Second legal action launched against EHRC over trans guidance
Campaign group Liberty said it has submitted legal papers to the High Court alleging the Equality and Human Rights Commission's (EHRC) six-week consultation period on the new guidance is 'unlawful', with anything less than 12 weeks 'wholly insufficient'.
The Supreme Court ruled in April that said the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex, and a trans person acquiring a gender recognition certificate (GRC) did not allow them to access single-sex spaces.
READ MORE: Comedian faces private prosecution over social media posts
The equalities regulator published draft guidance earlier this month which said that trans people could be excluded from single-sex spaces which align with their acquired gender, but also that they could also be legally excluded from spaces which align with their birth gender. However, it also said trans people "should not be put in a position where there are no facilities for them to use".
The EHRC at that stage said it had tripled the length of time for feedback from an original proposal of two weeks, 'in light of the level of public interest, as well as representations from stakeholders in Parliament and civil society'.
But Liberty is arguing this is not long enough and 'there is no good reason why it should not be' at least 12 weeks.
The human rights organisation said it sent a pre-action letter to the EHRC earlier this week and has now submitted legal papers to the High Court and is waiting to see if a judge decides whether to proceed to a hearing based on its arguments.
The group said it is also arguing that by having a consultation period shorter than 12 weeks, the commission is 'in breach of the public sector equality duty (PSED)' to 'eliminate unlawful discrimination'.
Jolyon Maugham is the director of Good Law ProjectThe latest attempted legal challenge comes two weeks after campaign group the Good Law Project (GLP) said it had taken the first step of a legal challenge against the commission over the aspect of the guidance related to trans people's use of toilets, which it is arguing is 'wrong in law'.
Further EHRC draft guidance earlier this month indicated a birth certificate could be requested by a sports club or hospital if there is 'genuine concern' about what biological sex a person is.
It said people can be asked to confirm their birth sex if it is 'necessary and proportionate for a service provider, those exercising public functions or an association to know an individual's birth sex to be able to discharge their legal obligations'.
It cautioned that any such question 'should be done in a sensitive way which does not cause discrimination or harassment'.
The commission added that if there is 'genuine concern about the accuracy of the response to a question about birth sex, then a birth certificate could be requested'.
READ MORE: 'Do something!': Question Time audience member in fiery row with Labour MP on Israel
The consultation on the draft guidance runs until June 30, with women and equalities minister Bridget Phillipson likely to be presented with the finished guidance for approval in July.
Akiko Hart, Liberty's director, said: 'We have taken legal action today because the consultation period set out by the EHRC is unlawful.
'As a public body, the EHRC has a legal duty to conduct a fair and lawful consultation process that allows everyone affected by a decision enough time to respond to it.
'Instead, they have tried to speed through sweeping changes to their guidance, initially giving just two weeks to people to respond to nearly 60 pages of amendments when printed out. Anything less than a minimum of 12 weeks on this issue is wholly insufficient and simply does not comply with the law.
'The EHRC's guidance will have life-changing implications for how all of us access vital services, from jobs, schooling, social clubs we might join, all the way up to how the armed forces operate. In particular, it will fundamentally change the ways in which trans people are able to safely participate in society, as well as how businesses and service providers operate.
'It is a fundamental part of our democracy that we are all given a fair opportunity to make our voices heard about any decision that impacts us. We urge the EHRC to extend the consultation period to at least 12 weeks, just as its previous consultation on this code of practice was. There is no good reason why it should not be.'
The EHRC has been contacted for comment.
Previously, responding to Good Law Project's legal action, it said: 'We are unable to comment on any threat of legal action at this stage.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
MI5 ‘deliberately and repeatedly lied' in agent's identity case, court told
An MI5 agent 'deliberately and repeatedly lied' after confirming to a journalist that a violent and misogynistic neo-Nazi was operating as an undercover source, a court has heard. The security service apologised to the High Court on Tuesday after acknowledging that a senior official gave false information under oath when he denied such a confirmation had occurred. A deputy director – identified only as Witness A – provided a sworn statement on behalf of MI5, insisting the agency had steadfastly maintained its policy to neither confirm nor deny (NCND) the identity of an informant. But that testimony was exposed as false earlier this year when a BBC journalist produced a recording of an MI5 agent – identified as Officer 2 – confirming that a violent neo-Nazi did work for them as a covert human intelligence source. Two investigations have since been launched to ascertain how MI5 came to provide false information to judges on three separate occasions. At a hearing before the High Court on Tuesday, Sir James Eadie KC, representing the Attorney General for MI5, reiterated an apology on behalf of the agency. 'Errors had not been deliberate' He said: 'I am not here to seek to excuse or diminish the seriousness of that position. Everyone from the director-general downwards acknowledges the seriousness caused.' But he insisted there had been 'no deliberate attempt to conceal or lie', suggesting that the 'failings and errors' had been down to poor recollection, a lack of accurate note-taking and communication issues. Sir James said the court could be 'properly satisfied' that a full investigation had taken place, and it concluded that the 'errors had not been deliberate'. He said the reviews found 'there had been no deliberate misleading or lying'. But Jude Bunting KC for the BBC said Officer 2 – the agent at the centre of the case – had 'deliberately and repeatedly lied', adding that there had been 'widespread knowledge within MI5' that he had done so. He said Officer 2 had been given authorisation from senior officials to 'deviate' from MI5's usual policy. Mr Bunting also said Sir Jonathan Jones KC, who was commissioned by the Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, to carry out the external review, had not spoken to Officer 2 directly during the probe. He said the conclusion was that Officer 2 appears 'to have consistently lied', adding that it was 'very troubling'. The embarrassing episode dates back to December 2021 when a BBC journalist was investigating the activities of a far-Right extremist. After emailing the man to put the allegations to him, the reporter was surprised to be contacted by an MI5 official saying the claims were not accurate. During several subsequent telephone conversations, the MI5 officer confirmed to the journalist the man, identified only as agent X, did indeed work for them as a paid informant and even offered to arrange a meeting. He also told the reporter he had been 'legally authorised' to disclose agent X's role, suggesting the decision had been signed off at a higher level. Sir Ken McCallum, the head of MI5, attempted to get the BBC to drop the story but, when the corporation refused, Suella Braverman, the Attorney General at the time, went to the High Court seeking an injunction. During MI5's submissions Witness A insisted they had not deviated from their standard procedure of never confirming nor denying the identities of agents. The same position was maintained in evidence given to two other courts as the man's ex-girlfriend sought to expose how he had used his MI5 cover to abuse and silence her. The BBC was eventually permitted to run the story about the man's violent past and extremist mindset, but was banned from naming him. Lady Chief Justice Baroness Sue Carr, sitting with Mr Justice Chamberlain and Dame Victoria Sharp, the president of the King's Bench Division, are considering what action, if any, to take against MI5. Mr Bunting said it was the BBC's position that the threshold for bringing Contempt of Court proceedings against the agency had been reached.
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
£5m cocaine ‘sombrero' drugs trafficker wins appeal against his sentence
He had a large black suitcase and was also carrying a bag with four multi-coloured sombreros A DRUG smuggler who was caught with more than £5 million worth of cocaine after claiming that all he brought back from Mexico was four sombreros has won an appeal against his jail sentence. Kristopher Purvis was stopped by a Border Force officer in the 'nothing to declare' customs channel at Edinburgh airport with a friend and a haul of 45 kilos of the Class A drug was recovered. Advertisement 1 Kristopher Purvis was stopped by a Border Force officer in the 'nothing to declare' customs channel at Edinburgh airport. Purvis, 35, was jailed for 10 years in April this year after admitting being concerned in the supply of cocaine and being concerned in the fraudulent evasion of the ban on importing controlled drugs on July 24 last year at the airport. But lawyers acting for the drug smuggler challenged the sentence imposed on him before criminal appeal judges in Edinburgh claiming that the penalty imposed on him was excessive. Lady Wise, who heard the appeal with Lord Doherty, said: 'In the whole circumstances we consider that a sentence of eight years and six months was appropriate.' She said they would allow the appeal and quash the ten-year jail term imposed by Lord Summers and substitute imprisonment for eight and a half years. Advertisement Lord Summers selected a starting point for his sentence as 15 years but then reduced it by a third as he said Purvis pled guilty at the earliest opportunity. The appeal judges said the headline sentence should have been lower but disagreed that the plea came at the earliest possible time. Purvis, of Mann Crescent, Murton, in County Durham, tendered his guilty pleas to the charge in March this year at the High Court in Edinburgh. The court heard that he arrived at Edinburgh airport after flying from Mexico via Paris before he was stopped. Advertisement He and his companion each had a large black suitcase and Purvis was also carrying a bag with four multi-coloured sombreros. Prosecutor Brian Gill KC told the court: 'He said that the only thing that he had acquired in Mexico was the sombreros.' GREEN MACHINE Watch dramatic moment sledgehammer-wielding GRINCH busts door of drug gang hideout to round up criminals in Xmas raid But a search of the cases found 15 vacuum-sealed packages covered in mustard to put off sniffer dogs, with each package containing three kilos of cocaine. The maximum street value of the drugs was in excess of pounds 5.6 million. Advertisement Purvis was told he was going to be questioned and responded: 'It's all mine, my mate has nothing to do with it. I put it in his case.' He was arrested and replied: 'Yeah, alright I understand. I'm useless and f***ing stupid and I'm f***ed anyway.' The court heard that Purvis stood to have a pounds 5000 debt wiped out and to be paid pounds 20,000 to bring the drugs into the UK. Defence solicitor advocate Simon Collins argued that the sentence imposed on the first offender was excessive and said he had 'a limited involvement' in what would have been a very lucrative transaction for others with more significant roles in the drugs trade.
The Courier
4 hours ago
- The Courier
Former Tayside teacher back behind bars for pupil sexual abuse
A former teacher from Tayside is back behind bars after admitting to the repeated abuse of a pupil. Andrew Wilson preyed on the teenage girl in the early 1980s, often leaving her in tears. The now-78-year-old was a Latin teacher at the time at a secondary school in Angus, as well as the leader of the school's hillwalking club. Wilson was jailed for three years in 2021 for the serial abuse of three boys. It was media reports of that case which led this latest victim to bravely go to police and report her ordeal from 40 years ago. On Tuesday, Wilson pled guilty at the High Court in Glasgow to the repeated indecent assault of the girl between 1981 and 1984. The pervert pensioner had been on bail but was remanded in custody pending sentencing next month. Prosecutor Adrian Stalker told the court: 'The incidents of sexual abuse took place without the consent of the girl. 'He groomed her over several years, during which time he indecently assaulted her continuously.' The young victim was said to have had a troubled home life at the time. Mr Stalker said: 'Wilson took advantage of the girl's vulnerability and his position as a teacher.' Wilson first struck after returning from a trip to Aviemore with the hillwalking club, of which the girl had been a member. He dropped off other pupils first and then asked her into his home, claiming he was tired. Wilson made her dinner and gave her three glasses of wine. He went on to massage the girl, who described how she 'froze'. Wilson kissed the pupil and molested her and it was only later she realised she was probably drunk at the time. The next day at school, Wilson asked her to come back to his home that evening. 'He said what happened was wrong due to her age and him being a teacher. 'He was upset during this discussion and the girl felt sorry for him but he said it was her fault for inviting herself into his house.' He carried out another sex attack and again implied she was to 'blame' for what happened, the prosecutor said. The court heard the abuse continued until the girl was aged around 18. Wilson had given her a key to his home but she could only visit when it was dark and no-one was outside. She could also not wear perfume. The court heard the girl 'would often cry' when being preyed upon. Other attacks happened during trips with the hillwalking club. The victim did not tell anyone until many years later when she was married. A newspaper article in 2021 about Wilson's abuse of the three schoolboys over a near-20-year period prompted her go to police. Wilson – then of Ceres, Fife – had been struck off as a teacher in 2011 following a probe into his behaviour but it was a decade later before he was convicted in a criminal court. Lady Drummond adjourned the latest case for reports.
