will be be more drones and autonomous systems, as well as other technologies harnessing software and artificial intelligence, to speed up battlefield decisions. Essentially, what is already happening in will still be "heavy metal", such as tanks, fighter jets and warships, but working more alongside autonomous systems. It is not just the military that will have to change. The review calls for a "whole of society approach". It says the government must have plans to achieve a transition to war if required. There should be a "defence readiness bill" to give the government more powers to support the mobilisation of industry and reserves, if required. The nation needs to do more to protect its critical national infrastructure, including undersea pipes and cables. The review says "a renewed focus on home defence and resilience is vital".Labour says this is the first defence review in a quarter of a century that will not lead to a cut in the overall size of the armed forces. During that time, the regular army has lost tens of thousands of troops. In 2010 it was more than a hundred thousand strong, and now it is just over 71,000 - still below its target strength of 73,000. The review highlights the need to tackle the crises in recruitment, retention and low morale. It says there should be an increase in the size of the regular army. But it does not say by how many or by review provides strong reasons to invest more in defence and national security. Many who read it might reasonably conclude that it will require a significant uplift in defence spending. So far that increase has been incremental – not transformational. Other Nato allies agree on the growing perils in the world – and have responded by spending a lot more.
The Guardian
16 hours ago
- The Guardian
French Open: world No 361 Boisson gets scent of success after shock win over Pegula
French wildcard Lois Boisson beat third seed Jessica Pegula to reach the French Open quarter-finals and send shockwaves around Roland Garros. The 22-year-old, ranked No 361 in the world, stunned American Pegula 3-6, 6-4, 6-4 in front of a delirious Court Philippe-Chatrier crowd. Boisson's only real claim to fame prior to this year's tournament was being the player Britain's Harriet Dart complained to an umpire about, saying 'tell her to wear deodorant'. But she came up smelling of roses on Monday afternoon after a famous win in the French capital. It was an emotional victory for Boisson, who was due to make her debut in Paris last year only to suffer a serious knee injury a fortnight before the tournament which kept her out of action for nine months. She will meet Russian teenager Mirra Andreeva, the sixth seed, in the last eight. Andreeva became the youngest player to reach back-to-back French Open quarter-finals in nearly three decades after the gifted Russian teenager overcame Australian 17th seed Daria Kasatkina 6-3, 7-5. The powerful 18-year-old has scythed through the women's field without dropping a set and her fourth-round victory on a sunbathed Court Suzanne Lenglen helped her match the feat of Swiss Martina Hingis between 1997 and 1998. 'Honestly, I'm so happy I won. I hate playing against her, we practise a lot and even that is a torture,' Andreeva said with a smile in her on-court interview. 'It was a hell of a match. I'm super happy I stayed calm in the second set when she raised her level ... I had to fight and continue playing my game. I knew if I believed in myself I would win a third set.' Andreeva came up with a tight hold to thwart her frequent practice partner in the seventh game and grabbed the break in the next game when Kasatkina sent a backhand long. Russian-born Kasatkina, who switched nationalities this year, beat Andreeva in three sets when they met in last year's Ningbo final and the 28-year-old showcased her fighting spirit in the next set to recover a break and lead 5-3. 'My coach [Conchita Martinez] says you've got to practise with the people you don't like. That's why I practise with her because I hate her,' Andreeva joked. 'I knew this match would be tough.' Earlier, second seed Coco Gauff brushed aside Russian Ekaterina Alexandrova 6-0, 7-5 to also move into the quarter-finals and stay on course for her first title in Paris. The American world No 2 must have thought she would have an easy morning session after powering through the first set in sensational fashion but the Russian bounced back in the second to test her opponent. 'The whole match I played well. She stepped up her game in the second set. Overall I thought I played great,' Gauff said. 'I move well on clay, really comfortable with sliding and moving on the surface. The most physical surface for sure and I do well in that department.' Hunting her first French Open crown after reaching the final in 2022 and semi-finals last year, the 21-year-old started fast, earning three consecutive breaks for a 5-0 lead in 15 minutes. Gauff was running her opponent ragged across the baseline, with the 30-year-old Alexandrova, bidding to reach her first Grand Slam quarter-final, earning a mere five points until that stage. Gauff, who has now won four of their five meetings, gave away five break points in the next game but still secured her first bagel of the tournament before the Russian got on the scoreboard at the start of the second set with her first hold. The second seed kept her composure in a much closer set and will next face the winner of the all-American fourth-round clash between Madison Keys and Hailey Baptiste.
