
The unlikely defenders of girls facing genital mutilation in Kenya
For generations, morans have been champions of tradition in Samburu culture: guardians of community honor, masculine ideals, and long-held customs. Among the customs they are responsible for upholding is female genital mutilation (FGM) — a
Get The Gavel
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
'I've seen what it does to our sisters,' says James Lelelit, 28, a former enforcer of the tradition turned anti-FGM activist. 'They bleed. They suffer infections. They drop out of school. Some never recover. I couldn't stay silent anymore.'
Advertisement
What makes this movement extraordinary is that it is not the result of outside pressure. It is coming from within the heart of the community. What's emerging in Samburu is not only an effort to champion women's rights and health, but a redefinition of masculinity. For young men raised to measure their worth by dominance and tradition, embracing compassion is no small feat.
Advertisement
In the past, anti-FGM messages often came from outsiders and were met with resistance. But today, morans are leading the conversations. They are young men who have seen firsthand the pain FGM causes their sisters and classmates. They are part of a generation more exposed to education, mobile technology, and evolving ideas about human rights. Crucially, they frame their opposition to FGM not as a rejection of traditional culture but as a way to protect it.
The hope is that this insider-led movement — in which warriors are speaking out and families are listening — will continue to grow. The transformation is fragile, but if sustained, it could mark a turning point not just for Samburu but for other communities where the custom remains entrenched.
FGM is illegal in Kenya, yet it continues in rural communities where government enforcement is weak and old customs remain deeply ingrained. In Samburu County, nearly
From warrior to defender
In a region where tradition often outweighs legislation, the morans are making all the difference.
'Everything changed when we started talking to the warriors,' says Samuel Leadismo, a Samburu warrior, founder of the Pastoralist Child Foundation, and former enforcer of FGM.
Leadismo's transformation into a defender of girls' rights began after he attended a community training by a local NGO that challenged old beliefs about FGM. It wasn't the facts alone that shifted his views but the girls' and women's harrowing testimonies. The knowledge hit differently because it came from people he trusted and because the people at the training asked him to reconsider what it truly meant to be a protector.
Advertisement
Today, he works to convince other young Samburu warriors that they have the power to end the practice. 'Morans have influence,' he says. 'If they decide to marry only girls who are not cut, everything changes.'
Indeed, this redefinition of masculinity — from enforcing harmful tradition to defending girls' bodies and futures — is what makes the movement so powerful. In a community where identity is rooted in heritage, warriors like Leadismo are showing that honoring culture can involve change. Rather than rejecting tradition outright, they are reframing it — turning strength into advocacy and authority into protection.
Their new stance has already had an effect. Families are increasingly choosing to let their daughters go through alternative rites of passage, including community-led ceremonies that celebrate a girl's coming of age without FGM. According to the Pastoralist Child Foundation, thousands of girls in the region have undergone these alternative rites of passage and remained in school.
Joy Lemasian, 17, remembers the day she told her father she did not want to be cut.
'He looked angry at first,' she recalls. 'But then my uncle, a moran, told him, 'The world is changing. Let her go to school.' That saved me.'
Lemasian now dreams of becoming a teacher. Her story is becoming more common, but she knows the danger hasn't disappeared. 'Some girls are still cut in secret,' she says softly. 'But now, at least we have people to talk to. People who believe in us.'
The morans occupy a unique space between the elders, who are often guardians of tradition, and the youth, who are hungry for change. Their voices carry weight in a society where age and gender roles are tightly defined.
Advertisement
Even some elders are beginning to come around.
'At first, I thought the boys were being disrespectful,' says Moses Lekilelei, a village elder in the town of Archers Post. 'But then I listened. They are not rejecting our culture. They are saving our daughters.'
Yet there has been backlash. In some villages, morans who speak out have faced threats or been ostracized.
'We were told we were no longer real men,' says Peter Loeku, 26. 'But I asked them — how is a real man one who causes harm to a child?'
Loeku admits the fight is slow. 'We need more schools, more role models. And we need to stop pretending this is just a women's issue. It affects all of us.'
Internationally, the story is being watched closely. The United Nations Population Fund warns that without faster progress, up to 89 million girls could still be at risk of FGM by 2030. Samburu's example offers hope.
'Being a moran used to mean strength, pride, silence,' says Lelelit. 'Now it means asking questions. It means choosing what kind of man you want to be.'
As the sun sets over the hills, the gathered morans in Samburu rise to leave. One of them ties his red cloth tighter around his waist and turns to speak.
'We are still warriors,' he says, smiling. 'But now we fight for something better.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
In bombing Iran, Trump gets his big-boy military show
Though the military used for the first time its so-called 'bunker-busting' bombs, Trump's declaration seems Advertisement But of course the president isn't walking back his statements. Nor has he explained why he committed what some are calling an Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up 'The … disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers,' Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York But the president who thinks himself a king does not feel the need to answer to anyone about making one of the most consequential decisions any leader can make — involving his nation in what could become a prolonged war. Advertisement At the same time, Trump has shown again — not that more evidence was necessary — that his is not a presidency that runs on strategic planning or a deft knowledge of world politics. It's driven by vibes, narcissism, and Fox News headlines. When Israel launched its assault on Iran earlier this month, Trump initially showed little desire to get involved. What changed, according to In doing so, Trump accepted Netanyahu's word about the extent of Iran's nuclear capabilities over that of This isn't even the first time that Trump has After the US military bombed Iran's nuclear facilities, Trump got what he always needs — gushing applause from his Fox News hype man Sean Hannity, who hailed the president's decision as 'one of the greatest military victories.' During the 2016 presidential campaign, Advertisement In whatever he does, Trump serves only his wants and needs, and that includes his need to win a Since returning to the White House, Trump has done nothing but enable the Netanyahu administration's continued slaughter and starvation of Palestinians in Gaza. Meanwhile Russia's unprovoked war against Ukraine, now nearing 3 ½ years, which Trump once claimed he could His Above all else, Trump wants to maintain his false image as a dealmaker and strongman. And so long as that remains his primary focus, his intrusion into this Middle East conflict — which has now also put this nation Advertisement Renée Graham is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at


Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Social Studies: Overconfident students; how opioids changed politics; a positive side effect of the COVID vaccine
Advertisement From opioid marketing to Republican votes Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Arteaga, C. & Barone, V., 'Republican Support and Economic Hardship: The Enduring Effects of the Opioid Epidemic,' National Bureau of Economic Research (June 2025). Advertisement Paying attention It appears that newspaper coverage of state legislators affects their performance in office. A political scientist at Stanford found that in legislative districts that have the most overlap with areas of newspaper readership, constituents have greater knowledge about the legislator who represents them and a greater likelihood of voting in state legislative races. Lawmakers elected in these districts are more likely to exhibit political moderation and to have high levels of productivity, as measured by bill sponsorship, being present for roll-call votes, and service on important legislative committees. Myers, A., 'Press Coverage and Accountability in State Legislatures,' American Political Science Review (forthcoming). Will vaccinate for food A new study finds that the COVID-19 vaccine rollout was a key ingredient in helping people have enough food to eat. Comparing people who were eligible for the vaccine at different times, the study found that people were significantly less likely to report food insufficiency in the weeks after vaccination. This effect appears to be explained by several mechanisms, including a greater willingness to return to in-person income-generating work and in-person grocery shopping. Aslim, E. et al., 'From Syringes to Dishes: Improving Food Sufficiency Through Vaccination,' Journal of Public Economics (July 2025). Advertisement


Boston Globe
12 hours ago
- Boston Globe
A cease-fire between Israel and Iran should be a prelude to peace
After years of insisting it would not allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon, Israel followed through by launching a wide-ranging attack earlier this month, assassinating nuclear scientists and military leaders and destroying many sites associated with Iran's decades-long nuclear program. Trump initially stayed on the sidelines, until Saturday when US bombers delivered the coup de grâce, destroying — or at least heavily damaging — a key underground site that only American bunker-buster bombs could reach. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Iran retaliated first by raining ballistic missiles down on Israel, some of which evaded the country's air defense and harmed civilians, and on Monday also attacked a US military base in Qatar. Advertisement But Iran was humiliated by its inability to stop almost daily Israeli hammer blows, and none of the proxy groups it has cultivated, such as Hezbollah, stepped up to defend it. If the Israeli pummeling had continued, they could have more directly targeted Iranian energy infrastructure, taking aim at the oil and gas revenues that are the regime's lifeblood. So, now what? Stopping Iran, whose unofficial national motto is 'Death to America,' from gaining a nuclear weapon has rightly been a US priority for decades. Advertisement Iran's nuclear program is now damaged but not destroyed. The administration should seek a deal in which Iran gives up its program in a verifiable way in exchange for some lifting of international sanctions. After all, military action can at best only delay an Iranian nuke. The only surefire way to prevent it is either to overthrow the regime in Iran — favored by some hardliners but sure to cause chaos and possibly lead to an even more hostile government in Tehran — or reach a deal. Elements of a deal could include some relief from sanctions and investment in Iran's tattered economy. It would also have to include an accounting for the A deal is preferable because while Iran has suffered setbacks, it can still do immense damage. Some 40,000 US troops are based in the Middle East, vulnerable to Iranian attack. There is also the lingering threat to the transport of oil and gas through the Regime change, meanwhile, will have to be up to the Iranians. The mullahs have misgoverned Iran for four decades, and hopefully by exposing the regime's core weakness the Israeli and American strikes will embolden opponents of the government. The mullahs' obsession with Israel, a country hundreds of miles away, has brought its people nothing but hardship. Advertisement The United States could, of course, have made a more significant contribution toward regime change had it not virtually abandoned efforts at soft diplomacy such as Talk about false economizing. The furloughs were right up there with the For now, the goal must be to turn the reported cease-fire into a more durable peace. Trump has a reputation for not being a long-term thinker or planner. But actions have consequences — and this one admittedly brilliant military operation will reverberate in the region and beyond for years to come. Now the president's obligation is to help put the diplomatic pieces back together. Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us