Trump to force NHS to pay for wonder drugs
NHS patients have been given new hope of accessing wonder drugs previously blocked in Britain as Donald Trump pressures the health service to spend more with US suppliers.
Ministers are understood to be reviewing the value-for-money rules that govern which drugs the NHS can buy, amid demands from the Trump administration for the UK to be more welcoming to US pharmaceutical companies.
Under the trade agreement signed between the two nations earlier this year, the Government agreed to 'endeavour to improve the overall environment for pharmaceutical companies operating in the UK'.
Earlier this week, The Telegraph revealed that this could result in the NHS paying more for US drugs to see off criticism of the differences in medicine prices between the two nations.
However, it is understood that discussions include not only paying more for treatments already supplied on the NHS but also making it easier for US drug giants to sell their most cutting-edge treatments to the health service.
It follows a wave of high-profile rejections of so-called 'wonder' drugs in recent years. The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (Nice), which approves new NHS drugs for purchase, has blocked treatments including one which stopped the progression of Alzheimer's disease and another that doubled the life expectancy for terminal breast cancer patients.
Nice has rejected them based on assessments of how long they would extend a patient's lifespan and improve quality of life. To qualify under Nice rules a new treatment must deliver one extra year of perfect health, or longer for less perfect health, for no more than £30,000.
This figure has not increased in line with inflation since 1999. If it had, it would be just over £53,000.
Nice has maintained that, to get approval for use on the NHS, medicines 'must not only provide benefits to patients but also represent a good use of NHS resources and taxpayers' money'.
However, critics say a failure to raise the threshold in-line with inflation meant life-changing drugs were being blocked. Richard Torbett, chief executive of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, said: 'There is growing evidence that it is becoming harder to bring new medicines to NHS patients. Increasingly, some new medicines may not be launched in the UK at all.'
Companies including US giant Eli Lilly have said the regulator must rethink how 'value-for-money' is assessed. On Monday, a spokesman for the company said: 'The UK has historically focused on medicines as a cost to the NHS rather than evaluating their social and economic value.'
Ministers are understood to be listening to demands from the industry for Nice to shake up its formula, with medicines such as AstraZeneca's breast cancer treatment Enhertu likely to be resubmitted for approval for NHS use if the formula is updated.
Nice and AstraZeneca previously failed to reach an agreement over a price for the drug, which costs an estimated £118,000 per course of treatment. The NHS typically gets discounts, although the level is commercially sensitive.
The Nice formula is being discussed after President Trump took a personal interest in the NHS issue. In trade documents between the US and UK, it said the NHS would review drug pricing to take into account the 'concerns of the president'.
US officials are particularly concerned by an arrangement that sees companies pay revenue back to the NHS if costs rise faster than expected. Drug companies paid £3bn back to the NHS last year.
In April, Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, said he was proud that the UK had kept prices of medicines low. However, he admitted that the UK had become too focused on cost rather than the benefits in some cases.
Mr Streeting said: 'We've moved from quite rightly trying to drive a good bargain on the price of drugs and treatment to a position where sometimes people view medicine spend as a dead weight cost'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
34 minutes ago
- The Hill
Hegseth orders ‘additional capabilities' to Middle East
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced Monday that he has directed 'the deployment of additional capabilities' to the Middle East amid escalating tensions in the region. 'Protecting US forces is our top priority and these deployments are intended to enhance our defensive posture in the region,' Hegseth said in a post to X. He did not name the additional capabilities, though earlier on Monday a U.S. official confirmed to NewsNation, The Hill's sister network, that the U.S. military has moved a large number of refueling tanker aircraft to Europe. The move is intended to 'provide options' to Trump amid the escalating tensions, the official added. Pentagon and White House officials have declined to say how many aircraft have been moved, but the flight tracking website AirNav systems counted more than 31 Air Force refueling aircraft such as KC-135s and KC-46s leaving the United States on Sunday and flying east. The military flights eventually landed at Ramstein air base in Germany and in the United Kingdom, Estonia, and Greece, according to the website. Multiple outlets also have reported that USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group is on its way to the Middle East as part of a pre-planned deployment – though the action has been expedited. The vessel is able to hold some 5,000 personnel and more than 60 aircraft, including fighter jets. The Pentagon and White House did not respond to questions from The Hill. The shifted U.S. military assets and personnel comes as the conflict between Israel and Iran has entered its fourth day, with both sides intensifying their assaults following Israel's initial strike on Tehran on Friday. Israel and Iran have taken part in tit-for-tat attacks, open warfare that Israeli officials have said could last 'weeks, not days' and threatens to spark a wider war in the Middle East. Israel last week moved forward with its strikes after accusing Iran of being on the verge of building a nuclear bomb. Since then, the two sides have traded large scale missile attacks back and forth in what has become the deadliest confrontation between the countries, with at least 24 people killed in Israel and more than 220 killed in Iran. White House and Israeli officials have said Israel began the strikes after approval from the U.S. – which has helped defend Israel from Iranian-fired missiles. But even as President Trump has voiced support for Israel, he appears wary of any U.S. involvement in its conflict. The president on Monday sidestepped a question as to what it would take for the U.S. military to get involved, telling reporters: 'I don't want to talk about that.' He also urged Tehran to return to talks with the U.S. over its nuclear program 'before it's too late.' 'They should talk, and they should talk immediately,' he said while attending an annual meeting of top western leaders in Canada. Trump a day prior on Sunday said the United States is not involved in Israel's strikes against Iran, but 'it's possible we could get involved.' He also has made clear Washington's support for Israel, warning that 'if we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before.' Israel, meanwhile, had reportedly urged Washington to help it in eliminating Iran's nuclear program, with its targets including energy installations, missile sites, nuclear infrastructure, command centers and Iran's state television station. 'We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved,' Trump told ABC News' Rachel Scott. The U.S. military already has a large footprint in the Middle East, with nearly 40,000 troops, air defense systems, fighter aircraft and ships.
New York Times
34 minutes ago
- New York Times
How the Trump Era Changed Trump
Ten years after a self-professed real estate tycoon and reality television star announced he was running for president, the country and its politics have irrevocably changed, my colleague Peter Baker wrote today. The man himself isn't quite the same, either. President Trump is still the attention-loving, payback-obsessed main character that he was in 2015. But he learned during his first term what glass he could break if he only had a hammer — while his four years out of office drove him to turn grievance into vengeance. To guide us through the way the Trump era has changed Trump, I Slacked the person who has chronicled his decade in more detail than just about anybody: my colleague Maggie Haberman. Our lightly edited conversation follows. The decade that's passed since Donald Trump came down the escalator and announced his first presidential run has changed the country enormously. You've covered every twist and turn along the way. How has this decade — with his rise, and fall and rise — changed Trump? In all of the big ways, Trump is very much the same person he was when he first announced, and for many decades before 2015. He is deeply focused on himself, on getting 'credit' — something he brought up in a Truth Social post over the weekend about Iran and Israel — and on dominating media coverage and his perceived rivals, and commanding financial advantage. He has always been interested in payback. But the experience of the Russia investigation in his initial term first began to harden his behaviors. Then, the four years out of office, which included indictments, a criminal conviction and two assassination attempts, have had a deeper effect on him than I think is always clear. What is that effect, and how has it shaped the first months of his second term? A couple of points stand out. One is, armed with the backing of a Supreme Court decision last year that granted him broad immunity for official acts, he is doing some of the things he wanted to during his first term, like maximizing official power — and testing what courts will let him get away with — to dismiss inspectors general and swaths of the bureaucracy, and to use the Justice Department openly as something of a personal law firm. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Post
35 minutes ago
- New York Post
Business as usual at NYC's seedy Roosevelt Avenue — despite illicit workers saying they're fearful of Trump's promised ICE crackdown: ‘I'm scared every day'
It was business as usual on crime-ridden Roosevelt Avenue Monday — despite ICE ramping up immigration enforcement raids and President Trump's promise of an even tougher crackdown on Democrat-run cities. A smattering of sex workers and knockoff goods-peddlers working the seedy stretch of Queens told The Post they were afraid of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement hitting the area, but not enough to keep them from plying their trades. 'I don't want to be here. I'm scared. I watch every minute to see if ICE shows up and I'm ready to run,' said Martina, a street walker who came to the US from Venezuela about two years ago. 'This has been every day. First I was scared of the police and now I'm scared of ICE. But what can I do? I have babies at home and I have no husband to provide for us,' she continued. 'If ICE takes me, I don't know what happens to them,' she said. 'I'm scared every day.' The thoroughfare has long been a center of migrant criminal activity. Locals earlier this year penned a letter to Trump border czar Tom Homan asking for federal assistance to deal with the rampant street crime they claimed was being spurred by homeless illegal immigrants. The street was also once a breeding ground for sex-trafficking being perpetrated by gangs like Tren de Aragua, according to law-enforcement sources. Advocates told The Post last year the vicious gang targeted women in city migrant shelters and forced them into sex work. 3 The smattering of street-walkers peppering Roosevelt Avenue in Queens is a far cry from its peak last year, but those who remain are living in fear of President Trump's promised ICE crackdown. NY Post Gov. Kathy Hochul sent in hundreds of state troopers last fall to take control of the area. The infamous 'Market of Sweethearts' — the blighted section of the avenue known for open-air drug markets and streetwalkers strolling its grubby sidewalks in broad daylight — appeared decidedly less shady Monday. But the handful of illicit goods purveyors that remained did so reluctantly, and in spite of the potential risks. Two blocks east, a street vendor hawking imitation designer sunglasses, pocketbooks, toys and other tchotchkes echoed Martina's fears, but shared her sense of having no other options. 'I know I take a risk but I don't have any choice,' said the merchant, who declined to give his name. 'I have problems with my health and can't do physical labor. There aren't so many people selling things on the Roosevelt because they are scared,' he said. 3 Gov. Kathy Hochul dispatched some 200 state troopers to assist the NYPD in efforts to crack down on the wanton street crime on the infamous thoroughfare. Trump, on Truth Social Sunday, announced plans to bring sweeping changes to big US cities known as hotbeds for unchecked illegal immigration — primarily Los Angeles, Chicago and New York. He vowed to unleash ICE agents to carry out 'the single largest Mass Deportation Program in History.' On Truth Social Sunday, Trump — unleashing Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents 'In order to achieve this, we must expand efforts to detain and deport Illegal Aliens in America's largest Cities, such as Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York, where Millions upon Millions of Illegal Aliens reside,' Trump wrote. 3 Those who spoke to The Post said they were only continuing to ply their illicit trades out of desperation and necessity. NY Post 'These Radical Left Democrats are sick of mind, hate our Country, and actually want to destroy our Inner Cities — And they are doing a good job of it!' he claimed. It's not clear how his announced crackdown will affect the Big Apple, where ICE has already been ramping up arrests of illegal immigrants by rounding up people showing up to federal immigration court hearings in Lower Manhattan. Asked about Trump's vow to flood the city with ICE, Mayor Eric Adams said Monday that NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch and City Hall 'will be communicating with the federal government and find out exactly what initiatives are going to take place.' He emphasized that local authorities would only work with ICE on criminal manners, not civil immigration enforcement. 'We will dig into to exactly what the next steps are, but I can't be clearer, the federal government is in charge of immigration enforcement. They are in charge of that. We are not gonna collaborate with civil enforcement and we're going to encourage people to not live in fear and go on with their lives,' Adams said. — Additional reporting by Kevin Sheehan
