logo
Emporia State University president defends cuts, firings in bid to recast higher education culture

Emporia State University president defends cuts, firings in bid to recast higher education culture

Yahoo12-03-2025

Emporia State University President Ken Hush, who fired tenured and tenure-track faculty as part of an initiative to right-size the university, outlined his philosophy of higher education administration for members of the Kansas Senate's government efficiency committee. (Grace Hills/Kansas Reflector)
TOPEKA — Emporia State University President Ken Hush defended Wednesday faculty and staff firings as well as academic program reallocations as overdue changes tied to imposition of a market-oriented business model at the liberal arts university.
Hush, a former president of a Koch Industries company hired to lead his alma mater in 2021, said aggressive administrative reform to address ESU's financial, enrollment and political realities ran counter to an ESU culture with a vested interest in avoiding rehabilitation. He said his work showed how a higher education reformer could be punished for seeking change, he said.
Hush's allies in the Kansas Legislature approved back-to-back $9 million special earmarks to help the university endure an enrollment-decline backlash. The appropriations were denounced by at least one legislator as special-interest government bailouts. It was the president's dismissal of tenured and tenure-track faculty in 2022 that triggered three years of state and federal court litigation and introduction by ESU's general counsel a bill in the 2025 session that would retroactively undermine tenure rights across Kansas.
'The cost of inaction has been huge,' Hush said during a presentation to the Senate Government Efficiency Committee on his philosophical approach to university leadership. 'It should have been done a decade-plus ago. It's massive and it's painful now.'
Overland Park Sen. Cindy Holscher, a Democrat on the Senate committee, asked Hush whether he was finished downsizing the faculty at ESU.
'I don't know,' Hush said. 'That's probably the honest answer to the total university. We feel comfortable where we're at.'
He said the ability of fired ESU faculty to press their case in court meant additional dismissals were on hold. ESU relied on a process approved by the Kansas Board of Regents during the COVID-19 pandemic emergency that eased due-process guarantees of faculty at the six public state universities, including University of Kansas, Kansas State University, Wichita State University and ESU.
'On the faculty, we're stuck,' Hush said. 'No more efficiencies there until someone decides on litigation.'
In December, U.S. District Court Judge Julie Robinson rejected a motion filed by ESU to dismiss a lawsuit filed by former faculty. Robinson said court precedent demonstrated a property interest existed in tenure held by Kansas higher education faculty.
In other words, Hush told legislators, ESU's use of the Board of Regents' policy making it easier to jettison tenured faculty 'didn't work.'
During the presentation at the Capitol, Hush focused on what he referred to as the ESU Model of reform that emphasized zero-based budgeting, trend analysis and profit-and-loss assessments. He said the objective was to right-size ESU rather than simply downsize the university. He said he didn't want the Legislature to cut state appropriations to ESU, but he expected to capture savings to invest in university priorities.
Leaders of ESU had to be reeducated to a way of thinking that better represented interests of students and taxpayers, he said.
Significant change was essential, Hush said, because community surveys showed the word salad describing ESU included 'mediocrity,' 'no financial acumen,' 'slow,' 'no accountability,' arrogant,' 'inaction,' 'dictators versus team,' 'low expectations' and 'not data driven.'
'We got problems, and culture problems,' Hush said. 'Basically, what we were doing over the years — we were preserving the institution.'
Hush said transformation was initially aided by a three-person subcommittee that allowed ESU to discuss reform ideas. The advisory panel was comprised of state Board of Regents member Wint Winter and former Board of Regents members Mark Hutton and Cindy Lane, Hush said. He said work of the subcommittee was terminated to end conflict with the Kansas Open Records Act.
'They were our team throughout this entire process,' Hush said. 'Unfortunately, the three-person committee was disbanded a year ago. We're sitting here — it's tough — because we have no one to bounce it off of. It put pressure on us — not having a sounding board.'
Hush said decline in the U.S. college-age population meant colleges and universities were in fierce competition for enrollment. He said the shrinking supply of potential students was juxtaposed with growing demand among higher education institutions. The state's research universities — KSU, KU, WSU — have a student recruiting advantage by offering medical, law, agriculture and aviation degree programs and because they have bigger endowments to award scholarships, he said.
He said enrollment turf wars were ongoing: 'It spells out full competition. Head-on fighting for students.'
Hush said he reached out to Emporia and Lyon County government officials to generate additional resources for ESU. He turned to the ESU Foundation, which 'stepped up' for the university on several occasions.
'My God,' he said, 'they had $120 million sitting over there. I don't know what they're waiting for. They ought to be reinvesting.'
Hush said he was frustrated ESU, Flint Hills Technical College and the Emporia public school district didn't work more collaboratively to deliver instruction in basic courses. In September, Hush sent a letter to a local economic development agency suggesting state legislators could force merger of the technical college with ESU. In that correspondence, he said the Emporia Regional Development Association ought to give $500,000 annually to ESU if it was able to offer $100,000 annually to Flint Hills.
'Here we are — we don't even work with them,' Hush said.
Sen. Patrick Schmidt, a Topeka Democrat on the Senate efficiency committee, asked whether Hush was considering a hostile takeover or some form of affiliation with Flint Hills.
Hush said there were ongoing talks with Flint Hills through a mediator.
'It's a natural merge,' Hush said. 'We don't approach it as an acquisition. It's work in progress. It's open discussion. We have to do something.'
Sen. Douglas Shane, a Louisburg Republican on the efficiency committee, said the presentation by Hush was welcomed anomaly. Shane is in his first-term senator.
'This has probably been my favorite presentation this entire session,' Shane said. 'It's very refreshing to hear a university president speak so candidly and having taken such a strong leadership position in their institution.'
Shane said conflict existed between university administrators and faculty. The senator earned from Kansas State a veterinary degree and a doctorate in pathobiology, and worked on KSU's Olathe campus as an animal health professor.
'Sometimes a Ph.D., for some folks, just means piled higher and deeper,' Shane said. 'I think you've been able to see that in an academic environment, in any university environment, change is really, really hard.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrat Congresswoman draws boos over 'shameful' sexism remark in committee hearing with Treasury Secretary
Democrat Congresswoman draws boos over 'shameful' sexism remark in committee hearing with Treasury Secretary

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democrat Congresswoman draws boos over 'shameful' sexism remark in committee hearing with Treasury Secretary

A House Ways and Means Committee hearing took an unexpected turn Wednesday when Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA) accused Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent of interrupting her because of her gender—prompting audible groans from the room. The exchange occurred during a tense five-minute questioning session, where Sanchez challenged Bessent on the impact of tariffs enacted under President Trump's administration. "Prices are rising on many everyday goods," Sanchez said, citing increases in clothing, shoes, canned food, toys, and household tools. She added, "On average, Trump's tariffs are estimated to cost households $3,000 more for the same goods than they would have last year," though she did not cite the source of the figure when pressed. Trump Says 'Total Reset Negotiated' With China During Tariff Talks In Geneva When Bessent attempted to interject, Sanchez quickly cut him off: "Please don't interrupt me… I know I'm a woman, but please try to limit yourself to answering my questions." That remark prompted groans from the hearing room, with one attendee audibly reacting, "Oh, come on." Sanchez responded: "No, I'm sorry, but we get talked over all the time, and I don't want that to happen at this hearing." Read On The Fox News App Bessent, who is openly gay, did not address the accusation and instead focused on defending the administration's trade policies. When Sanchez challenged him on pricing impacts and China's trade behavior, Bessent responded, "That's incorrect," and said, "They met their agreements under President Trump in 2020, and President Biden did not enforce them." Wh Slams Dems' 'Partisan Games' After Trump-foe Schiff Calls For Insider Trading Investigation Over Tariffs Sanchez repeatedly claimed that American consumers are paying more due to tariffs and described recent negotiations with China as rushed and lacking transparency. "A poorly negotiated trade deal with China is probably not worth the paper that it is written on," she said. "I was alarmed to hear this morning that Trump said the U.S.–China deal was done after just two days of talks in London." Bessent defended the agreement as an initial step. "The deal struck was for a specific goal, and it will be a much longer process," he said, adding, "China has proven an unreliable partner." The clash between Sanchez and Bessent was repeatedly moderated by Chairman Adrian Smith (R-NE), who reminded members of time limits and decorum throughout the article source: Democrat Congresswoman draws boos over 'shameful' sexism remark in committee hearing with Treasury Secretary

House Republicans draft competing budget as Senate nears deal with Hobbs
House Republicans draft competing budget as Senate nears deal with Hobbs

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

House Republicans draft competing budget as Senate nears deal with Hobbs

Photo by Jerod MacDonald-Evoy | Arizona Mirror Arizona lawmakers are at odds again, but this time it's the Republicans in the House of Representatives and Senate who can't agree on how to forge the state budget. Creating the state budget — deciding how much to allocate to departments, projects and initiatives or whether to fund them at all — is the most important job that legislators do each year, and the only thing they are constitutionally required to complete. Before the group of bills that will become the state budget becomes law, it must be approved by a majority in both the Arizona Senate and House — which are both controlled by Republicans — and garner a signature from Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs. In recent history, budget negotiations in Arizona have occurred behind closed doors among the governor and legislative leaders in the House and Senate. But this year is different, with Hobbs and Republican leaders in the Senate nearing a deal after weeks of negotiations. GOP leaders in the House, who haven't been involved in those talks, have responded by drafting their own budget, which was introduced late Wednesday afternoon. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX 'This is a sound, disciplined budget that delivers safe communities, strong families, and a government that lives within its means,' House Speaker Steve Montenegro said in a Wednesday evening statement. 'We're raising pay for our state law enforcement officers, reducing tuition at public universities, fully funding school choice, fixing critical infrastructure and roads, and protecting taxpayers. Our budget reins in government and puts it back to work for the people it serves.' But the spending package, which is chock-full of proposals that are unlikely to pass muster with Hobbs, will never become law. Instead, it is better viewed as a way for House Republicans to lay down a marker in order to force Hobbs and the Senate to move closer to the House's proposal. Republican political consultant Barrett Marson said House GOP leaders are hoping to demonstrate that the chamber can pass a spending plan in order to get leverage in the negotiations. 'Sometimes there's just gotta be movement to unstick a sticky situation,' he said. 'The House has an equal voice. And unlike previous years when one or both chambers had a go-it-alone ethos, the House isn't looking to be draconian or anything. They want something more responsible.' Marson said a major point of contention between the House and Senate is what to do with the budget surplus. While the Senate and Hobbs have settled on copying the novel process from 2023, in which each lawmaker was given a pot of money from the surplus that was used to fund whatever initiatives they wanted, the House wants to negotiate all of those details and not surrender control of that money to individual legislators. During a House Rules Committee meeting earlier Wednesday afternoon, House Minority Leader Oscar De Los Santos, of Laveen, said he was disappointed in the way the budgeting process was happening this year. 'We should not be moving forward with a House Republican-only budget that is destined to fail,' he said. 'This will not get signed by the governor. I don't even think it's going to pass out of the Senate.' De Los Santos even questioned whether the proposal would get enough votes to pass through the House, where Republicans hold 33 of the chamber's 60 seats. 'What we do know is that this is not a negotiated, bipartisan deal in good faith,' he said. 'House Democrats are at the table negotiating in a bipartisan way with the executive, with our (Senate) counterparts across the courtyard. That is the way to get things done in shared government.' But Republican Rep. Neal Carter, of San Tan Valley, replied that the work of governing should be done transparently, instead of in private — and that it should allow for input from the public. 'As a Republican, I stand for full transparency and not for back-room deals or negotiated budgets with parties that are somehow outside of this public process,' Carter said. The House Republican budget, introduced by House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Livingston, proposes significant changes in how federal money allocated to the state, but not restricted to specific uses, is controlled. The billions in unrestricted federal funds, currently controlled by the governor, would shift to legislative control and could only be spent on essential government services. The House GOP's budget proposal would also place new restrictions and monitoring requirements on entitlement programs, like the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System — the state's Medicaid program — and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly called food stamps. Both programs would be monitored on at least a quarterly basis for participants who don't qualify, to be kicked off. And any participants who win $3,000 or more through gambling or playing the state lottery and don't report those winnings would become ineligible. It would also give the Arizona Department of Economic Security the authority to screen recipients of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families for illegal drug use and would ban anyone who tests positive for drugs not prescribed to them from the cash assistance program for a year. House Republicans also intend to increase the percentage of money spent in K-12 classrooms, as opposed to on administration; to decrease tuition for students attending the state's three public universities; and to ban those universities from using public or private money to give scholarships to students without legal immigration status. Hobbs introduced her budget proposal, which includes a much different list of priorities, back in January. Shortly after that, Livingston and Rep. Matt Gress, R-Phoenix, panned her proposal for leaving out projected cost increases for programs like AHCCCS. Hobbs spokesman Christian Slater told the Arizona Mirror on Wednesday that Livingston and Gress were to blame for the House's lack of collaboration on the budget. 'This is DDD all over again,' Slater said via email, referring to a fight earlier this year over funding for the Department of Developmental Disabilities. 'It's another circus led by the Speaker, David Livingston, and Matt Gress where they have refused to participate with any caucuses, including their Republican counterparts in the Senate, in a meaningful manner and are once again just trying to score some political points even though they know their plan is going absolutely nowhere.' Livingston and Gress, a former budget director for Republican Gov. Doug Ducey, were both key players in the fight over an extra $122 million in emergency funding for DDD that put vital services for the developmentally disabled in jeopardy. 'Rather than being productive, the House Republican leadership continues to show they are in over their head and unserious about governing,' Slater said. The House Appropriations Committee is set to discuss the proposal Thursday morning. The Senate Republicans have not introduced their budget proposal. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Food Bank of Iowa warns about SNAP implications in President Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
Food Bank of Iowa warns about SNAP implications in President Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Food Bank of Iowa warns about SNAP implications in President Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

DES MOINES, Iowa — The Food Bank of Iowa is sounding the alarm while the fate of the President's 'big, beautiful bill' sits in the United States Senate. The concerns outlined by the organization are food insecurity and limited resources that food banks already have. 'We're gravely concerned about the one big, beautiful bill act as written,' said Annette Hacker, Vice President of Strategy and Communications for the Food Bank of Iowa. 'It stands to slash $267 billion with a 'b' from SNAP over ten years. And it takes 9.5 billion meals a year off of the table for people facing hunger.' New law helps clear the way for birthing centers in Iowa The bill has states pay for these federal benefits, in part, through a cost sharing method. Hacker said that this would be roughly $40 million a year the state would have to account for, which to her doesn't feel possible. The legislation also raises the age of SNAP work requirements to 65-years-old, extending those requirements to parents without children younger than 7-years-old. 'The crushing need this would create is not possible for the charitable food system, that's us, to absorb. If you look at every Feeding America food bank in this country, of which Food Bank of Iowa is one of 200 and all the partners and pantries we stock across the entire country, that's 6 billion meals a year distributed. This would be 9.5 billion more meals, a gap that would have to be filled. And the math just doesn't work,' said Hacker. U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley said that the goal is for the chamber to take it up on the Senate floor in the last week of June. To volunteer or donate, visit the Food Bank of Iowa's website. Iowa News: Food Bank of Iowa warns about SNAP implications in President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' Winner named in Coolest Thing Made in Iowa contest New law helps clear the way for birthing centers in Iowa Iowa governor rejects GOP bill to increase regulations of Summit's carbon dioxide pipeline Third case of measles in Iowa this year reported by HHS Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store