New Orleans may be first U.S. city to use live AI facial recognition camera network
Why it matters: It's likely the first AI-enhanced live surveillance system to be used in a major American city, the paper says of the investigation.
The big picture: New Orleans police have been using information from Project NOLA's 200-plus camera network to find wanted individuals for at least the past two years, Douglas MacMillan and Aaron Schaffer wrote in the story.
Project NOLA's facial recognition cameras monitor the streets and send alerts to officers' phones in real time through an app when the system finds a possible match.
Project NOLA, a privately run nonprofit, puts in the details about who to look for based on press releases and social media alerts from NOPD and other agencies, Project NOLA founder Bryan Lagarde tells Axios.
Case in point: NOPD Superintendent Anne Kirkpatrick said the department used the facial recognition technology Friday to identify one of the 10 inmates who escaped from Orleans Justice Center earlier that day.
"This is the exact reason why facial recognition technology is so critical," Kirkpatrick said.
Project NOLA in a post said Louisiana State Police sent the escapees' information at 10:35am Friday. The cameras found two of the escapees less than 10 minutes later in the French Quarter and pinged authorities, leading to the arrest of one.
The group later released the video footage of the two escapees.
Between the lines: Project NOLA doesn't have a formal contract with the city, Lagarde tells Axios. Individual officers download the app and sign up for alerts, he says.
NOPD officers are "regrettably" no longer participating in the alerts, he told Axios on Monday. However, he said alerts are still going to LSP and federal agencies.
Flashback: A 2022 City Council ordinance regulates how the city uses facial recognition software, according to reporting by The Lens.
Before then, it wasn't allowed, but police had been using it for years, according to The Lens.
Mayor LaToya Cantrell requested to reverse the ban, The Lens said.
The other side: The ACLU of Louisiana blasted the technology in 2022 and again this week.
"This is the first known time an American police department has relied on live facial recognition technology cameras at scale, and is a radical and dangerous escalation of the power to surveil people as we go about our daily lives," ACLU said in a statement.
The organization called on the City Council to launch an investigation into NOPD's use of the system.
What's next: Kirkpatrick told the Washington Post the department is doing a formal review of how many officers used the alerts, what arrests were made and whether this violated the ordinance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
28 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump wants troops in D.C. But don't expect him to stop there
Well, at least they're not eating the cats and dogs. To hear President Trump tell it, Washington, D.C., has become a barbarous hellhole — worse even than Springfield, Ohio, it would seem, where he accused Black immigrants, many from Somalia, of barbecuing pets last year during the campaign. Back then, Trump was just a candidate. Now, he's the commander in chief of the U.S. military with a clear desire to use troops of war on American streets, whether it's for a fancy birthday parade, to enforce his immigration agenda in Los Angeles or to stop car thefts in the nation's capital. 'It's becoming a situation of complete and total lawlessness,' Trump said during a Monday news conference, announcing that he was calling up National Guard troops to help with domestic policing in D.C. 'We'll get rid of the slums, too. We have slums here. We'll get rid of them,' he said. 'I know it's not politically correct. You'll say, 'Oh, so terrible.' No, we're getting rid of the slums where they live.' Where 'they' live. While the use of the military on American streets is alarming, it should be just as scary how blatantly this president is tying race not just to crime, but to violence so uncontrollable it requires military troops to stop it. Tying race to criminality is nothing new, of course. It's a big part of American history and our justice system has unfortunately been steeped in it, from the Jim Crow era to the 1990s war on drugs, which targeted inner cities with the same rhetoric that Trump is recycling now. The difference between that last attack on minorities — started by President Nixon and lasting through Presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush, also under the guise of law and order — and our current circumstances is that in this instance, the notion of war isn't just hyperbole. We are literally talking about soldiers in the streets, targeting Black and brown people. Whether they are car wash employees in California or teenagers on school break in D.C., actual crimes don't seem to matter. Skin color is enough for law enforcement scrutiny, a sad and dangerous return to an era before civil rights. 'Certainly the language that President Trump is using with regard to D.C. has a message that's racially based,' said Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law. Chemerinsky pointed out that just a few days ago, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals called out the Trump administration for immigration raids that were unconstitutional because they were basically racial sweeps. But he is unabashed. His calls for violence against people of color are escalating. It increasingly appears that bringing troops to Los Angeles was a test case for a larger use of the military in civilian settings. 'This will go further,' Trump ominously said, making it clear he'd like to see soldiers policing across America. 'We have other cities also that are bad, very bad. You look at Chicago, how bad it is,' he went on. 'We have other cities that are very bad. New York has a problem. And then you have, of course, Baltimore and Oakland. We don't even mention that anymore, they're so, they're so far gone.' In reality, crime is dropping across the United States, including in Washington. As the Washington Post pointed out, violent crime rates, including murders, have for the most part been on a downward trend since 2023. But all it takes is a few explosive examples to banish truth from conscientiousness. Trump pointed out some tragic and horrific examples — including the beating of Edward 'Big Balls' Coristine, a former employee of the president's Department of Government Efficiency who was attacked after attempting to defend a woman during a carjacking recently, not far from the White House. These are crimes that should be punished, and certainly not tolerated. But the exploitation we are seeing from Trump is a dangerous precedent to justify military force for domestic law enforcement, which until now has been forbidden — or at least assumed forbidden — by the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878. This week, just how strong that prohibition is will be debated in a San Francisco courtroom, during the three-day trial over the deployment of troops in Los Angeles. While it's uncertain how that case will resolve, 'Los Angeles could provide a bit of a road map for any jurisdiction seeking to push back against the Trump administration when there's a potential threat of sending in federal troops,' Jessica Levinson, a constitutional legal scholar at Loyola Law School, told me. Again, California coming out as the biggest foil to a Trump autocracy. But while we wait in the hopes that the courts will catch up to Trump, we can't be blind to what is happening on our streets. Race and crime are not linked by anything other than racism. Allowing our military to terrorize Black and brown people under the guise of law and order is nothing more than a power grab based on the exploitation of our darkest natures. It's a tactic Trump has perfected, but one which will fundamentally change, and weaken, American justice if we do not stop it.
New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
AG Tish and Sen. Schiff's alleged fraud peril: Letters to the Editor — Aug. 12, 2025
The Issue: Potential charges of mortgage fraud against Letitia James and Adam Schiff. For New York Attorney General Letitia James, who openly campaigned on prosecuting President Trump and his family instead of rooting out corruption, this is a classic case of 'what goes around comes around' ('Donald's holding Dems accountable,' Miranda Devine, Aug. 11). It couldn't have happened to a bigger phony than James, who conspired with Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg on politically motivated indictments to destroy and jail Trump. Now that the worm has turned, James blames politics for facing her own investigation for false claims on mortgage applications for personal financial benefit. Anthony Scro Whitestone New York AG Letitia James and California Sen. Adam Schiff believed they were untouchable and above the law. They are proof that power unchecked leads to moral decline, unethical behavior and corruption. Robert Neglia The Bronx President Trump was targeted from the moment Letitia James ran for office. She didn't hide it one bit — instead, she flaunted it. The fact of the matter is it was an extraordinarily exaggerated approach of pure vengeance intended to disgrace and shame President Trump. It is hard not to wish for a little schadenfreude after absorbing everything James put Trump through. I guess if you wait long enough, what goes around really does come around. Revenge is a dish best served cold, especially on a sizzling hot summer day. Ronald Frank West Orange, NJ The chickens have come home to roost. Letitia James once claimed that no one is above the law. Letitia, do you believe in karma? Maybe you should. Remember to leave an aisle seat in the third row of the courtroom empty, so President Trump can sit in it while you're on trial. Gene O'Brien Whitestone President Trump and his administration have every right to prove to the American people once and for all just how corrupt the Democratic Party has become. There are plenty of smoking guns — a favorite term used by the Dems during another scandal that seems almost quaint in comparison to this one. The administration needs to declassify and release all evidence connected to the plot to destroy President Trump and prosecute everyone from Letitia James to the odious Adam Schiff. The American people have a right to know — if for no other reason than to prevent the Dems from thinking they can subvert our Constitution and get away with it. Michael D'Auria Bronxville It looks like the worm has turned for Tish. Maybe this is retribution for her part in allowing New York City criminals to be released without bail, only to commit more crimes, sometimes resulting in the deaths of innocent people. She owns a house in Norfolk, Va. Before she loses it, maybe she can pack a seabag and stow away on one of the US Navy aircraft carriers headed for ports unknown. Smooth sailing, Tish. Dick Mills Franklin Lakes, NJ Adam Schiff and Letitia James are being probed by grand jurors for falsifying mortgage loan applications. They join a growing list of people who had an obsession with bringing down President Trump. So, the question is: Is this a revenge tour, or just Attorney General Pam Bondi doing her job? It really doesn't matter. It's a simple yes or no question: Did you break the law, or not? Because, as James said many times, no one is above the law. Trump should also stop commenting on the pending legal actions, and let the process play out. Rob Feuerstein Staten Island I find it hysterically comical that Letitia James can say the Department of Justice is being weaponized against her in regards to the recent subpoenas issued. I still have one question: When will she be held accountable for her statements regarding President Trump being 'too male, too pale and too stale?' Steven Cassidy Franklin Square Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
Atlantic
29 minutes ago
- Atlantic
This Isn't About Crime
Donald Trump is famously reluctant to commit troops abroad, but salivates at the prospect of using them against Americans at home. That is the context in which one must understand his takeover of the Washington, D.C., police force; his deployment of the National Guard; and his threats to occupy other cities. Trump claims that he is acting to quell a spike in violent crime. And although he might very well feel sincere concern about crime, this does not explain his actions any more than concern about fentanyl smuggling (which he no doubt also genuinely opposes) motivates his trade restrictions against Canada. The most obvious reason for skepticism about Trump's desire to fight crime is that he is the most pro-criminal president in American history. He has treated laws as suggestions throughout his career, beginning with his defiance of Justice Department orders that he and his father stop discriminating against Black prospective tenants. Trump is a felon who has surrounded himself with criminals and promiscuously extended clemency to criminals who support him. When Trump talks about 'criminals,' he doesn't mean people who violate the law, or even people who violate the narrower and more serious set of laws against violence. (One of the first acts of his second term was a blanket pardon of violent criminals convicted of assaulting police officers on January 6, 2021. He even appointed to the Justice Department one of the instigators of the violence.) Trump's idea of criminality excludes himself and his supporters; includes noncriminal states of being, such as homelessness; and focuses heavily on categories of street crime that he seems to associate with Black people. Even by this skewed definition of crime, however, Trump's D.C. takeover makes little sense. His executive order announcing a state of emergency claims that crime is 'rising' and 'out of control,' but in reality, it has been falling since its post-pandemic spike two years ago. His defenders might correctly respond that crime remains too high. But imagine if Trump were declaring an emergency on the slightly more honest basis that crime in Washington was not falling quickly enough for his tastes. What would be left of the concept of an emergency? Serious policy experts, some of them conservative, have proposed solutions to bring down crime levels in Washington. The most straightforward remedy is to fill vacancies in the city's courts to speed up the processing of criminal cases. At Trump's press conference, the Fox News host turned (God help us) U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro denounced the District of Columbia's laws restricting sentencing for juvenile offenders. That's a reasonable complaint, but one that could be addressed by legislation, not by putting troops on the streets. Gilad Edelman: Just don't call her unqualified Trump's plan bears little resemblance to any of these remedies. His big idea is to flood the streets with troops. Yet the president himself does not appear committed to the belief that this will solve crime. In his press conference, Trump said that, by his reckoning, Washington already has more than enough police officers (3,500) to deter criminals. If that's true, why would adding more bodies—specifically, members of the military who lack training in law enforcement—improve the situation? Nothing about this proposal makes sense. The fact that Trump has proposed something illogical does not automatically imply that he is concealing a hidden motive. Anonymous White House sources assured Politico that the president is acting out of revulsion at scenes of crime and disorder that he has spotted while driving around town, and that might be true. But the obvious reality is that Trump has consistently and openly displayed a lust to use the power of the state against his political enemies. During his first term, he constantly described protesters as an unruly mob. He did this well before the George Floyd demonstrations, which did include pockets of vandalism and violence. He raged at the leaders of the military for failing to carry out his orders to have troops shoot protesters. More recently, before staging his birthday parade in June, he warned, 'If there's any protester that wants to come out, they will be met with very big force,' making no distinction between violent and peaceful protests. At the press conference, Trump appeared with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Attorney General Pam Bondi, both of whom have followed the second-term Trump mandate to place personal loyalty to the president above all other considerations. Hegseth's worldview, judging by his written output, is predicated on erasing the difference between foreign enemies and domestic critics. The Justice Department has lately been leaking splashy investigations of various Trump critics who obviously did nothing illegal. Activists on the post-liberal right, who yearn for Trump to use state power to crush their opponents, have barely disguised their glee. 'Trump has the opportunity to do a Bukele-style crackdown on DC crime,' Chris Rufo, a conservative activist who has influenced the administration, wrote on X. 'Big test: Can he reduce crime faster than the Left advances a counternarrative about 'authoritarianism'? If yes, he wins. Speed matters.' Note that Rufo is putting authoritarianism in scare quotes while holding up as a model Nayib Bukele, the thuggish president of El Salvador whose gulag-style prison employs torture, and who just recently smashed a constitutional term limit that represented one of the few remaining checks on his power. Bukele no doubt dislikes crime. But he has also used crime as a wedge to delegitimize all opposition. Rufo's invocation of him as an aspirational archetype is revealing. This morning, Trump depicted the Washington deployment as essential to secure the nation's capital, which hosts important foreign and domestic visitors. (He did not even claim to care about the needs of the city's residents.) He proceeded to mention, almost casually, that he would like to follow the occupation of Washington with similar action in a host of other cities. It should be abundantly clear that his stated motives do not align with his actual ones. His plans for Washington, D.C., are a warning to us all.
