
Non-students in pro-Palestinian camps ‘likely to have extended protests'
The presence of 'external individuals' in pro-Palestinian encampments on university campuses is likely to have helped the protests last longer, a report has suggested.
Universities could not take disciplinary action against individuals who joined campus encampments – which took place across the UK in spring and summer last year – if they were not students or staff, according to the Higher Education Policy Institute (Hepi) paper.
The camps made many Jewish students 'fearful' for their safety and the protests may have encouraged students to engage in antisemitic behaviour, the think tank's report said.
The Office for Students (OfS), England's higher education regulator, 'missed an opportunity' to help institutions, and the Government put them in an 'awkward position' over the topic, it found.
The paper – which is based on interviews with student protesters, senior university leaders, students' union officers and Jewish students – concluded: 'It is very likely that the involvement of external individuals helped encampments continue for longer and campaign more energetically.
Now a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas has been signed, it is a good time for universities to reflect on this fraught period of student activism
Josh Freeman, author of the Hepi report
'They provided supplies and food, occupied tents overnight so students could return to their accommodation and participated in activities.
'They also boosted morale by giving students the energising sense they were having a positive impact.'
Some students said members of the local community also helped by 'adding numbers to encampment-organised protests'.
Students who took part in the protests were motivated by 'feelings of anger and powerlessness' about the war in Gaza and they felt genocide was being 'live-streamed' to their phones via social media, the report said.
It added: 'Students used social media to build support for the cause by making a seemingly distant conflict seem personal for students and staff.
'The most widely shared posts attacked institutions and senior staff directly for their alleged complicity in genocide or mistreatment of protesters.'
But the report – which looked at the encampment protests at 36 universities across the UK last academic year – suggested that students were also motivated to join due to 'wider grievances'.
It said: 'They felt that institutions were not taking seriously their concerns around Islamophobia, tuition fees, staff pay and pensions, mental health or the freedom to protest.'
The paper said there was a consensus that the OfS 'failed to help institutions deal with contested free speech like the 'river to the sea' chant'.
It added that some members of encampments engaged in antisemitic behaviour – including writing antisemitic slogans in Arabic.
'The presence of encampments may also have emboldened other students not involved in the protests to engage in antisemitic behaviour,' the report suggested.
If similar protests take place again, the think tank called on universities to take steps to prevent external individuals from joining encampments, and they should establish robust communication with Jewish students and staff.
There is much that we can learn from this balanced reflection of the perspectives of many of those who have been involved in the protests over the past year
Vivienne Stern, chief executive of Universities UK
Josh Freeman, policy manager at Hepi and author of the report, said: 'Now a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas has been signed, it is a good time for universities to reflect on this fraught period of student activism.
'Most protests last only a few hours and disappear as quickly as they appear. The encampments were very different.
'From April 2024, they became a semi-permanent feature on many campuses. This allowed the protesters to build a visible, sustained campaign to pressure institutions to take action.'
He added: 'The visibility brought its own challenges. Many students and staff were uncomfortable to have to walk past the protests every day.
'Institutions should learn the lessons of the protests. Supporting the free speech of protesters and others was and should be a key priority.
'Another important consideration is supporting student wellbeing, and more should have been done to support vulnerable members of the academic community, including Jewish students and staff and the protesters themselves.'
Researchers carried out interviews with 14 student protesters, 19 university staff, eight students' union officers, 10 Jewish students and representatives, three other representatives of the Jewish community and two others.
Vivienne Stern, chief executive of Universities UK (UUK), said: 'This report illustrates the challenges universities face in balancing their duty to protect and promote free speech, and to allow legitimate protest, with the obligation to ensure the safety of their campuses and the ability of staff and students to go about their work and study.
'They are also obliged by law to prevent hate speech, antisemitism and racism.
'There is much that we can learn from this balanced reflection of the perspectives of many of those who have been involved in the protests over the past year.'
Arif Ahmed, director for freedom of speech and academic freedom at the OfS, said: 'Universities and colleges need to take steps to uphold free speech within the law for students, staff and visiting speakers. This includes making provision for peaceful protest.'
He added: 'We're clear that lawful speech does not, and cannot, include discrimination against, or harassment of, Jewish students or staff – or any other conduct prohibited by law.
'In other examples, speech may be offensive or shocking to some but its legality may be highly dependent on the particular facts of the case.
'That is why the OfS cannot offer blanket guidance on, for example, the lawfulness of certain phrases.'
Stella Swain, youth and students campaigns officer at the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC), said: 'Students set up encampments because they are rightly horrified at the fact that their institutions have links with Israel's genocidal assault on the Palestinian people in Gaza.'
She added: 'Universities must listen to their students and ensure they stand on the right side of history by breaking all ties of complicity with Israel's ongoing violence, its illegal occupation, and its violations of the rights of the Palestinian people across their homeland.'
A Department for Education spokesperson said: 'We welcome this report and encourage institutions to reflect on what can be learned regarding handling protests appropriately and effectively.
'Everyone is entitled to their political opinions and has the right to campaign on issues, but any action must be conducted lawfully.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
4 hours ago
- Spectator
What happened to Piers Morgan
'What happened to Piers Morgan?' asked a Spectator writer last weekend. The answer, according to slavishly pro-Israel commentator Jonathan Sacerdoti, is that I'm now 'dark, degraded, dismal and debased' – because I've become more critical of how Israel is prosecuting its war in Gaza. For a long time on my YouTube show Uncensored, I defended the country's right to defend itself after 7 October attacks. But I now believe Benjamin Netanyahu's government has crossed the 'proportionality' line with its recent food and aid blockade and relentless bombardment of civilians. Self-evidently, Israel is failing in its mission to eliminate Hamas and get the remaining hostages released. Its forces have been killing and starving a horrendous number of children as they go after the terrorists – and if finance minister Bezalel Smotrich is to be taken at his genocidal-sounding word, its new mission is to kick all Palestinians out of Gaza, which would constitute ethnic cleansing. Even former Israeli prime ministers now say it's committing war crimes. When I defended Israel, I was subjected to a ferocious onslaught from pro-Palestinian trolls who branded me a 'Zionist genocide-enabler'. Now, I've had an equally vile barrage of abuse and threats from pro-Israeli trolls branding me a 'Jew-hating anti-Semite'. How can I be both? Amid the pro-Israeli hate, I criticised Dawn French for offensively downplaying 7 October as just 'a bad thing' in a mocking video, and I described the insufferably tedious Greta Thunberg as an attention-seeking narcissist for preposterously claiming she'd been kidnapped by the IDF on her puerile selfie-yacht stunt. I was instantly attacked as an Israeli stooge by the same pro-Palestinian trolls who'd been lauding me and praised by the pro-Israeli trolls who'd been howling 'Hamas lover!' at me for days. 'You can't win, Piers,' I hear you say. But for a journalist to be attacked by both sides in a war of this historical complexity is a win. It means I'm doing my job properly. The answer to 'What happened to Piers Morgan?' is that I'm right where I want to be. 'Cambio de Tercio tonight? x' read the anonymous text as I attended the Champions League final. I was intrigued; that's my favourite Spanish restaurant in London. 'Who's this?' I replied. 'I'm in Munich.' 'Rishi.' I've regularly texted with our former prime minister, and Cambio is also one of his favourite restaurants, so this made perfect sense. 'Ah! You've got a new number. Are you there tonight? Let's have dinner soon.' 'I have a new number. Would love dinner. Will you be in LA over the summer?' (Rishi and I, with our wives, dined together in Beverly Hills last August.) 'Great,' I replied, 'And yes, will be in LA.' He then said he'd get one of his advisers, a mutual friend, to sort the date. 'PSG ripping Inter Milan to pieces,' I added. 'I'm watching on TV,' he said. 'I was rooting for Inter, always backing the underdog!' Again, very Rishi. It was only the next day that I spotted the 'x' at the end of his initial message and alarm bells rang. Rishi and I are friendly, but not 'x' friendly. Sure enough, our mutual friend confirmed it wasn't him. Coincidentally, during my trip to Qatar to attend the Emir's state dinner for President Trump, one of the latter's aides reminded me of the time a prankster once chatted to The Donald on the phone by pretending to be me. Incredibly, the imposter persuaded the White House switchboard to put 'me' through to Trump and they had a lengthy conversation. Obviously, all hell broke loose when one of his team later asked me how the call had gone and I said I hadn't made any calls. The aide said they assumed the fake chat would get leaked somewhere, and prompt several firings, but nothing ever appeared. Which raises the question, as with the fake Rishi: why do it? Five years ago, on a family villa holiday in Saint-Tropez, we were burgled by a gang that broke in while we were asleep. A local detective revealed they were ruthless teenage girl thieves with petite mains or 'little hands'. This week, Deadline Hollywood announced that Universal Studios and Working Title had won a 'ten-way bidding war' to land a rights deal in the 'six-figure against seven figures' for my wife Celia's new novel Little Hands, about a gang of girl thieves operating on the French Riviera. And they say crime doesn't pay. I'm 33-1 to be London's next mayor. In light of Sir Keir Starmer's winter fuel allowance U-turn, broken tax promises and unachievable plan to build 1.5 million new homes during this parliament, if I ever do become a politician, my only pledge will be to make no pledges.

South Wales Argus
4 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Fifa warned about free speech restrictions at 2026 World Cup
The warnings follow recent US government policies under President Donald Trump, which include a travel ban affecting 12 countries, such as World Cup qualifier Iran, and heightened criticism over responses to civil unrest. The United States will co-host the tournament alongside Canada and Mexico, with California's Rose Bowl also set to host matches during the upcoming FIFA Club World Cup, which starts on Saturday. Ronan Evain, executive director of Football Supporters Europe, said: "Fans travel to the World Cup to celebrate and express their passion and any attempt to curtail our fundamental rights, including the right to free speech, is a betrayal of the spirit of football. "We're particularly concerned about the potential for selective enforcement and discrimination against fans based on our perceived political views or national origin. "FIFA must obtain the necessary guarantees to ensure fans from all over the world are able to safely travel and attend the games." Human rights organisations have voiced concerns about increasing restrictions on freedom of expression, particularly regarding pro-Palestinian protests. Minky Worden, director of global initiatives at Human Rights Watch, said: "FIFA should publicly acknowledge the threat US immigration and other anti-human rights policies pose to the tournament's integrity and use its leverage with the US government to ensure that the rights of all qualified teams, support staff, media and fans are respected as they seek to enter the United States, regardless of nationality, gender identity, religion or opinion." The US government has stated that the travel ban will not apply to players or team staff from qualified nations. However, it will prevent fans from Iran and other affected countries from attending matches in person. FIFA and the US State Department have been contacted for comment.


NBC News
6 hours ago
- NBC News
ICE rejected Mahmoud Khalil's request to be detained closer to newborn son, emails show
After nearly three months in Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention, pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil made a request to move closer to his family. It was denied by the agency last week, according to emails reviewed Wednesday by NBC News. Khalil's legal team asked in late May that he be transferred to a detention center in New Jersey to be closer to his wife and newborn son. He has been held in a Louisiana ICE facility since March. ICE's policy requires that detained noncitizen parents or legal guardians, who are primary caretakers or have custody of minor children, be held in facilities close to their children The New Orleans ICE Field Office wrote that Khalil did not fall under the criteria of the agency policy and denied the request without explanation, according to the emails. 'I am declining your request that Mr. Khalil be transferred from the Central Louisiana ICE Processing Center in Jena, Louisiana to a detention center in New Jersey,' an official at the field office wrote. Nora Ahmed, legal director of the ACLU of Louisiana, which is part of Khalil's legal team, called the decision 'cruel.' 'ICE's directive recognizes that the government should have no role in destroying the family unit, and yet that is exactly what is happening here,' Ahmed said. Neither ICE nor the Department of Homeland Security immediately responded to NBC News' request for comment on the emails. Khalil's wife, Dr. Noor Abdalla, a Michigan-born dentist, gave birth to the couple's son in April. Citing the ICE policy, his legal team reached out to the New Orleans office in hopes of getting him moved. The directive, issued in 2022, considers detained parents who have custody of their children as 'covered individuals' under the policy. It stipulates that covered individuals must be placed 'as close as practicable' to their minor children. It also requires ICE personnel to accommodate regular visitation between covered individuals and their minor children. 'There is no possible justification to detain Mr. Khalil at such a great distance from his minor child, in violation of ICE's own policy, when ICE maintains numerous detention facilities within driving distance of where Mr. Khalil's wife and infant son reside in New York City,' Khalil's counsel wrote in an email to the New Orleans ICE office. In an email to Khalil's legal counsel, an official at the New Orleans ICE office said that the detainee did not qualify as a covered individual. Khalil, who grew up in a Palestinian refugee camp in Syria and was granted permanent U.S. resident status last year, became a widely recognized activist amid the pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University last year. In March, he was abruptly arrested outside of his student housing on campus and detained before being accused by the Trump administration of leading 'activities aligned to Hamas, a designated terrorist organization.' He has not been charged with any criminal conduct. ICE previously rejected Khalil's request to attend his son's birth, court documents show. 'The most immediate and visceral harms I have experienced directly relate to the birth of my son, Deen. Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone,' Khalil said in a legal filing last week. Khalil met his son for the first time last month, his attorneys said, just before an immigration hearing.